Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

ADAPTATION TO PREGNANCY AND ABILITY TO COPE WITH STRESS OF PREGNANT WOMEN DIAGNOSED WITH HYPEREMESIS GRAVIDARUM

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 4, 277 - 283, 19.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.17049/ataunihem.547213

Öz

Aim: This
research has been done in order to determine of adapting to pregnancy and
coping styles with stress of pregnant diagnosed of hyperemesis gravidarum.

Methods: The descriptive study
was conducted with 160 pregnant women diagnosed as hyperemesis gravidarum and
hospitalized in a women's health education and research hospital. Ethics
Committee approval and the necessary permits are obtained for this research.
Information Form, Prenatal Self Evaluation Questionnaire (PSEQ) and Ways of
Coping with Stress Inventory (WCSI) are used to collect of data. Number,
percentage, mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum values and  pearson correlation  were used to evaluate of data.

Results: The
PSEQ point average was 173.3±35.8. The WCSI sub-dimension point average for
"self-confident approach" was 14.5±4.5, "optimistic
approach" was 10.1±3.1, "resorting to social support" was
7.4±2.2, "helpless approach" was 11.6±4.8, and "submissive
approach" was 8.1±3.6.







Conclusion: A significant negative
relationship was found between total prenatal self-evaluation and the
"self-confident approach" and "optimistic approach", two
effective methods for coping with stress. A significant positive relationship
was found between total prenatal self evaluation and "helpless
approach" and "submissive approach", two ineffective methods for
coping with stress. While the use of “self-confident” and “optimistic”
approaches result in better adaption to pregnancy, the use of ineffective
methods decreases adaptation to pregnancy.

Kaynakça

  • REFERENCESBayık A, Özsoy-Altuğ S, Ardahan M, Özkahraman Ş, İz-Başalan F. Situations of women encountering stressful life events. Journal of Atatürk University School of Nursing 2006; 9(2): 1-12.Beydağ KD, Mete S. The validity and reliability study of the prenatal self-assessment scale. Journal of Atatürk University School of Nursing 2008; 11(1):16-24. Chou FH, Avant KC, Kuo SH, Fetzer SJ. Relationships between nausea and vomiting, perceived stress, social support, pregnancy planning and psychosocial adaptation in a sample of mothers: A questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2008; 45 (8): 1185-1191. Dağlar G, Nur N. Relation of stress management styles to anxiety and depression levels of pregnancies. Cumhuriyet Medical Journal 2014; 36:429-441.Demirbaş H, Kadıoğlu H. Adaptation to pregnancy in prenatal period women and factors associated with adaptation. Journal of Marmara University Institute of Health Sciences 2014; 4(4): 200-206.Ege E, Eryılmaz G. Investigation of the effects of daily living activities of pregnant women with early gestational period nausea and vomiting. Journal of Atatürk University School of Nursing 2000; 3(1): 1-8.Elkin N. The ways in which pregnant women cope with stress and the factors that affect them. Mersin University Journal of Health Sciences 2015; 8(1): 22-31.Güleç D, Öztürk R, Şen S, Güneri SE. Comparison of psychological symptoms in hyperemesis gravidarum and healthy pregnancies: a case-control study. Gaziantep Med Journal 2014; 20(2): 136-140.Gümüşdaş M, Apay-Ejder S, Özorhan EY. Comparing the psychosocial health of both at-risk and non-at-risk pregnancies. HSP 2014; 1(2): 32- 42.Hacker NF, Moore JG, Gambone JC. Principles of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Üstün C, Koçak İ, editor. 4th ed. Nobel Medicine Bookstores; 2004. p. 227-228.Kuo SH, Wang RH, Tseng HC, Jian SY, Chou FH. A comparison of different severities of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy relative to stress, social support and maternal adaptation. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health 2007; 52(1): e1-e7.Lacasse A, Rey E, Ferreira E, Morin C, Berard A. Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: what about quality of life? BJOG 2008; 115:1484-1493.Mutlugüneş E, Mete S. The relationship between nausea and vomiting and maternal role and acceptance of pregnancy, Cumhuriyet Nursing Journal 2013; 2(1): 8-14. Ölçer Z, Oskay Ü. Stressors suffering from high-risk pregnancies and ways of coping with stress. Journal of Nursing Education and Research 2015; 12(2): 85-92.Saunders RB. Maternity care during pregnancy. Maternity& Women’s Health Care. Lowdermilk DL, Perry SE, editor. 8th ed. Mosby; 2004. p. 397-401. Siva ASBO and KKO factor analysis and reliability study. Unpublished data.1988.Şahin NH, Durak A. Scale of coping styles with stress: Adaptation for university students. Journal of Turkish Psychology1995; 10 (34):56-73.Taşkın L. Birth and Women's Health Nursing. 10th ed. Ankara: System Offset Printing; 2011.Yanıkkerem E, İldan- Çalım S, Göker A, Oruç- Koltan S, Koyuncu FM. Considerations and requirements for diseases of pregnant women with hyperemesis gravidarum. Gümüşhane University Journal of Health Sciences 2012; 1(4): 269-280.Yılmaz- Dereli S, Beji-Kızılkaya N. Pregnancy stress coping, depression and prenatal attachment levels and factors affecting them. General Medical Journal 2010; 20(3): 99-108.

ADAPTATION TO PREGNANCY AND ABILITY TO COPE WITH STRESS OF PREGNANT WOMEN DIAGNOSED WITH HYPEREMESIS GRAVIDARUM

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 4, 277 - 283, 19.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.17049/ataunihem.547213

Öz

ABSTRACT

Aim: This research has been done in order to determine of adapting to pregnancy and coping styles with stress of pregnant diagnosed of hyperemesis gravidarum.

Methods: The descriptive study was conducted with 160 pregnant women diagnosed as hyperemesis gravidarum and hospitalized in a women's health education and research hospital. Ethics Committee approval and the necessary permits are obtained for this research. Information Form, Prenatal Self Evaluation Questionnaire (PSEQ) and Ways of Coping with Stress Inventory (WCSI) are used to collect of data. Number, percentage, mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum values and  pearson correlation  were used to evaluate of data.

Results: The PSEQ point average was 173.3±35.8. The WCSI sub-dimension point average for "self-confident approach" was 14.5±4.5, "optimistic approach" was 10.1±3.1, "resorting to social support" was 7.4±2.2, "helpless approach" was 11.6±4.8, and "submissive approach" was 8.1±3.6.

Conclusion: A significant negative relationship was found between total prenatal self-evaluation and the "self-confident approach" and "optimistic approach", two effective methods for coping with stress. A significant positive relationship was found between total prenatal self evaluation and "helpless approach" and "submissive approach", two ineffective methods for coping with stress. While the use of “self-confident” and “optimistic” approaches result in better adaption to pregnancy, the use of ineffective methods decreases adaptation to pregnancy.

Keywords: Hyperemesis Gravidarum;  Adapting to Pregnancy;Coping with Stress; Nursing

ÖZ 

Hiperemezis Gravidarum Tanısı Alan Gebelerin Gebeliğe Uyum ve Stresle Başa Çıkma Tarzlarının Belirlenmesi 

Amaç: Bu araştırma, Hiperemezis Gravidarum tanısı alan gebelerin gebeliğe uyum ve stresle başa çıkma tarzlarının belirlenmesi amacıyla yapılmıştır.

Yöntem: Tanımlayıcı olarak yapılan çalışma Hiperemezis Gravidarum tanısı alan ve bir kadın sağlığı eğitim ve araştırma hastanesinde yatan 160 gebe kadın ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma için Etik Kurul onayı ve gerekli izinler alınmıştır. Verilerin toplanmasında, Tanıtıcı Bilgi Formu, Prenatal Kendini Değerlendirme Ölçeği (PKDÖ) ve Stresle Başa Çıkma Tarzları Ölçeği (SBTÖ) kullanılmıştır. Verilerin değerlendirilmesinde sayı, yüzde, ortalama, standart sapma, minumum ve maksimum değerler ve pearson korelasyon testi kullanılmıştır.

Bulgular: Bu araştırmada PKDÖ puan ortalaması 173,3±35,8, SBTÖ alt boyutları puan ortalamaları; “kendine güvenli yaklaşım” 14,5±4,5, “iyimser yaklaşım” 10,1±3,1, “sosyal desteğe başvurma” 7,4±2,2, “çaresiz yaklaşım” 11,6±4,8 ve “boyun eğici yaklaşım” 8,1±3,6 olarak saptanmıştır.

Sonuç: Toplam PKDÖ puan ortalamaları ile stresle başa çıkmada etkili yöntemlerden olan “kendine güvenli” ve “iyimser yaklaşım” arasında negatif doğrultuda anlamlı bir ilişki saptanırken, etkisiz yöntemler olan “çaresiz” ve “boyun eğici yaklaşım” arasında pozitif doğrultuda anlamlı bir ilişki saptanmıştır. Etkili yöntemlerden “kendine güvenli” ve “iyimser yaklaşım” kullanımı arttıkça gebeliğe uyum artmakta, etkisiz yöntemlerin kullanımı arttıkça gebeliğe uyum azalmaktadır.   













Anahtar Kelimeler: Hiperemezis Gravidarum; Gebeliğe Uyum; Stresle Başa Çıkma, Hemşirelik


Kaynakça

  • REFERENCESBayık A, Özsoy-Altuğ S, Ardahan M, Özkahraman Ş, İz-Başalan F. Situations of women encountering stressful life events. Journal of Atatürk University School of Nursing 2006; 9(2): 1-12.Beydağ KD, Mete S. The validity and reliability study of the prenatal self-assessment scale. Journal of Atatürk University School of Nursing 2008; 11(1):16-24. Chou FH, Avant KC, Kuo SH, Fetzer SJ. Relationships between nausea and vomiting, perceived stress, social support, pregnancy planning and psychosocial adaptation in a sample of mothers: A questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2008; 45 (8): 1185-1191. Dağlar G, Nur N. Relation of stress management styles to anxiety and depression levels of pregnancies. Cumhuriyet Medical Journal 2014; 36:429-441.Demirbaş H, Kadıoğlu H. Adaptation to pregnancy in prenatal period women and factors associated with adaptation. Journal of Marmara University Institute of Health Sciences 2014; 4(4): 200-206.Ege E, Eryılmaz G. Investigation of the effects of daily living activities of pregnant women with early gestational period nausea and vomiting. Journal of Atatürk University School of Nursing 2000; 3(1): 1-8.Elkin N. The ways in which pregnant women cope with stress and the factors that affect them. Mersin University Journal of Health Sciences 2015; 8(1): 22-31.Güleç D, Öztürk R, Şen S, Güneri SE. Comparison of psychological symptoms in hyperemesis gravidarum and healthy pregnancies: a case-control study. Gaziantep Med Journal 2014; 20(2): 136-140.Gümüşdaş M, Apay-Ejder S, Özorhan EY. Comparing the psychosocial health of both at-risk and non-at-risk pregnancies. HSP 2014; 1(2): 32- 42.Hacker NF, Moore JG, Gambone JC. Principles of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Üstün C, Koçak İ, editor. 4th ed. Nobel Medicine Bookstores; 2004. p. 227-228.Kuo SH, Wang RH, Tseng HC, Jian SY, Chou FH. A comparison of different severities of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy relative to stress, social support and maternal adaptation. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health 2007; 52(1): e1-e7.Lacasse A, Rey E, Ferreira E, Morin C, Berard A. Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: what about quality of life? BJOG 2008; 115:1484-1493.Mutlugüneş E, Mete S. The relationship between nausea and vomiting and maternal role and acceptance of pregnancy, Cumhuriyet Nursing Journal 2013; 2(1): 8-14. Ölçer Z, Oskay Ü. Stressors suffering from high-risk pregnancies and ways of coping with stress. Journal of Nursing Education and Research 2015; 12(2): 85-92.Saunders RB. Maternity care during pregnancy. Maternity& Women’s Health Care. Lowdermilk DL, Perry SE, editor. 8th ed. Mosby; 2004. p. 397-401. Siva ASBO and KKO factor analysis and reliability study. Unpublished data.1988.Şahin NH, Durak A. Scale of coping styles with stress: Adaptation for university students. Journal of Turkish Psychology1995; 10 (34):56-73.Taşkın L. Birth and Women's Health Nursing. 10th ed. Ankara: System Offset Printing; 2011.Yanıkkerem E, İldan- Çalım S, Göker A, Oruç- Koltan S, Koyuncu FM. Considerations and requirements for diseases of pregnant women with hyperemesis gravidarum. Gümüşhane University Journal of Health Sciences 2012; 1(4): 269-280.Yılmaz- Dereli S, Beji-Kızılkaya N. Pregnancy stress coping, depression and prenatal attachment levels and factors affecting them. General Medical Journal 2010; 20(3): 99-108.
Toplam 1 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Ayşe Bulut 0000-0002-0016-2988

Funda Özdemir 0000-0002-6404-3056

Yayımlanma Tarihi 19 Aralık 2019
Gönderilme Tarihi 31 Mart 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019 Cilt: 22 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

Vancouver Bulut A, Özdemir F. ADAPTATION TO PREGNANCY AND ABILITY TO COPE WITH STRESS OF PREGNANT WOMEN DIAGNOSED WITH HYPEREMESIS GRAVIDARUM. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2019;22(4):277-83.

Dergimiz 2019 dan itibaren EBSCO CINAHL Database'de listelenmektedir.

Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0) ile lisanslanmıştır.

20547


    1.