METHODS OF DEVELOPING INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION IN TEACHING NATURAL SCIENCES

Öz

This article is an answer to a problem that has not been solved in universities in Kazakhstan. After the independence of the Republic of Kazakhstan, our universities have been studying methods of pedagogical development in teaching Social Sciences in The Bachelor's degree. The goal of the modern education system is to train a competitive specialist. The school is a teaching environment, its heart is a teacher. A special feature of the creative work of an inquisitive teacher is his ability to transform the lesson and find the way to the heart of the individual. For this purpose, we want to highlight the main features of interdisciplinary communication. Therefore, to combine their functional literacy with professional skills, it is necessary to have an andrological process that purposefully educates, forms, and develops in a result-oriented educational model. In other words, education for adults, in order to stimulate cognitive activity aimed at developing the general culture and social activity of people through the development of the need for general and professional education, the achievements of Science, Education, and culture. The modern educational paradigm provides for the transition from education aimed at a" qualified person "to education aimed at a" cultural person". This education requires a new organization - a deeper revision of its philosophical, psychological, pedagogical Foundations, Theory, and practice. Therefore, today in the country's education system, the task is to ensure a new content of the learning process based on new ideas.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• interdisciplinary communication
• science
• competence
• training program

Kaynakça

1. [1] Amusan, O.O.C. (1992).Hints on the Teaching of Carbon Compounds of the Senior Secondary School Level. Journal of Science Teachers Association of Nigeria, Vol.27, No.2, 98-103.
2. [2] Ушинский К.Д.(1857-1958) ж.ж. “Тәрбие үшін журналы” “Педагогикалық әдебиеттің пайдасы туралы”
3. [3] Қазақстан Республикасы Үкіметінің 2007 жылғы 28 маусымдағы №546 қаулысы. «Білім туралы» Қазақстан Республикасы Заңы.
4. [4] Құдайбергенова К.С.2007. Құзырлылық амалының негізгі ұғымдары. Алматы
5. [5] Кузьмина, Н. В. 2002. Понятие «педагогической системы» и критерии ее оценки. методы системного педагогического исследования: Народное образование,– С. 7–52.
6. [6] Gallton, A. 2000. Curriculum for the New Millennium [Text] / A. Gallton, Jaihall; R. E. Brandt (Ed.). – Educational in a New Era, U.S.A. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development,P. 97–121
7. [7] Jacinta A. Opara. 2015. Оutlook on teaching school science for sustainable development. Scientific Journal «ScienceRise» №5/1(10). DOI: 10.15587/2313-8416.2015.42797
8. [8] Шанин С.В. 2015. Подготовка будущего учителя физики к экологическому воспитанию школьников средствами межпредметной внеклассной деятельности. https://www.dissercat.com/content/podgotovka-budushchego-uchitelya-fiziki-k- ekologicheskomu-vospitaniyu-shkolnikov-sredstvami- . Россия

9. [9] G. Schraw, Terri Flowerday, S. Lehman. 2001. Increasing Situational Interest in the Classroom Published Psychology Educational Psychology Reviewю.
10. [10] K.N. Jumadillayev., Zh.K. Sydykova. 2016. Teaching methodology of physics. Almaty.
11. [11] M.Vanaja., D. Bhaskara Rao. 2002. Methods of teaching physics. India.
12. [12] Elizabeth A. Davi. 2003. Knowledge Integrationin Science Teaching: Analysing Teachers’ Knowledge Development. Research in Science Education 34: 21–53,
13. [13] Halah Saeed, B.A and Najah, A.A. (2010). Interdisciplinary Science and Developing Science Teaching. Proceedings of 10th International Educational Technology Conference and Exhibition, Istanbul-Turkey 26-28 April, Vol.2.
14. [14] Leunes Jack L. 1984. New trends in physics teaching. ЮНЕСКО.
15. [15] Қазақстан Республикасында білім беруді дамытудың 2005-2010 жылдарға арналған мемлекеттік бағдарламасы. 2004. Астана. 28-б. https://kk.wikipedia.org/wiki/