LOWER FACE PROFILOPLASTY WITH MULTIDISCIPLINARY TREATMENT APPROACH: A CASE REPORT

Yıl 2011, Cilt: 2011 Sayı: 2, 119 - 124, 01.02.2011

Dr. Sıdıka Sinem Soydan Doç. Dr. Firdevs Veziroğlu Yrd. Doç. Dr. Mustafa Sancar Ataç Doç. Dr. Selin Kale Varlık Prof. Dr. Ergun Yücel

https://izlik.org/JA74JS25MX

Öz

-

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

MULTİDİSİPLİNER TEDAVİ YAKLAŞIMI İLE ALT YÜZ PROFİLOPLASTİSİ: VAKA RAPORU

https://izlik.org/JA74JS25MX

Öz

Mandibular alveolar hastalarda, malokluzyonların ve protrüziv profilin düzeltilmesinde ortodontik tedavi yaklaşımları tercih edilmektedir. Ortodontik tedavi keserlerin maksillada labiale ve mandibulada da linguale aşırı hareketine neden olurken, iskeletsel prognatizmin karakteristik görünümünde değişikliğe yol açmaz. Mandibular alveolar prognatizmin tedavisinde minör invaziv cerrahi bir işlem olan mandibular alveolar osteotomi alternatif bir tedavi seçeneğidir. Bu teknik dişlerin aşırı hareket etmesini engellerken, iskeletsel prognatik görünümü de düzeltir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Mandibuler segmental osteotomi , mandibuler subapikal osteotomi , dudak rekonstrüksiyonu

Kaynakça

• Yoshioka I, Khanal A, Tominaga K, Horie A, Furuta N, Fukuda J. Vertical ramus versus sagittal split osteotomies: comparison of stability after mandibular setback. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:1138-1144.
• Ichida T, Kikuta T, Fukuda J, Yamada K. Treatment of Mandibular Alveolar prognatism by a Lower Anterior Subapical Osteotomy. J Clin Orthod 1998;32:747-752.
• Proffit WR, White RP, Saver DM. Contemporary treatment of Dentofacial Deformities. 1st ed. St. Louis; CV Mosby: 2002. p. 394-415.
• Bloomquist DS, Lee JL. In: Peterson’s Principles of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2nd ed. Ontario; BC Decker Inc: 2004. p. 1135-1178.
• Hausamen JE. The scientific development of maxillofacial surgery in the 20th century and an outlook into the future. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001; 29: 2-21.
• Silvestri A, Caputo A, Della Grotta AM. Segmental osteotomies of the mandible in the orthodontic surgical treatment of malformations of the facial bones. Ann Ital Chir 1990;61:125-139.
• Mobarak KA, Krogsrad O, Espeland L,Lyberg T. Factors Influencing the predictability of soft tissue profile changes following mandibular setback surgery. Angle Orthodontist 2001;71:216-227.
• Gjørup H, Athanasiou AE. Soft-tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with mandibular setback osteotomy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:312-323.
• Fanibunda KB. Changes in the facial profile following correction for mandibular prognathism. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989;27:277-286.
• Baek SM, Baek RM. Profiloplasty of the lower face by maxillary and mandibular anterior segmental osteotomies. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1993;17: 129-137.
• Freihofer HP, Mooren RE. Profiloplasty: variations in personal views. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1997;25:249-253.
• Iino M, Ohtani N, Niitsu K, Horiuchi T, Nakamura Y, Fukuda M. Two-stage orthognathic treatment of severe class III malocclusion: report of a case. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;42:170-172.
• Lew KK, Loh FC. A comparison of profile changes between ramus and anterior mandibular subapical osteotomies in class III chinese patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991;49:831-37.
• Smith RG, Reed EH, Hendler BH. Fonseca Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1st ed. Philadelphia; WB Saunders Co: 2000. p. 491-511.
• Schmitt SM, Cronin RJ Jr, Berg S. Anterior mandibular subapical osteotomy: a useful treatment for patients with severely worn mandibular anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:468-471.