EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS AND POSTOPERATIVE SENSITIVITY FOLLOWING OZONE AND LASER ACTIVATED BLEACHING METHODS

Derya Sürmelioğlu; Özgür Yıldırım Torun

doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.566815

EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS AND POSTOPERATIVE SENSITIVITY FOLLOWING OZONE AND LASER ACTIVATED BLEACHING METHODS

Öz

ABSTRACT

Aim: Bleaching of discolored teeth is one of the important issues of aesthetic dentistry. For this purpose, peroxides have been used for many years. Ozone is a contemporary bleaching method used as a substitute for hydrogen peroxide because of undesired side effects of peroxides. The aim of this in vivo study is to compare different bleaching methods including hydrogen peroxide (HP), laser activated hydrogen peroxides and ozone.

Materials and methods: A hundred patients were divided into 5 groups (n=20) for this study. Group 1: Bleaching with ozone. Group 2: Chemical bleaching with 40% HP gel. Group 3: Chemical bleaching with 35% HP gel. Group 4: Bleaching with 40% HP gel + diode laser activation. Group 5: Bleaching with 35% HP gel + diode laser activation. Color of the teeth before, immediately after bleaching and 2 weeks later the treatment were evaluated with the CIE L*a*b*system. Hypersensitivity was assessed with a Visual Analogue Scale. Differences between the groups were statistically analyzed.

Results: Immediately after treatment color changes among the groups were statisticall similar (p > 0.05) while at 2 weeks recall color change of Group 1 was significantly less than the other groups (p < 0.05). In terms of hypersensitivity, Group 1 represented significantly less values compared to the other groups (p < 0.05) while other groups were statistically similar (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: HP is superior to ozone in bleaching effectiveness. Ozone is safer in hypersensitivity. Activation with diode laser reduced the time but did not affect bleaching effectiveness.

Key words: Hydrogen peroxide, hypersensitivity, laser, ozone, bleaching

OZON VE LAZER İLE AKTİVE EDİLEN BEYAZLATMA METODLARINI TAKİBEN ETKİNLİK VE POSTOPERATİF HASSASİYETİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

ÖZ

Amaç: Renklenmiş dişlerin beyazlatılması, estetik diş hekimliğinin önemli konularından biridir. Bu amaçla, uzun yıllardır, peroksitler kullanılagelmiştir. Ozon ise peroksitlerin istenmeyen yan etkilerini taşımayan güncel bir beyazlatma yöntemidir. Bu in vivo çalışmanın amacı; hidrojen peroksit (HP), lazer aktivasyonlu HP ve ozon içeren beyazlatma yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılmasıdır.

Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışma için yüz hasta 5 gruba ayrıldı (n = 20). Grup 1: Ozon ile beyazlatma; Grup 2: % 40 HP jel ile kimyasal beyazlatma; Grup 3: %35 HP jel ile kimyasal beyazlatma; Grup 4: %40 HP jel + diyot lazer aktivasyonu ile beyazlatma; Grup 5: %35 HP jel + diyot lazer aktivasyonu. Beyazlatma tedavi öncesi, sonrası ve 2 hafta sonrasında diş renkleri CIE L*a*b* sistemi ile değerlendirildi. Hipersensitivite, Görsel Analog Skala ile değerlendirildi. Gruplar arasındaki farklılıklar istatistiksel olarak analiz edildi.

Bulgular: Tedavi hemen sonra gruplar arasındaki renk değişimleri istatistiksel olarak benzer (p > 0.05) iken, 2 hafta sonra grup 1'deki renk değişimi diğer gruplara göre anlamlı derecede düşüktü (p < 0.05). Hipersensitivite açısından ise grup 1 diğer gruplara göre anlamlı derecede düşük değerler gösterirken (p < 0.05) diğer gruplar istatistiksel olarak benzerdi (p > 0.05).

Sonuç: Ozon ile yapılan beyazlatma tedavisi, hipersensitivite açısından daha güvenli bulunurken; beyazlatma etkinliği açısından hidrojen peroksit daha üstün bulundu. 980 nm diyot lazer ile aktivasyon tedavi süresini kısalttı ancak beyazlatma etkinliğine etki etmedi.

Anahtar kelimeler: Hidrojen peroksit, hipersensitivite, lazer, ozon, beyazlatma

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hydrogen peroxide,hypersensitivity,laser,ozone

Kaynakça

1. Joiner A. The bleaching of teeth: a review of the literature. J Dent 2006;34: 412-419.
2. Greenwall L. Bleaching Techniques in Restorative Dentistry. 2 ed: London; Martin Dunitz: 2005. p.132-163
3. Matis B, Cochran M, Eckert G. Review of the effectiveness of various tooth whitening systems. Oper Dent 2009;34:230-235.
4. Ontiveros JC. In-office vital bleaching with adjunct light. Dent Clin North Am 2011;55:241-253.
5. Gurgan S, Cakir FY, Yazici E. Different light-activated in-office bleaching systems: a clinical evaluation. Lasers Med Sci 2010;25:817-822.
6. Elsalawy RN, Hamza HS, Yousry MM. The effectıveness of ozone gas as a bleachıng agent and ıts ınfluence on the enamel surface roughness. Egypt Dent J 2005;51:1351.
7. Polydorou O, Wirsching M, Wokewitz M, Hahn P. Three-month evaluation of vital tooth bleaching using light units—A randomized clinical study. Oper Dent 2013;38:21-32.
8. Dahl JE, Pallesen U. Tooth bleaching-a critical review of the biological aspects. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2003;14:292-304.

9. White JM, Pelino J, Rodrigues R, Zwhalen BJ, Nguyen MH, Wu E. Surface and pulpal temperature comparison of tooth whitening using lasers and curing lights. Laser Ther 2016; 25: 215–220
10 Uzer Çelik E, Yılmaz F, Tunaç AT. Comparison of bleaching efficacy and color ctability of different in-office bleaching systems. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2016; 26: 413-418
11. Mena-Serrano A, Garcia E, Luque-Martinez I, Grande R., Loguercio A, Reis AA. Single-blind randomized trial about the effect of hydrogen peroxide concentration on light-activated bleaching. Oper Dent 2016;41:455-464.
12. Ontiveros JC, Paravina RD. Color change of vital teeth exposed to bleaching performed with and without supplementary light. J Dent 2009;37:840-847.
13. Henry R, Bauchmoyer S, Moore W, Rashid R. The effect of light on tooth whitening: a split‐mouth design. Int J Dent Hyg 2013;11:151-154.
14. Giudice RL, Pantaleo G, Lizio A, Romeo, U, Castiello G, Spagnuolo G, Giudice GL. Clinical and spectrophotometric evaluation of LED and laser activated teeth bleaching. Open Dent J 2016;10:242.
15. Polydorou O, Wirsching M, Wokewitz M, Hahn P. Three-month evaluation of vital tooth bleaching using light units—A randomized clinical study. Oper Dent 2013;38:21-32.
15. Christensen Gj. The tooth-whitening revolution. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133:1277-1279.
16. Zhang C, Wang X, Kinoshita JI, Zhao B, Toko T, Kimura Y, Matsumoto K. Effects of KTP laser irradiation, diode laser, and LED on tooth bleaching: a comparative study. Photomed Laser Surg 2007;25:91-95.
17. Vanderstricht K, Nammour S, De Moor R. " Power bleaching" with the KTP laser. Rev Belge. Med Dent 2009;64:129-139.
18. Gutknecht. N. Lasers in Endodontics. J. Laser Health Academy 2008;4.
19. Marson F, Sensi L, Vieira L, Araújo E. Clinical evaluation of in-office dental bleaching treatments with and without the use of light-activation sources. Oper Dent 2008;33:15-22.
20. Ishikawa‐Nagai S, Terui T, Ishibashi K, Weber HP, Ferguson M. Comparison of Effectiveness of Two 10% Carbamide Peroxide Tooth‐Bleaching Systems Using Spectrophotometric Measurements. J Esthet Restor Dent 2004;16:368-375
21. Kwon SR, Wertz PW. Review of the mechanism of tooth whitening. J Esthet Restor Dent 2015;27:240-57.
22. de Oliveira Duque CC, Soares DG, Basso FG, Hebling J, de Souza Costa CA. Bleaching effectiveness, hydrogen peroxide diffusion, and cytotoxicity of a chemically activated bleaching gel. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:1631-1637.
23. Torres C, Crastechini E, Feitosa F, Pucci C, Borges A. Influence of pH on the effectiveness of hydrogen peroxide whitening. Oper Dent 2014;39:E261-8.
24. Al-Omiri MK, Al Nazeh AA, Kielbassa AM, Lynch E. Randomized controlled clinical trial on bleaching sensitivity and whitening efficacy of hydrogen peroxide versus combinations of hydrogen peroxide and ozone. Sci Rep 2018;8:2407.
25. Al-Omiri MK, Hassan ReSA, Kielbassa AM, Lynch E. Bleaching efficacy of ozone/hydrogen peroxide versus hydrogen peroxide/ozone application. Quintessence Int 2017;48.
26. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC. Free radicals in biology and medicine. 3 ed., New York; Oxford University Press 2015: p.10-121
27. He LB, Shao MY, Tan K, Xu X, Li JY. The effects of light on bleaching and tooth sensitivity during in-office vital bleaching: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2012;40:644-653.
28. Marson FC, Sensi LG, Vieira LC, Araujo E. Clinical evaluation of in-office dental bleaching treatments with and without the use of light-activation sources. Oper Dent 2008;33:15-22.
29. Tsubura S. Clinical evaluation of three months’ nightguard vital bleaching on tetracycline-stained teeth using Polanight 10% carbamide gel: 2-year follow-up study. Odontology 2010;98:134-138.
30. Matis B, Hamdan Y, Cochran M, Eckert G. A clinical evaluation of a bleaching agent used with and without reservoirs. Oper Dent 2002;27:5-11.
31. Mena-Serrano AP, Parreiras SO, do Nascimento EM, Borges, CP, Berger, SB, Loguercio, AD, Reis A. Effects of the concentration and composition of in-office bleaching gels on hydrogen peroxide penetration into the pulp chamber. Oper Dent 2015;40:E76-82.
32. Wang Y, Gao J, Jiang T, Liang S, Zhou Y, Matis BA. Evaluation of the efficacy of potassium nitrate and sodium fluoride as desensitizing agents during tooth bleaching treatment—A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2015;43:913-923.
33. Bernardon JK, Sartori N, Ballarin A, Perdigao J, Lopes GC, Baratieri LN. Clinical performance of vital bleaching techniques. Oper Dent 2010;35:3-10.
34. Valko M, Izakovic M, Mazur M, Rhodes CJ, Telser J. Role of oxygen radicals in DNA damage and cancer incidence. Mol Cell Biochem 2004;266:37-56.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Diş Hekimliği

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Derya Sürmelioğlu
0000-0002-6034-3131

Özgür Yıldırım Torun Bu kişi benim
0000-0002-4359-9370

Yayımlanma Tarihi

16 Temmuz 2019

Gönderilme Tarihi

10 Aralık 2018

Kabul Tarihi

17 Mayıs 2019

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2019 Cilt: 29 Sayı: 3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.566815

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA68MD78AX

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Sürmelioğlu, D., & Torun, Ö. Y. (2019). EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS AND POSTOPERATIVE SENSITIVITY FOLLOWING OZONE AND LASER ACTIVATED BLEACHING METHODS. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(3), 416-423. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.566815

AMA

1.Sürmelioğlu D, Torun ÖY. EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS AND POSTOPERATIVE SENSITIVITY FOLLOWING OZONE AND LASER ACTIVATED BLEACHING METHODS. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2019;29(3):416-423. doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.566815

Chicago

Sürmelioğlu, Derya, ve Özgür Yıldırım Torun. 2019. “EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS AND POSTOPERATIVE SENSITIVITY FOLLOWING OZONE AND LASER ACTIVATED BLEACHING METHODS”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 29 (3): 416-23. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.566815.

EndNote

Sürmelioğlu D, Torun ÖY (01 Temmuz 2019) EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS AND POSTOPERATIVE SENSITIVITY FOLLOWING OZONE AND LASER ACTIVATED BLEACHING METHODS. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 29 3 416–423.

IEEE

[1]D. Sürmelioğlu ve Ö. Y. Torun, “EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS AND POSTOPERATIVE SENSITIVITY FOLLOWING OZONE AND LASER ACTIVATED BLEACHING METHODS”, Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg, c. 29, sy 3, ss. 416–423, Tem. 2019, doi: 10.17567/ataunidfd.566815.

ISNAD

Sürmelioğlu, Derya - Torun, Özgür Yıldırım. “EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS AND POSTOPERATIVE SENSITIVITY FOLLOWING OZONE AND LASER ACTIVATED BLEACHING METHODS”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 29/3 (01 Temmuz 2019): 416-423. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.566815.

JAMA

1.Sürmelioğlu D, Torun ÖY. EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS AND POSTOPERATIVE SENSITIVITY FOLLOWING OZONE AND LASER ACTIVATED BLEACHING METHODS. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2019;29:416–423.

MLA

Sürmelioğlu, Derya, ve Özgür Yıldırım Torun. “EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS AND POSTOPERATIVE SENSITIVITY FOLLOWING OZONE AND LASER ACTIVATED BLEACHING METHODS”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 29, sy 3, Temmuz 2019, ss. 416-23, doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.566815.

Vancouver

1.Derya Sürmelioğlu, Özgür Yıldırım Torun. EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS AND POSTOPERATIVE SENSITIVITY FOLLOWING OZONE AND LASER ACTIVATED BLEACHING METHODS. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 01 Temmuz 2019;29(3):416-23. doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.566815