Yol Analizi: Sporcu Kimliği Bağlamında Psikolojik Performans Stratejilerini Tahmin Etme

Öz

Teorik çerçevede ortak özellikleri bulunan sporcu kimliği ve psikolojik performans stratejileri arasındaki ilişkiye yönelik araştırmalar sınırlıdır. Bu doğrultuda yeni bilgilere katkıda bulunma girişimi ile araştırmanın amacı sporcu kimliğinin psikolojik performans stratejileri üzerindeki belirleyici rolünü tespit etmektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda araştırmaya farklı takım sporu branşlardan (Futbol, Basketbol, Voleybol, Hentbol) profesyonel olarak spor yaşamına devam eden 302 erkek sporcu (yaş=22,18±4,60) gönüllü olarak katılmıştır. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak araştırmacılar tarafından oluşturulan Kişisel Bilgi Formu, Sporcu Kimliği Ölçeği ve Psikolojik Performans Stratejileri Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. 302 katılımcıdan elde edilen verilerin analizinde ilk olarak normallik testi için çarpıklık basıklık değerleri, Q-Q grafiğinin dağılımları incelenmiş ve verilerin normal dağılıma uygun olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu aşamadan sonra değişkenler arasında çoklu doğrusal bağlantı problemi olup olmadığı Pearson Momentler Çarpımı Korelasyon analizi ile incelenmiştir. Araştırma kapsamında ölçeklerin testi birinci ve ikinci düzey Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi ile test edildikten sonra, sporcu kimliğinin performans stratejileri üzerindeki yordayıcı rolü YEM analizi kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular incelendiğinde, sporcu kimliğinin hedef belirleme, gevşeme, negatif düşünme, imgeleme, harekete geçme, kendinle konuşma ve duygusal kontrol stratejilerini anlamlı düzeyde yordadığı, otomatiklik alt boyutu üzerinde ise herhangi bir etkiye sahip olmadığı tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak; yüksek düzeyde sporcu kimliğinin psikolojik performans stratejileri üzerinde etkisinin olduğu ve bu bulgulardan yola çıkarak araştırmacılar tarafından daha etkili psikolojik beceri antrenman programlarının geliştirilebileceği söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sporcu Kimliği
• Psikolojik Performans Stratejileri
• Takım Sporu

Path Analysis: Predicting Psychological Performance Strategies in the Context of Athlete Identity

Öz

Research on the relationship between athlete identity and psychological performance strategies, which have common features in the theoretical framework, is limited. With an attempt to contribute new knowledge in this direction, the aim of the research is to determine the determining role of athlete identity on psychological performance strategies. For this purpose, 302 male athletes ( age=22.18±4.60) who continue their professional sports life from different team sports branches (Football, Basketball, Volleyball, Handball) voluntarily participated in the research. Personal Information Form, Athlete Identity Scale and Psychological Performance Strategies Scale created by the researchers were used as data collection tools in the study. In the analysis of the data obtained from 302 participants, firstly, the skewness and kurtosis values for the normality test, the distributions of the Q-Q graph were examined and it was determined that the data were suitable for the normal distribution. After this stage, whether there is a multicollinearity problem between the variables was examined by Pearson Product Moments Correlation analysis. Within the scope of the research, after testing the scales with first and second level Confirmatory Factor Analysis, the predictive role of athlete identity on performance strategies was examined using SEM analysis. When the findings were examined, it was determined that the identity of the athlete significantly predicted the strategies of goal setting, relaxation, negative thinking, imagery, acting, talking to oneself and emotional control, but it did not have any effect on the automaticity sub-dimension. As a result; It can be said that a high level of athlete identity has an effect on psychological performance strategies and based on these findings, more effective psychological skills training programs can be developed by researchers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Athlete Identity
• Psychological Performance Strategies
• Team Sport

Kaynakça

1. Baumgartner, H., ve Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: a review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139-161.
2. Brewer B., W, ve Cornelius AE. (2001). Norms and factorial invariance of the Athletic Identity Measurement Scale. Academic Athletic Journal, 15, 103–113.
3. Brewer, B. W., Van Raalte, J., ve Linder, D. E. (1993). Athletic identity: Hercules’ muscle or Achilles heel? International Journal of Sport Psychology, 24, 237-254.
4. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. New York: Routledge.,
5. Carpita, M., ve Manisera, M. (2011). On the imputation of missing data in surveys with Likert-Type Scales. Journal of Classification, 28(1), 93-112.
6. Chang, W. H., Wu, C. H., Kuo, C. C., ve Chen, L. H. (2018). The role of athletic identity in the development of athlete burnout: The moderating role of psychological flexibility. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 39, 45-51.
7. Connaughton, D., Wadey, R., Hanton, S., ve Jones, G. (2008). The development and maintenance of mental toughness: Perceptions of elite performers. Journal of Sports Sciences, 26(1), 83-95. doi:10.1080/02640410701310958
8. Costa, S., Santi, G., di Fronso, S., Montesano, C., Di Gruttola, F., Ciofi, E. G., ve Bertollo, M. (2020). Athletes and adversities: athletic identity and emotional regulation in time of COVID-19. Sport Sciences for Health, 16(4), 609-618.

9. Creswell, J. W., ve Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches: SAGE Publications.
10. Danish, S. J. (1983). Musing about personal competence: The contributions of sport, health, and fitness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 11, 221-240.
11. Doll, W.J., Xia, W., ve Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument, MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 357–369.
12. Downey, R. G., ve King, C. (1998). Missing data in Likert ratings: A comparison of replacement methods. J Gen Psychol, 125(2), 175-191.
13. Fletcher, D., ve Hanton, S. (2001). The relationship between psychological skills usage and competitive anxiety responses. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2(2), 89-101.
14. Fournier, J. F., Calmels, C., Durand-Bush, N., ve Salmela, J, H. (2005). Effects of a season-long PST program on gymnastic performance and on psychological skill development. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 3, 59-77.
15. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E. ve Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8. bs.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. Fraser, L., Fogarty, G., ve Albion, M. (2009). Levels of athletic identity among elite Australian athletes: The impact of gender, age, and career status. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 12, S79-S80. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2008.12.192.
17. Gapin, J. I, ve Petruzzello S. J. (2011). Athletic identity and disordered eating in obligatory and non-obligatory runners. Journal of Sports Sciences, 29(10), 1001-1010.
18. Gardner, F. L., ve Moore, Z. E. (2006). Clinical sport psychology, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
19. Gould, D., Dieffenbach, K., & Moffett, A. (2002). Psychological characteristics and their development in Olympic champions. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14(3), 172-204.
20. Gravetter, F. J., ve Forzano, L. A. B. (2012). Research methods for the behavioral sciences. Cengage Learning.4.BASKI.
21. Gustafsson, H., Martinent, G., Isoard-Gautheur, S., Hassmen, P., ve Guillet-Descas, E. (2018). Performance based self-esteem and athlete-identity in athlete burnout: A person-centered approach. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 38, 56-60.
22. Harrison L, Sailes G, Rotich W. K, ve Bimper A. Y, (2011). Living the dream or awakening from the nightmare: Race and athletic identity. Race Ethnicity and Education, 14, 1, 91-103.
23. Horton, R. ve Mack, D. (2000). Athletic identity in marathon runners: Functional focus or dysfunctional commitment?. Journal of Sport Behavior, 23(2), 101-119.
24. Hu, L. T., ve Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
25. Jackson, S. A., Thomas, P. R., Marsh, H. W., ve Smethurst, C. J. (2001). Relationships between flow, self-concept, psychological skills, and performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13(2), 129-153.
26. Karageorghis, C. I., ve Terry, P. C. (2015). Spor psikolojisi (Inside sport psychology). Nobel/Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc..
27. Katsikas, C., Argeitaki, P., ve Smirniotou, A. (2009). Performance strategies of greek track and field athletes: Gender and level differences. Biology of exercise, 5(1).
28. Kline, RB. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press, New York.
29. Lally, P. (2007). Identity and athletic retirement: A prospective study. Psychology of sport and exercise, 8(1), 85-99.
30. Lamont-Mills, A., ve Christensen, S. A. (2006). Athletic identity and its relationship to sport participation levels. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 9, 472-478.
31. Lane, A. M., Devonport, T. J., Soos, I., Karsai, I., Leibinger, E., ve Hamar, P. (2010). Emotional intelligence and emotions associated with optimal and dysfunctional athletic performance. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 9(3), 388.
32. Li H., Y, ve Andersen M.B. (2008). Athletic identity in China: Examining the AIMS in a Hong Kong sample. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 6, 2, 176-188.
33. Malouff , J. M., J. A. McGee, H. T. Halford, ve S. E. Rooke. (2008). Effects of pre-competition positive imagery and self-instructions on accuracy of serving in tennis. Journal of Sport Behavior 31(3):264-275.
34. Martin, J. J., Eklund, R. C., & Mushett, C. A. (1997). Factor structure of the athletic identity measurement scale with athletes with disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 14, 74-82.
35. Mead G.H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36. Miçooğulları, B. O. (2017). Reliability and validity of the turkish language version of the test of performance strategies. Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 6(1), 73-79.
37. Miller, K. (2009). Sport-related identities and the "toxic jock". Journal of Sport Behavior, 32, 69-91.
38. Miller, K. E., Melnick, M. J., Barnes, G. M., Farrell, M. P., ve Sabo, D. (2005). Untangling the links among athletic involvement, gender, race, and adolescent academic outcomes. Sociology of Sport Journal, 22, 178–193.
39. Öztürk, P., ve Koca, C, (2013). Sporcu kimliği ölçeğinin Türkçe formunun psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesi. Hacettepe Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 24(1), 1-10.
40. Pearson, R. E. ve Petitpas, A. J. (1990). Transitions of athletes: Developmental and preventive perspectives. Journal of Counseling and Development, 69(1), 7-10.
41. Phoenix, C., Faulkner, G., ve Sparkes, A. C. (2005). Athletic identity and self-ageing: The dilemma of exclusivity. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 6(3), 335-347.
42. Ritz, N., (2012). Th e eff ects of mental preparation for distance runners. Marathon & Beyond, 2,120-130.
43. Steiger, JH. (2000). Point estimation, hypothesis testing, and interval estimation using the RMSEA:some comments and a reply to Hayduk and Glaser. Structural Equation Modeling 7(2):149-62.
44. Tabachnick L, Fidell, (2013) Using Multivariate Statistics (sixth ed.) Pearson, Boston.
45. Tasiemski, T., ve Brewer, B. W. (2011). Athletic identity, sport participation, and psychological adjustment in people with spinal cord injury. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 28, 233-250.
46. Tenenbaum, G., ve Eklund, R. C. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of sport psychology (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
47. Thomas, P. R., Murphy, S. M., ve Hardy, L. (1999). Test of performance strategies: Development and preliminary validation of a comprehensive measure of athletes' psychological skills. Journal of Sports Science, 17(9), 697-711.
48. Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
49. Van Rens, F. E., Ashley, R. A., ve Steele, A. R. (2019). Well-being and performance in dual careers: The role of academic and athletic identities. The Sport Psychologist, 33(1), 42-51.
50. Westlund, N. (2012). Examining the relationships between imagery, sport motivation, and athletic identity in curling. Master Thesis, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
51. Wiechman, S. A., ve Williams, J. (1997). Relation of athletic identity to injury and mood disturbance. Journal of Sport Behavior, 20(2), 199-210.
52. Wright, S. (1934). The method of path coefficients. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 5, 161-215.