FROM THE COLONY OF JAPAN TO THE SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE JAPANESE DEVELOPMENT MODEL: TRACES OF JAPAN IN THE DEVELOPMENTALIST POLITICAL ECONOMY OF SOUTH KOREA

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 41 - 54, 30.06.2022

Nilay Ökten Arzu Al

Öz

While this study examines the effect of the colonial past on post-independence institutions on the Japan-South Korea axis through the experience of developmentalist political economy, it focuses on the application of the Japanese development model in the post-independence political economy of South Korea, a former Japanese colony, and detects the traces of Japan in the country's political economy. An exemplary study was conducted on how the colonial heritage felt itself in the social and economic structures established during and after the new state building, and how Korea was built on this colonial legacy with independence that came after years of control by Japan, and to what extent the colonial history was influential in the country's political economy. Within the scope of this study, while focusing on Japan's legacy in the Korean political economy, it is also aimed to include a comparative political economy perspective of the study with references to the world colonial history. The study mainly identifies the Japanese heritage in the history of South Korea's political economy, and identifies the traces of Japan in the success of South Korea, which emulates Japanese developmentalism in post-independence political economy. While the legacy of the infrastructure of the colonial period remains in one place, a theoretical discussion is carried out on the Japanese model, whose traces we see in a different dimension in the political economy of South Korea, with the adoption of the developmentalist model of Japan after independence.

Anahtar Kelimeler

South Korea, Japanese Colonialism, Chaebols, Development, Political Economy

Kaynakça

• Akamatsu, K. (1962). A Historical Pattern of Economic Growth in Developing Countries. Journal of Developing Economies, Vol.1 No.1, 3-25.
• Akkemik, K. A. (2015). Çin'de Bir Finans Krizi Beklemeli Miyiz? Japonya'dan Alınacak Dersler. In K. A. Akkemik, & S. Ünay (Eds.), Doğu Asya'nın Politik Ekonomisi (p. 282-322). Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınevi.
• Akkemik, K. A., & Ünay, S. (2015). Doğu Asya'nın Politik Ekonomisi. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
• Anderson, P. (1976). The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review ı(100) November-December, 5-78.
• Arrighi, G. (March-April 2005). Hegemony Unravelling. New Left Review 32.
• Arrighi, G. (May-June 2005). HEGEMONY UNRAVELLING—2. New Left Review 33.
• Atay, E. (2015). Kore Aile Holdingleri: Chaeboller. In K. A. Akkemik, & S. Ünay (Eds.), Doğu Asya'nın Politik Ekonomisi (p. 197-225). Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınevi.
• Baran, P. A. (1973). The Political Economy of Growth. Penguin Books.
• Byres, T. (2009). Tarım ve Kalkınma. In F. Şenses, Neoliberal Küreselleşme ve Kalkınma (p. 387-430). İletişim.
• Chang, C. S., & Chang, N. J. (1994). The Korean Management System: Cultural, Political, Economic Foundations. Quorum Books.
• Chung, K. H., Lee, H. C., & Jung, K. H. (1997). Korean Management: Global Strategy and Cultural Transformation. Walter de Gruyter.
• Çakmak, N. S. (2015). Güney Kore Toprak Reformunun Ekonomi Politiği. Marmara Üniversitesi İİB Dergisi, Vol.37 No.1, 65-192.
• Ermağan, İ. (2016). Dünya Siyasetinde Doğu Asya. Nobel Yayıncılık.
• Evans, P. (1995). Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton University Press.
• Frank Jr., C. R., Kim, K. S., & Westphal, L. E. (1975). Foreign Trade Regimes and Economic Development: South Korea. NBER.
• Frank, A. G. (2010). Yeniden Doğu Asya Çağında Küresel Ekonomi. Transl. Kamil Kurtul. İmge Kitabevi.
• Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (1997). The Economics of Industrial Innovation. Pinter Publication.
• Gill, I. S., & Kharas, H. (2007). An East Asian Renaissance: Ideas for Economic Growth. World Bank Publications.
• Harvie, C., & Lee, H. (2003). Export Led Industrialisation and Growth – Korea’s Economic Miracle 1962-89. Department of Economics, University of Wollongong, Working Paper 03, 1-25.
• Holcombe, C. (2019). Doğu Asya Tarihi Çin, Japonya, Kore Medeniyetin Köklerinden 21. Yüzyıla Kadar. Transl. Muhammed Murtaza Özeren. Dergah Yayınları. 2nd Edition.
• Hunter, G. (1966). Southeast Asia Race, Culture and Nation. Oxford University Press.
• Jones, L., & SaKong, I. (1980). Government, Business, and Entrepreneurship in Economic Development: The Korean Case. Harvard University Asia Center.
• Kang, M.-h. (1996). The Korean business conglomerate: Chaebol then and now. University of California.
• Kim, B. (2010). Cultural forces and historical events to shape organizing principles in Korea: An exploratory perspective. Management Decision, Vol. 48 No. 5, 826-841.
• Kim, J.‐K. (2002). An estimation of the productive efficiency of chaebols of Korea and their reform. International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 29 No. 3, 172-186.
• Ohno, K. (2009). Avoiding the Middle-Income Trap: Renovating Industrial Policy Formulation in Vietnam. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, Vol. 26, No. 1, 25-43.
• Öniş, Z. (1996). “The State and Economic Development in Contemporary Turkey: Etatism to Neoliberalism and Beyond. In V. Mastny, & R. C. Nation, Turkey Between East and West: New Challenges for a Rising Reginal Power (p. 155-178). Westview Press.
• Rodrik, D. (2009). Tek Ekonomi Çok Reçete: Küreselleşme Kurumlar ve Ekonomik Büyüme, Transl. Neşenur Domaniç. Efil Yayınları.
• Schenoni, L. L. (2019). Hegemony. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. Oxford University Press and International Studies Association.
• Shin, J.-S. (1996). The Economics of the Latecomers: Catching-up, Technology Transfer and Institutions in Germany, Japan and South Korea. Routledge.
• Sönmez, A. (2003). Doğu Asya "Mucizesi" ve Bunalımı/Türkiye İçin Dersler. İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
• Sungur, N. (2000). Güney Kore Kalkınma Fırsatını Nasıl Yakaladı? Mülkiye, Vol.24 No.225, 119 - 124.
• Tiryakioğlu, M. (2015). Geç Kalkınma Yolunda Orta Gelir Tuzağı ve Doğu Asya'nın Ekonomi Politiğinden Dersler. In K. A. Akkemik, & S. Ünay (Eds.), Doğu Asya'nın Politik Ekonomisi (p. 37-59). Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınevi.
• Tiryakioğlu, M. (2015). Güney Kore'de Sanayi Politikasının Gelişimi: Öğrencilikten Öğretmenliğe Geçiş. In K. A. Akkemik, & S. Ünay (Eds.), Doğu Asya'nın Politik Ekonomisi (p. 226-237). Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınevi.
• Ünay, S. (2013). Kalkınmacı Modernlik. Küre Yayınları.
• Ünay, S. (2015). Savaş Sonrası Dönemde Türkiye-Japonya Ekonomi Politiklerine Bakış: Ulusal Kalkınmacılıktan Ulusal Rekabete. In K. A. Akkemik, & S. Ünay (Eds.), Doğu Asya'nın Politik Ekonomisi (p. 163-184). Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınevi.
• Vanden, H. E., & Prevost, G. (2002). Politics of Latin America: the power game. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Varlı, İ. (2018). Hegemonya Savaşı. Destek Yayınları.
• Wade, R. H. (2003). What Strategies are Viable for Developing Countries Today? Review of International Political Economy, Vol.10 No.4, 621-644.
• Wallerstein, I. (2003). Liberalizmden Sonra. İstanbul: Metis Yayıncılık.
• Woo-Cumings, M. (1999). The Developmental State. Cornell University Press.
• Yeldan, E. (2010). İktisadi Büyüme ve Bölüşüm Teorileri. Efil Yayınevi.