THE TECHNOLPGY OF ORGANIZING THE PROCESS OF FORMING THE COMPETENCE OF PLAUSIBLE REASONING OF FUTURE TEACHERS

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: Prof. Dr. RASKUL IBRAGIMOV Özel Sayısı, 195 - 208, 15.05.2023

Roza Kadirbayeva

Öz

The article deals with the issues of the process of forming the competence of plausible reasoning in future teachers through collective constructive learning of problem-cognitive topics.
Based on the identified features of the life and professional activities of a modern school teacher, a conclusion is made about the need to modify the education system by moving from the paradigm of extensive cognitive-reproductive activity to an intensive creative-activity paradigm. Also, a brief review of works on the methods of deduction, induction and abduction was carried out and the idea of their combination was considered, which led to the emergence of the method of vortexing reasonable reasoning and the technology of organizing the process of forming the competence of reasonable reasoning. The swirl method is based on the processing of the plain text of the problem into a large amount of information, consisting of several sequential or time-integrated stages. The paper presents processing algorithms at each stage.
In the 2022-2023 academic years, in the process of preparing future teachers of mathematics at the South Kazakhstan State Pedagogical University, the technology we developed was tested; its usefulness and effectiveness were identified.

Anahtar Kelimeler

competence, plausible reasoning, future teacher, open tasks

Kaynakça

• 1. Solomin V. P. Pedagogical education and science: ways of development [Text] / Solomin Valery Pavlovich // Bulletin of the Herzen University [Text] / RSPU. - St. Petersburg, 2011. - N 11 (97). - pp. 12-21.
• 2. D. Walton; C. W. Tyndale; T. F. Gordon (2014). Application of Modern Methods of Argumentation to Some Ancient Examples of Plausible Reasoning" (PDF). Argumentation. 28 (1): pp. 85-119. doi:10.1007/s10503-013-9306-y.
• 3. Svetlov V.A. Methodological concept of scientific knowledge of Charles Pierce: the unity of abduction, deduction and induction // Logical and philosophical studies. 2008. T. 5. -pp. 165-187. ISSN 2071-9183.
• 4. Fin V. K. Abduction. Internet resource URL: https://web.archive.org/web /20110127013407/http:/iph.ras.ru/page54852159.htm#
• 5. Ruzavin G.I. Abduction as a method of searching and substantiating explanatory hypotheses // Theory and Practice of Argumentation. M., 2001. pp.39-67
• 6. George Fields Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning, Volume I, II: Induction and Analogy in Mathematics. Princeton University Press. 1954. p. 462.
• 7. Khalmos P.R. (1955). Review: G. Pohl, Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning." Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society. 61 (3): 243-245. doi:10.1090/s0002-9904-1955-09904-x
• 8. Collins A. M. (1989). The Logic of Plausible Reasoning: A Basic Theory. Cognitive Science. 13: pp.1-49. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1301_1.
• 9. Shafrin Yu., Fundamentals of computer technology: Proc. allowance for grades 7-11 on the course "Computer science and computer technology" / Y. Shafrin. - 2nd ed., add. and reworked. - Moscow: ABF, 1997. – p. 655.
• 10. Shmelev D.N. Problems of semantic analysis of vocabulary. - M.: Nauka, 1973. – p. 280.
• 11. Gromyko, N.V. Activity epistemology and the problem of translation of theoretical knowledge in educational practice: author. dis. ... Dr. Phil. Sciences: 09.00.01 / Gromyko N. V. - M., 2011. - 51 p.
• 12. Zhadanov V.I., Charikova I.N. Epistemological aspects of the pedagogical implementation of innovative design technologies in the educational process at the university // Bulletin of the OSU. -2017. No. 10 (210). - pp. 55-58.
• 13. Mikeshina L. A. Philosophy of science: modern epistemology. Scientific knowledge in the dynamics of culture. Methodology of scientific research: textbook. Allowance. M., 2005. p. 464.
• 14. Rockmore T. On Constructivist Epistemology. Lanham, 2008. p. 164.
• 15. The Oxford handbook of epistemology / ed. P. K. Moser. Oxford, 2002. p. 320.
• 16. Bunyatova F. Constructive learning: essence, principle, goals and samples of lessons. - Baku, 2008. – p. 218.
• 17. Krainev I. V. Constructive pedagogy. M., 2004. pp. 5–28.
• 18. Shatalova N. P. ABC of constructive learning. Monograph. - Krasnoyarsk: Scientific and Innovation Center LLC, 2011. –p. 204.
• 19. Glasersfeld E. Radikal constructivism: A. Way of Knowing and learning. London, 1985. Radical constructivism: A. A way of knowing and learning. London, 1985. p. 230.