Dentin bonding and evaluation methods

Öz

-

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

Dentine bağlanma ve değerlendirme metodları

Öz

Dentin dokusuna bağlanabilen adeziv materyallerin geliştirilmesiyle dişhekimliğinde yeni bir çağ başlamıştır. Dentin dokusuna bağlanmada dentinin are challenges in bonding to dentin related with dentin’s yapısı ve içeriğinden kaynaklanan güçlükler mevcuttur. structural properties and composition. Dentin is a vital Dentin, vital ve dinamik bir dokudur. Dentin tübül- and dynamic tissue. Differences in diameters of tubules lerinin çapının mine–dentin sınırından pulpaya doğru at dentinoenamel junction and pulp tissue, presence of değişmesi, dentin sıvısının varlığı, smear tabakası ve dentinal fluid, occurance of smear layer and dentinde oluşan fizyopatolojik değişiklikler dentine pathophysiological changes are challenges in bonding to bağlanmayı zorlaştırmaktadır. Dentine bağlanmada self-etch ve total-etch olmak üzere farklı adeziv dentin bonding mechanism; self- etch and total- etch sistemler kullanılmaktadır. Bu derlemenin amacı, denapproach. The aim of this article is to evaluate dentin tine bağlanma mekanizmaları ve materyallerin bonding mechanism and adhesion durability tests that bağlanma dayanımlarını değerlendirmekte kullanılan are used to evaluate materials’ bonding durability on testler hakkında bilgi vermektir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dentin, dental adezivler, bağlantı dayanımı testleri

Kaynakça

1. Van Meerbek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y. Buonocore Memorial Lecture, Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28(3): 215-235.
2. James B. Summitte, J. William Robbins, Thomas J. Hilton, Richard S. Schwartz. Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry. A Contemporary Approach. Third Edition. 2006 Quintessence Publishing.
3. Nalçacı A. The Effect of Self-etch and One Bottle Bonding Systems in Class V Cavities on Microleakage. A.Ü. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. 2005;32(2):85-90,.
4. Nakabayashi N. Resin reinforced dentin due to infiltration of monomers into the dentin at the adhesive interface. J Jpn Dent Mater 1982;1:78- 81. farklı bağlanma dayanımı testinin karşılaştırılması (Mikroshear ve Mikrotensile) SÜ Dişhek Fak Derg, 2009;18:118-121.
5. Clifford M. Sturdevant, Theodore M. Roberson, Harald O. Heymann, John R. Sturdevant. The Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. Third Edition. Mosby- Year Book, 1995.
6. Avery JK. Essential of oral histology and embryology. Aclinical Approach. St. Louis, Baltimore, Boston. Mosby Year Book, 1992.
7. Kwong SM, Cheung GS, Kei LH, Itthagarun A, Smales RJ, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Micro-tensile bond strengths to sclerotic dentin using a self-etching and a total-etching technique. Dent Mater. 2002;18:359-369.
8. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Resin bonding to cervical sclerotic dentin: a review. J Dent. 2004;32(3):173- 196.

9. Kiremitçi A, Altıncı P. Self-Etch Adeziv Sistemlerde Güncel Gelişmeler Bölüm I: Farklı Özelliklerde Diş Sert Dokularına Bağlanma Etkinliği. Hacettepe Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2008;32(4):33-48.
10. Erhardt MCG, Toledano M, Osorio R, Pimenta LA. Histomorphologic characterization and bond strength evaluation of caries-affected dentin/resin interfaces: effects of long-term water exposure. Dent Mater. 2008;24:786-798.
11. Swift JE. Dentin/enamel adhesives: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24:456-461.
12. Yuan Y, Shimada, Ichinose S, Sadr A. Effects of dentin characteristics on interfacial nanoleakage. J Dent Res. 2007;86:1001-1006.
13. Yeşilyurt C, Bulucu B. Bond strength of total-etch dentin adhesive systems on peripheral and central dentinal tissue: a microtensile bond strength test. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006;7(2):26-36.
14. Giannini M, Carvalho RM, Martins LRM, Dias CTS, Pashley DH. The influence of tubule density and area of solid dentin on bond strength of two adhesive systems to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2001;3:315-324.
15. Oliveria SA, Pugach MK, Hilton FJ, Watanabe LG. The influence of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: a self-etching primer vs. a total-etch system. Dent Mater. 2003;19:758-767.
16. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Have dentin adhesives become too hydrophilic? J Can Dent Assoc. 2003;69(11):726-31.
17. Perdiga OJ. New developments in dental adhesion. Dent Clin N Am. 2007;51:333-357.
18. Kanca J. Resin bonding to wet substrate. I. Bonding to dentin. Quintessence Int. 1992;23:39- 41.
19. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Manso PA. Stability of wet versus dry bonding with different solvent-based adhesives. Dent Mater. 2008;24:476-482.
20. Ritter AV, Bertoli C, Swift EJ Jr. Dentin bond strengths as a function of solvent and glutaraldehyde content. Am J Dent 2001;14:221- 226.
21. Proença JP, Polido M, Osorio E, Erhardt MCG.
22. Dentin regional bond strength of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 2007;3:1542-1548.
23. Sauro S, Pashley DH, Mannocci F, Tay FR. Micropermeability of current self-etching and etch&rinse adhesives bonded to deep dentine: a comparison study using a double-staining/ confocal microscopy technique. Eur J Oral Sci. 2008;116:184-193.
24. Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Microtensile bond strenghts of seven dentin adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 2000;6(3):180-187.
25. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res. 2005;84(2):118- 132.
26. Al- Salehi SK, Burke FJ. Methods used in dentin bonding tests: an analysis of 50 investigations on bond strength. Quintessece Int. 1997;28:717-23.
27. Özyöney G. Aşırı madde kayıplı kişlerde IPS Empress II onley restorasyonların klinik ve in vitro şartlarda incelenmesi. M.Ü Diş Hek Fak Diş Hastalıkları ve Tedavisi AD, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul, 2008.
28. Güven G, Altun C. Restoratif dişhekimliğinde bağlanma kuvveti testleri. Türk Dişhekimliği Dergisi 2007; 67(14):4-8.
29. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Suzuki K, et al. Four-year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res 2003;82:136-140.
30. Santerre JP, Shajii L, Leung BW Relation of dental compositeformulations to their degra- dation and the release of hydrolyzedpolymeric-resin-derived products. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2001;12:136-151.
31. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Sano H, Tay FR, Kaga Kudo et al. Micromorphological changes inresin-dentin bonds after 1 year of water storage. Biomed Mater Res 2002;63:306-311.
32. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Endo K, Sano H, Oguchi H. In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds in humans over 1 to 3 years. J Dent Res 2000;79:1385-1391.
33. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999;27:89-99.
34. Frankenberger R, Strobel WO, Kramer N, Lohbauer U, Winterscheidt J, Winterscheidt B, et al. Evaluation of the fatigue behavior of the resin- dentin bond with the use of different methods. J BiomedMater Res Part B: Appl Biomater. 2003; 67(B):712-721.
35. Baran G, Boberick K, McCool. Fatigue of restorative materials. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med J 2001;12:350- 360.
36. Al-Ehaıdeb A, Mohammed. Shear bond strength of ‘one- bottle’ dentin adhesives. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 84(4):408-412.
37. Giannini M, Seixas CAM, Reis AF, Pimenta LAF. Six- month storage-time evaluation of one-bottle adhesive systems to dentin. J Esthet ResDent 2003;15:43-49.
38. Şengün A, Yalçın M, Kocabaşoğlu A. Yedinci jenerasyon adeziv sistemlerinin dentine makasla- ma bağlanma dayanımlarının karşılaştırılması. Atatürk Üniv. Dis Hek. Fak. Derg. 2009;3:156-160.
39. Ulker M, Ozcan M, Sengun A, Ozer F, Belli S. Effect of Artificial Aging Regimens on the Performance of Self-Etching adhesives J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater. 2010;93(B):175– 184.
40. Belli S, Ozcopur B, Yesilyurt C, Bulut G, Ding XD. The Effect of Loading on lTBS of Four All-In-One Adhesives On Bonding to Dentin J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 2009;91(B):948–956.