Rwanda's Approach to International Criminal Law Through Juridical Regime of The Rwanda's High Court Chambers for International Crimes: Lessons Thereof

Öz

Unarguably, Rwanda has been an object of discussion on issues bordering on International Criminal Law. However, the majority of these discussions, approximately 90% relate to issues concerning the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), while the remaining 10%, represent the Gacaca Courts (GC) procedures. This paper revealed that GC represents an informal adjudicatory system of justice. Advancing on this argument, Rwanda has not ratified the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC). The paper relied on doctrinal methods in its analysis. In the efforts to sustain strict adherence to the enforcement of global justice standards, upholding the rights of human beings, along with the law of Nations, Rwanda created Chambers for adjudications of global wrongs incorporated into the High Court Systems. Ultimately, the primary aim of the paper is to examine how municipal and global justice systems can collaborate to enhance greater accountability and promote justice delivery.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Rwanda
• ICC
• Juridical Regime
• High Court Chambers
• International Crimes

Etik Beyan

No violation of any ethical rules.

Ruanda'nın Uluslararası Suçlar Yüksek Mahkemesi Dairelerinin Hukuki Rejimi Aracılığıyla Ruanda'nın Uluslararası Ceza Hukukuna Yaklaşımı: Bundan Çıkarılacak Dersler

Öz

Ruanda'nın Uluslararası Ceza Hukukunu ilgilendiren konularda tartışma konusu olduğu tartışmasızdır. Ancak bu tartışmaların çoğunluğu, yaklaşık %90'ı Ruanda Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi (ICTR) ile ilgili konularla ilgiliyken, kalan %10'luk kısım Gacaca Mahkemeleri (GC) prosedürlerini temsil etmektedir. Bu çalışma, GC'nin gayriresmi bir yargısal adalet sistemini temsil ettiğini ortaya koymuştur. Bu argümanı geliştiren Ruanda, Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi'nin (UCM) Roma Statüsü'nü onaylamamıştır. Çalışma, analizinde doktriner yöntemlere dayanmıştır. Ruanda, küresel adalet standartlarının uygulanmasına sıkı sıkıya bağlılığı sürdürme, insan haklarını ve uluslar hukukunu koruma çabaları kapsamında, Yüksek Mahkeme Sistemlerine dahil edilen küresel yanlışların yargılanması için Daireler oluşturmuştur. Sonuç olarak, bu makalenin temel amacı, yerel ve küresel adalet sistemlerinin daha fazla hesap verebilirliği artırmak ve adalet dağıtımını teşvik etmek için nasıl işbirliği yapabileceğini incelemektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ruanda
• UCM
• Hukuki Rejim
• Yüksek Mahkeme Daireleri
• Uluslararası Suçlar

Kaynakça

1. Bassiouni, M. (2001). Universal jurisdiction for international crimes: Historical perspectives and contemporary practice. Virginia Journal of International Law, 42(1), 81-161.
2. Bolhuis, M. (2026). "No Safe Haven" and the politics of accountability: The extradition and exclusion of Rwandan genocide suspects. Refugee Survey Quarterly, Makale hdag004. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdag004
3. Britannica Editors. (2025, March 25). Rwanda genocide of 1994. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/event/Rwanda-genocide-of-1994
4. Cassese, A. (2003). International criminal law. Oxford University Press.
5. Costello, C., & Itamar, M. (2020). Border justice: Migration and accountability for human rights violations. German Law Journal, 21, 311-334.
6. Hirondelle News. (2012, February 16). Rwanda/justice - Rwanda creates special chamber for international crimes. JusticeInfo.net. https://www.justiceinfo.net/en/24222-160212-rwandajustice-rwanda-creates-special-chamber-for-international-crimes.html
7. International Criminal Court. (1998). Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. https://www.icc-cpi.int/resource-library/documents/rs-eng.pdf
8. International Criminal Court (Ed.). (2010). Review conference of the Rome statute of the International Criminal Court. International Criminal Court Publication.

9. International Criminal Court. (2023, March 17). Situation in Ukraine: ICC judges issue arrest warrants against Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin and Maria Alekseyevna Lvova-Belova [Press release]. https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/situation-ukraine-icc-judges-issue-arrest-warrants-against-vladimir-vladimirovich-putin-and
10. International Criminal Court Project. (n.d.). Structure of the ICC. International Criminal Court Project. https://www.aba-icc.org/about-the-icc/structure-of-the-icc/
11. Khetarpal, M., & Jogiram, S. (2024). The role of national courts in complementing international tribunals: Successes, limitations, and future prospects. MSW Management Journal, 34(1), 390-407.
12. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands. (2022, June 14). Questions from member Eppink (JA21) regarding the report that the Netherlands continued to provide financial support to dictatorial Rwanda despite human rights violations [Parliamentary document AH-TK-20212022-3123]. Official Publications of the Netherlands
13. Morris, J. W. (2013). The trouble with transfers: An analysis of the referral of Uwinkindi to the Republic of Rwanda for trial. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 11(1), 1-23.
14. Muhumuza, R. (2016, November 12). Netherlands extradites 2 genocide suspects to Rwanda. AP News. https://apnews.com/general-news-56a6a618f6a14887aa4ba5f9289f2c67
15. Mutabazi, H. (2018, April 2). High Court Chamber for International Crimes to be moved to Nyanza this month. The New Times. https://www.newtimes.co.rw/article/150127/News/high-court-chamber-for-international-crimes-to-be-moved-to-nyanza-this-month
16. Nnawulezi, U., Nwaechefu, H., & Magashi, S. B. (2023). Addressing the principles and challenges of enforcement and prosecutions under universal jurisdictions: Charting new pathways for international justice. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 20(2), 263-286.
17. O'Keefe, R. (2004). Universal jurisdictions: Clarifying the basic concept. International Journal of Criminal Justice, 2, 735-760.
18. Prosecution v Mugesera, Case no RP 0001/12/CCI, 15/04/2016.
19. Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, ICC-01/04-01/06, Judgment pursuant to Article 74 of the Statute, Trial Chamber I, 14 March 2012.
20. Roberts, A. (2011). Comparative international law? The role of national courts in creating and enforcing international law. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 60, 57-92.
21. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 1998.
22. Rwanda. (2018). Law n°30/2018 of 02/06/2018 determining the jurisdiction of courts (Official Gazette, n° Special of 02/06/2018).
23. Rwanda. (2018). Law nº012/2018 of 04/04/2018 determining the organization and functioning of the judiciary (Official Gazette, n° Special of 30/05/2018).
24. Rwanda. (2018). Law nº014/2018 of 04/04/2018 determining the organization, functioning and competence of the national public prosecution authority and of the military prosecution department (Official Gazette, n° Special of 30/05/2018).
25. Rwanda. (2018). Law nº22/2018 of 29/04/2018 relating to the civil, commercial, labour and administrative procedure (Official Gazette, nº Special of 29/04/2018).
26. Rwanda. (2018). Law nº68/2018 of 30/08/2018 determining offences and penalties in general (Official Gazette, no. Special of 27/09/2018).
27. Rwanda. (2019). Law nº 027/2019 of 19/09/2019 relating to the criminal procedure (Official Gazette, n° Special of 08/11/2019).
28. Rwanda. (2023). Constitution of the Republic of Rwanda (Official Gazette, n° Special of 04/08/2023).
29. Sarkin, J. (2021). The tension between justice and reconciliation in Rwanda: Politics, human rights, due process and the role of the Gacaca Courts in dealing with the genocide. Journal of African Law, 45(2), 143-172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0221855301001675
30. Schabas, W. A. (2010). The International Criminal Court. In D. R. Black & P. D. Williams (Eds.), The international politics of mass atrocities (1st ed., pp. 134-154). Routledge.
31. Spencer, A. B. (2006). Jurisdiction to adjudicate: A revised analysis. University of Chicago Law Review, 73(2), Article 3.
32. Statute of the International Court of Justice, 1945.
33. TRIAL International. (2025, April 8). Pierre-Claver Karangwa. Universal Jurisdiction Database. https://ujim.trialinternational.org/latest-post/pierre-claver-karangwa/
34. United Nations. (1945). Charter of the United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter Utrecht Centre for Accountability and Liability Law. (2016, November 29). Does the Netherlands' extradition of genocide suspects to Rwanda violate their human rights? https://blog.ucall.nl/index.php/2016/11/does-the-netherlands-extradition-of-genocide-suspects-to-rwanda-violate-their-human-rights/