ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PERI-IMPLANT DISEASES AND CEMENT-RETAINED PROSTHESIS: A REVIEW

Fatih Karaaslan; Mithat Terzi

doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.290575

ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PERI-IMPLANT DISEASES AND CEMENT-RETAINED PROSTHESIS: A REVIEW

Öz

Dental implants are used treatment of partial and total edentulousness. Although implants have long-term success, some problems such as peri-implant diseases can occur around the peri-implant tissues. Peri-implant diseases can considered to result in loss of peri-implant bone and osseintegration that effects the long-term succes of dental implants.

Cement-retained restorations are prefered by clinicans because their cementation likes traditional crown cementation. However, cement-retained implant restorations can associate with peri-implant diseases because of involving risk of residual cement. Residual cement in peri-implant mucosa causes bleeding on probing and suppuration, and inflammation can progress the bone then the peri-implant bone loss can occur.

In this review the role of cemented implant restorations in the formation of peri-implant diseases were evaluated and it is tried to explain the impact of residuel cement.

Key Words: cement, peri-implant diseases, cement-retained prosthesis

PERİ-İMPLANT HASTALIKLAR İLE SİMANTE PROTEZLER ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: DERLEME

ÖZ

Dental implantlar parsiyel ve total dişsizliklerin tedavisinde kullanılmaktadır. İmplantlar uzun dönem başarıya sahip olmalarına rağmen, peri-implant hastalıklar gibi bazı problemler gözlenebilir. Peri-implant hastalıklarda kemik ile osseointegrasyon kaybı gözlenir ve bu durum implantların uzun dönem başarısını etkilemektedir.

Simante edilen implant restorasyonlar, simantasyon prosedürlerinin geleneksel kronlara benzemesinden dolayı klinisyenler tarafından tercih edilmektedir. Bununla birlikte simante edilen implant restorasyonlar, artık simandan dolayı peri-implant hastalıklara neden olabilmektedir. Artık siman, sondalamada kanama ile süpürasyona neden olabilmekte ve enflamasyonun ilerlemesiyle kemik kaybı meydana gelebilmektedir.

Bu derlemede simante implant restorasyonların peri-implant hastalıkların oluşmasındaki rolü değerlendirilmiş ve artık simanın etkileri anlatılmaya çalışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler: siman, peri implant hastalıklar, simante protezler

Anahtar Kelimeler

cement,peri-implant diseases

Kaynakça

. Aglietta M, Siciliano VI, Zwahlen M, Bragger U, Pjetursson BE, Lang NP, Salvi GE. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extensions after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009, 20: 441-51.
2. Mombelli A, Lang NP. The diagnosis and treatment of peri-implantitis. Periodontol 2000 1998, 17: 63-76.
3. Lindhe J, Meyle J. Peri-implant diseases: Consensus Report of the Sixth European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2008, 35: 282-5.
4. Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Marinello C, Ericsson I, Liljenberg B. Soft tissue reaction to de novo plaque formation on implants and teeth. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992, 3: 1-8.
5. Pontoriero R, Tonelli MP, Carnevale G, Mombelli A, Nyman SR, Lang NP. Experimentally induced peri-implant mucositis. A clinical study in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994, 5: 254-9.
6. Lang NP, Wilson TG, Corbet EF. Biological complications with dental implants: their prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000, 11 Suppl 1: 146-55.
7. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986, 1: 11-25.
8. Sanz M, Chapple IL. Clinical research on peri-implant diseases: consensus report of Working Group 4. J Clin Periodontol 2012, 39 Suppl 12: 202-6.

9. Salvi GE, Aglietta M, Eick S, Sculean A, Lang NP, Ramseier CA. Reversibility of experimental peri-implant mucositis compared with experimental gingivitis in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012, 23: 182-90.
10. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II). Etiopatho- genesis Eur J Oral Sci 1998, 106: 721-64.
Trejo PM, Bonaventura G, Weng D, Caffesse RG, Bragger U, Lang NP. Effect of mechanical and antiseptic therapy on peri-implant mucositis: an experimental study in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006, 17: 294-304.
12. Porras R, Anderson GB, Caffesse R, Narendran S, Trejo PM. Clinical response to 2 different therapeutic regimens to treat peri-implant mucositis. J Periodontol 2002, 73: 1118-25.
13. Maximo MB, de Mendonca AC, Renata Santos V, Figueiredo LC, Feres M, Duarte PM. Short-term clinical and microbiological evaluations of peri-implant diseases before and after mechanical anti-infective therapies. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009, 20: 99-108.
14. Strooker H, Rohn S, Van Winkelhoff AJ. Clinical and microbiologic effects of chemical versus mechanical cleansing in professional supportive implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998, 13: 845-50.
15. Nociti FH, Jr., Cesco De Toledo R, Machado MA, Stefani CM, Line SR, Goncalves RB. Clinical and microbiological evaluation of ligature-induced peri-implantitis and periodontitis in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001, 12: 295-300.
16. Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Lang NP. Comparative biology of chronic and aggressive periodontitis vs. peri-implantitis. Periodontol 2000, 2010, 53: 167-81.
17. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci 1998, 106: 527-51.
18. Renvert S, Samuelsson E, Lindahl C, Persson GR. Mechanical non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: a double-blind randomized longitudinal clinical study. I: clinical results. J Clin Periodontol 2009, 36: 604-9.
19. Karring ES, Stavropoulos A, Ellegaard B, Karring T. Treatment of peri-implantitis by the Vector system. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005, 16: 288-93.
20. Renvert S, Polyzois I, Claffey N. Surgical therapy for the control of peri-implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012, 23 Suppl 6: 84-94
Korsch M, Obst U, Walther W. Cement-associated peri-implantitis: a retrospective clinical observational study of fixed implant-supported restorations using a methacrylate cement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014, 25: 797-802.
32. Weber HP, Kim DM, Ng MW, Hwang JW, Fiorellini JP. Peri-implant soft-tissue health surrounding cement- and screw-retained implant restorations: a multi-center, 3-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006, 17: 375-9.
33. Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Peciuliene V. The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement-retained implant restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011, 22: 1379-84.
34. Lindhe J, Berglundh T. The interface between the mucosa and the implant. Periodontol 2000, 1998, 17: 47-54.
35. Keller W, Bragger U, Mombelli A. Peri-implant microflora of implants with cemented and screw retained suprastructures. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998, 9: 209-17.
36. Piattelli A, Scarano A, Paolantonio M, Assenza B, Leghissa GC, Di Bonaventura G, Catamo G, Piccolomini R. Fluids and microbial penetration in the internal part of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-abutment connections. J Periodontol 2001, 72: 1146-50.
37. Nissan J, Narobai D, Gross O, Ghelfan O, Chaushu G. Long-term outcome of cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported partial restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011, 26: 1102-7.
38. Agar JR, Cameron SM, Hughbanks JC, Parker MH. Cement removal from restorations luted to titanium abutments with simulated subgingival margins. J Prosthet Dent, 1997, 78: 43-7.
39. Dumbrigue HB, Abanomi AA, Cheng LL. Techniques to minimize excess luting agent in cement-retained implant restorations. J Prosthet Dent, 2002, 87: 112-4.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Bölüm

Derleme

Yazarlar

Fatih Karaaslan

Mithat Terzi Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

24 Kasım 2016

Gönderilme Tarihi

1 Şubat 2016

Kabul Tarihi

8 Haziran 2016

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2016

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.290575

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA22FA38DP

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Karaaslan, F., & Terzi, M. (2016). ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PERI-IMPLANT DISEASES AND CEMENT-RETAINED PROSTHESIS: A REVIEW. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 80-84. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.290575

AMA

1.Karaaslan F, Terzi M. ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PERI-IMPLANT DISEASES AND CEMENT-RETAINED PROSTHESIS: A REVIEW. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. Published online 01 Kasım 2016:80-84. doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.290575

Chicago

Karaaslan, Fatih, ve Mithat Terzi. 2016. “ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PERI-IMPLANT DISEASES AND CEMENT-RETAINED PROSTHESIS: A REVIEW”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Kasım 1, 80-84. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.290575.

EndNote

Karaaslan F, Terzi M (01 Kasım 2016) ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PERI-IMPLANT DISEASES AND CEMENT-RETAINED PROSTHESIS: A REVIEW. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 80–84.

IEEE

[1]F. Karaaslan ve M. Terzi, “ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PERI-IMPLANT DISEASES AND CEMENT-RETAINED PROSTHESIS: A REVIEW”, Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg, ss. 80–84, Kas. 2016, doi: 10.17567/ataunidfd.290575.

ISNAD

Karaaslan, Fatih - Terzi, Mithat. “ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PERI-IMPLANT DISEASES AND CEMENT-RETAINED PROSTHESIS: A REVIEW”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 01 Kasım 2016. 80-84. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.290575.

JAMA

1.Karaaslan F, Terzi M. ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PERI-IMPLANT DISEASES AND CEMENT-RETAINED PROSTHESIS: A REVIEW. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2016;:80–84.

MLA

Karaaslan, Fatih, ve Mithat Terzi. “ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PERI-IMPLANT DISEASES AND CEMENT-RETAINED PROSTHESIS: A REVIEW”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Kasım 2016, ss. 80-84, doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.290575.

Vancouver

1.Fatih Karaaslan, Mithat Terzi. ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PERI-IMPLANT DISEASES AND CEMENT-RETAINED PROSTHESIS: A REVIEW. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 01 Kasım 2016;80-4. doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.290575