Ne Clark Kentim Ne Süpermenim: Sanal Gerçeklik Perspektifinden Metaverse Etkinlik Deneyimi Üzerine Bir Çalışma

Öz

Günümüzde metaverse, sanal gerçeklik/artırılmış gerçeklik gibi teknolojilerin gelişmesiyle dünyanın dört bir yanından büyük ilgi görmektedir. Eğlence sektöründe de önemli bir yere sahip olan metaverse, fiziksel gerçekliği dijital sanallıkla birleştiren sürekli ve kalıcı çok kullanıcılı bir ortam olan gerçeklik sonrası evren olarak ifade edilmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, üniversite öğrencilerinin sanal gerçeklik perspektifinden metaverse etkinlik deneyimine ilişkin deneyimlerini, düşüncelerini ve etkinlik sırasında yaşadıkları duyguları belirlemeye yöneliktir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Fakültesinde lisans öğrenimi gören 34 öğrenci araştırmaya dahil edilmiştir. Araştırma katılımcılarının seçiminde amaçlı örnekleme yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Katılımcılara yaklaşık 5 dakika süren Roller Coaster metaverse videosu izlettirildikten sonra derinlemesine görüşme tekniği kullanılmıştır. Katılımcıların Roller Coaster metaverse etkinliğine yönelik deneyimlerini keşfetmek için yapılan nitel araştırmada Süpermen, haz yolculuğu, korkusuz korkak, akış, duygu kuşağı ve FoMO olmak üzere altı ana tema ortaya çıkmıştır. Sonuç olarak, öğrencilerin bu deneyimden oldukça haz aldıkları ve bu sırada zamanın nasıl geçtiğini anlayamadıkları, korkularının üstesinden gelme aşamasında bu deneyimin bir basamak olduğu, yaşadıkları deneyim sayesinde farklı dünyalara ve duygulara geçiş yaptıkları, bu deneyimi yaşayan kişilerden eksik kalma korkularının olduğu ve gerçek dünyadaki tüm kısıtlamalardan uzaklaşarak özgür olma hissini yaşadıkları ortaya çıkmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Metaverse
• Sanal Gerçeklik
• Etkinlik Deneyimi
• Boş Zaman

I am neither Clark Kent nor Superman: A Case Study of Experience in Virtual Activity in the Metaverse

Abstract

The metaverse has gained attention as an important aspect of virtual word, but little is known about user experiences. This study aims to determine university students' experiences, thoughts, and feelings regarding the metaverse event experience from a virtual reality perspective. A qualitative research method including in-depth interview was utilized to collect data from 34 university students, using purposive sampling method. The interviews were applied after the participants experienced the Roller Coaster metaverse game, which lasted for about 5 minutes. In the qualitative research conducted to explore the participants' experiences with the Roller Coaster metaverse activity, six main themes emerged: Superman, Pleasure Journey, Fearless Coward, Flow, Emotion Zone, and Fear of Missing Out (FoMO). As a result, it was concluded that the students thoroughly enjoyed this experience. Moreover, they couldn't believe how quickly time passed, that this experience was a step toward overcoming their fears. They also added that the experience transitioned them to different worlds and emotions. Additionally, they had FoMO when someone else had this experience before them. Finally, it was revealed that they experienced the feeling of freedom by removing all real-world restrictions. This study might enable to the advancement of virtual reality environments, Metaverse, and leisure-based activities in particular and may reveal many potential research opportunities.

Keywords

• Metaverse
• Virtual Reality
• Activity Experience
• Leisure

Kaynakça

1. Argan, M., & Tokay Argan, M. (2018). Fomsumerism: A theoretical framework. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 10(2), 109-117. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v10n2p109
2. Argan, M., & Tokay Argan, M. (2019). Toward a new understanding of FoMO: Fomsumerism. Journal of Theory and Practice in Marketing, 5(2), 277-302.
3. Argan, M., & Tokay Argan, M. (2020). Share or worry! Relationship among FOMO, social visibility and conspicuous sharing. Journal of Internet Applications and Management, 11(2), 63-80.
4. Argan, M., Tokay Argan, M., & Dinç, H. (2022). Take me to other universes! Metaverse event experience of users. Journal of Internet Applications and Management, 3(1), 33-53. https://doi.org/10.34231/iuyd.1123136
5. Armstrong, C. M., Reger, G. M., Edwards, J., Rizzo, A. A., Courtney, C. G., & Parsons, T. D. (2013). Validity of the Virtual Reality Stroop Task (VRST) in active duty military. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 35(2), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2012.740002
6. Aylan, F. K., & Aylan, S. (2020). Reflection of virtual reality and augmented reality applications to recreational activities: Digital recreation. Journal of Turkish Tourism Research, 4(3), 2746-2760. https://doi.org/10.26677/TR1010.2020.507
7. Blumenfeld‐Jones, D. (1995). Fidelity as a riterion for practicing and evaluating narrative inquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839950080104
8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using the maticanalysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

9. Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. 5th edition. Oxford University Press, London.
10. Chen, M., Saad, W., & Yin, C. (2018). Virtual reality over wireless networks: Quality-of-service model and learning-based resource management. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 66(11), 5621-5635. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2018.2850303
11. Choi, Y. H., Jang, D. P., Ku, J. H., Shin, M. B., & Kim, S. I. (2001). Short-term treatment of acrophobia with Virtual Reality Therapy (VRT): A case report. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 4(3), 349-454. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493101300210240
12. Coleman, D., & Iso-Ahola, S. E. (1993). Leisure and health: The role of social support and self-determination. Journal of Leisure Research, 25(2), 111-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1993.11969913
13. Duan, H., Li, J., Fan, S., Lin, Z., Wu, X., & Cai, W. (2021). Metaverse for social good: A university campus prototype. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 153-161. https://doi.org/10.1145/3474085.3479238
14. El-Said, O., & Aziz, H. (2021). Virtual tours a means to an end: An analysis of virtual tours’ role in tourism recovery post COVID-19. Journal of Travel Research, 61(3), 528-548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287521997567
15. Gadalla, E., Keeling, K., & Abosag, I. (2013). Metaverse-retail service quality: A future framework for retail service quality in the 3D internet. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(13-14), 1493-1517. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2013.835742
16. Günbayı, İ. (2019). Nitel araştırmada veri analizi: Tema analizi, betimsel analiz, içerik analizi ve analitik genelleme (Data analysis in qualitative research: Theme analysis, descriptive analysis, content analysis and analytical generalization). http://www. nirvanasosyal.com/h-392-nitel-arastirmada-veri-analizi-tema-analizi-betimsel-analiz-icerik-analizi-ve-analitik-genelleme.html. Access: 08.2023.
17. Häfner, P., Häfner, V., & Ovtcharova, J. (2013). Teaching methodology for virtual reality practical course in engineering education. Procedia Computer Science, 25(2013), 251-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.11.031
18. Han, S. L., An, M., Han, J. J., & Lee, J. (2020). Telepresence, time distortion, and consumer traits of virtual reality shopping. Journal of Business Research, 118(2020), 311-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.056
19. Han, D. I. D., Bergs, Y., & Moorhouse, N. (2022). Virtual reality consumer experience escapes: Preparing for the metaverse. Virtual Reality, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-022-00641-7
20. Hovan George, A.S., Fernando, M., Shaji George, A., Baskar, T., & Pandey, D. (2021). Metaverse: The next stage of human culture and the Internet. International Journal of Advanced Research Trends in Engineering and Technology (IJARTET), 8(12), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6548172
21. Juan, M. C., & Pérez, D. (2009). Comparison of the levels of presence and anxiety in an acrophobic environment viewed via HMD or CAVE. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 18(3), 232-248. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.18.3.232
22. Kaleci, D., Tepe, T., & Tüzün, H. (2017). Users’ opinions of experiences in three dimensional virtual reality environments. The Journal of Turkish Social Research, 21(3), 669-689.
23. Khan, R., Plahouras, J., Johnston, B. C., Scaffidi, M. A., Grover, S. C., & Walsh, C. M. (2018). Virtual reality simulation training for health professions trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 8, CD008237 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008237.pub3
24. Khor, W. S., Baker, B., Amin, K., Chan, A., Patel, K., & Wong, J. (2016). Augmented and virtual reality in surgery-the digital surgical environment: Applications, limitations and legal pitfalls. Annals of Translational Medicine, 4(23), 454. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2016.12.23
25. Kim, M. J., & Hall, C. M. (2019). A hedonic motivation model in virtual reality tourism: Comparing visitors and non-visitors. International Journal of Information Management, 46(2019), 236-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.016
26. Kim, D., & Ko, Y. J. (2019). The impact of virtual reality (VR) technology on sport spectators' flow experience and satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 93(2019), 346-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.040
27. Kim, Y. M., Rhiu, I., & Yun, M. H. (2020). A systematic review of a virtual reality system from the perspective of user experience. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(10), 893-910. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1699746
28. Lee, L. H., Braud, T., Zhou, P., Wang, L., Xu, D., Lin, Z., ... & Hui, P. (2021). All one needs to know about metaverse: A complete survey on technological singularity, virtual ecosystem, and research agenda. Journal of Latex Class Files, 14(8), 1-66. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.05352
29. Li, Y., Jin, Y., Yin, Y., & Shen, H. (2008). Simulation of shallow-water waves in coastal region for marine simulator. In Proceedings of The 7th Acm Siggraph International Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry, 15, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1145/1477862.1477882
30. Lincoln, Y. S., & Denzin, N. K. (Ed.s.). (2000). The hand book of qualitative research. Sage.
31. Melo, M., Gonçalves, G., Monteiro, P., Coelho, H., Vasconcelos-Raposo, J., & Bessa, M. (2022). Do multisensory stimuli benefit the virtual reality experience? A systematic review. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 28(2), 1428-1442. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.3010088
32. Moro-Visconti, R. (2022). From physical reality to the metaverse: A multilayer network valuation. Journal of Metaverse, 2(1), 16-22.
33. Mystakidis, S. (2022). Metaverse. Encyclopedia, 2, 486-497. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia2010031
34. Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The concept of flow. In Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology, pp. 239-263, Springer, Dordrecht.
35. Odabaşı, Y. (2006). Tüketim kültürü (consumption culture). Istanbul: Sistem Publishing.
36. Ondrejka, C. (2004). Escaping the gilded cage: User created content and building the metaverse, NYL Sch. L. Rev., 49(1), 11-28.
37. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications, ThousandOaks, CA.
38. Park, S. M., & Kim, Y. G. (2022). A Metaverse: Taxonomy, components, applications, and open challenges. Ieee Access, 10, 4209-4251. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3140175
39. Pendit, U. C., Mahzan, M. B., Basir, M. D. F. B. M., Mahadzir, M. B., & Binti Musa, S. N. (2017). Virtual reality escape room: The last breakout. In 2017 2nd International Conference on Information Technology (INCIT), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/INCIT.2017.8257884
40. Pomfret, G. (2006). Mountaineering adventure tourists: A conceptual framework for research. Tourism Management, 27(1), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2004.08.003
41. Ranasinghe, N., Jain, P., Thi Ngoc Tram, N., Koh, K. C. R., Tolley, D., Karwita, S., ... & Do, E.Y.L. (2018). Season traveller: Multisensory narration for enhancing the virtual reality experience. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,1-13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174151
42. Rothbaum, B. O., Hodges, L., Kooper, R., Opdyke, D., Williford, J. S., & North, M. (1995a). Virtual reality graded exposure in the treatment of acrophobia: A case report. Behavior Therapy, 26(3), 547-554. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80100-5
43. Rothbaum, B. O., Hodges, L., Kooper, R., Opdyke, D., Williford, J. S., & North, M. (1995b). Effectiveness of computer generated (virtual reality) graded exposure in the treatment of acrophobia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1(152), 626-628.
44. Slater, M., & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2016). Enhancing our lives with immersive virtual reality. Front. Robot. AI, 3(74), 1-47. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2016.00074
45. Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook, Sage.
46. Suhaeni, T., Brien, A., Andrianto, T., & Mannaa, M. T. (2022). Predicting future halal tourist behavior: Incorporating holistic tourist experience and virtual reality experience. International Journal of Applied Business Research, 4(1), 16-31. https://doi.org/10.35313/ijabr.v4i1.212
47. Tcha-Tokey, K., Loup-Escande, E., Christmann, O., & Richir, S. (2016). A questionnaire to measure the user experience in immersive virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 2016 Virtual Reality International Conference, 19, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1145/2927929.2927955
48. Tepe, T., Kaleci, D., & Tüzün, H. (2016). New trends in educational technologies: Virtual reality applications. In 10th International Computer and Instructional Technologies Symposium (ICITS), 16(18), 547-555.
49. Ünal, S., & Ceylan, C. (2008). Reasons leading consumers to hedonic shopping: A comparative study in Istanbul and Erzurum provinces. Ataturk University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 22(2), 265-283.
50. Xu, M., Niyato, D., Kang, J., Xiong, Z., Miao, C., & Kim, D. I. (2022). Wireless edge-empowered metaverse: A learning-based incentive mechanism for virtual reality. In ICC 2022-IEEE International Conference on Communications, 5220-5225. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC45855.2022.9838736
51. Van-den Bor, M., Slond, F., Liesdek, O.C., Suyker, W. J., & Weldam, S. W. (2022). The use of virtual reality in patient education related to medical somatic treatment: A scoping review, Patient Education and Counseling. 105(7), 1828-1841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.12.015
52. Våpenstad, C., & Buzink, S. N. (2013). Procedural virtual reality simulation in minimally invasive surgery, Surgical Endoscopy, 27(2), 364-377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.12.015
53. Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. Cambridge University Press.