ÇEVREYE UYARLANMIŞ KUZNETS EĞRİSİ: TÜRKİYE ÜZERİNE BİR UYGULAMA
Öz
Anahtar Kelimeler
İktisadi Büyüme, Çevreye Uyarlanmış Kuznets Eğrisi Hipotezi.
Kaynakça
- Antle, J., Heidebrink, G. (1995). “Environment and Development: Theory and International Evidence”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 43, 603-25.
- Bergstrom, T. C., Goodman, R. P. (1973). “Private Demands for Public Goods”, American Economic Review, 63, 3, 280-96.
- Bertinelli, T., Strobl, E. (2005). “The Environmental Kuznets Curve Semi- Parametrically Revisited”, Economics Letters, 88, 350–7.
- Bhattarai, M., Hammig, M., (2001). “Institutions and the Environmental Kuznets Curve for deforestation: A Cross-Country Analysis for Latin America, Africa, and Asia”, World Development, 29, 6, 995–1010.
- Boercherding, T., Deacon, R. T. (1972). “The Demand for the Services of Non- federal Governments”, American Economic Review, 62, 891-901.
- Borghesi, S., (1999). “The Environmental Kuznets Curve: A Survey of the Literature”, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) Working Paper, 85/99.
- Bradford, D. F., Schlieckert, R., Shore, S. H. (2000). “The Environmental Kuznets Curve: Exploring a Fresh Specification”, CESifo Working Paper Series, No. 367.
- Canas, A., Ferrao, P., Conceiçao, P. (2003). “A New Environmental Kuznets Curve? Relationship Between Direct Material Input and Income per capita: Evidence from Industrialised Countries”, Ecological Economics, 46, 217-/229.
- Carson, R., Jeon, Y., McCubbin, D. (1997). “The Relationship between Air Pollution Emissions and Income: USA data”, Environment and Development Economics, 2, 433-50.
- Costa, D., (1997), “Less of a Luxury: The Rise of Recreation since 1888”, NBER Working Paper, No. 6054.


