Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Sağlıklı Olma Kültürü Davranışlarının Araştırılması

Öz

Mevcut çalışmamız üniversitesi öğrencilerinin sağlıklı olmak kültürü davranışlarını tespiti için yapılmıştır. Sunulan çalışmamızda 2 alt boyut toplam 14 maddeden oluşan Alfrey ve ark. (2019) tarafından oluşturulmuş ve Türkçe uyarlaması Uğraş ve Ark. (2021) yapılmış olan Sağlıklı Olma Kültürü (Healtism) Davranışları Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Çalışma öncesi ilgili kurumdan gerekli izinler alışmış olup araştırmamıza katılan öğrencilere gerekli bilgilendirme yapılmıştır. Elde edilen bulguların değerlendirilmesinde sosyal ve sağlık bilimleri için geliştirilen SPSS 22 istatistik programı kullanılmıştır. Çalışmamızda ikiden fazla değişkenlerin verdikleri cevapların ortalamalarının karşılaştırılmasında tek yönlü varyans analizi (ANOVA); ikiden az değişkenin ortalamalarının karşılaştırılmasında ise bağımsız örneklem t test kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada yaş ortalaması: 21,57±1,9 olan; kız (n=243, %51,1); erkek (n=233, %48,9) toplam 476 üniversitesi öğrencisi gönüllü olarak katılmıştır. Araştırma sonunda fakülte değişkenine göre Bireysel eylemlerin eleştirisi ve Yargı alt boyutunda p<0,05 düzeyinde anlamlı olduğu bulgusuna; cinsiyet değişkenine göre ise Bireysel eylemlerin eleştirisi anlamlı farklılaşma olduğu bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sağlıklı Olma Kültürü
• Fiziksel Aktivite
• Obezite

A Study on The Examination of University Students' Cultures Of Being Healthy

Abstract

Our current study was conducted to determine the healthy culture behaviors of University students. In our study, the Healthy Being Culture (Healthism) Behaviors Scale, which was created by Alfrey et al. (2019) and adapted to Turkish by Uğraş et al. (2021), consisting of 2 sub-dimensions and a total of 14 items, was used. Before the study, the necessary permissions from the relevant institution were accustomed and the necessary information was provided to the students who participated in our research. In the evaluation of the findings obtained, SPSS 22 statistical program developed for social and health sciences was used. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) in the comparison of the mean of the responses of more than two variables in our study; In the comparison of the mean of less than two variables, independent sample t test was used. The mean age in the study was: 21.57±1.9 years; female (n=243, 51.1%); A total of 476 male (n=233, 48.9%) university students participated voluntarily. At the end of the research, according to the faculty variable, it was found that the criticism of individual actions and the Judgment sub-dimension were significant at the level of p<0.05; According to the gender variable, the criticism of individual actions was found to be a significant differentiation.

Keywords

• Healthism
• Physical Activity
• Obesity

Kaynakça

1. Aksoy,T., & Uçar. H. (2014). Healthy lifestyle behaviors of nursing students. Hacettepe University Journal of Nursing Faculty, 1(2), 53-67.
2. Alfrey, L., O’Connor, J., Phillipson, S., Penney, D., Jeanes, R., & Phillipson, S. (2019). Attitudes of pre-service physical education teachers to healthism: Development and validation of the Attitude Towards Healthism Scale (ATHS). European Physical Education Review, 25(2), 424-437.
3. Bozhüyük, A., Özcan, S., Kurdak, H., Akpınar, E., Saatçı, E., & Bozdemir, N. (2012). Healthy lifestyle and family medicine. Turkish Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 6(1).
4. Cihangiroğlu, Z., & Deveci, S. E. (2011). Healthy lifestyle behaviors and influencing factors of Fırat University Elâzığ School of Health students. Fırat Medical Journal, 16(2), 78-83.
5. Cusumano, D. L., & Thompson, J. K. (1997). Body image and body shape ideals in journals: Expation, Awareness, and Internalization. Gender Roles, 37(9), 701-721.
6. Dağdevire, Z., & Şimşek, Z. (2013). Health promotion behaviors of high school students in Şanlıurfa city center and related factors. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin, 12(2), 135-142.
7. Kargün, M., Togo, O. T., Biner, M., & Adem, P. (2016). Examination of physical activity levels of university students. Marmara University Journal of Sports Sciences, 1(1), 61-72.
8. Kavas A. (2003). Proper nutrition for a healthy life (3rd Edition). İstanbul: Literature Publishing, 6-15

9. Kaya, F., Ünüvar, R., Bıçak, A., Yorgancı, E., Öz, B., & Kankaya, F. C. (2008). Examination of health promotion behaviors of instructors and influencing factors. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin, 7(1), 59-64.
10. Kong, R. (1995). Building community capacity for health promotion: a challange for public health nurses. Public Health Nursing, 12(5), 312-8
11. Kurtdaş, M. Ç. (2016). New forms of consumption shaped around the slogan of "healthy living". Sociological Thinking, 1(1), 1-10.
12. Öztürk, Y. E., & Kıraç, R. (2019). Health and disease. Scientific Developments, 382.
13. Pasinlioğlu, T., & Gözüm, S. (1998). Health behaviors of health personnel working in primary health care services. Cumhuriyet University Journal of School of Nursing, 2, 60-68.
14. TUİK. (2021). Regional Results of Income and Living Conditions Survey, Issue: 45582. WHO/ILO joint estimates of the work-related burden of disease and injury, 2000-2016: global monitoring report: Geneva: World Health Organization and the International Labour Organization, 2021.
15. Uğraş, S., Özen, G., Aykora, E., & Yurdakul, H. (2021). Adaptation of the healthism attitude scale to turkey: A validity and reliability study. Human Sport Medicine, 21(1), 117–123.