İdeal Benlikten Kaçış: The Menu Filminde Mükemmeliyetçilik ve Jungçu Bireyleşme

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 1, 779 - 794, 27.03.2026

Razieh Mohammadinia , Burhan Kılıç

https://doi.org/10.11616/asbi.1824399

https://izlik.org/JA34CJ26UA

Öz

Bu makale, The Menu (2022) filminin, patolojik mükemmeliyetçilikten kurtuluşun “daha üstün bir denetimle” değil, bireyleşmeyle mümkün olduğunu sahneleyen bir alegori sunduğunu savunmaktadır. Bu çalışma, filmin Jungcu bireyselleşmeyi, toplumsal beklentilerin dayattığı ideal benlik imajından kurtuluş aracı olarak nasıl sunduğu sorusuna cevap aramaktadır. Yöntemsel olarak çözümleme iki bütünleşik aşamada yürütülmüştür. İlk aşama, filmin simgesel dilini haritalandırmak amacıyla on belirgin motifin Barthesyen göstergebilim okumalarını üretmiştir; her öğe için gösteren düzeyi ile çağrışımsal düzey ayrıştırılmış ve gerekli yerlerde ikon/indeks/simge işlevleri saptanmıştır. İkinci aşama, bu çıktıları, metnin kendi kodlarıyla sınırlandırılmış çokanlamlılığa dayanan Eco’nun “açık metin” çerçevesi içinde yeniden okumaktadır; Bunun yanında Jungçu analitik psikoloji ve Enneagram tipolojisinden yararlanılmıştır. Bulgular, filmin çok katmanlı gösterge düzeninin okuru tek bir sonuca yönlendirdiğini göstermektedir: The Menu, filminin mükemmeliyetçilik kültürünü eleştirdiği ve bireyleşmeyi bu kültüre bir alternatif olarak sunduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Mükemmeliyetçilik , Jungçu bireyleşme , açık metin , göstergebilim.

Escaping the Ideal Self: Perfectionism and Jungian Individuation in The Menu Film

https://izlik.org/JA34CJ26UA

Öz

This article argues that The Menu (2022) stages a contemporary parable in which release from pathologicsal perfectionism is achieved not by superior control but individuation. The study seeks to answer the question of how The Menu presents Jungian individuation as a means of liberation from the ideal self-image imposed by societal expectations. Methodologically, the analysis proceeds in two integrated stages. Stage 1 performs a Barthesian semiotic reading of ten salient motifs distingushing denotation from connotation and annotation sign function to map the film’s symbolic grammar. Stage 2 re-reads these outputs within an Eco-informed open-text frame while mobilizing Jungian analytical psychology and Enneagram characterography. Findings show that the film’s multi-layered sign system leads the model reader to a convergent claim: The Menu (2022) critiques the culture of perfectionism and advances individuation as its ethical and psychological alternative.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Perfectionism , Jungian individuation , open text , semiotics.

Kaynakça

• Alexander, M. (2020). The Enneagram: A primer for psychiatry residents. The American Journal of Psychiatry Residents Journal. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp-rj.2020.150301
• Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies (Çev.: A. Lavers). New York, NY: Hill & Wang.
• Barthes, R. (1977). Image-Music-Text (Çev.: S. Heath). New York, NY: Hill & Wang.
• Berman, M. (1982). All that is solid melts into air: The experience of modernity. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
• Bordwell, D., & Thompson, K. (2017). Film art: An introduction (11. bs.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
• Bradley, S. (2016, April 5). Icon, index, and symbol: Three categories of signs. Vanseo Design. Erişim adresi: https://vanseodesign.com/web-design/icon-index-symbol/
• Curran, T. ve Hill, A. P. (2019). Perfectionism is increasing over time: A meta-analysis of birth cohort differences from 1989 to 2016. Psychological Bulletin, 145(4), p. 410-429.
• Deleuze, G. (1986). Cinema 1: The movement-image (Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• Douglas, R. (2022, Kasım 17). Last supper: A review of The Menu. Fort Kent Cinema. Erişim adresi: https://www.fortkentcinema.com/fort-kent-cinema-blog/a-review-of-the-menu/
• Eco, U. (1979). The role of the reader: Explorations in the semiotics of texts. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
• Eco, U. (1990). The limits of interpretation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
• Elsaesser, T., & Hagener, M. (2015). Film theory: An introduction through the senses. Routledge.
• Farahbakhsh, A. ve Ebrahimi, R. (2021). The social implications of metaphor in Bong Joon-ho’s Parasite. CINEJ Cinema Journal, 9(1), p. 87-116.
• Goodwin-Mc, B. (2023, Ocak 10). I’m still hungry: Taste and eating in The Menu (2022). You Remind Me of the Frame. Erişim adresi: https://youremindmeoftheframe.ca/2023/01/im-still-hungry-taste-and-eating-in-the-menu-2022/
• Gupta, G. ve Vijayaraghavan, A. P. (2024). “Nothing in this kitchen is unplanned”: Food as performance in Mark Mylod’s The Menu. Agathos: An International Review of Humanities and Social Sciences, 15(2), p. 275–284.
• Hillman, J. (1992). Re-visioning psychology (Harper Perennial ed.). New York, NY: HarperCollins.
• Jung, C. G. (1933). Modern man in search of a soul. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.
• Jung, C. G. (1966). Two essays on analytical psychology (R. F. C. Hull, Çev.; 2. bs.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Marino, C., Gini, G., Vieno, A. ve Spada, M. M. (2018). The associations between problematic Facebook use, psychological distress and well-being among adolescents and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 226, p. 274–281.
• Marcuse, H. (1964). One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
• Marx, K. (1976). Capital: A critique of political economy (Trans.; 1. bs.). London: Penguin Books.
• Mylod, M. (Yönetmen). (2022). The Menu [Film]. Searchlight Pictures.
• Peirce, C. S. (1931). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce: Volume I, Principles of philosophy (C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Poached Jobs. (2023, Ocak 17). Now you’re free too: A review of The Menu, Chef Slowik, burnout, and depression [Blog yazısı]. Poached Jobs. Erişim adresi: https://blog.poachedjobs.com/2023/01/17/restaurant-business/restaurant-insights-news/the-menu chef-slowik-review/
• Riso, D. R. ve Hudson, R. (1999). The wisdom of the Enneagram: The complete guide to psychological and spiritual growth for the nine personality types. New York, NY: Bantam.
• Roy, S. (2023, Ocak 4). The Menu ending explained: What is the meaning of the film? What happens to Margot, Tyler & Slowik? DMTalkies. Erişim adresi: https://dmtalkies.com/the-menu-meaning-and-ending-explained-2022-drama-film-mark-mylod/
• Sedera, D. ve Lokuge, S. (2020). The mirage of perfection: Understanding and managing digital flourishing. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.11565
• Shelburne, W. A. (1983). Mythos and logos in the thought of Carl Jung: The theory of the collective unconscious in scientific perspective. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
• Stein, M. (2006). Individuation: Inner work for the outer world. Chiron Publications.
• The Enneagram Institute. (2025). Type 1: The Reformer. Erişim: 17 Ekim 2025, https://www.enneagraminstitute.com/type-1
• The Narrative Enneagram. (2025). Type 9 - The Mediator. Erişim: 17 Ekim 2025, https://www.narrativeenneagram.org/enneagram-type/type-9-the-mediator
• This is Barry. (2023). The Menu explained (Every question answered). Erişim adresi: https://www.thisisbarry.com/film/the-menu-movie-explained-every-question-answered/
• U/Oris-Zora. (2023). Movie “The Menu” (2022) = quick analysis of archetypes and symbols [Online forum post]. Reddit. Erişim adresi: https://www.reddit.com/r/Jung/comments/19dlyig/movie_the_menu_2022_quick_analysis_of_archetypes/
• Wollen, P. (1969). Signs and meaning in the cinema. London: Secker & Warburg.