-
Abstract
Accumulation of experiences on the social, economical and political areas during historical process has unexpectedly caused changes in social structures, especially the management structures. New Public Management (NPM) approach (paradigm) of Anglo-Saxon perspective, being discussed elaborately especially in the last quarter of 20th Century, has been influential during that period. The most penetrative times of NPM for Germany was 1990s in which the country was passing through important political, social and economic changes. In Germany, NPM, being different from Anglo-Saxon countries that the approach firstly emerged and other Continental European countries, has been reflected as a new model - “Neuen Steuerungsmodell (NSM)” - on the public management practice as a bottom-up exercise from local to federal (or central) government. Evolving German local governments in the context of prevailing management paradigms, by having a powerful local management tradition, have their own peculiarities. In this study, the content, tools and objectives, and differences of Neuen Steuerungsmodell (NSM), having peculiarities of German management culture, which has been triggered by prevailing approach, NPM of 1990s have been described and discussed. To get clear the picture of Neuen Steuerungsmodell (NSM) in practice, various interviews were conducted by local managers and politicians from Disburg province of Nordrhein-Westfalen (NRW) state. The study discussed the ways to drive benefit from Disburg case in local government experiences of Turkey.
Keywords
Kaynakça
- Akın, Ö. (2004), “Federal Almanya”, Nuray E. Keskin (Ed.), Kamu Yönetimi Ülke İncelemeleri, AÜ SBF KAYAUM, Ankara, s. 227-260.
- Akın, Ö. (2009), “Federal Almanya’da Kamu Yönetimi”, Birgül Ayman Güler vd. (Ed.), Kamu Yönetimi Ülke İncelemeleri, İmge Kitabevi Yayınları, Ankara, s. 413-468.
- Aydın, M. D. (2004), “Kamu Sektöründe Toplam Kalite Yönetimi”, M. Kemal Öktem ve Uğur Ömürgönülşen (Ed.), Kamu Yönetimi – Gelişimi ve Güncel Sorunlar, İmaj Yayınevi, Ankara, s. 187-230.
- Baldersheim, H. (2002), “Subsidiarity at Work: Modes of Multi-Level Governance in European Countries”, Janice Caulfield ve Helge O. Larsen (Ed.), Local Government at the Millennium, Leske+Budrich, Opladen, s. 203-212.
- Banner, G. (2006), “Local Government – A Strategic Resource in German Public Management Reform”, Vincent Hoffmann-Martinot ve Hellmut Wollmann (Ed.), State and Local Government Reforms in France and Germany, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, s. 125-144.
- Benz, A. - A. Meincke (2006), “Sub-National Government and Regional Governance in Germany”, Vincent Hoffmann-Martinot ve Hellmut Wollmann (Ed.), State and Local Government Reforms in France and Germany, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, s. 59-74.
- Bogumil, J. (2006), “Administrative Modernisation and Logic of Politics – Impact of the New Steering Model on Relations between Local Government Politics and Administration”, German Journal of Urban Studies, 45 (2), s. 13-25.
- Böhret, Carl - Götz Konzendorf (2001), “Administration in its Social and Economic Environment”, Klaus König ve Heinrich Siedentopf (Ed.), Public Administration in Germany, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, BadenBaden, s. 57-72.
- Busse, V. (2001), “The Structure of Federal Administration”, Klaus König ve Heinrich Siedentopf (Ed.), Public Administration in Germany, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden, s. 105-122.
- Coe, C. K. (2008), “Preventing Local Government Fiscal Crises: Emerging Best Practices”, Public Administration Review, 68(4), s. 759-767.
