Genç Badmintoncularda Ağırlık Yeleği Kullanılarak Yapılan Dirençli Pliometrik Antrenmanın Çeviklik Performansı Üzerine Etkisinin Antrenman Programının Bitiminde ve Detraining Döneminde İncelenmesi

Yıl 2022, , 254 - 268, 28.06.2022

Dilek Topal , Yaşar Gül Özkaya

https://doi.org/10.38021/asbid.1118178

Cited By: 2

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı genç badmintonculara uygulanan sekiz haftalık pliometrik antrenman ve ağırlık yeleği kullanılarak yapılan dirençli pliometrik antrenmanın çeviklik performansı üzerine etkisinin antrenman programının bitiminde ve detraining döneminde incelenmesidir. Araştırmaya 24 kadın, 24 erkek olmak üzere toplam 48 sporcu katılmıştır. Katılımcıların yaş ortalamaları 16,06±0,78 yıl, vücut ağırlıkları ortalamaları 58,70±7,45 kg, boy ortalamaları 168,60±5,95 cm’dir. Sporcular, her bir grupta toplam 16 sporcu olmak üzere antrenman protokollerine göre kontrol grubu (KG), pliometrik antrenman grubu (PG) ve ağırlık yeleği kullanılarak yapılan dirençli pliometrik antrenman grubu (AG) olarak 3 gruba ayrılmıştır. Sporcuların çeviklik testi T testi kullanılarak ölçülmüş ve test, çalışmanın başında ve sonunda tekrarlanmıştır. Çalışmada ayrıca antrenman programının tamamlanmasını takiben detraining ölçümü için sporcular 4 hafta boyunca pliometrik ve ağırlık yelekli pliometrik antrenmana ara vermiştir. Belirtilen sürenin sonunda sporculardan tekrar çeviklik testi ölçümü alınmıştır. Veri analizinde SPSS 22.0 paket programı kullanılmıştır. Gruplar arası karşılaştırmada varyans analizi, ölçümler arası karşılaştırmada t testi kullanılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda gruplar kendi aralarında karşılaştırıldığında PG ve AG gruplarında uygulanan 8 haftalık antrenman programının çeviklik performansını önemli ölçüde kısalttığı (p<0.05), çeviklik performansı bakımından PG ve AG arasında istatistiksel fark olmadığı, PG ve AG’de detraining ölçümlerinin son-test seviyelerinden daha uzun olduğu (p<0.05), yapılan istatistiksel analizde KG ve PG gruplarında kadın ve erkek sporcular arasında fark bulunmadığı, buna karşılık erkek sporcularda AG grubunda son test ölçümünde çeviklik süresindeki kısalmanın ve detraining döneminde başlangıç seviyelerine geri dönüş miktarının, kadın sporculara göre istatistiksel olarak daha büyük olduğu saptanmıştır. Sonuç olarak bu çalışmada 8 hafta boyunca uygulanan pliometrik ve ağırlık yeleği kullanılarak uygulanan dirençli pliometrik antrenmanın çeviklik performansını iyileştirdiği, bu etkinin 4 haftalık detraining ile geri döndüğü, ağırlık yeleği kullanılarak uygulanan dirençli pliometrik antrenmanın antrenman döneminin bitiminde ve detraining döneminde başlangıç düzeylerine dönüş etkisinin erkeklerde daha belirgin olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ağırlık Yeleği, Detraining, Badminton, Egzersiz

Investigation of the Effect of Resistive Plyometric Training Using Weight Vests on Agility Performance in Young Badminton Players at the End of the Training Program and During the Detraining Period

Öz

The aim of this study is to examine the effect of eight-week plyometric training applied to young badminton players and resistance plyometric training using weight vests on agility performance at the end of the training program and during the detraining period. A total of 48 athletes, 24 women and 24 men, participated in the study. The mean age of the participants was 16.06±0.78 years, their average body weight was 58.70±7.45 kg, and their average height was 168.60±5.95 cm. Athletes were divided into 3 groups as control group (KG), plyometric training group (PG) and resistance plyometric training group (AG) using weight vest, according to training protocols, with a total of 16 athletes in each group. The agility test of the athletes was measured using the T test and the test was repeated at the beginning and end of the study. In the study, after the completion of the training program, the athletes took a break from plyometric and weight vest plyometric training for 4 weeks to measure detraining. At the end of the specified time, agility test measurements were taken from the athletes again. SPSS 22.0 package program was used in the analysis of the data. Analysis of variance was used for group comparison, and t test was used for comparison between measurements. As a result of the study, when the groups were compared among themselves, the 8-week training program applied in the PG and AG groups significantly shortened the agility performance (p<0.05), there was no statistical difference between PG and AG in terms of agility performance, detraining measurements in PG and AG were longer than the post-test levels. (p<0.05), in the statistical analysis, there was no difference between male and female athletes in the KG and PG groups. was found to be. In conclusion, 8 weeks of plyometric and resistance plyometric training applied using a weight vest improved agility performance, this effect returned with 4 weeks of detraining, and the effect of resistance plyometric training applied using a weight vest at the end of the training period and during the detraining period was more pronounced in men.

Anahtar Kelimeler

weight vest, detraining, badminton, exercise

Kaynakça

• Aagaard, P, Simonsen, EB, Andersen, JL, Magnusson, P, and Dyhrepoulsen, P. Increased rate of force development and neural drive of human skeletal muscle following resistance training. J Appl Physiol 93: 1318–1326, 2002.
• Arazi, H., Asadi, A., & Roohi, S. (2014). Enhancing muscular performance in women: compound versus complex, traditional resistance and plyometric training alone. Journal of Musculoskeletal Research, 17(02), 1450007.
• Asadi, A., Arazi, H., Young, W. B., & de Villarreal, E. S. (2016). The effects of plyometric training on change-of-direction ability: A meta-analysis. International journal of sports physiology and performance, 11(5), 563-573.
• Brughelli, M., Cronin, J., Levin, G., and Chaouachi, A. (2008). Understanding change of direction ability in sport: A review of resistance training studies. Sports Medicine, 38: 1045–1063.
• Cabello, D., Padial, P., Lees, A., Rivas, F. (2004). Temporal and physiological characteristics of elite women's and men's singles badminton. International Journal of Applied Sports Sciences, 16,2, 1-12.
• Cetin, E., Hindistan, I. E., & Ozkaya, Y. G. (2018). Effect of different training methods on stride parameters in speed maintenance phase of 100-m sprint running. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 32(5), 1263-1272.
• Cheng Y, Whang Y, Liang C. (2006). ‘Reaction time and competitive ability of badminton players’ Zhejiang Sport Sci.28: 60–63.
• Cissik, J. M. (2004). Means and methods of speed training, Part I. Strength & Conditioning Journal, 26, 24–29.
• Crossrefde Marche Baldon, R., Lobato, D. F. M., Yoshimatsu, A. P., dos Santos, A. F., Francisco, A. L., Santiago, P. R. P., & Serrão, F. V. (2014). Effect of plyometric training on lower limb biomechanics in females. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 24(1), 44-50.
• Egesoy, H. (2021). Detraining'in temel fizyolojik sistemler üzerindeki etkileri. Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 23(3), 40-48.
• Faccioni, A. (1994). Assisted and resisted methods for speed development: Part 2. Modern Athlete and Coach, 32, 3–6.
• Greig, M., & Naylor, J. (2017). The efficacy of angle-matched isokinetic knee flexor and extensor strength parameters in predicting agility test performance. International journal of sports physical therapy, 12(5), 728.
• Heang, L. J., Hoe, W. E., Quin, C. K., & Yin, L. H. (2012). Effect of plyometric training on the agility of students enrolled in required college badminton programme.
• International Journal of Applied Sports Sciences, 24(1), 18-24.
• Hindistan, I. E., Ozdogan, E. C., Bilgin, G., Colak, O. H., & Ozkaya, Y. G. (2020). Effects of sprint interval training on sloping surfaces on aerobic and anaerobic power. Biomedical Human Kinetics, 12(1), 41-50.
• Hussain I, Arshad BM. (2011). ‘Kinematic alanalysis of forehand and backhand smash in badminton’. Innov Syst Des Eng.2:20–6.
• Hyatt, J.P.K. Brown, E.A. Deacon, H.M. & Mccall, G.E., (2019). Muscle Specific Sensitivity To Voluntary Physical Activity And Detraining. Frontiers in Physiology, 10, 1328.
• Khlifa, R., Aouadi, R., Hermassi, S., Chelly, M. S., Jlid, M. C., Hbacha, H., & Castagna, C. (2010). Effects of a plyometric training program with and without added load on jumping ability in basketball players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 24(11), 2955-2961.
• Lennemann, L. M., Sidrow, K. M., Johnson, E. M., Harrison, C. R., Vojta, C. N., & Walker, T. B. (2013). The influence of agility training on physiological and cognitive performance. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 27(12), 3300-3309.
• Liddle SD, Murphy MH, Bleakley W (1996). A comparison of the physiological demands of singles and doubles badmınton: a heart. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 1996, 30, 159-176.
• Loureiro Jr LFB, De Freitas PB. (2012). ‘Influence of the performance level in badminton players in neuromotor aspects during a target-pointing task’. Braz J Sports Med.; 18:203–207.
• Macadam, P., Cronin, J. B., & Simperingham, K. D. (2017). The effects of wearable resistance training on metabolic, kinematic and kinetic variables during walking, running, sprint running and jumping: A systematic review. Sports Medicine, 47, 887–906. Crossref. PubMed.
• Miller, M. G., Herniman, J. J., Ricard, M. D., Cheatham, C. C., ve Michael, T. J. (2006). The effects of a 6-week plyometric training program on agility. Journal of sports science & medicine, 5(3), 459.
• Mujika, I. & Padılla, S., (2000a). Detraining: Loss of Training-Induced Physiological and Performance Adaptations. Part I: Short Term Insufficient Training Stimulus. Sports Med., 30, 79–87.
• Mujika, I. & Padilla, S., (2000b). Detraining: Loss of Training-Induced Physiological and Performance Adaptations. Part II: Long Term Insufficient Training Stimulus. Sports Med., 30, 145-154.
• Özbay, S., Ulupınar, S., ve Özkara, A.B. (2018). Sporda Çeviklik Performansı. Ulusal Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(2), 97-112.
• Pamuk, O., Hancı, E., Ucar, N., Hasanlı, N., Gundogdu, A., & Ozkaya, Y. G. (2022). Resisted plyometric exercises increase muscle strength in young basketball players. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte, 28, 331-336.
• Pamuk, Ö., Özçelik, M. A., Toktaş, N., Gündoğdu, A., Hindistan, İ. E., & Özkaya, Y. G. (2019). Cognitive task during fatiguing exercise increases the sensory-motor performance in professional dancers. Gazzetta Medica Italiana-Archivio per le Scienze Mediche, 178(5), 268-76.
• Pamuk, Ö., & Özkaya, Y. G. (2017). 15-17 Yaş Erkek Basketbolculara Uygulanan Dirençli Pliometrik Antrenmanların Sprint ve Çeviklik Performansına Etkisi. Sportif Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 1-13.
• Pancar, Z., Biçer, M., & Özdal, M. (2018). 12–14 yaş grubu bayan hentbolculara uygulanan 8 haftalik pliometrik antrenmanlarin seçilmiş bazi kuvvet parametrelerine etkisi. Spor ve Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(1), 18-24.
• Raman D, Nageswaran A (2013). Effect of game-specific strength training on selected physiological variables among badminton players. SSB, 2, 10,1-2.
• Raya, M. A., Gailey, R. S., Gaunaurd, I. A., Jayne, D. M., Campbell, S. M., Gagne, E., . . . Tucker, C. (2013). Comparison of three agility tests with male servicemembers: Edgren Side Step Test, T-Test, and Illinois Agility Test. J Rehabil Res Dev, 50(7), 951-960.
• Schultz, F.A., Cavazzoni, P., Carnevale, R.V., Abad, C.C., Kobal, R., Pereira, L.A., & Loturco, I. (2015). Speed and power predictors of change of direction ability in elite snow athletes. Journal of Human Sport & Exercise, 10(4); 847-856.
• Semenick, D. (1990). ’The T:test’. NSCA i 12(1):36-37.
• Sheppard, J. M., & Young, W. B. (2006). Agility literature review: Classifications, training and testing. Journal of sports sciences, 24(9), 919-932.
• Simperingham, K., & Cronin, J. (2014). Changes in sprint kinematics and kinetics with upper body loading and lower body loading using exogen exoskeletons: A pilot study. Journal of Australian Strength & Conditioning, 22, 69–72.
• Sonoda, T., Tashiro, Y., Suzuki, Y., Kajiwara, Y., Zeidan, H., Yokota, Y., ... & Aoyama, T. (2018). Relationship between agility and lower limb muscle strength, targeting university badminton players. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 30(2), 320-323.
• Sporis, G., Milanovic, L., Jukic, I., Omrcen, D., & Molinuevo, J. S. (2010). The effect of agility training on athletic power performance. Kinesiology: international journal of fundamental and applied kinesiology, 41(1), 65-72.
• Sturgess, S., & Newton, R. U. (2008). Design and implementation of a specific strength program for badminton. Strength & Conditioning Journal, 30(3), 33-41.
• Tiwari LM, Rai V, Srinet S (2011). Relationship of selected motor fitness components with the performance of badminton player. Asian J Phys Educ Comput Sci Sports, 5, 1, 88-91.
• Turğut, M., Aydın, R., & Erkılıç, A. O. (2017). Bartın Üniversitesi badminton takımında yer alan kadın sporculara uygulanan 8 haftalık klasik badminton antrenmanlarının bazı fiziksel performans parametreleri üzerine etkileri. Uluslararası Kültürel ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi (UKSAD), 3(Special Issue 2), 354-364.
• Turner, A. (2011). Defining, developing and measuring agility. Prof Strength Cond, 22, 26-28.
• Uysal, Ö., Delioğlu, K., & Firat, T. (2021). The effects of hamstring training methods on muscle viscoelastic properties in healthy young individuals. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 31(2), 371-379.
• Verkhoshansky, Y., & Tatyan, V. (1973). Speed-strength preparation of future champions. Legkaya Atleika, 2, 12-13.