PIERRE BOURDIEU: YAPISAL AKILDA HABITUS

Öz

Sosyal fenomenlerin anlaşılmasını kolaylaştıran aktörler arasında meydana gelen günlük mücadeleler, çağın karakteristik kalıbını sürdürmek için konum ve yerleşimde özel olarak tasarlanmıştır. Çok yönlü fenomenlere benzersiz içgörüler oluşturmak için, işleyişi hakkında sayısız ve tekrarlanan sorularla birlikte yapısal akıl; benliği anlamlandırmada kültürel süreçlerdeki habitusa atıfta bulunur. Yapısal akılda, aynı tasarımın ayrılmaz bileşenleri olarak bir failin sosyal uzamda konumlanması, toplumsal dünyanın içkin öğretilerini miras alır. Bourdieu sosyolojisinde, kültürel değerleri tanımlama ve meşrulaştırma yetkisi nesnel bir mesafe ölçüsü elde etmeyi ve yine bu sosyolojide; yaklaşımın araştırma probleminin doğasından kaynaklandığı fikri, akademik deneyim yoluyla bağlamların çeşitlilik ve sıklığını anlamayı gerektirir. Bu makale, Bourdieu sosyolojisinde belirlenen temalar ve alt temaların nedenlerine değil; sosyal bilim metodolojisinde habitus eksenli bazı önemli katkılara odaklanmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda, makalede, Bourdieu sosyolojisinin temel parametrelerinden olan habitus, yapısal akıl ekseninde tartışılacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Fail
• Habitus
• Pierre Bourdieu
• Toplumsal Alan
• Yapısal Akıl

PIERRE BOURDIEU: HABITUS IN THE STRUCTURAL REASON

Öz

The daily struggles that occur between the actors facilitating the understanding of social phenomena in order to maintain the pattern characteristic of the era are specifically designed in location and placement. Together with numerous and repeated questions, the structural reason refers to creating unique insights into multifaceted phenomena, to the habitus in cultural processes about their functioning, to making sense of the self. In the structural reason, an agent's positioning in social space inherits the immanent teachings of the social world as integral components of the same design. In Bourdieu sociology, the authority to define and legitimize cultural values requires acquiring an objective measure of distance and academic experience in the research problem of the relevant approach to understanding the frequency of contexts. This article focuses on some important contributions in the methodology of habitus-oriented social science rather than the causes of the themes and sub-themes identified in Bourdieu's sociology. In this direction, in the article, habitus, one of the main parameters of Bourdieu sociology, will be discussed in the axis of structural reason.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Agency
• Habitus
• Pierre Bourdieu
• Social Sphere
• Structural Reason

Kaynakça

1. Adkins, L. (2011), Practice as Temporalisation: Bourdieu and Economic Crisis, (Eds.: S. Susen and B. Turner), The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Essays, s.347-366, Anthem Press. Archer, M. S. (2010), Routine, Reflexivity, and Realism, Sociological Theory, 28(3), s.272-303.
2. Bennett, A. ve Elman, C. (2006), Qualitative Research: Recent Developments in Case Study Methods, Annual Review of Political Science, 9(1), s.455-476.
3. Bennett, T. (2011), Culture, Choice, Necessity: A political Critique of Bourdieu's Aesthetic, Poetics, 39(6), s.530-546.
4. Bourdieu, P., Schultheis, F., Pfeuffer, A. ve Susen, S. (2011), With Weber Against Weber: In Conversation With Pierre Bourdieu, (Eds.: S. Susen and B. Turner), The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Essays, s.111-124, Anthem Press.
5. Bourdieu, P. (1977), Structures and the Habitus, (Çev.: R. Nice), Outline of a Theory of Practice (Cambridge Studies in Social and Cultural Anthropology), s.72-95, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Collet, F. (2009), Does Habitus Matter? A Comparative Review of Bourdieu’s Habitus and Simon’s Bounded Rationality with Some Implications for Economic Sociology, Sociological Theory, 27(4), s.419-434.
7. Cruz, J. (1996), Habitus, Solidarity, and Authority, Gentlemen, Bourgeois, and Revolutionaries: Political Change and Cultural Persistence among the Spanish Dominant Groups, 1750–1850, s.169-207, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. David, J. (2020), On an Enigmatic Text by Pierre Bourdieu, (Eds.: J. Ahearne and J. Speller), Bourdieu and the Literary Field: Paragraph Volume 35, Number 1, s.115-130, Edinburgh University Press. Delva, J., Forrier, A. ve Cuyper, N. D. (2021), Integrating Agency and Structure in Employability: Bourdieu's Theory of Practice, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 127, s.1-11.

9. Dubois, V. (2011), Cultural Capital Theory vs. Cultural Policy Beliefs: How Pierre Bourdieu Could Have Become a Cultural Policy Advisor and Why He Did Not, Poetics, 39, s.491–506.
10. Ebrahim, A. (2003), The Making of NGOs: The Relevance of Foucault and Bourdieu, NGOs and Organizational Change: Discourse, Reporting, and Learning, s.7-20, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Gerring, J. (2017), Qualitative Methods, Annual Review of Political Science, 20(1), s.15-36.
12. Greene, M. (1986), Qualitative Research and the Uses of Literature, Journal of Thought, 21(3), s.69-83.
13. Haenssgen, M. J. (2019), Qualitative Research Issues, Interdisciplinary Qualitative Research in Global Development: A Concise Guide, Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, s.119-131.
14. Harvey, C., Yang, R., Mueller, F. ve Maclean, M. (2020), Bourdieu, Strategy and the Field of Power, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 73, s.1-15.
15. Jackson, P. (2008), Pierre Bourdieu, the ‘Cultural Turn’ and the Practice of International History, Review of International Studies, 34(1), s.155-181.
16. Jain, S. (2016), Worlds within and Beyond Words: Bourdieu and the Limits of Theory, (Ed.: D. Robbins), The Anthem Companion to Pierre Bourdieu, s.201-226, Anthem Press.
17. Joseph, J. E. (2020), The Agency of Habitus: Bourdieu and Language at the Conjunction of Marxism, Phenomenology and Structuralism, Language & Communication, 71, s.108-122.
18. Kögler, H. (2011), Overcoming Semiotic Structuralism: Language and Habitus in Bourdieu, (Eds.: S. Susen and B. Turner), The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Essays, s.271-300, Anthem Press.
19. Mullen, E. (1995), Pursuing Knowledge Through Qualitative Research, Social Work Research, 19(1), s.29-32.
20. Richter, M. M. (2012), Habitus and Physicality, Musical Worlds of Yogyakarta, s.81-88, ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.
21. Robbins, D. (2016), Reading Bourdieu Phenomenologically, (Ed.: D. Robbins), The Anthem Companion to Pierre Bourdieu, s.19-48, Anthem Press.
22. Smith, M. (1987), Publishing Qualitative Research, American Educational Research Journal, 24(2), s.173-183.
23. Stenbacka, C. (2001), Qualitative Research Requires Quality Concepts of Its Own, Management Decision, 39(7), s.551-556.
24. Swartz, D. (2020), Pierre Bourdieu: An Intellectual Legacy, (Ed.: P. Kivisto), The Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory, s.317-342, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.