Uluslararası Turizm Araştırmalarında Türkiye’nin Yeri

Yıl 2019, , 45 - 57, 23.10.2019

Dilek Acar , Esra Gül Yılmaz

https://doi.org/10.17123/atad.636748

Cited By: 1

Öz

Bilimsel gelişmede ulusal koşullar önemli belirleyicilerdir. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’nin uluslararası turizm araştırmalarındaki yeri, SSCI’de yer alan Türkiye adresli makaleler aracılığı ile incelenmektedir. Bu çerçevede 1989-2018 yıllarında arasında yayınlanmış olan 330 makale tespit edilmiş, ilişkisel ve değerlendirici genel bibliyometrik parametrelerle analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmanın önemli sonuçlarına göre, SSCI’de yer alan Türkiye adresli makalelerin sayısı 2016’dan itibaren hızla artmaya başlamıştır. 330 makalenin yaklaşık yarısı Türkiye’den iki kurum ve 10 araştırmacı tarafından üretilmiştir, 120 makalenin yabancı kurumlardaki yazarlarla ortak üretilmesi, uluslararası işbirliklerinin önemini göstermektedir. Anahtar kelime analizine göre, makalelerin çoğunda Türkiye ve otel, ağırlama, yönetim ve insan kaynakları ile ilgili sözcüklerin kullanıldığı görülmüştür. Son olarak, araştırmaların yaklaşık dörtte üçünde nicel veriye dayalı desenlemeden yararlanıldığı gözlenmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Turizm araştırmaları, Uluslararası turizm araştırmaları, Ortak yazarlık, SSCI, Bibliyometri

Position of Turkey within the International Tourism Research

Öz

The national factors are the key determinants in the scientific development of a community. This study aims to analyse the position of Turkey within the international tourism research through its articles indexed in SSCI. In this context, the study determines 330 articles published between 1989-2019 and analyses using relational and evaluative bibliometric parameters. The important results of this study are the tourism articles addressed to Turkey and indexed in SSCI have been in an increase since 2016. Approximately half of the articles were published by two institutions and 10 researchers from Turkey. Co-authorship with researchers in foreign institutions within 120 articles points out the significant role of international collaboration. In addition, the mostly used keywords were Turkey, hotel, hospitality, management and human resources. Finally, 75 per cent of the articles were designed by quantitative methods.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tourism research, International tourism research, Co-authorship, SSCI, Bibliometry

Kaynakça

• Asan, A. (2017). Uluslararası Bilimsel Dergi İndeksleri, Önemleri ve Türkiye Kaynaklı Dergilerin Durumu: Bölüm 2: Türkiye’deki Durum, Acta Medical Alanya, 1(1): 43-54.
• Bao, J., Chen, G. ve Jin, X. (2018) China Tourism Research: A Review of Publications from Four Top International Journals, Journal of China Tourism Research, 14 (1): 1-19.
• Benckendorff, P. ve Zehrer, A. (2013). A Network Analysis of Tourism Research, Annals of Tourism Research, 43: 121-149.
• Cheng, C.K., Li, X(R), Petrick, J.F. ve O’Leary, J.T. (2011). An Examination of Tourism Journal Development, Tourism Management, 32 (1): 53-61.
• Cunill, O. M., Salva, A. S., Gonzalez, L. O. ve Forteza, C.M. (2019). Thirty-Fifth Anniversary of the International Journal of Hospitality Management: A Bibliometric Overview, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 78: 89-101.
• Gearing, C.E., Var, T. ve Swart, W.W. (1972). A Decision Structure for Touristic Investment Allocations, The Tourist Review, 1 (Ocak/Mart): 2-13.
• Hall, C. M. (2011). Publish and Perish? Bibliometric Analysis, Journal Ranking and the Assessment of Research Quality in Tourism. Tourism Management, 32: 16–27.
• Hennemann, S., Rybski, S. ve Liefner, I. (2012). The Myth of Global Science Collaboration, Journal of Informetrics, 6 (2): 217-225.
• Hicks, D. (1999). The Difficulty of Achieving Full Coverage of International Social Science Literature and the Bibliometrick Conseqences, Scientomterics, 44 (2): 193-215.
• Huang, (S). S. (2012). Similar Exercises, Different Consequences: An Examination of Tourism Research in National Research Assessment Frameworks, Tourism Management Perspectives, 2 (3): 13-18.
• Huang S. (S.) ve Chen, G. (2016). Current State of Tourism Research in China, Tourism Management Perspectives, 20: 10-18.
• Huang S. (S.) ve Hsu, C. H. C. (2008). Recent Tourism and Hospitality Research in China, International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration, 9 (3): 267-287.
• Korzay, M. (1986). The Ultimate Constraint Tourism Labor Force, Annals of Tourism Research, (13): 1: 118-118.
• Kozak, N. (1995a). Türkiye Turizm Araştırmalarının Neresinde?, Anatolia Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6: 3.
• Kozak, N. (1995b). Türkiye’de Yayımlanan Turizm Konulu Makaleler Üzerine Bir İnceleme, Anatolia Dergisi, 6: 62-72.
• Kozak, N. (2000). Türkiye’de Akademik Turizm Literatürünün Gelişim Süreci Üzerine Bir İnceleme, Doğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1 (1): 15-58.
• Kozak, M. ve Kozak, N. (2016) Institutionalisation of Tourism Research and Education: From the Early 1900s to 2000s, Journal of Tourism History, 8 (3): 275-299.
• Köseoğlu, M. A., Rahimi, R., Okumuş, F. ve Liu, J. (2016). Bibliometric Studies in Tourism, Annals of Tourism Research, 61: 180-198.
• Köseoğlu, M.A., Şehitoğlu, Y. ve Craft, I. (2015a). Academic Foundations of Hospitality Management Research with an Emerging Country Focus: A Citation and Co-Citation Analysis, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 45: 130-144.
• Köseoğlu, M.A., Şehitçioğlu, Y. ve Parnelld, J.A. (2015b). A Bibliometric Analysis of Scholarly Work in Leading Tourism and Hospitality Journals: The Case of Turkey, Anatolia: An International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 26 (3): 359-371.
• Liu, J.Y. (2014). “Problems, Strategies, and Impact of SSCI Publication in English. İçinde C.P. Chou (Editör). The SSCI Syndrome in Higher Education: Comparative and International Education. Rotterdam: Sense Pub.
• Liu, W., Hu, G., Tang, L. ve Wang, Y. (2015). China’s Global Growth in Social Science Research: Uncoveringevidence from Bibliometric Analyses of SSCI Publications (1978-2013), Journal of Informetrics, 9: 555-569.
• Olalı, H. (1973). La Tourisma Consider Comme un Facteur da Rapprochement et D’entents Internaionaux. Revus de L’Academie Internationals du Tourisme.
• Reid, L. J., ve Andereck, K. (1989). Statistical Analyses Use in Tourism Research, Journal of Travel Research, 28 (2): 21-24.
• Tsang, N.K.F. ve Hsu, C.H.C. (2011). Thirty Years of Research on Tourism and Hospitality Management in China: A Review and Analysis of Journal Publications, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30 (4): 886-896.
• TÜBİTAK (2005). Bilim ve Teknoloji Yüksek Kurulu Onbirinci Toplantısı-10 Mart 2005. http://www.tubitak.gov.tr/tubitak_content_files/BTYPD/btyk/11/11btyk_karar.pdf, Erişim tarihi: 21 Şubat 2019.
• Sun, Y., Wei, Y. ve Zhang, L. (2017). International Academic Impact of Chinese Tourism Research: A Review Based on the Analysis of SSCI Tourism Articles from 2001 to 2012, Tourism Management, 58: 245-252.
• Uysal, M. ve Crompton, J. L. (1984a). Determinants of Demand for International Tourist Flows to Turkey, Tourism Management, 5 (4): 288-297.
• Uysal, M. ve Crompton, J. L. (1984b). Identification of Key Variables Explaining International Tourist Flows to Turkey and Suggessted Policy Implications, Journal of Turkish Economy and Tourism, 2 (4): 7-15.
• Üsdiken, B. ve Pasadeos, Y. (1992). Türkiye’de Örgütler ve Yönetim Yazını, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 26 (2): 73-93.
• Weiner, G. (2001). The Academic Journal: Has it a Future?, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 9 (9): 1-19.
• Wu, B., Xiao, H., Dong, X., Wang, M. ve Xue, L. (2012). Tourism Knowledge Domains: A Keyword Analysis, Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 17 (4): 355-380.
• Xiao, H. ve Smith, S.J. (2006). The Maturation of Tourism Research: Evidence from a Content Analysis, Tourism Analysis 10 (4): 335-348.
• Xin, S., Tirbe, J. ve Chambers, D. (2013). Conceptual Research in Tourism, Annals of Tourism Research, 41: 66-83.
• Zupic, I. ve Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization, Organizational Research Methods, 18(3): 429-472.