Araştırma Makalesi

Supernatural Elements and Social Criticism in Charles Dickens’s The Chimes

Sayı: 69 30 Aralık 2022
PDF İndir
TR EN

Supernatural Elements and Social Criticism in Charles Dickens’s The Chimes

Öz

Charles Dickens incorporates supernatural elements in his realistic works. He, therefore, refers to opposite religious and scientific explanations for the existence of unearthly phenomena that prevailed in the Victorian period. However, in The Chimes, one of his ghost stories, he focuses on scientific attitudes to supernatural beings rather than conventional views. He generally relates the main character’s mind and uncanny visions to social problems and inequality which traumatize underprivileged citizens. This study examines the work in relation to the depiction of the supernatural. After a brief discussion of the Victorian attitudes to the eerie and the unknown, it discusses the ways in which Dickens employs supernatural figures, blending them with social criticism.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Bauer, Matthias. (2015). “The Chimes and the Rhythm of Life”. Joachim Frenk, Lena Steveker (eds.). Charles Dickens as an Agent of Change. (p. 111-27). New York: AMS Press.
  2. Chakraborty, Soumya. (2012). “Dark Side of the Moon: Dickens and the Supernatural”. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, IV/1, p. 58-72.
  3. Dickens, Charles. (2006). “The Chimes”. Robert Douglas-Fairhurst (ed.). A Christmas Carol and Other Christmas Books. (p. 85–162). Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Originally published in 1844)
  4. Dickson, Melissa. (2020). “Dickens’s nightmare: dreams, memory, and trauma”. Interface Focus, 10, p. 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2019.0076.
  5. Gordon, John. (2011). Sensation and Sublimation in Charles Dickens. New York: Palgrave Macmillan
  6. Harris, Jason Marc. (2008). Folklore and the Fantastic in Nineteenth-century British Fiction. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  7. Henson, Louise. (2004). “Investigations and fictions: Charles Dickens and ghosts”. Nicola Bown, Carolyn Burdett, Pamela Thurschwell (eds.). The Victorian Supernatural. (p. 44-63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Kurata, Marilyn J. (1984). “Fantasy and Realism: A Defense of The Chimes”. Dickens Studies Annual, 13, p. 19-34.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Sanat ve Edebiyat

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Aralık 2022

Gönderilme Tarihi

25 Mart 2021

Kabul Tarihi

6 Ekim 2021

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2022 Sayı: 69

Kaynak Göster

APA
Öztekin, S. (2022). Supernatural Elements and Social Criticism in Charles Dickens’s The Chimes. Atatürk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 69, 94-99. https://doi.org/10.5152/AUJFL.2022.900374
AMA
1.Öztekin S. Supernatural Elements and Social Criticism in Charles Dickens’s The Chimes. AUEDFD. 2022;(69):94-99. doi:10.5152/AUJFL.2022.900374
Chicago
Öztekin, Sercan. 2022. “Supernatural Elements and Social Criticism in Charles Dickens’s The Chimes”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, sy 69: 94-99. https://doi.org/10.5152/AUJFL.2022.900374.
EndNote
Öztekin S (01 Aralık 2022) Supernatural Elements and Social Criticism in Charles Dickens’s The Chimes. Atatürk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 69 94–99.
IEEE
[1]S. Öztekin, “Supernatural Elements and Social Criticism in Charles Dickens’s The Chimes”, AUEDFD, sy 69, ss. 94–99, Ara. 2022, doi: 10.5152/AUJFL.2022.900374.
ISNAD
Öztekin, Sercan. “Supernatural Elements and Social Criticism in Charles Dickens’s The Chimes”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi. 69 (01 Aralık 2022): 94-99. https://doi.org/10.5152/AUJFL.2022.900374.
JAMA
1.Öztekin S. Supernatural Elements and Social Criticism in Charles Dickens’s The Chimes. AUEDFD. 2022;:94–99.
MLA
Öztekin, Sercan. “Supernatural Elements and Social Criticism in Charles Dickens’s The Chimes”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, sy 69, Aralık 2022, ss. 94-99, doi:10.5152/AUJFL.2022.900374.
Vancouver
1.Sercan Öztekin. Supernatural Elements and Social Criticism in Charles Dickens’s The Chimes. AUEDFD. 01 Aralık 2022;(69):94-9. doi:10.5152/AUJFL.2022.900374