Cilt: 27 Sayı: 2 5 Mart 2013
Gülşen Kıral , Mehmet Fatih Tıraş , Gulsen Kıral , Mehmet Traş
PDF İndir
EN TR

-

Abstract

This paper investigates determinants of child labour in urban Turkey, on the basis of binary response variables in order to estimate a probability for child labour participation decision, given some sort of characteristics and reviews previous finds in this field with a newer data set. For this purpose, we use a newer data, collected by official statistic institution of Turkey and implement a regression procedure, namely, Probit Regression. According to our finds, there does exist significant relations between child labour participation decision and individuals’ characteristics, as well as financial constraints of household members in Turkey. In particular, child labour participation decision is significantly associated with father’s income. Therefore, we find implies about luxury good property of counter decision of child labour participation in Turkey.

Keywords

Child Labour Labour Participation, Probit Regression

Kaynakça

  1. Baland, J. M. and Robinson, J. A. (2000), Is Child Labor Inefficient?”, The Journal of Political Economy , Vol. 108, No. 4, pp. 663-679.
  2. Basu, K. (1999), Child Labor: Cause, Consequence, and Cure, with Remarks on International Labor Standarts, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 1083-1119.
  3. Basu, K.. and Ray, R. (2001), The Collective Model of the Household and an Unexpected Implication for Child Labor: Hypotesis and an Emprical Test, The World Bank Working Paper 2813, Washington D.C.
  4. Basu, K.. and Van, P. H. (1998), The Economics of Child Labour, American Economic Review, Vol. 88, No. 3, pp. 412-427.
  5. Basu, K.. and Zarghamee H. (2009), Is product boycott a good idea for controlling child labor? A theoretical investigation, Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 88, pp. 217–220.
  6. Beegle, K.. and Dehejia, R., Gatti, R. (2008), Why Should We Care About Child Labor? The Education, Labor Market, and Health Consequences of Child Labor, The Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 44.
  7. Binder, M. and Scrogin, D. (1999), Labour Force Participation and Household Work of Urban Schoolchildren in Mexico: Characteristics and Consequences, Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol.48, No. 1, pp. 123-154.
  8. Brown, D. K.. and Deardorff, A. V. and Stern, R. M. (2002), The Determinant of Child Labor: Theory and Evidence, RSIE Discussion Paper, No. 486, University of Michigan.
  9. Dayioglu, M. (2005), Patterns of Chance in Child Labour in Schooling in Turkey: The Impact of Compulsary Schooling, Oxford Development Studies, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 195-210.
  10. Dayioglu, M. (2006), The Impact of Household Income on Child Labour in Urban Turkey, Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 42, No. 6, pp. 939-95

Kaynak Göster

APA
Kıral, G., Tıraş, M. F., Kıral, G., & Traş, M. (2013). Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 27(2), 109-120. https://izlik.org/JA66TZ92YZ