Contextual Transformation in Installation Art: The Influence of the Museum Space on the Meaning of the Artwork

Öz

The art of installation emerged as a form of expression that transcended the boundaries of modernist aesthetic understanding from the 1960s onwards, transforming space into an active component of art production. This transformation, ranging from Duchamp’s ready-made objects to site-specific approaches, demonstrated that the meaning of a work of art is directly related to the context in which it is exhibited. Brian O’Doherty’s critique of the “white cube” and Walter Benjamin's concept of “aura” provide important theoretical frameworks that explain the decisive role of the museum space in the perception of the work. This study examines the relationship that installation art establishes with context through contemporary art institutions in Turkey. The purposeful sample of the research consists of institutions such as OMM Modern Museum, Istanbul Modern, Arter, Pera Museum, and Elgiz Museum. The transformation of the production and experience areas of installation art, as reflected in the architectural qualities, exhibition strategies, and site-specific practices of these museums, is analyzed through case studies. These institutions were selected because they use site-specific productions extensively in their current exhibition practices, have distinct architectures, and include examples that make the experiential dimension of installation art visible. The works examined establish a direct relationship with the spatial structure of each institution, are suitable for contextual reading, and constitute a field of discussion in the literature on the interaction between space and work. The findings show that the museum space is not merely a display surface but a dynamic structure that reconfigures the meaning of the work. According to this article, installation art develops spatial strategies that differ according to institutional structures in Turkey, and museum architecture directly influences the artist’s production language. Furthermore, the study shows that space functions not only as a physical environment but also as an active subject that constructs the artwork’s meaning. The innovative aspect of the research is that it is the first to comprehensively evaluate, within a theoretical framework, the interaction between contemporary museum architecture and site-specific art production in Turkey.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Installation art
• site-specificity
• context transformation
• white cube
• contemporary art
• museum space

Yerleştirme Sanatında Bağlam Dönüşümü: Müze Mekanının Eser Anlamı Üzerindeki Etkisi

Öz

The art of installation emerged as a form of expression that transcended the boundaries of modernist aesthetic understanding from the 1960s onwards, transforming space into an active component of art production. This transformation, ranging from Duchamp’s ready-made objects to site-specific approaches, demonstrated that the meaning of a work of art is directly related to the context in which it is exhibited. Brian O’Doherty’s critique of the “white cube” and Walter Benjamin's concept of “aura” provide important theoretical frameworks that explain the decisive role of the museum space in the perception of the work. This study examines the relationship that installation art establishes with context through contemporary art institutions in Turkey. The purposeful sample of the research consists of institutions such as OMM Modern Museum, Istanbul Modern, Arter, Pera Museum, and Elgiz Museum. The transformation of the production and experience areas of installation art, as reflected in the architectural qualities, exhibition strategies, and site-specific practices of these museums, is analyzed through case studies. These institutions were selected because they use site-specific productions extensively in their current exhibition practices, have distinct architectures, and include examples that make the experiential dimension of installation art visible. The works examined establish a direct relationship with the spatial structure of each institution, are suitable for contextual reading, and constitute a field of discussion in the literature on the interaction between space and work. The findings show that the museum space is not merely a display surface but a dynamic structure that reconfigures the meaning of the work. According to this article, installation art develops spatial strategies that differ according to institutional structures in Turkey, and museum architecture directly influences the artist’s production language. Furthermore, the study shows that space functions not only as a physical environment but also as an active subject that constructs the artwork’s meaning. The innovative aspect of the research is that it is the first to comprehensively evaluate, within a theoretical framework, the interaction between contemporary museum architecture and site-specific art production in Turkey.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Installation art
• site-specificity
• context transformation
• white cube
• contemporary art
• museum space

Kaynakça

1. Arkitektuel (2019). Arter. Arkitektuel. Retrieved from https://www.arkitektuel.com/arter/ (Access date: September 11, 2025).
2. Artfulliving (2023, May 7). Sarkis exhibition at Arter: Infinity. Artfulliving. Retrieved from https://www.artfulliving.com.tr/gundem/arterde-sarkis-sergisi-sonsuz-i-27689 (Access date: September 11, 2025).
3. Elgiz Museum (n.d.). About us. Elgiz. Retrieved from https://www.elgizmuseum.org/tr_TR/hakkimizda/basinda-biz/elgiz-muezesinin-yolculuu (Access date: September 11, 2025).
4. Erek, C. (2020). Cevdet Erek Works [Website]. Retrieved from https://cevdeterek.com/2020/02/11/bergama-stereotip-arter/ (Access date: September 11, 2025).
5. Ertuğrul-Tomsuk, E., ve Yücel, B. (2021). Günümüz sanatında değişen galeri ortamı bağlamında mekân-doğa etkileşimi [The interaction between space and nature in the context of the changing gallery environment in contemporary art]. Art Journal, 37, 239-261. http://doi.org/10.47571/ataunigsfd.872081
6. İstanbul Modern (n.d.). New museum building. İstanbul Modern. Retrieved from https://www.istanbulmodern.org/en/corporate/new-museum-building (Access date: September 11, 2025).
7. İstanbulmodern (n.d.). About Us. İstanbul Modern. Retrieved from https://www.istanbulmodern.org/en/corporate/about-us (Access date: September 11, 2025).
8. İstanbulmodern (n.d.). Selma Gürbüz exhibition at Istanbul Modern: "This Place We Call World". İstanbul Modern. Retrieved from https://www.istanbulmodern.org/en/press-releases/selma-gurbuz-exhibition-at-istanbul-modern-this-place-we-call-world (Access date: September 11, 2025).

9. Kaya, Y. (2017). Güncel sanatta yeni bir yaklaşım olarak “melezlik” [“Hybridity” as a new approach in contemporary art]. Art and Design Journal (STD), 20, 165-182. https://doi.org/10.18603/sanatvetasarim.370751
10. Know, M. (2002). One place after another: Site-specific art and locational identity. Graphic Composition. MIT Press.
11. Krauss, R. (1979). Sculpture in the expanded field. The Mit Press, 8, 30-44.
12. O’Doherty, B. (1986). Inside the white cube: The ideology of the gallery space. The Lapis Press.
13. Odunpazarı Modern Müze (n.d.). The building. OMM. Retrieved from https://omm.art/en/details/the-building (Access date: September 11, 2025).
14. Omm.art (2025). Tanabe Chikuunsai IV’s Site-Specific Installation. OMM. Retrieved from https://omm.art/en/collection/tanabe-chikuunsai (Access date: September 11, 2025).
15. Özdoğan-Türkyılmaz, H. (2022). Vehbi Koç Vakfı Çağdaş Sanat Koleksiyonu’nun oluşumu ve Arter müzesine dönüşümü [The formation of the Vehbi Koç Foundation Contemporary Art Collection and its transformation into the Arter Museum]. MSFAU Academy Journal, 1(25), 147-165. https://doi.org/10.56074/msgsusbd.1123800
16. Özkan-Bilgiç, S. (2024). Yerleştirme (enstalasyon) ve yer-mekana özgü yerleştirme sanatı: Sanatçının yer-mekan tanımı üzerine bir irdeleme (Installation art and site-specific installation art: An examination of the artist's definition of place and space) [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation in Art]. Anadolu University, Graduate Education Institute, Eskişehir.
17. Pera Museum (2021). İstanbul’da Bu Ne Bizantinizm (What is this Byzantinism in Istanbul?) [Artwork]. Retrieved from https://www.peramuzesi.org.tr/sergi/-istanbul’da-bu-ne-bizantinizm-/1279 (Access date: September 11, 2025).
18. Pera Museum (n.d.). About us. Pera Museum. Retrieved from https://www.peramuzesi.org.tr/pera-muzesi-hakkinda (Access date: September 11, 2025).
19. Şahin, B. (2024). Modern sanat müzelerinde sergileme tasarımı: OMM Modern Müzesi, İstanbul Modern ve CerModern örneği [Exhibition design in modern art museums: The examples of OMM Modern Museum, Istanbul Modern and CerModern]. Bingol University Journal of Technical Sciences, 5(2), 28-42.
20. Sevim, B. A. (2010). Walter Benjamin’in kavramlarıyla kültür endüstrisi: “Aura”, “Öykü Anlatıcısı” ve “Flâneur” [The culture industry through Walter Benjamin’s concepts: “Aura,” “Storyteller,” and “Flâneur”]. The Journal of International Social Research, 3(11), 510-512.
21. Tokdil, E. (2023). Richard Serra örnekleminde kamusal alanda vandalizm, kültürün özelleştirilmesi ve eleştirel sanatın sansürlenmesi [Vandalism in the public space in the case of Richard Serra, privatization of culture and censorship of critical art]. Journal of Interdisciplinary and Intercultural Art, 8(16), 129-149.
22. Toluyağ, D. (2020). Sanat pratiğinde enstalasyon, mekan, nesne ve sanatçı örnekleri [Examples of installation, space, object, and artist in art practice]. Academic Art Journal, 5(11), 101-114.
23. Yılmaz, H. (2011). Mekâna özgü heykel bağlamında oluşturulmuş heykel parkları (Sculpture parks created within the context of site-specific sculptures) [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation in Art]. Marmara University, Institute of Fine Arts, Istanbul.