Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Examination of Coworking Space Literature with Bibliometric Analysis Method

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 29, 125 - 142, 30.09.2024
https://doi.org/10.31455/asya.1496389

Öz

With the increasing importance of the sharing economy, coworking spaces have become one of the concepts that have entered the working life in our country as well as in the world. On the one hand, while technology is developing, on the other hand, the ways of doing things are changing, so it has become a necessity to make a difference in the places where we work. Especially with the increase in remote working, digitalization and technological opportunities, the culture of working outside the office has started to develop. Although working from home is becoming more common today, this brings some distractions in terms of work-life balance. In addition, the emergence of the need for individuals to belong to a community over time makes it possible for them to apply for alternative office spaces. In this context, the first academic research on coworking spaces emerged in the 2010s. The aim of this study is to conduct a bibliometric analysis of articles in the international literature on coworking spaces based on various parameters. Within the framework of this purpose, firstly, Web of Science (WoS) database was searched with the terms “coworking space”, “co-working space”, “coworking spaces” and “co-working spaces” and 324 articles published between 2012 and 2023 were found. The distribution of the analyzed articles according to years, languages, organizations, journals, Web of Science categories and indexes, sustainable development goals and countries of production are shared with tables and figures. In addition, the most frequently used keywords in the articles, the most cited articles, the linkage of the publications and the journals in which the publications are included according to the bibliographic matching analysis, the linkage status in the citation, journal and author co-citation network were visualized and interpreted through VOSviewer software.

Kaynakça

  • Bacevice, P., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2023). ‘It's like, instant respect’: Coworking spaces as identity anchoring environments in the new economy. New Technology, Work and Employment, 38(1), 59-81.
  • Berbegal-Mirabent, J. (2021). What do we know about co-working spaces? Trends and challenges ahead. Sustainability, 13, 1416.
  • Birleşmiş Milletler Türkiye. https://turkiye.un.org/tr/sdgs adresinden 03.02.2024 tarihinde erişildi.
  • Bouncken, R.B., Aslam, M.M., & Qiu, Y. (2021). Coworking spaces: Understanding, using, and managing sociomateriality. Business Horizons, 64(1), 119-130.
  • Carmel, E., & Sawyer, S. (2023). The multi-dimensional space of the futures of work. Information Technology & People, 36(1), 1-20.
  • Cheah, S., & Ho, Y-P. (2019). Coworking and sustainable business model innovation in young firms. Sustainability, 11(10), 2959.
  • Coworker.com. https://www.coworker.com adresinden 01.02.2024 tarihinde erişildi.
  • Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W.M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296.
  • Fu, Y., Mao, Y., Jiang, S., Luo, S., Chen, X., & Xiao, W. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in Ophthalmology. Frontiers in Medicine, 10.
  • Gandini, A. (2015). The rise of coworking spaces: A literature review. Ephemera Theory & Politics in Organization, 15(I), 193-205.
  • Konecka-Szydłowska, B., & Czupich, M. (2022). Coworking-A new entrepreneurship model in the sharing economy. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of regions], 18(1), 280-295.
  • Liao, H., Tang, M., Luo, L., Li, C., Chiclana, F., & Zeng, X.-J. (2018). A bibliometric analysis and visualization of medical big data research, Sustainability, 10, 166.
  • Lim, W.M., & Kumar, S. (2024). Guidelines for interpreting the results of bibliometric analysis: A sensemaking approach. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 43(2), 17-26.
  • Mariotti, I., & Di Matteo, D. (2022). Are coworkers in the Italian peripheral areas performing better? A counterfactual analysis. Sustainability, 14(1), 550.
  • Oswald, K., & Zhao, X. (2022). Collaborative learning and individual work performance in coworking spaces. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 23(1), 162-179.
  • Spinuzzi, C., Bodrozic, Z., Scaratti, G., & Ivaldi, S. (2019). “Coworking is about community”: But what is “community” in coworking?. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33(2) 112-140.
  • Spreitzer, G.M., Bacevice, P., & Garrett, L. (2015), Why people thrive in coworking spaces. Harvard Business Review, https://hbr.org/2015/05/why-people-thrive-in-coworking-spaces adresinden 02.02.2024 tarihinde erişildi.
  • Sweileh, W.M. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of peer-reviewed literature on climate change and human health with an emphasis on infectious diseases. Global Health, 16, 44.
  • Weijs-Perrée, M., Van de Koevering, J., Appel-Meulenbroek, R., & Arentze, T. (2019). Analysing user preferences for co-working space characteristics. Building Research & Information, 47(5), 534-548.
  • Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472.

Coworking Alan Literatürünün Bibliyometrik Analiz Yöntemi ile İncelenmesi

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 29, 125 - 142, 30.09.2024
https://doi.org/10.31455/asya.1496389

Öz

Paylaşım ekonomisinin öneminin gün geçtikçe artmasıyla ortak çalışma alanları olarak da ifade edilen coworking alanlar, dünyada olduğu gibi ülkemizde de çalışma hayatına giren kavramlardan biri hâline gelmiştir. Bir yandan teknoloji gelişirken bir yandan da işlerin yapılış şekilleri değişmekte, dolayısıyla çalışılan mekânlarda farklılığa gitmek bir zorunluluk hâline gelmektedir. Özellikle uzaktan çalışmanın, dijitalleşmenin ve teknolojik olanakların artmasıyla ofis dışında çalışma kültürü gelişmeye başlamıştır. Günümüzde evden çalışma daha fazla yaygın hâle gelse de bu durum iş-yaşam dengesi açısından birtakım dikkat dağıtıcı unsurları beraberinde getirmektedir. Ayrıca zamanla bireylerin bir topluluğa ait olma ihtiyacının ortaya çıkması alternatif ofis alanlarına başvurmalarını mümkün hâle getirmektedir. Bu kapsamda ortaya çıkan coworking alanlara ilişkin yapılan ilk akademik araştırmalar ise 2010’lu yıllarda başlamaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, coworking alanlar konusunda uluslararası literatürdeki makalelerin çeşitli parametrelere dayalı olarak bibliyometrik analizinin gerçekleştirilmesidir. Bu amaç çerçevesinde öncelikle, Web of Science (WoS) veri tabanında “coworking space”, “co-working space”, “coworking spaces” ve “co-working spaces” ifadeleriyle arama yapılmış, arama sonucunda 2012-2023 tarihleri arasında yayımlanan 324 makaleye ulaşılmıştır. İncelenen makalelerin; yıllara, üretildiği dillere, üretildiği kuruluşlara, yayımlandığı dergilere, Web of Science kategorileri ve indekslerine, sürdürülebilir kalkınma hedeflerine ve üretildiği ülkelere göre dağılımları tablolar ve şekiller ile paylaşılmıştır. Ayrıca makalelerde en sık kullanılan anahtar kelimeler, en çok atıf alan makaleler, yayınların ve yayınların yer aldığı dergilerin bibliyografik eşleştirme analizine göre bağlantısı, atıf, dergi ve yazar ortak atıf ağında bağlantı durumu VOSviewer yazılımı üzerinden görselleştirilerek yorumlanmıştır.

Kaynakça

  • Bacevice, P., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2023). ‘It's like, instant respect’: Coworking spaces as identity anchoring environments in the new economy. New Technology, Work and Employment, 38(1), 59-81.
  • Berbegal-Mirabent, J. (2021). What do we know about co-working spaces? Trends and challenges ahead. Sustainability, 13, 1416.
  • Birleşmiş Milletler Türkiye. https://turkiye.un.org/tr/sdgs adresinden 03.02.2024 tarihinde erişildi.
  • Bouncken, R.B., Aslam, M.M., & Qiu, Y. (2021). Coworking spaces: Understanding, using, and managing sociomateriality. Business Horizons, 64(1), 119-130.
  • Carmel, E., & Sawyer, S. (2023). The multi-dimensional space of the futures of work. Information Technology & People, 36(1), 1-20.
  • Cheah, S., & Ho, Y-P. (2019). Coworking and sustainable business model innovation in young firms. Sustainability, 11(10), 2959.
  • Coworker.com. https://www.coworker.com adresinden 01.02.2024 tarihinde erişildi.
  • Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W.M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296.
  • Fu, Y., Mao, Y., Jiang, S., Luo, S., Chen, X., & Xiao, W. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in Ophthalmology. Frontiers in Medicine, 10.
  • Gandini, A. (2015). The rise of coworking spaces: A literature review. Ephemera Theory & Politics in Organization, 15(I), 193-205.
  • Konecka-Szydłowska, B., & Czupich, M. (2022). Coworking-A new entrepreneurship model in the sharing economy. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of regions], 18(1), 280-295.
  • Liao, H., Tang, M., Luo, L., Li, C., Chiclana, F., & Zeng, X.-J. (2018). A bibliometric analysis and visualization of medical big data research, Sustainability, 10, 166.
  • Lim, W.M., & Kumar, S. (2024). Guidelines for interpreting the results of bibliometric analysis: A sensemaking approach. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 43(2), 17-26.
  • Mariotti, I., & Di Matteo, D. (2022). Are coworkers in the Italian peripheral areas performing better? A counterfactual analysis. Sustainability, 14(1), 550.
  • Oswald, K., & Zhao, X. (2022). Collaborative learning and individual work performance in coworking spaces. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 23(1), 162-179.
  • Spinuzzi, C., Bodrozic, Z., Scaratti, G., & Ivaldi, S. (2019). “Coworking is about community”: But what is “community” in coworking?. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33(2) 112-140.
  • Spreitzer, G.M., Bacevice, P., & Garrett, L. (2015), Why people thrive in coworking spaces. Harvard Business Review, https://hbr.org/2015/05/why-people-thrive-in-coworking-spaces adresinden 02.02.2024 tarihinde erişildi.
  • Sweileh, W.M. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of peer-reviewed literature on climate change and human health with an emphasis on infectious diseases. Global Health, 16, 44.
  • Weijs-Perrée, M., Van de Koevering, J., Appel-Meulenbroek, R., & Arentze, T. (2019). Analysing user preferences for co-working space characteristics. Building Research & Information, 47(5), 534-548.
  • Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472.
Toplam 20 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Örgütsel, Kişilerarası ve Kültürlerarası İletişim
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Burcu Akkaya 0000-0002-1624-2368

Gülşah Karavardar 0000-0001-9574-8190

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Eylül 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi 5 Haziran 2024
Kabul Tarihi 24 Ağustos 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 29

Kaynak Göster

APA Akkaya, B., & Karavardar, G. (2024). Coworking Alan Literatürünün Bibliyometrik Analiz Yöntemi ile İncelenmesi. Asya Studies, 8(29), 125-142. https://doi.org/10.31455/asya.1496389

88x31.png  Asya Studies dergisinde yer alan eserler Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.