TR
EN
THE COMMON POINTS OF MACHIAVELLIANISM AND FASCISM
Abstract
There is no consensus among political thinkers on Machiavellian political thought (Machiavellianism) and its relation to Machiavelli’s personality. Some critics consider Machiavelli as a supporter of militarism, authoritarianism, and pragmatism, and others find him a realist, expedient, and proponent of a lofty society. This study discusses the effects of the Machiavellian political perspective signified in The Prince and how it imprinted Hitler’s fragment of the totalitarian schools of the twentieth century, namely Fascism reflected in Mein Kampf. This study investigates whether the origins of the fascist principles are rooted in Machiavellianism or not? The hypothesis is the influence of Machiavellian thought on fascism. Machiavelli’s recommendations, such as hegemony, coercion, propaganda, authoritarian leadership, social deception, democratization, abuse of religion, and extreme militarism, attracted Hitler’s attention directly or indirectly. This research exploits the descriptive-analytical mold to come up with a scientific response to the specified question through qualitative content analysis via investigating the roots of the policy myths of the recent age.
Keywords
Kaynakça
- Amato, D. (1972). The relevance of Machiavelli to contemporary world politics. In: The Political Calculus: Essays on Machiavelli’s philosophy, Anthony Parel (ed.), Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
- Ball, T. (2011). The Value of the History of Political Philosophy. In 1254699564 928840010 G. Klosko (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Political Philosophy (Oxford Handbooks Online, pp. 1-16). NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199238804.003.0004
- Cassirer, E. (2013). The myth of the state. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- Dettling, C. R. (2019, September 16). Napoléon and Machiavelli: Bonapartism Is machiavellism. Retrieved March 15, 2021, from https://medium.com/@christopherrichardwadedettling/napol%C3%A9on-and-machiavelli-bonapartism-is-machiavellism-ee2c8e008ac0
- Dogan, N. (2004). Machiavellism, kantian deontology, and the melian dialogue: a reflection on morality and the use of force. Ankara niversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 44(1), pp. 65-75, from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2054408
- Edwards, A., & Townshend, J. (2002). Interpreting Modern Political Philosophy: From Machiavelli to Marx. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Femia, J. (2004). Machiavelli and Italian Fascism. History of Political Thought, 25(1), 1-15. Retrieved March 16, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/26220182
- Hirschfeld, G. (2010). Hitler’s War Aims. National Institute for Defense Studies (International Forum on War History) [Cong. Doc. Speakers from Ninth Forum: “The Strategy of the Axis Powers in the Pacific War” sess.]. Tokyo, pp. 51-61. Retrieved March 16, 2021, from http://www.nids.mod.go.jp/english/event/forum/pdf/2010/04.pdf
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
-
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Yayımlanma Tarihi
31 Ekim 2021
Gönderilme Tarihi
31 Ağustos 2021
Kabul Tarihi
27 Eylül 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2021 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 4