Beden Eğitimi ve Sporda Yapay Zeka: ChatGPT ile Yeni Ufuklar

Öz

Teknolojinin hızla gelişmesi, yapay zeka uygulamalarının kullanım alanlarını genişletirken, insanlarla doğal ve akıcı bir diyalog kurma kabiliyeti olan ChatGPT gibi NLP teknolojileri giderek daha fazla ilgi görmektedir. ChatGPT, gelişmiş algoritmaları sayesinde, gerçek insanlarla olan konuşmaları taklit ederek, kişilere daha interaktif ve verimli bir iletişim deneyimi sunmaktadır. Yapay zeka teknolojilerinin çeşitli alanlarda kullanımının artmasıyla birlikte beden eğitimi ve sporda kullanım potansiyeli de dikkat çekmeye başlamıştır. Bu bağlamda, çalışma ChatGPT'nin beden eğitimi ve sporda kullanım potansiyelini, alanın geleceğine sağlayabileceği olası katkıları ve kullanım endişelerini ele almayı amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada, veri toplama yöntemi olarak röportaj kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın amacına uygun hazırlanan sorular araştırmacı tarafından ChatGPT'ye yöneltilmiş ve ChatGPT'nin cevapları kaydedilmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda, ChatGPT'nin beden eğitimi ve spor alanında kişiselleştirilmiş antrenman programları oluşturma, sporcuların performansını analiz etme, spor olaylarını özetleme ve haberleştirme gibi birçok alanda kullanılabileceği ortaya çıkmıştır. Beden eğitimi öğretmenlerinin, öğrencilerin etkileşimli ders planları, egzersiz programları, antrenman yöntemleri, sağlık ve beslenmeleri hakkında ChatGPT ile iletişim kurarak, daha etkili bir öğrenme deneyimi sağlayabilecekleri tespit edilmiştir. ChatGPT'nin beden eğitimi ve spor alanının geleceğine potansiyel olarak büyük bir etkiye sahip olabileceği sonucuna varılmıştır. Ayrıca, ChatGPT'nin teknolojiye aşırı güven, bilgi yanlışlığı, teknik zorluklar ve etik kaygılar gibi olumsuz yönleri olduğu da tespit edilmiştir. Çalışma, ChatGPT'nin beden eğitimi ve spor alanında nasıl kullanılabileceğine dair öneriler sunmakta ve gelecekteki araştırmalar için bir yol haritası çizeceği düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yapay Zeka
• ChatGPT
• Beden Eğitimi ve Spor

Artificial Intelligence in Physical Education and Sports: New Horizons with ChatGPT

Öz

While the rapid advancement of technology broadens the application areas of artificial intelligence applications, NLP technologies such as ChatGPT, which can construct a natural and fluent discourse with humans, are gaining popularity. ChatGPT imitates real-life discussions with its powerful algorithms, providing users with a more dynamic and efficient communication experience. With the increased usage of artificial intelligence technology in a variety of sectors, the potential for application in physical education and sports has begun to get attention. In this context, the research intends to explore ChatGPT's potential for application in physical education and sports, as well as its potential contributions to the field's future and use problems. In the study, interviews were employed to obtain data. The questions prepared in accordance with the purpose of the study were directed to ChatGPT by the researcher and the answers of ChatGPT were recorded. As a result of the study, it has emerged that ChatGPT can be used in many areas such as creating personalized training programs in the field of physical education and sports, analyzing the performance of athletes, summarizing and reporting sports events. It has been determined that physical education teachers can provide a more effective learning experience by communicating with ChatGPT about students' interactive lesson plans, exercise programs, training methods, and health and nutrition. It was determined that ChatGPT might have a significant effect on the future of physical education and sport. Furthermore, ChatGPT has been discovered to have negative elements such as over-reliance on technology, inaccuracy of information, technological issues, and ethical concerns. The study provides recommendations on how ChatGPT might be utilized in the field of physical education and sports, and it is intended to lay the groundwork for future research.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Artifical Intelligence
• ChatGPT
• Physical Education and Sports

Kaynakça

1. Abdelghani, R., Wang, Y. H., Yuan, X., Wang, T., Sauzéon, H., & Oudeyer, P. Y. (2022). GPT-3-driven pedagogical agents for training children's curious question-asking skills. arXiv Preprint, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.14228
2. Alkhaqani, A. L. (2023). ChatGPT and nursing education: Challenges and opportunities. Al-Rafidain Journal of Medical Sciences, 4, 50-51. https://doi.org/10.54133/ajms.v4i.110
3. Basham, J. D., Hall, T. E., Carter, R. A., & Stahl, W. M. (2016). An operationalized understanding of personalized learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 31(3), 126-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643416660835
4. Baysal, A., Aksoy, M., Besler T., Bozkurt, N., Keçecioğlu, S., Merdol, K. T., Pekcan, G., Mercanlıgil, S., & Yıldız, E. (2008). Diyet el kitabı. Ankara: Hatiboğlu Yayınları
5. Biswas, S. (2023). ChatGPT and the future of medical writing. Radiology, 307(2), https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.223312
6. Blanco-Gonzalez, A., Cabezon, A., Seco-Gonzalez, A., Conde-Torres, D., Antelo-Riveiro, P., Pineiro, A., & Garcia-Fandino, R. (2022). The role of aI in drug discovery: Challenges, opportunities, and strategies. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.08104
7. Cahan, P., & Treutlein, B. (2023). A conversation with ChatGPT on the role of computational systems biology in stem cell research. Stem Cell Reports, 18(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2022.12.009
8. Coronado, M., Iglesias, C. A., Carrera, Á., & Mardomingo, A. (2018). A cognitive assistant for learning java featuring social dialogue. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 117, 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.02.004

9. Dönmez, İ., Sahin, I., & Gülen, S. (2023). Conducting academic research with the ai interface chatgpt: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of STEAM Education, 6(2), 101-118. https://doi.org/10.55290/steam.1263404
10. Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., ... & Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 1-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
11. Ersoy, G. (2004). Egzersiz ve spor yapanlar için beslenme. Ankara: Nobel Basımevi.
12. Fitria, T. N. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) technology in OpenAI ChatGPT application: A review of ChatGPT in writing English essay. In ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching, 12(1), 44-58. https://doi.org/10.15294/elt.v12i1.64069
13. Gao, C. A., Howard, F. M., Markov, N. S., Dyer, E. C., Ramesh, S., Luo, Y., & Pearson, A. T. (2022). Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewers. bioRxiv, 6(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.23.521610
14. George, A. S., & George, A. H. (2023). A Review of ChatGPT aI's ımpact on several business Sectors. Partners Universal International Innovation Journal, 1(1), 9-23. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7644359
15. Gilson, A., Safranek, C., Huang, T., Socrates, V., Chi, L., Taylor, R. A., & Chartash, D. (2022). How well does ChatGPT do when taking the medical licensing exams? The ımplications of large language models for medical education and knowledge Assessment, medRxiv, preprint https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.23.22283901
16. Görmez, Y., Dağdeler, O. K., & Kavuklu, M. (2022). Kişiselleştirilmiş yabancı dil öğrenimi için makine öğrenmesi yöntemleriyle ilgi alanı tahmini. Journal of Higher Education & Science/Yüksekögretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 12(1), 111-121. https://doi.org/10.5961/higheredusci.982740
17. Grıffıth, H. W. (2000). Spor sakatlıkları rehberi. İstanbul: Birol Basın Yayın Dağıtım. Hallsworth, J. E., Udaondo, Z., Pedrós-Alió, C., Höfer, J., Benison, K. C., Lloyd, K. G., Cordero, R. J. B., de Campos, C. B. L.,
18. Yakimov, M. M., & Amils, R. (2023). Scientific novelty beyond the experiment. Microbıal Biotechnol, online ahead of print, 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.14222
19. Haque, M. U., Dharmadasa, I., Sworna, Z. T., Rajapakse, R. N., & Ahmad, H. (2022). I think this is the most disruptive technology: Exploring sentiments of ChatGPT early adopters using Twitter data. arXiv preprint, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.05856
20. Islam, I., & Islam, M. N. (2023). Opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in academia: A conceptual analysis. Authorea Preprints. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.22541/au.167712329.97543109/v1
21. Jiao, W., Wang, W., Huang, J. T, Wang, X., & Tu, Z. (2023). Is ChatGPT a good translator? A preliminary study. arXiv preprint, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.08745
22. Kester, L., Kirschner, P. A., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. (2005). The management of cognitive load during complex cognitive skill acquisition by means of computer-simulated problem solving. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904X19254
23. Kooli C. (2023). Chatbots in education and research: A critical examination of ethical implications and solutions. Sustainability, 15(7), 5614. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075614
24. Kostick-Quenet, K. M., & Gerke, S. (2022). AI in the hands of imperfect users. npj Digital Medicine, 5(1), 197. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00737-z
25. Kung, T. H., Cheatham, M., Medenilla, A., Sillos, C., De Leon, L., Elepaño, C., ... & Tseng, V. (2023). Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLoS digital health, 2(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198
26. Li, J., Dada, A., Kleesiek, J., & Egger, J. (2023). ChatGPT in healthcare: A taxonomy and systematic review. medRxiv preprint, https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.30.23287899
27. Lieberman, M. (2023). What Is ChatGPT and how Is It used in education? Education week. (Access 10 February 2023: at; https://www.edweek.org/technology/what-is-chatgptandhow-is-it-used-in-education/2023/01)
28. Lund, B.; & Wang, S. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library Hi Tech News preprint, https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-01-2023-0009
29. Luo, B., Lau, R. Y, Li, C., & Si, Y. W. (2022). A critical review of state‐of‐the‐art chatbot designs and applications. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 12 (1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1434
30. Lv, Z., Han, Y., Singh, A. K., Manogaran, G., & Lv, H. (2020). Trustworthiness in industrial IoT systems based on artificial intelligence. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 17(2), 1496-1504. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2020.2994747
31. Mavrogenis, A. F., Quaile, A., & Scarlat, M. M. (2020). The good, the bad and the rude peer-review. International Orthopaedics, 44, 413-415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04504-1
32. McCarthy, J., Minsky, M. L., Rochester, N., & Shannon, C. E. (1995). A proposal for the dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence, AI magazine, 27(4),12.
33. Moons P, Van Bulck L. ChatGPT (2023). Can artificial intelligence language models be of value for cardiovascular nurses and allied health professionals. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing preprint, 00, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvad022
34. OpenAI. OpenAI: Models GPT-3. Available online: https://beta.openai.com/docs/models (accessed on 14 January 2023).
35. Öz, T., Pehlivan, M., & Pirim, İ. (2023). Böbrek nakilli hastalarda greft sağkalımının yapay zeka yöntemleri ile tahmin edilmesi. Forbes Tıp Dergisi, 4(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.4274/forbes.galenos.2022.30592
36. Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu (No. JRC107466).
37. Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
38. Salas-Pilco, S. Z., Xiao, K., & Hu, X. (2022). Artificial intelligence and learning analytics in teacher education: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 12(8), 569. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12080569
39. Sallam, M. (2023, March). ChatGPT utility in health care education, research, and practice: Systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. In Healthcare, 11(6), 887. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060887
40. Shen, Y., Heacock, L., Elias, J., Hentel, K. D., Reig, B., Shih, G., & Moy, L. (2023). ChatGPT and other large language models are double-edged swords. Radiology, 307(2), e230163. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.230163
41. Shiohira, K. (2023). Understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on skills development. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/574290 .
42. Singh, S., & Beniwal, H. (2022). A survey on near-human conversational agents. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 34(10), 8852-8866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.10.013
43. Sok, S., & Heng, K. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research: A review of benefits and risks. SSRN preprint, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4378735
44. Stokel-Walker, C., & Van Noorden, R. (2023). What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science. Nature, 614(7947), 214-216. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00340-6
45. Studente, S., Ellis, S., & Garivaldis, S. F. (2020). Exploring the potential of chatbots in higher education: a preliminary study. International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences, 14(9), 768-771.
46. Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
47. Tobore, T. O. (2019). On energy efficiency and the brain's resistance to change: The neurological evolution of dogmatism and close-mindedness. Psychological Reports, 122 (6), https://doi.org/10.1177/003329411879267
48. van Dis, E. A., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R., & Bockting, C. L. (2023). ChatGPT: five priorities for research. Nature, 614(7947), 224-226. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7
49. Villegas-Ch, W., Arias-Navarrete, A., & Palacios-Pacheco, X. (2020). Proposal of an architecture for the integration of a chatbot with artificial intelligence in a smart campus for the improvement of learning. Sustainability, 12(4), 1500. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041500
50. Wang, S., Scells, H., Koopman, B., & Zuccon, G. (2023). Can ChatGPT Write a good boolean query for systematic review literature search? arXiv preprint, arXiv:2302.03495, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.03495
51. Yeo, Y. H., Samaan, J. S., Ng, W. H., Ting, P. S., Trivedi, H., Vipani, A., Ayoub, W., Yang, J. D., Liran, O., & Spiegel, B., (2023). Assessing the performance of ChatGPT in answering questions regarding cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. medRxiv 2023, Preprint, https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.06.23285449
52. Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT user experience: Implications for education. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312418