Elektrikli SUV Araç Seçiminde Çok Kriterli Karar Verme: Bütünleşik Critic-Copras Yöntemi

Öz

Çalışmada Türkiye’de satışı olan elektrikli SUV’lardan, satın almayı planlayan tüketiciler için en uygun e-SUV alternatifi belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Bu amaçla, Türkiye’de distribütör satışında olan elektrikli SUV ‘lardan 10 farklı araç belirlenmiştir. Belirli kriterler altında seçilen bu 10 farklı aracın sıralamasında Çok Kriterli Karar Verme yöntemlerinden bütünleşik olarak CRITIC ve COPRAS yöntemleri kullanılmıştır. Kriterlerin ağırlıklarının belirlenmesinde CRITIC yöntemiyle yapılan hesaplamalar sonucunda en önemli ilk üç kriter; hızlı şarj süresi, enerji tüketimi ve fiyat kriterleridir. CRITIC yöntemiyle belirlenen ağırlıklar kullanılarak COPRAS yöntemiyle gerçekleştirilen analizler sonucunda e-SUV’lara ilişkin sıralamalar elde edilmiştir. Bu sonuçlara göre ilk üç alternatif Subaru Solterra, New MG ZS EV ve BMW iX3 eDrive20 olarak belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Elektrikli araçlar,
• Çok kriterli karar verme,
• Critic,
• Copras

Multi-Criteria Decision Making In The Selection Of Electric Sports Utility Vehicles: Integrated Critic–Copras Method

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess and determine the most suitable electric sports utility vehicle (e-SUV) alternatives for consumers who are considering buying an e-SUV that is sold in Turkey. Accordingly, 10 different vehicles were selected using specific criteria from the e-SUVs available through distributor sales in Turkey. CRITIC and COPRAS methods were used to rank these vehicles. The results of the CRITIC method for determining the weights of the criteria were the following three: fast charging time, energy consumption, and price. The results of the analyses conducted using the COPRAS method and these weights determined the e-SUV rankings. Based on these results, the top three alternatives were Subaru Solterra, New MG ZS EV, and BMW iX3 eDrive20.

Keywords

• Electric vehicles,
• Multi-criteria decision making,
• Critic,
• Copras

Kaynakça

1. Abdulvahitoğlu,A., Abdulvahitoğlu, A. and Vural,D.(2022), Elektrikli Otomobil Seçiminde Çok Kriterli Karar Verme: Borda Tümleşik Multimoora Yöntemi. 4th International Conference On Applied Engineering And Natural Sciences, Konya.
2. Aksoy, E., Ömürbek, N. and Karaatlı, M.(2015),Ahp Temelli Multimoora Ve Copras Yöntemi İle Türkiye Kömür İşletmeleri’nin Performans Değerlendirmesi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(4),p.1-28. Doi.10.17065/Huiibf.10920.
3. Ayçin, E. (2020), Çok Kriterli Karar Verme: Bilgisayar Uygulamalı Çözümler, 2. Baskı, Nobel Yayıncılık, Ankara.
4. Biswas,T.K and Das, M.C.(2019), Selection of Commercially Available Electric Vehicle Using Fuzzy AHP- MABAC, J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. C 100(3),p.531–537. Doi.org/10.1007/s40032-018-0481-3.
5. Brey J.J., Contreras I., Carazo A.F., Brey R., Hern´ andez-Díaz A.G, Castro A.(2007), Evaluation of Automobiles with Alternative Fuels Utilizing Multicriteria Techniques, Journal of Power Sources ,169(1),p.213–219.
6. Büyükselçuk, E.Ç. and Tozan,H.(2022), Elektrikli Araçların Performanslarının Critic-Eatwos İle Değerlendirilmesi,Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 10(1),p.1670-1688.Doi: 10.29130/Dubited.1002851.
7. BMW(2023),BMW İX3 eDrive 20, Available at: https://www.bmw.com.tr/. (Accessed: 09 August 2023).
8. Dacia (2023),Dacia Spring, Available at: https://www.dacia.com.tr/. (Accessed: 09 August 2023).

9. Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G. and Papayannakis, L. (1995),Determining Objective Weights In Multiple Criteria Problems: The Critic Metho, Computers And Operations Research,22(.7),p.763-770.Doi.Org/10.1016 /0305-0548(94)00059-H.
10. Dwivedi,P.P and Sharma,K.D (2023), Evaluation and Ranking of Battery Electric Vehicles by Shannon’s Entropy and TOPSIS methods, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 212, p.457-474.
11. Ecer, F.(2021), A Consolidated MCDM Framework for Performance Assessment of Battery Electric Vehicles Based on Ranking Strategies, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 143, p.1-19.
12. Gavcar,E. and Kara,N. (2020),Elektrikli Otomobil Seçiminde Entropi Ve Topsis Yöntemlerinin Uygulanması, İş Ve İnsan Dergisi, 7(2),p.351-359.Doi.Org/10.18394/İid.695702.
13. Karaalp, H. S. (2008),Sektörel Açıdan İklim Değişikliği: Tarım, Ulaştırma Ve Sanayi. (Der. E. Karakaya), Küresel Isınma ve Kyoto Protokolü İklim Değişikliğinin Bilimsel, Ekonomik Ve Politik Analizi, p.376,İstanbul: Bağlam Yayıncılık.
14. Khan,F.,Ali,Y. and Khan A.U.(2020), Sustainable Hybrid Electric Vehicle Selection in the Context of a Developing Country,Air Quality, Atmosphere&Health,13,p.489–499. Doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00812-y
15. Maimoun M., Madani K., Reinhart D.(2016), Multi-Level Multi-Criteria Analysis of Alternative Fuels for Waste Collection Vehicles in the United States, Science of The Total Environment, 550,p.349–361.
16. Mercedes Benz(2023a), Mercedes Benz EQA 250, Available at:https://www.mercedes- benz.com.tr/,(Accessed 09 August 2023).
17. Mercedes Benz(2023b), Mercedes Benz EQB 250, Available at: https://www.mercedes- benz.com.tr/,(Accessed 09 August 2023).
18. Muratori, M., M. Alexander, D. Arent, M. Bazilian, E. M. Dede, J. Farrell and J. Ward.(2021), The Rise Of Electric Vehicles 2020 Status And Future Expectations. Progress İn Energy, 3( 022002),p.135.
19. New MG (2023),New MG ZS EV, Available at: https://www.mg-turkey.com/, (Accessed 09 August 2023).
20. Pradhan,P. S. and Pradhan,S. (2022),Selection Of Electric Vehicle Using İntegrated Fuzzy-Mcdm Approach With Analysis On Challenges Faced İn Hilly Terrain, Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, And Environmental Effects, 44(2),p. 2651-2673.Doi.Org/10.1080/15567036.2022.2056665.
21. Qiu, C. and Wang,G.(2016),New Evaluation Methodology Of Regenerative Braking Contribution To Energy Efficiency İmprovement Of Electric Vehicles, Energy Conversion And Management,119(1),p.389–98.Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Enconman.2016.04.044.
22. Seres (2023), Seres 3, Available at: https://www.seres-tr.com/,(Accessed 09 August 2023). Shammut,M., Cao,M., Zhang,Y., Papaix,C., Liu,Y. and Gao,X(2019),Banning Diesel Vehicles In London: Is 2040 Too Late, Energies, 12(3495),p. 1–17. Doi.Org/10.3390/En12183495.
23. Skywell (2023), Skywell ET5, Available at: https://www.skywell.com.tr/ ,(Accessed 09 August 2023).
24. Subarru (2023), Subarru Solterra, Available at: https://www.subaru.com.tr/,(Accessed 09 August 2023).
25. Togg(2023),Togg T10X, Available at: https://www.toggotomobil.net/,(Accessed 09 August 2023).
26. Tzeng G.H.,Lin C.W., Opricovic S.(2005), Multi-Criteria Analysis of Alternative-fuel Buses for Public Transportation. Energy Policy,33(11),p.1373–1383.
27. Uçarol, H. and Kural, E. (2009), Ulaşımda Enerji Verimliliği İçin Hibrid Ve Elektrikli Araçlar. Mühendis Ve Makine, 50(59),p. 66-71.
28. Volvo(2023),Volvo XC40 Recharge, Available at: https://www.volvocars.com/tr/cars/xc40-electric/,(Accessed 09 August 2023).
29. Zavadskas, E. K., A. Kaklauskas, F. Peldschus and Z. Turskis. (2007),Multi-Attribute Assessment Of Road Design Solutions By Using The COPRAS Method. The Baltic Journal Of Road And Bridge Engineering, 2(4),p.195–203.
30. Zavadskas, E.K., Kaklauskas, A., Turskıs, Z. and Tamosaıtıene, J. (2008), Contractor Selection Multi-Attribute Model Applying Copras Method With Grey İnterval Numbers, International Conference 20th EURO Mini Conference, 20-23 May, Neringa-Lithuania.
31. Ziemba, P. (2020), Multi-Criteria Stochastic Selection Of Electric Vehicles For The Sustainable Development Of Local Government And State Administration Units İn Poland. Energies, 13(6299),p.1–19. Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/En13236299.