ÇİN'İN KÜRESEL EKONOMİ VİZYONU VE BORÇ TUZAĞI SORUNU: KUŞAK VE YOL İNİSİYATİFİNİN BORÇ BAĞIMLILIĞI AÇISINDAN ANALİZİ

Yıl 2024, , 1 - 20, 26.06.2024

Mustafa Yıldıran Mustafa Alpin Gülşen

https://doi.org/10.58640/asyar.1450451

Öz

Bu çalışma Kuşak ve Yol İnisiyatifi ülkeleri için 2011-2019 döneminde Çin’e olan borç bağımlılığının düzeyini araştırmaktadır. Bu amaçla 65 İnisiyatif ülkesine ait 5 farklı borç oranı belirlenmiş ve borç bağımlılığı (veya tuzağı) endeksi geliştirilmiştir. Endeks kriterlerinin tutarlılığı, dinamik ve statik panel veri analizi ile test edilmiştir. Bulgulara göre 29 İnisiyatif ülkesinin dış borç ödeme kapasitesinde ihracatın ve ithalatın katkısı vardır. Çin’den yapılan ithalat/GSYH oranındaki artış büyümeyi %0,22; Çin’e yapılan ihracat/GSYH oranındaki artış büyümeyi %0,37 artırmaktadır. Ancak Çin’e olan dış borç yükündeki artış, büyümeyi %0,64 azaltmaktadır. Ek olarak Çin’e olan borç stokunun toplam borçlarındaki oranındaki artış, büyümeyi %0,36 negatif etkilemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kuşak ve Yol İnisiyatifi, Borç Tuzağı, Panel Analiz, Sabit Etkiler, Dinamik Sistem GMM

Kaynakça

• Aoyama, R. (2016). “One Belt, One Road: China’s New Global Strategy”. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies. 5 (2), 3-22.
• Bandiera, L. & Tsiropoulos, V. (2019). “A Framework to Assess Debt Sustainability and Fiscal Risks under The Belt and Road Initiative”. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. (8891), 1-56.
• Bastos, P. (2020). “Exposure of Belt and Road Economies to China Trade Shocks”. Journal of Development Economics. 145, 1-14.
• Becker, W.; Paruolo, P.; Saisana, M. & Saltelli, A. (2017). “Weights and Importance in Composite Indicators: Mind the Gap”. Handbook of Uncertainty Quantification. 1187-1216.
• Behuria, A. (2018). “How Sri Lanka Walked into a Debt Trap, and the Way Out”. Strategic Analysis. 42 (2), 168-178.
• Belt and Road Initiative. (2021). https://www.beltroad-initiative.com/institutions-and-mechanisms/ (e.t.: 01 February, 2021).
• Berksoy, T.; Mehmet, Ş. & Özge U. (2012). “Kamusal Beyaz Filler ve Kamu Özel Sektör Ortaklıkları”. Bankacılar. 23 (83), 77-97.
• Bhattacharyay, B. (2010). “Estimating Demand for Infrastructure in Energy, Transport, Telecommunications, Water and Sanitation in Asia and the Pacific: 2010-2020”. ADB Working Paper Series. 248, 1-44.
• Boulanger, P. (2014). Elements for a Comprehensive Assessment of Public Indicators. JRC Scientific and Policy Reports. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
• Chowdhury, K. (1994). “A Structural Analysis of External Debt and Economic Growth: Some Evidence from Selected Countries in Asia and the Pacific”. Applied Economics. 26 (12), 1121-1131.
• Chun, Z. (2017). “The Belt and Road Initiative and Global Governance in Transition”. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies. 3 (2), 175-191.
• Clements, B.; Bhattacharya, R. & Nguyen, T. Q. (2003). “External Debt, Public Investment and Growth in Low-income Countries”. IMF Working Paper. 1-25.
• Dünya Bankası. (2021). Wits. Worldbank, China Global Investment Tracker. (e.t.: 02 Şubat, 2021).
• Dünya Bankası. (2021). https://data.worldbank.org/ (e.t.: 05 Şubat, 2021).
• Eulerhermes. (2021). https://www.eulerhermes.com/en_global/economic-research/country-reports.html (e.t.: 05 February, 2021).
• Falcetti, E.; Lysenko, T. & Sanfey, P. (2006). “Reforms and Growth in Transition: Re-Examining the Evidence”. Journal of Comparative Economics. 34 (3), 421-445.
• Ferchen, M. & Perera, A. (2019). “Why Unsustainable Chinese Infrastructure Deals Are a Two-Way Street”. Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy. 1-6.
• Gao, B.; Li, J.; Shi, B. & Wang, X. (2020). “Internal Conflict and Bank Liquidity Creation: Evidence from the Belt and Road Initiative”. Research in International Business and Finance. 53, 1-10.
• Glasberg, D. S. & Ward, K. B. (1993). “Foreign Debt and Economic Growth in The World System”. Social Science Quarterly. 74 (4), 703-720.
• Hub, G. I. (2017). “Global Infrastructure Outlook”. Global Infrastructure Hub.
• He, C. (2018). “The Belt and Road Initiative as Global Public Good: Implications for International Law”.
• Normative Readings of The Belt and Road Initiative: Road to New Paradigms. 85-104.
• Hongcai, X. (2017). “The BRI is a Global Public Goods”, http://www.cciee.org.cn/Detail.aspx?newsId=13859&TId=231 (e.t.: 01 March, 2021).
• Hurley, J.; Morris, S. & Portelance, G. (2019). “Examining The Debt Implications of The Belt and Road Initiative from a Policy Perspective”. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development. 3(1), 139-175.
• Joshua, J. (2019). The Belt and Road Initiative and International Relations. In: The Belt and Road Initiative and the Global Economy. London: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
• Jung, J. Y.; Wang, W. & Cho, S. W. (2020). “The Role of Confucius Institutes and One Belt, One Road Initiatives on The Values of Cross-Border M&A: Empirical Evidence from China”. Sustainability. 12 (24), 1-20.
• Kaul, I.; Grunberg, I. & Stern, M. (1999). Global Public Goods. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Kuah, K. (2019). “China’s Soft Power: Culturalisation Along the Belt Road Corridors”. In: Silk Road to Belt Road. 129-145.
• Lai, K. P.; Lin, S. & Sidaway, J. D. (2020). “Financing the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI): Research Agendas beyond The “Debt-Trap” Discourse”. Eurasian Geography and Economics. 61 (2),109-124.
• Lien, D.; Oh, C. H. & Selmier, W. T. (2012). “Confucius Institute Effects on China’s Trade and FDI: Isn’t it Delightful When Folks Afar Study Hanyu?”. International Review of Economics & Finance. 21 (1), 147-155.
• Lien, D. & Co, C. Y. (2013). “The Effect of Confucius Institutes on US Exports to China: A State Level Analysis”. International Review of Economics & Finance. 27, 566-571.
• Lien, D. (2013). “Financial Effects of the Confucius Institute on Chinese Language Acquisition: Isn’t it Delightful that Friends come from Afar to Teach You Hanyu?”. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance. 24, 87-100.
• Mahadevan, R. & Suardi, S. (2008). “A Dynamic Analysis of the Impact of Uncertainty on İmport-and/or Export-Led Growth: The Experience of Japan and the Asian Tigers”. Japan and the World Economy. 20 (2), 155-174.
• Marantidou, V. (2014). “Revisiting China’s ‘String of Pearls’ Strategy: Places ‘With Chinese Characteristics’ and Their Security Implications”. Issues and Insights. 14 (7), 1-39.
• Neuman, L. W. (2017). Social Research Methods, 6/E. India: Pearson Education.
• OECD. (2017). “China’s Road Initiative in the Global Trade, Investment and Finance Landscape”, Business and Finance. Paris: OECD Publishing.
• OECD. (2017). Investing in Climate. Investing in Growth. Paris: OECD Publishing.
• Öztürk, İ. (2019). “The Belt and Road İnitiative As a Hybrid International Public Good”. Working Papers on East Asian Studies. 125, 1-37.
• Pattillo, C.; Helene P. & Luca R. (2004) “Through What Channels Does External Debt Affect Growth? [with Comments and Discussion]”. IMF Working Paper. 1-34.
• Schortgen, F. (2018). “China and the Twenty-First-Century Silk Roads: A New Era of Global Economic Leadership?”. China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Changing the Rules of Globalization. 17-33.
• Se, W. (2019). “Putting Sri Lanka’s Debt Issue into Perspective”, 收藏, Koleksiyonlar Dergisi (Colections Journal). 86-95.
• Shang, H. (2019). “The Belt and Road in History”. In: The Belt and Road Initiative: Key Concepts. 45-69.
• Soyres, F.; Mulabdic, A.; Murray, S.; Rocha, N. & Ruta, M. (2019). “How Much Will the Belt and Road Initiative Reduce Trade Costs?”. International Economics. 159, 151-164.
• Thangavelu, S. M. & Rajaguru, G. (2004). “Is There an Export or Import-Led Productivity Growth in Rapidly Developing Asian Countries? A Multivariate VAR Analysis”. Applied Economics. 36 (10), 1083-1093.
• Wang, H.; Han, Y.; Fidrmuc, J. & Wei, D. (2021). “Confucius Institute, Belt and Road Initiative, and Internationalization”. International Review of Economics & Finance. (71), 237-256.
• Woetzel, J., Garemo, N., Mischke, J., Kamra, P., & Palter, R. (2017). “Bridging İnfrastructure Gaps: Has the World Made Progress”, https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/operations/our-insights/bridging-infrastructure-gaps-has-the-world-made-progress (e.t.: 19 January, 2021).