AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ’NDE KAMU YÖNETİMİ REFORMLARI ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 12, 10 - 20, 27.12.2018

Fatih Demir

Öz

Avrupa
Birliği ülkelerinde kamu yönetimi reformları ile ilgili olarak 1980’lerden bu
yana kapsamlı bir dönüşüm yaşanmıştır. Bu reformların iki dönem olarak
incelenmesi mümkündür. 1990’ların ortalarına kadar olan dönemde reformlar yeni
kamu işletmeciliği paradigmasının etkisi altında gerçekleştirilmiştir. Daha
sonraki reformlarda ise YKİ’nin ilkelerine yönelik ciddi eleştirilerin
getirildiğini görmek mümkündür. Günümüzde Avrupa Birliği ülkelerinde kamu
yönetimi reformları hakkındaki tartışmalar yoğun şekilde devam etmektedir.
Diğer taraftan, AB tarafından aday ülkelerden birtakım kamu yönetimi reformlarını
hayata geçirmeleri talep edilmektedir. Kamu yönetimi reformları konusunda
izlenecek yol konusunda yoğun tartışmaların sürdüğü bir ortamda bu türden
taleplerin ne kadar etkili olacağı belirsizdir. Bazı çalışmalar, son dönemde kamu
yönetimi reformlarının yönü hakkında kafa karışıklığının arttığını
göstermektedir. Bu çalışmada yeni kamu işletmeciliğinin özellikle son 10 yılda
Avrupa ülkelerinde ciddi eleştirilerle karşılaştığı ileri sürülmekte ve
örnekler verilmektedir. Türkçe literatürde bu konuda çalışmaların azlığı
dikkate alındığında çalışmanın alana katkı yapacağı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

kamu yönetimi, reformlar, Avrupa Birliği

Kaynakça

• Boyle, R. (1995) Towards a new public service, (Dublin: Institute of Public Administration).Christensen, T., ve Lægreid, P. (2007) “The whole‐of‐government approach to public sector reform”, Public Administration Review, 67(6): 1059-1066.Clıfton, J, Diaz Fuentes, D, Fernandez Guttierrez, M, James, O, Jilke, S.R, and Van de Walle, S.G.J. (2013) “Satisfaction, Voice and Choice in European Public Services”, European PolicyBrief, http://repub.eur.nl/pub/78042/. Curry, D. (2014) “Trends for the Future of Public Sector Reform: A Critical Review of Future-Looking Research in Public Administration”, <http://www.cocops.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/TrendsForTheFutureOfPublicSector Reform.pdf>, (Erişim Tarihi – 9 Nisan 2016).Curry, D., Hammerschmid, G., Jılke, S. and Van de Walle, S. (2015) “Executive Perceptions of Public Sector Reform in Europe”, International Handbook of Public Administration and Governance, (Ed: Massey, A. & Johnston, K.), Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 369-398. (Austria, Estonia, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Spain, UK)Curry, D., Blıjleven, W. and Van de Walle, S. (2014). “Current and Future Trends in Public Sector Reform: the Views of Trade Unions and Consultants in Ten European Countries”, COCOPS WORK PACKAGE 8, <http://www.cocops.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/ COCOPS-REPORT-8-4-goede-versie.pdf>, (Erişim Tarihi – 20 Mart 2016).De Vries, J. (2010) “Is New Public Management Really Dead”?, OECD Journal on Budgeting, <https://www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting/48168865.pdf>, (Erişim Tarihi – 3 Nisan 2016).Demir, Fatih. (2008) “Avrupa İdari Alanı’nın Oluşumu ve Yansımaları (Orta ve Doğu Avrupa Ülkeleri ile Türkiye Örneği)”, yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Sakarya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitisü. Denhardt, Robert B., ve Denhardt, J. V. (2000) “The new public service: Serving rather than steering.” Public administration review, 60(6): 549-559.Drechsler, W. (2014) “The rise and demise of the New Public Management: Lessons and opportunities for South East Europe”, International Public Administration Review, 7(3): 7-27.Drechsler, W. (2009) “Towards a Neo-Weberian European Union? Lisbon Agenda and Public Administration”, Halduskultuur–Administrative Culture, 10: 6-21.Drechsler, W., ve Kattel, R. (2009) “Conclusion: Towards the Neo-Weberian State? Perhaps, but Certainly Adieu, NPM”, The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 1(2), 95-99.Drechsler, W. (2005) “The Re-Emergence of “Weberian” Public Administration after the Fall of New Public Management: The Central and Eastern European Perspective”, Halduskultuur – Administrative Culture, 6: 94-108.Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., ve Tinkler, J. (2006) “New public management is dead—long live digital-era governance”, Journal of public administration research and theory, 16(3): 467-494.Elbasani, A. (2009) “EU Administrative Conditionality and Domestic Downloading: The Limits of Europeanization in Challenging Contexts”, KFG Working Paper , Nr. 2.Falkner, G., Treib, O., ve Holzleithner, E. (2008) Compliance in the enlarged European Union: living rights or dead letters?, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Ferlie, E. (1996) The new public management in action, Oxford University Press, ABD.Giddens, A. (1998). The Third Way, Cambridge. Polity, 129.Goetz, K. H. (2005) The New Member States and the EU, in Simon Bulmer ve Christian Lequesne (eds.), Member States and the European Union, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Grabbe, H. (2001) “How does Europeanization affect CEE governance? Conditionality, diffusion and diversity”, Journal of European public policy, 8(6): 1013-1031.Gregory, R. (1995) “The peculiar tasks of public management: Toward conceptual discrimination”, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 54(2): 171-183.Haynes, A. S., Derrick, G. E., Chapman, S., Redman, S., Hall, W. D., Gillespie, J., ve Sturk, H. (2011) “From “our world” to the “real world”: exploring the views and behaviour of policy-influential Australian public health researchers”, Social science & medicine, 72(7): 1047-1055.Hunt, S. (2005) “Whole-of-government: does working together work”? <https://digitalcollections.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/43012>, (Erişim Tarihi – 18 Mayıs 2016).Kaldor, M. ve Vejvoda, I. (1997) “Democratization in Central and Eastern European Countries”, International Affairs, 73(1): 59-82. Katzenstein, P. J. (2005) A world of regions: Asia and Europe in the American imperium, Cornell University Press.Laegreid, P., ve Christensen, T. (Ed). (2013) Transcending new public management: the transformation of public sector reforms, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Lapsley, I. (2008) “The NPM agenda: back to the future”, Financial accountability & management, 24(1): 77-96.Lapsley, I. (2009) “New Public Management: The Cruellest Invention of the Human Spirit”? 1. Abacus, 45(1): 1-21.Lizbon Zirvesi Sonuç Bildirgesi (2000), http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv%3Ac10241 (Erişim Tarihi – 16 Mart 2016)Lodge, M. ve Gıll, D. (2011) “Toward a New Era of Administrative Reform? The Myth of Post-NPM in New Zealand”, Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 24(1): 141–166.Lynn, L. (2008) “What is a Neo-Weberian State? Reflections on a Concept and its Implications”, The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 1(2): 17-30.Moynihan, D. P. (2008) The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform, Georgetown University Press.Noordhoek, P., & Saner, R. (2005). “Beyond new public management. Answering the claims of both politics and society”, Public Organization Review, 5(1): 35-53.Osborne, D. & Gaebler, T. (1992) Reinventing Government. How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector, Addison Wesley, Massachusetts, ABD. Papadimitriou, A., Gornitzka, A. ve Stensaker, B. (2015). “Designed Diffusion? The Impact of an EU Instrument for Public Management Reform in the Western Balkans”, Journal of European Integration, 37(6): 629-647.Patrick, S., ve Brown, K. (2007). Greater than the sum of its parts?: Assessing" whole of government" approaches to fragile states, International Peace Academy, New York, ABD.Pippan, C. (2004) “The rocky road to Europe: the EU’s stabilisation and association process for the Western Balkans and the principle of conditionality”, European Foreign Affairs Review, 9(2): 219-245.Pollitt, C. (1995) “Justification by works or by faith? Evaluating the new public management”, Evaluation, 1(2): 133-154.Pollitt, C., ve Bouckaert, G. (2004) Public management reform: A comparative analysis, Oxford University Press, ABD.Pollitt, C., ve Bouckaert, G. (2011) Public Management Reform: A comparative analysis-new public management, governance, and the Neo-Weberian state, Oxford University Press.Pollitt, C. ve Sorin, D. (2011) “The Impacts of the New Public Management in Europe: A Meta-Analysis”, COCOPS WORK PACKAGE 1, <http://www.cocops.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/WP1_Deliverable1_Meta-analysis_Final.pdf.>, (Erişim Tarihi – 12 Mart 2016).Randma-Liiv, T. (2008) “New public management versus the Neo-Weberian state in Central and Eastern Europe”, The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 1(2): 49-71.Schimmelfennig, F., ve Scholtz, H. (2008) “EU Democracy promotion in the European neighbourhood political conditionality, economic development and transnational exchange”, European Union Politics, 9(2): 187-215.Schimmelfennig, F., ve Sedelmeier, U. (2004) “Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe”, Journal of European public policy, 11(4): 661-679.Schimmelfennig, F., ve Sedelmeier, U. (2008) Candidate countries and conditionality, Palgrave Macmillan, Birleşik Krallık. Van de Walle, S. ve Hammerschmid, G. (2011) “The impact of the new public management: Challenges for coordination and cohesion in European public sectors”, Halduskultuur – Administrative Culture, 12(2): 190-209. Verheijen, T. (2000). “Civil service systems in Central and Eastern Europe”. Public Administration, 78(4): 989-992.Wilkinson, M. J. (1995). “Love is not a marketable commodity: new public management in the British National Health Service”, Journal of advanced Nursing, 21(5): 980-987.William, D. N. ve Miller, D. Y. (2007). “A Critique of the New Public Management and the Neo-Weberian State: Advancing a Critical Theory of Administrative Reform”, Public Organization Review, 7(4): 345–358.