The One China Policy and the Paradox of Taiwan’s Recognition: Patron-Statehood, Strategic Exclusion, and Norm Contestation

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 3, 1396 - 1408, 30.11.2025

Vildan Meydan

https://doi.org/10.11616/asbi.1742535

Öz

This article examines the question of Taiwan's recognition under international law in the context of the “One China” policy of the People's Republic of China. Despite meeting the criteria for statehood as defined in the Montevideo Convention, Taiwan remains largely unrecognized and is prevented from participating in international organizations. The study draws attention not only to the legal focus of recognition, but also to the fact that it is an interest and power-based process. The paper provides a broad framework for analyzing Taiwan's current status, including China's policies of patron-state strategies and a number of diplomatic pressure mechanisms. Finally, using Hegel's master-slave dialectic, Taiwan's struggle for subjectivation without recognition is theoretically discussed. The study aims to discuss the limits of the recognition regime in international law and the need for transformation through the case of Taiwan.

Anahtar Kelimeler

State Recognition , Hegelian Dialectic , One-China Policy , Taiwan , Patron-State Strategy .

Kaynakça

• Anghie, A. (2005). Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. Cambridge University Press.
• Binghui, L. and Wang, D. (2006). Taiwan Under Japanese Colonial Rule, 1895-1945: History, Culture, Memory, New York: Columbia University Press
• Blanchard, J. F., Hickey, D. V. (2012). Introduction: More than Two “Sides” to Every Story: An Introduction to New Thinking About Taiwan Issue, (Ed. Blanchard, J. F., Hickey, D. V.), New Thinking About the Taiwan Issue: Theoretical Insight to Its Origins, Dynamics and Prospects, London and New York: Routledge
• Bock, J. and Parilla, H. (2024). Why Countries Abandon Taiwan: Indicators for a Diplomatic Switch, Global Taiwan Institute, https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/china-taiwan-relations-tension-us-policy-trump?utm, (Accessed: 13.05.2025)
• Burgess, B. (2025). Competition Continues between China and Taiwan for Latin America Allies, AIDDATA, https://www.aiddata.org/blog/competition-continues-between-china-and-taiwan-for-latin-american- allies?utm_, (Accessed: 18.05.2025)
• Bush, R. and Hass, R. (2021). Taiwan’s Democracy and China Challenge, Brookings, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/taiwans-democracy-and-the-china-challenge/, (Accessed: 18.06.2025)
• Bush, R. C. (2021). Difficult Choices: Taiwan’s Quest for Security and the Good Life. Brookings Institution Press.
• Chao, C.M. and Hsu, C.C. (2006). China isolates Taiwan, (Ed. Friedman E.), China’s Rise, Taiwan’s Dilemmas and International Peace, London and New York: Routledge
• Chen, Y.J. (2022). One China” Contention in China-Taiwan Relations: Law, Politics and Identity, The China Quarterly, 252, p.1025-1044
• Chiu, H. (1996). The International Legal Status of Taiwan, (Ed. Henckaerts, J.M.), The International Legal Status of Taiwan in the New World Order: Legal and Political Considerations, London: Kluwer Law International
• Copper, J. F. (2020). Taiwan: Nation State or Province?, 7th Ed., New York and London: Routledge
• Cooley, A. and Mitchell, L. A. (2010). Engagement Without Recognition: A New Strategy Toward Abkhazia and Eurasia’s Unrecognized States, The Washington Quarterly, 33(4), p. 59-73. doi: 10.1080/0163660X.2010.516183
• Crawford, J. (2006). The Creation of States in International Law. Oxford University Press.
• Foreign Ministry Spokeperson ‘s Remarks on the Government of the Republic of Nauru’s Announcement to Break Diplomatic Ties with the Taiwan Region and Seek to Reestablish Diplomatic Ties with China, https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng./xw/fyrbt/fyrbt/202405/t20240530_11349831.html, (Accessed: 20.06.2025)
• Gold, Thomas B. (2016). Retrocession and Authoritarian KMT Rule (1945-1986), (Ed. Schubert, G.) Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Taiwan, London and New York: Routledge
• Grant, T. D. (1999). The Recognition of States: Law and Practice in Debate and Evolution. Praeger.
• He, B. (2015). Governing Taiwan and Tibet: Democratic Approaches, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
• Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). Phenomenology of Spirit (trans. A.V. Miller). Oxford University Press.
• Hickey, D. V. (2007). Foreign Policy Making in Taiwan: From Principle to Pragmatism. Routledge.
• Hickey, D. (2006). The High Cost of Excluding Taiwan from WHO, (Ed. Friedman E.), China’s Rise, Taiwan’s Dilemmas and International Peace, London and New York: Routledge
• Högger, D. (2013), The Recognition of States: A Study on the Historical Development in Doctrine and Practice with a Special Focus on the Requirements , LIT Verlag
• Jackson, R. H. (1990). Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World. Cambridge University Press.
• Jacobs, B. (2006). One China, Diplomatic Isolation and a Separate Taiwan, (Ed. Friedman E.), China’s Rise, Taiwan’s Dilemmas and International Peace, London and New York: Routledge
• Koskenniemi, M. (2006). International Law and Hegemony: A Reconfiguration, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 17(2), p. 137–156.
• Koskenniemi, M. (2006). From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. Cambridge University Press.
• Krasner, S. D. (1999). Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton University Press.
• Krasner, S. (2009) Who Gets a State, and Why?, Foreign Affairs, www.foreignaffairs.com /articles/2009-03- 30/who-gets-state-and-why, (Accessed: 22.06.2025)
• Leifer, M. (2001). Taiwan and South-East Asia: The Limits to Pragmatic Diplomacy, The China Quarterly, 165, p.173-185
• Meydan, V. (2024). Hegel’in Felsefesinde Bireyden Devlete ve Ardından Uluslararası Hukuka Giden Süreçte Tanınmanın Yeri, İçtimaiyat, 8(1), p. 96-105
• Maizland, L. and Fong, C. (2025). Why China–Taiwan Relations Are So Tense, CFR (Council on Foreign Relations), https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/china-taiwan-relations-tension-us-policy-trump?utm_ , (Accessed: 20.05.2025)
• Mark, J. and Graham, N. (2023). Relying on Old Enemies: The Challenge of Taiwan’s Economic Ties to China, Atlantic Council, https://responsiblestatecraft.org/moscow-economy-war/ , (Accessed: 12.06.2025)
• MOFA (2024). List of Diplomatic Allies of the Republic of China (Taiwan). Ministry of Foreign Affairs, ROC.
• Newman, E. (2020). State Recognition and International Order, (Ed. Visoka G.; Doyle J and Newman E.) Routledge Handbook of State Recognition, London and New York: Routledge
• Rich, T. S. and Dahmer, A. (2020). Taiwan, (Ed. Visoka G.; Doyle J and Newman E.) Routledge Handbook of State Recognition, London and New York: Routledge
• Richards, R., and Smith, R. (2015). Statebuilding and the Politics of Non Recognition. (Ed. Daase C. Et al.), Recognition in International Relations , Palgrave Macmillan., p. 163-177
• Ringmar, E. (2002). The Recognition Game: Soviet Russia Against the West, Cooperation and Conflict, Journal of the Nordic International Studies Association,37(2), p. 115–136
• Sehnálková, J. and Kučera, O. (2012). Taiwan’s Participation in International Organizations: Obstacles, Strategies, Patterns?, (Ed.Damm J. and Lim P.) European Perspectives on Taiwan, Springer
• Scimia, E. (2023). Taiwan Boosts Economic Diplomacy despite Chinese Pressure, Responsible Statecraft, https://responsiblestatecraft.org/moscow-economy-war/, (Accessed: 02.06.2025)
• Sheng, L. (2002). China and Taiwan: Cross-Strait Relations Under Chen Shui-bian, ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute Taiwan is Part of China – An Indisputable Fact Supported by History and Law, Embassy of the People’s Republic of China in the Republic of South Africa, http://za.china- embassy.gov.cn/eng/xwfb/202504/t20250425_11604294.htm , (Accessed: 20.06.2025)
• Taylor, J. (2009). The Generalissimo: Chiang Kai-shek and the Struggle for Modern China. Harvard University Press.
• United Nations (1971). UN General Assembly Resolution 2758.
• Vidmar, J. (2012). Explaining the Legal Effects of Recognition, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 61(2), p. 361–387. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589312000083
• Wachman, A. M. (2007). Why Taiwan?: Geostrategic Rationales for China’s Territorial Integrity, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Wang, T. G. (2006). China and the Taiwan Issue: Impeding War at Taiwan Strait, Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America
• Wang, V. W. (2006). Taiwan’s Participation in International Organizations, (Ed. Friedman E.) China’s Rise, Taiwan’s Dilemmas and International Peace, London and New York: Routledge
• Wendt, A. (1992). “Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization, 46(2), 391–425.
• Xi Meets with KMT Honorary Chairman Calling National Rejuvenation a “Common Goal”, Embassy of the People’s Republic of China in the United States of America, http://us.china- embassy.gov.cn/eng/zt/twwt/201306/t20130614_4914232.htm, (Accessed: 20.06.2025)
• Yu, M. M. (2025). America’s World War with China: One China Principle vs. One China Policy, Hoover Institution, https://www.hoover.org/research/americas-word-war-china-one-china-principle-vs-one-china-policy? utm_, Accessed: September 3, 2025
• Zhu, J. (2022). Study on the Issue of Taiwan’s Participation in the International Space, Singapore: Springer