Farklı oral hijyen motivasyon yöntemlerinin sabit ortodontik tedavi gören bireylerin

Öz

Purpose: Various oral hygiene motivation methods were proposed to prevent periodontal diseases and caries before and during the orthodontic therapy. In this study, it was aimed to compare the effects of two different oral hygiene motivation methods on halitosis level in patients treated by fixed orthodontic therapy. Materials and Methods: Forty subjects (21 male, 19 female) were included in this study. The subjects were divided into two groups as verbal (V) and demonstration with models and application under clinician’s guidance (M). The gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI), percentage of bleeding sites (%BOP) and halitosis levels were recorded at baseline and 1 month after the orthodontic therapy began. The comparisons between the groups were analyzed by using Mann Whitney U test and intra-group differences were determined by using the Wilcoxon signed ranks test. The correlations were investigated by using the Spearman correlation test. Results: Baseline values of the recorded parameters were not found to be different significantly between the groups (P>0.05). All of the parameters in the V group have decreased significantly after 1 month (P<0.025). The M group has not presented significant difference between the time interval (P>0.025). Except the halitosis values, the decrease amount of the clinical parameters were different significantly between the groups (P<0.05). The correlations between GI and PI, and GI and % BOP; and between PI and %BOP in the M group were found statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: The oral hygiene motivation methods used in the present study were not found significantly different from each other, in terms of the halitosis levels. However, the decrease in the clinical parameters has marked the critical importance of the oral hygiene motivation for the patients undergoing fixed orthodontic therapy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Orthodontic therapy, halitosis, oral hygiene motİvation

Farklı oral hijyen motivasyon yöntemlerinin sabit ortodontik tedavi gören bireylerin

Öz

Amaç: Ortodontik tedavi öncesinde ve sırasında plak birikimine bağlı olan periodontal hastalıkların ve çürüklerin önlenebilmesi için bireylere oral hijyen motivasyonu yapılmaktadır. Bu çalışma ile sabit ortodontik tedavi gören bireylerde iki farklı motivasyon yönteminin halitozis düzeyine etkilerinin karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya 40 birey (21 erkek, 19 kadın) katıldı. Sabit ortodontik tedavilerine başlanmadan önce bireyler oral hijyen motivasyon yöntemlerine göre sözel (S) ve model üzerinde gösterim ve hekim rehberliğinde uygulama (M) şeklinde iki gruba ayrıldı. Başlangıçta ve sabit ortodontik tedavinin başlamasından bir ay sonra gingival indeks (Gİ), plak indeksi (Pİ), sondlamada kanama yüzdesi (SK%) ve halitozis düzeyleri kaydedildi. Gruplar arasındaki farklılıklar Mann Whitney U testi ile analiz edildi ve grup içi farklılıklar her bir grupta Wilcoxon sıralı işaretler testi ile belirlendi. Korelasyonlar Spearman korelasyon testi kulanılarak araştırıldı. Bulgular: Başlangıç ölçümlerinde herhangi bir parametrede gruplar arası anlamlı farklılık belirlenmedi (P>0,05). S grubunda kaydedilen parametrelerin hepsi 1. ayda başlangıç ölçümlerinden anlamlı derecede azalma gösterdi (P<0,025); M grubunda ise başlangıç ve 1. ay ölçümleri arasında anlamlı farklılık belirlenmedi (P>0,025). Halitozis haricinde iki grupta klinik parametrelerde oluşan azalma miktarları birbirinden anlamlı derecede farklıydı (P<0,05). M grubunda Gİ, Pİ ve SK% ile; Pİ ise SK% ile anlamlı korelasyon gösterdi (P<0,05). Sonuç: Sabit ortodontik tedavi gören bireylerde çalışmamızda uygulanan oral hijyen motivasyon yöntemleri halitozis değerleri açısından birbirinden farklı bulunmadı. Ancak klinik parametrelerdeki düşüşler sabit ortodontik tedavi gören bireylerin oral hijyen yönünden motive edilmesinin kritik önem taşıdığını vurgulamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• ortodontik tedavi; halitozis, oral hijyen motivasyonu

Kaynakça

1. Pham TAV, Ueno M, Zaitsu T, Takehara S, Shinada K, Lam PH, Kawaguchi Y. Clinical trial of oral malodor treatment in patients with periodontal diseases. J Periodont Res 2011; 46: 722–9.
2. Tangerman A, Winkel EG. Intra- and extra-oral halitosis: finding of a new form of extra-oral bloodborne halitosis caused by dimethyl sulphide. J Clin Periodontol 2007; 34: 748–55.
3. Scully C, Greenman J. Halitology (breath odour: aetiopathogenesis and management. Oral Dis 2012;18: 333–45.
4. Tangerman A. Halitosis in medicine: a review. Int Dent J 2002; 52: 201-6.
5. Torresyap G, Haffajee AD, Uzel NG, Socransky SS. Relationship between periodontal pocket sulfide levels and subgingival species. J Clin Periodontol 2003; 30: 1003-10.
6. Ousehal L, Lazrak L, Es-Said R, Hamdoune H, Elquars F, Khadija A. Evaluation of dental plaque control in patients wearing fixed orthodontic appliances: a clinical study. Int Orthod 2011; 9: 140Huber SJ, Vernino AR, Nanda RS. Professional prophylaxis and its effect on the periodontium of full-banded orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod 1972; 42: 26-34.
7. Yeung SC, Howell S, Fahey P. Oral hygiene program for orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1989; 96: 208-13.
8. Boyd RL. Longitudinal evaluation of a system for self-monitoring plaque control effectiveness in orthodontic patients. J Clin Periodontol 1983; 10: 380McGlynn FD, Le Compte EJ, Thomas RG, Courts FJ, Melamed BG. Effect of behavioral selfmanagement on oral hygiene adherence among orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod 1987; 91: 321

9. Lees A, Rock WP. A comparison between written, verbal, and videotape oral hygiene instruction for patients with fixed appliances. J Orthod 2000; 27: 323Yetkin Ay Z, Sayın MÖ, Özat Y, Sert T, Kırzıoğlu FY. Tekrarlı oral hijyen motivasyon yöntemlerinin sabit ortodontik tedavi gören adölesanların plak ve inflamasyon belirteçleri üzerine etkisi. SDÜ Sağ Bil Enst Derg 2011; 2: 16-24.
10. Ay ZY, Sayin MO, Ozat Y, Goster T, Atilla AO, Bozkurt FY. Appropriate oral hygiene motivation method for patients with fixed appliances. Angle Orthod 2007; 77: 1085-9.
11. Lundgren T, Mobilia A, Hallström H, Egelberg J. Evaluation of tongue coating indices. Oral Dis 2007; 13: 177–80.
12. Van Tornout M, Dadamio J, Coucke W, Quirynen M. Tongue coating: related factors. J Clin Periodontol 2013; 40: 180–5.
13. Löe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. I. Prevalence and severity. Acta Odontol Scand 1963; 21: 533–51.
14. Silness J, Löe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontol Scand 1964; 22: 121–35.
15. Ainamo J, Bay I. Problems and proposals for recording gingivitis and plaque. Int Dent J 1975; 25: 229-35.
16. Babacan H, Sokucu O, Marakoglu I, Ozdemir H, Nalcaci R. Effect of fixed appliances on oral malodor. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139: 351-5.
17. Kim JG, Kim YJ, Yoo SH, Lee SJ, Chung JW, Kim MH, Park DK, Hahm K. Halimeter ppb levels as the predictor of erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gut Liver 2010; 4: 320-5.
18. Yaegaki K, Coil JM. Examination, classification, and treatment of halitosis; clinical perspectives. J Can Dent Assoc 2000; 5: 257–61.
19. Martignon S, Ekstrand KR, Lemos MI, Lozano MP, Higuera C.Plaque, caries level and oral hygiene habits in young patients receiving orthodontic treatment. Community Dent Health 2010; 27: 133
20. Berlin-Broner Y, Levin L, Ashkenazi M.Awareness of orthodontists regarding oral hygiene performance during active orthodontic treatment. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2012;13:187-91.
21. Lalic M, Aleksic E, Gajic M, Milic J, Malesevic D. Does oral health counseling effectively improve oral hygiene of orthodontic patients? Eur J Paediatr Dent 2012; 13: 181-6.
22. Yoder ME. Preferred learning style and educational technology: linear vs. interactive video. Nurs Health Care 1994;15:128-32.
23. Self TH, Brooks JB, Lieberman P, Ryan MR. The value of demonstration and role of the pharmacist in teaching the correct use of pressurized bronchodilators. Can Med Assoc J 1983; 128: 129
24. Gray D, McIntyre G. Does oral health promotion influence the oral hygiene and gingival health of patients undergoing fixed appliance orthodontic treatment? A systematic literature review. J Orthod 2008; 35: 262-9.
25. Glans R, Larsson E, Øgaard B. Longitudinal changes in gingival condition in crowded and noncrowded dentitions subjected to fixed orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 124: 679-82.
26. Calil CM, Lima PO, Bernardes CF, Groppo FC, Bado F, Marcondes FK. Influence of gender and menstrual cycle on volatile sulphurcompounds production. Arch Oral Biol 2008; 53: 1107-12.
27. Monteiro-Amado F, Chinellato LE, Tarzia O, Rezende ML. Evaluation of oral and nasal odor patients with and without cleft lip and palate: preliminary report. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2004; 41: 661-3. Yazışma Adresi: Doç. Dr. Zuhal YETKİN AY
28. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Periodontoloji Anabilim Dalı, Isparta. Telefon: [phone] Faks: 02462370607 e-posta: [e-mail]