BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

ÇOĞUL GEBELİK REDÜKSİYONU VE HEMŞİRENİN ROLÜ

Yıl 2010, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 3, 1 - 6, 04.01.2011

Öz

Günümüzde yardımcı üreme tekniklerindeki hızlı gelişmeler, çoğul gebelik oranlarındaki artışı da
beraberinde getirmiştir. Çoğul gebelik; yenidoğanda ve annede birçok komplikasyona neden olabilmektedir. Bu
problemlerin önlenmesi için de son 20 yıldır fetal redüksiyon işlemi uygulanmaktadır. Çoğul gebelik
redüksiyonu, çoğul gebeliklerde ortaya çıkacak komplikasyonların önlenmesi için fetüs sayısının azaltılması
işlemidir. Fetal redüksiyon işleminin, maternal ve fetal sonuçlarına ilişkin ülkemizde ve dünyada birçok yayın
bulunmakla birlikte konu ile ilgili hemşirelik yayını oldukça kısıtlıdır. Oysa kadın hastalıkları ve infertilite
kliniklerinde çalışan hemşirelerin işlem öncesi ve sonrasında önemli sorumlulukları bulunmaktadır. Bu
bağlamda, bu makalede fetal redüksiyon kavramı ve işlemde hemşirenin rolü ele alınmıştır.

Kaynakça

  • Evans MI, Britt DW (2005). Fetal reduction.
  • Seminars In Perinatology 29:321-329. Stone J, Eddleman K (2000). Multifetal pregnancy reduction. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 12:491-496.
  • Tadin I, Roje D, Banocic I et al. (2002). Fetal reduction in multifetal pregnancy-ethical dilemmas.
  • Yonsei Medical Journal 43(2): 252-258. Hammond KR (1998). Multifetal pregnancy reduction. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing 27(3): 338-343.
  • Naykı Ü, Büyüktosun C, Mızrak T (2004). Düşük tehditi sonrası dördüz gebelikte fetal redüksiyon.
  • Perinatoloji Dergisi 12:173-177. Stone J, Eddleman K, Lynch L et al. (2002). A single center experience with 1000 consecutive cases of multifetal pregnancy reduction. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 187(5): 1163-1167.
  • Timor-Tritsch IE, Peisner DB, Monteagudo A et al. (1993). Multifetal pregnancy reduction by transvaginal puncture: Evaluation of the tecnique used in 134 case. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 168:799-804.
  • Evans MI, Berkowitz RL, Wapner RJ et al. (2001). Improvement in outcomes of multifetal pregnancy reduction with increased experience.
  • American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology (2): 97-103. Stone J, Eddleman K, Gallousis F et al. (1998).
  • Pregnancy outcome after first trimester MPR to single fetus. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology :521. Lipitz S, Reichman B, Uval J et al. (1994). A prospective comparison of the outcome of triplet pregnancies managed expectantly or by multifetal reduction to twins. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 170: 874-879.
  • Evans MI. Dommergues M. Wapner RJ et al. (1993). Efficacy of transabdominal multifetal pregnancy reduction: Collaborative experience among the world’s largest centers.
  • Obstetrics & Gynecology 82: 61-66. Evans MI, Dommergues M, Wapner RJ et al. (1996) International, collaborative experience of patients having multifetal pregnancy reduction:
  • A plateauing of risks and outcomes. Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation 3: 23-26. Alexander JM, Hammond KR, Steinkampf MP (1995). Multifetal reduction of high-order multiple pregnancy: Comparison of obstetrical outcome with spontaneous twin gestations. Fertility and Sterility :1201-1203.
  • Chescheir N (2004). Outcome of multifetal pregnancy reductions. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 47(1): 134-145.
  • Schreiner-Engel P, Walter VN, Mindes J, Lynch L et al. (1995). First-trimester multifetal pregnancy reduction: Acute and persistent psychologic reactions.
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2): 541-542. Maifeld M, Hahn S, Titler MG et al. (2003).
  • Decision making regarding multifetal reduction. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing 32(3): 357-369. Wang H, Chao Y (2006). Lived experiences of
  • Taiwanese women with multifetal pregnancies who receiven fetal reduction. Journal of Nursing Research (2): 143-154. Garel M, Stark C, Blondel B et al. (1997).
  • Psychological reactions after multifetal pregnancy reduction: a 2-year follow-up study. Human Reproduction 12(3): 617–622. Bergh C, Möller A, Nilsson L et al. (1999).
  • Obstetric outcome and psychological follow-up of pregnancies after embryo reduction. Human Reproduction 14(8): 2170-2175.
  • Begley A M (2000). Preparation for practice in the new millennium: A discussion of the moral implications of multifetal pregnancy reduction. Nursing Ethics 7(2): 99-112.
  • Collopy KS (2004). “I couldn’t think that far’’:infertile women’s decision making about multifetal reduction. Research in Nursing & Health : 75–86
  • FIGO Committee Report (2006). “Ethical recommendations on multiple pregnancy and multifetal reduction” International Journal of
  • Gynecology and Obstetrics 92: 331-332. Obstetrik ve Jinekolojide Etik Konular (2008).
  • FIGO Komitesi Üreme ve Kadın Sağlığında Etik Görüşler Çalışması. Çev. Ed. Dölen İ. S: 47-49. Sentilhes L, Audibert F, Dommergues M et al. (2007). Multifetal pregnancy reduction: indications, technical aspects and psychological impact. Presse Medicale 13: 295-306.
Yıl 2010, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 3, 1 - 6, 04.01.2011

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Evans MI, Britt DW (2005). Fetal reduction.
  • Seminars In Perinatology 29:321-329. Stone J, Eddleman K (2000). Multifetal pregnancy reduction. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 12:491-496.
  • Tadin I, Roje D, Banocic I et al. (2002). Fetal reduction in multifetal pregnancy-ethical dilemmas.
  • Yonsei Medical Journal 43(2): 252-258. Hammond KR (1998). Multifetal pregnancy reduction. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing 27(3): 338-343.
  • Naykı Ü, Büyüktosun C, Mızrak T (2004). Düşük tehditi sonrası dördüz gebelikte fetal redüksiyon.
  • Perinatoloji Dergisi 12:173-177. Stone J, Eddleman K, Lynch L et al. (2002). A single center experience with 1000 consecutive cases of multifetal pregnancy reduction. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 187(5): 1163-1167.
  • Timor-Tritsch IE, Peisner DB, Monteagudo A et al. (1993). Multifetal pregnancy reduction by transvaginal puncture: Evaluation of the tecnique used in 134 case. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 168:799-804.
  • Evans MI, Berkowitz RL, Wapner RJ et al. (2001). Improvement in outcomes of multifetal pregnancy reduction with increased experience.
  • American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology (2): 97-103. Stone J, Eddleman K, Gallousis F et al. (1998).
  • Pregnancy outcome after first trimester MPR to single fetus. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology :521. Lipitz S, Reichman B, Uval J et al. (1994). A prospective comparison of the outcome of triplet pregnancies managed expectantly or by multifetal reduction to twins. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 170: 874-879.
  • Evans MI. Dommergues M. Wapner RJ et al. (1993). Efficacy of transabdominal multifetal pregnancy reduction: Collaborative experience among the world’s largest centers.
  • Obstetrics & Gynecology 82: 61-66. Evans MI, Dommergues M, Wapner RJ et al. (1996) International, collaborative experience of patients having multifetal pregnancy reduction:
  • A plateauing of risks and outcomes. Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation 3: 23-26. Alexander JM, Hammond KR, Steinkampf MP (1995). Multifetal reduction of high-order multiple pregnancy: Comparison of obstetrical outcome with spontaneous twin gestations. Fertility and Sterility :1201-1203.
  • Chescheir N (2004). Outcome of multifetal pregnancy reductions. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 47(1): 134-145.
  • Schreiner-Engel P, Walter VN, Mindes J, Lynch L et al. (1995). First-trimester multifetal pregnancy reduction: Acute and persistent psychologic reactions.
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2): 541-542. Maifeld M, Hahn S, Titler MG et al. (2003).
  • Decision making regarding multifetal reduction. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing 32(3): 357-369. Wang H, Chao Y (2006). Lived experiences of
  • Taiwanese women with multifetal pregnancies who receiven fetal reduction. Journal of Nursing Research (2): 143-154. Garel M, Stark C, Blondel B et al. (1997).
  • Psychological reactions after multifetal pregnancy reduction: a 2-year follow-up study. Human Reproduction 12(3): 617–622. Bergh C, Möller A, Nilsson L et al. (1999).
  • Obstetric outcome and psychological follow-up of pregnancies after embryo reduction. Human Reproduction 14(8): 2170-2175.
  • Begley A M (2000). Preparation for practice in the new millennium: A discussion of the moral implications of multifetal pregnancy reduction. Nursing Ethics 7(2): 99-112.
  • Collopy KS (2004). “I couldn’t think that far’’:infertile women’s decision making about multifetal reduction. Research in Nursing & Health : 75–86
  • FIGO Committee Report (2006). “Ethical recommendations on multiple pregnancy and multifetal reduction” International Journal of
  • Gynecology and Obstetrics 92: 331-332. Obstetrik ve Jinekolojide Etik Konular (2008).
  • FIGO Komitesi Üreme ve Kadın Sağlığında Etik Görüşler Çalışması. Çev. Ed. Dölen İ. S: 47-49. Sentilhes L, Audibert F, Dommergues M et al. (2007). Multifetal pregnancy reduction: indications, technical aspects and psychological impact. Presse Medicale 13: 295-306.
Toplam 25 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil tr;en
Bölüm Derlemeler
Yazarlar

Aytül Hadımlı Bu kişi benim

Ümran Sevil Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 4 Ocak 2011
Gönderilme Tarihi 4 Ocak 2011
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2010 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

Vancouver Hadımlı A, Sevil Ü. ÇOĞUL GEBELİK REDÜKSİYONU VE HEMŞİRENİN ROLÜ. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2011;13(3):1-6.

Dergimiz 2019 dan itibaren EBSCO CINAHL Database'de listelenmektedir.

Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0) ile lisanslanmıştır.

20547


    1.