Kolektı̇f Hafızanın İzlerı̇: Zeve Şehı̇tlerı̇ Anıtı’nın Paylaşılan Anlamlarının İncelenmesi

Öz

Bu araştırma, Zeve Şehitleri Anıtı’nı kolektif bellek oluşturan ve şekillendiren bir bağlama oturtarak anıtla ilgili sosyal temsillerin içeriğini ve yapısını mercek altına almaktadır. Çalışmaya toplam 481 üniversite öğrencisi katılmıştır (Kadın = 341; Erkek = 140). Zeve Şehitleri Anıtı ile ilgili temsillerin içeriğini ve yapısını keşfetmek için katılımcılardan “Zeve Şehitleri Anıtı” denildiğinde kendiliğinden akıllarına gelen ilk dört kelimeyi yazmaları istenmiştir. Daha sonra, katılımcılar bu kelimeleri kendileri için önem derecesine göre sıralayarak hiyerarşik çağrışım verileri elde edilmiştir. Kelime çağrışım testi verileri IRAMUTEQ programı aracılığıyla prototip analizi ve benzerlik analizine tabi tutulmuştur. Bu karma desenli çalışmanın sonuçları, anıtla ilgili temsillerin a) ulusal ve dini sembollerin kullanımı yoluyla hayatta kalmayı ve trajediyi anlamlandırdığını, b) yaşanan trajediyle ilişkili katliam ve üzüntü gibi olumsuz deneyimleri vurguladığını ve c) gruplar arası dinamikler yerine grup içi süreçlere daha fazla odaklandığını ortaya koymaktadır. Bu paylaşılan anlamların kişisel ve grup düzeyindeki işlevleri kapsamlı bir şekilde incelenmiştir. Bu sonuçlar sosyal temsiller ve kolektif bellek literatürüne katkıda bulunmakta ve insan deneyimini zenginleştirmek için Zeve Şehitleri Anıtı’nın yeniden bağlamsallaştırılmasının önemini vurgulamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Anıt
• kolektif bellek
• sosyal temsiller
• Van
• Türkiye

Proje Numarası

SYD-2023-1 0607

Traces of Collective Memory: Exploring the Shared Meanings of the Zeve Martyrs’ Memorial

Öz

In this study, we examined the Zeve Martyrs’ Memorial as a collective memory builder and shaper, exploring the content and structure of shared meanings surrounding the memorial. A total of 481 university students participated in the study (Female = 341; Male = 140). To explore the content and structure of representations related to the Zeve Martyrs’ Memorial, participants were instructed to spontaneously write down the first four words that came to mind when prompted with “the Zeve Martyrs’ Memorial.” They then ranked these words based on free association, providing hierarchical association data. The word association test data were subjected to prototype analysis and similarity analysis using the IRAMUTEQ program. The results of this mixed-design study reveal that the shared meanings associated with the Zeve Martyrs’ Memorial are as follows: a) underscore the endurance of the tragedy through national and religious symbols; b) accentuate negative experiences within the tragedy; and c) exhibit a greater focus on intragroup processes than intergroup processes. Thorough examination of the personal- and group-level functions of these shared meanings is given. Both sets of results contribute to the literature on social representation and collective memory and underscore the importance of recontextualizing the Zeve Martyrs’ Memorial to enrich human experience.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• memorial
• collective memory
• social representations
• Van
• Türkiye

Destekleyen Kurum

This study was conducted within the scope of a research project funded by Van Yüzüncü Yıl University titled “A Memorial on the Border of Remembering and Forgetting: The Zeve Martyrs’ Memorial.” (Project No: SYD-2023-1 0607).

Proje Numarası

SYD-2023-1 0607

Etik Beyan

Ethics committee approval was secured from Van Yuzuncu Yil University (16/03/2023, No: 14826).

Teşekkür

None

Kaynakça

1. Aşur, F., Aydın, Ü., & Alp, Ş. (2023). Investigation and development of landscape design proposal for Van Zeve Martyrdom area as a cultural heritage. In K. Günçe, & D. Mısırlısoy (Eds.), Architectural sciences and cultural heritage–traces of the history (pp. 106–138). Iksad Publications.
2. Bar-Tal, D. (2007). Sociopsychological foundations of intractable conflicts. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(11), 1430–1453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764207302462
3. Bar-Tal, D. (2014). Collective Memory as social representations. Papers on Social Representations, 23(1), 5.1–5.26.
4. Beckstead, Z., Twose, G., Levesque-Gottlieb, E., & Rizzo, J. (2011). Collective remembering through the materiality and organization of war memorials. Journal of Material Culture, 16(2), 193–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183511401494
5. Billig, M. (1995). Banal nationalism. Sage Publications.
6. Cryder, C. E., Lerner, J. S., Gross, J. J., & Dahl, R. E. (2008). Misery is not miserly: Sad and self-focused individuals spend more. Psychological Science, 19(6), 525–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02118.x
7. Çelik, H. (2016). Acı bir tarihin canlı şahitleri: Mezalimi görenler anlatıyor [Living Witnesses of a Painful History: Eyewitness Accounts of the Massacre]. In görenlerin gözü ile Van’da Ermeni mezâlimi (6. ed.) [Eyewitness Accounts: Armenian Atrocities in Van, 6th ed.] (pp. 47–161). Cedit Neşriyat.
8. Çoksan, S., & Üzümçeker, E. (2023). Nitel verinin elde edilme sürecinde temel nitelikler [Basic Qualities in the Process of Obtaining Qualitative Data]. In H. Peker-Dural, & M. Karasu (Eds.), Nitel araştırma yöntemleri: psikoloji uygulama örnekleriyle [Qualitative Research Methods with Application Examples in Psychology] (pp. 54–86). Nobel.

9. Dany, L., Urdapilleta, I., & Lo Monaco, G. (2015). Free associations and social representations: some reflections on rank- frequency and importance-frequency methods. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 49(2), 489–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0005-z
10. Duncan, C. R. (2009). Monuments and Martyrdom: Memorializing the dead in post–conflict North Maluku. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 165(4), 429–458. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-90003628
11. Ekman, P. (1992). Are there basic emotions? Psychological Review, 99(3), 550–553. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033- 295X.99.3.550
12. Ekman, P. (2007). Emotions revealed: Recognizing faces and feelings to improve communication and emotional life (2nd ed.). Macmillan.
13. Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Pyszczynski, T. (1997). Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: Empirical assessments and conceptual refinements. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol 29) (pp. 61–139). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60016-7
14. Halbwachs, M. (1980). The collective memory (F. J. Didder Jr, & V. Y. Ditter, Trans.). Harper & Row. Hirst, W., & Manier, D. (2008). Towards a psychology of collective memory. Memory, 16(3), 183–200.
15. Kahramanmaraş earthquake of 2023 (2024, January 28). In Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/event/2023–Turkey–Syria–earthquake
16. Kansteiner, W. (2002). Finding meaning in memory: A methodological critique of collective memory studies. History and Theory, 41(2), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/0018-2656.00198
17. Karasu, M., & Göregenli, M. (2017). Disclosure of subjectivity in Armenian issue: A Q methodology study. In D. Kökdemir, & Z. Yeniçeri (Eds.), 1st Social Psychology Congress Proceedings (pp. 355–366). Başkent University.
18. Kaşdarma, E. (2020). “Namuslu Kadın” ile “Namuslu Erkek” Temsillerinin Kalıpyargı İçeriği Modeline Entegre Edilmesi ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet Kalıpyargılarının Sistemi Meşrulaştırıcı İşlevinin İncelenmesi [The Integration of “Honorable Woman” and “Honorable Man” Representations into the Stereotype Content Model and Examination of the System– Justifying Function of the Gender Stereotypes]. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Bursa Uludağ University.
19. Kentel, F., & Poghosyan, G. (2005). Ermenistan ve Türkiye vatandaşları karşılıklı algılama ve diyalog projesi [Mutual Perception and Dialogue Project Between Citizens of Armenia and Türkiye]. TESEV Publishing.
20. King, A. (1998). Sacred Union. In Memorials of The Great War in Britain: The Symbolism and Politics of Remembrance (pp.216–245). Bloomsbury Publishing.
21. Kinnvall, C. (2004). Globalization and religious nationalism: Self, identity, and the search for ontological security. Political Psychology, 25(5), 741–767. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00396.x
22. Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., & Weber, E. U. (2013). The Financial Costs of Sadness. Psychological Science, 24(1), 72–79.
23. Lo Monaco, G., Piermattéo, A., Rateau, P., & Tavani, J. L. (2017). Methods for studying the Structure of Social Representations: A critical review and agenda for future research. The Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 47(3), 306–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12124
24. Maia, V. L. L. B., Lago, E. C., Ramos, C. V., Fernandes, M. A., Alves, E. L. M., Batista, P. M. S., ... & Cronemberger, G. L. (2017). Similarity analysis about the training of family health strategy professionals for the psychosocial care of the elderly. International Archives of Medicine, 10, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3823/2501
25. Marschall, S. (2008). Pointing to the dead: Victims, martyrs and public memory in South Africa. South African Historical Journal, 60(1),103–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/02582470802287745
26. Mercan, S. (2016). Arşiv belgelerinde Van Ermeni isyanları [Armenian Rebellions in Van According to Archival Documents]. Gece Kitaplığı.
27. Moscovici, S. (1963). Attitudes and Opinions. Annual Review of Psychology, 14, 231– 260.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.14.020163.001311
28. Moscovici, S. (1973). Foreword. In C. Herzlich (Ed.), Health and Illness: A Social Psychological Analysis (pp. ix-xiv). Academic Press.
29. Moscovici, S. (1981). On social representation. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Social Cognition: Perspectives on Everyday Understanding (pp. 181–209). Academic Press.
30. Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. M. Farr, & S. Moscovici (Ed.), Social Representations (pp. 3–69). Cambridge University Press.
31. Moscovici, S. (1988). Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 211-250. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180303
32. Moscovici, S. (2000). The phenomenon of social representations. In G. Duveen (Ed.), Social Representations: Explorations in Social Psychology (pp. 18–77). Polity Press.
33. Mosse, G. L. (1990). Fallen soldiers: Reshaping the memory of the World Wars. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195071399.001.0001
34. Okray, Z., & Şimşek, A. H. (2018). Anıtların göstergebilimsel analizi: KKTC öncesi ve sonrası [Semiotic Analysis of Monuments: Before and After TRNC]. Kıbrıs Araştırmaları ve İncelemeleri Dergisi, 2(3), 7–20.
35. Özdoğan, G. G., & Kılıçdağı, O. (2012). Türkiye Ermenilerini duymak: Sorunlar, talepler ve çözüm önerileri [Hearing Armenians of Türkiye: Problems, Demands and Policy Suggestions]. TESEV Publishing.
36. Özkan Demir, K. (2022). Kadın Üniversite öğrencilerinin değer yönelimleri ve sosyal temsillerinin değişim olasılıkları: Barış ve savaş üzerine odak grup tartışmalarına katılımın etkisi [Possibilities of Change in Value Orientations and Social Representations of Women University Students: The Effect of Participation in Focus Group Discussions on Peace and War]. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Bursa Uludağ University.
37. Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Culture and Tourism. (2022). Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Van Kültür Varlıklarını Koruma Bölge Kurulu Kararı [Ministry of Culture and Tourism Van Cultural Heritage Conservation Regional Board Decision]. Van, Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı.https://korumakurullari.ktb.gov.tr/Eklenti/96922,12–van–ili–tusba–ilcesi–zeve–sehitligi– tescil–guncellem–.pdf?0
38. Rivers, S. E. (2005). Discrete emotions in emotion regulation: The case of anger and sadness [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Yale University.
39. Sargın, İ. (1990). Zeve katliamından kurtuluşum [My Survival from the Zeve Massacre]. In Proceedings of Van International Symposium in Our Recent History (pp. 39–41). Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Yayınları Nu: 6.
40. Selimovic, J. M. (2013). Making peace, making memory: Peacebuilding and politics of remembrance at memorials of mass atrocities. Peacebuilding, 1(3), 334–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2013.813175
41. Storeide, A. H. (2022). “It no longer is the same place”: Exploring realities in the memorial falstad centre with the “Falstad Digital Reconstruction and V/AR Guide.” In D. I. Popescu (Ed.), Visitor experience at Holocaust Memorials and Museums (pp. 119–132). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003220626-11
42. Süslü, A. (1990). Van-Zeve’deki Türk katliamı [Massacre of Turks in Zeve]. In Proceedings of Van International Symposium in Our Recent History (pp. 27–35). Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Yayınları
43. Süslü, A. (2012). Diplomaside, tarihte dostluk: Türk–Ermeni ilişkileri [Friendship in Diplomacy and History: Turkish–Armenian Relations]. Belgi Dergisi, 4, 458–470.
44. Uras, E. (1976). Tarihte Ermeniler ve Ermeni meselesi [Armenians in History and the Armenian Issue]. Belge Yayınları.
45. Van YYÜ Rectorate. (1990). Neden katliam seksiyonu? [Why the Massacre Section?]. In Proceedings of Van International Symposium in Our Recent History (pp. 341–354). Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Yayınları Nu: 6. Van’ı Tanıma ve Tanıtma Cemiyeti [The Society for Recognizing and Promoting Van]. (1963). Zeve. Van’ı Tanıma ve Tanıtma Cemiyeti Yayınları, No: 2.
46. Viejo-Rose, D. (2011). Memorial functions: Intent, impact and the right to remember. Memory Studies, 4(4), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698011411367
47. Wagner, W., & Hays, N. (2005). Everyday discourse and common sense: The theory social representations. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07263-4
48. Wasserman, J. R. (1998). To trace the shifting sands: Community, ritual, and the memorial landscape. Landscape Journal, 17, 42–61. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.17.1.42
49. Watkins, N., Cole, F., & Weidemann, S. (2010). The war memorial as healing environment: the psychological effect of the Vietnam veterans memorial on Vietnam war combat veterans’ posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms. Environment and Behavior, 42(3), 351–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916510361873
50. Xu, H., & Jin, S. (2022). A Study on the relationship between red memorial landscape perception, collective memory, and identity-take the martyrs monument as an example. Journal of Innovation and Social Science Research, 9(1), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.53469/jissr.2022.09(01).18
51. Ysseldyk, R., Matheson, K., & Anisman, H. (2010). Religiosity as identity: Toward an understanding of religion from a social identity perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309349693
52. Zittoun, T. (2004). Memorials and semiotic dynamics. Culture & Psychology, 10(4), 477–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X04045748