KURUMSAL YÖNETİM VE ÇOKULUSLU İŞLETMELERİN STRATEJİ TERCİHLERİ

Tülay İlhan Nas; Kader Tan Şahin; Tarhan Okan

EN TR

KURUMSAL YÖNETİM VE ÇOKULUSLU İŞLETMELERİN STRATEJİ TERCİHLERİ

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kurumsal Yönetim, Yönetim Kurulları, Giriş Stratejileri

Kaynakça

Agarwal, S., and Ramaswami, S.N. (1992), “Choice of Foreign Market Entry Mode: Impact of Ownership, Location and Internalization Factors”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol.23, No.1: 1-27.
Aguilera, R.V. and Jackson G. (2003), “The Cross-National Diversity of Corporate Governance: Dimensions and Determinants”, Academy of Management Review, Vol.28, No.3: 447-465.
Aguilera, R.V. and Yip, G.S. (2004), “How National Corporate Governance Systems Affect Global Integration”, AIM Research Working Paper Series, 001-June 2004, ISSN:1744-0009.
Aguilera, R.T. (2005), “Corporate Governance and Director Accountability: an Institutional Comparative Perspective”, British Journal of Management, Vol.16: 39-53.
Alpay, G, Bodur, M., Ener H and Talug C. (2005), “Comparing Board Level Governance at MNEs and Local Firms Lessons from Turkey”, Journal of International Management, 11: 67-86.
Barkema, H.G. and Vermeulen F. (1997), “What Differences in the Cultural Backgrounds of Partners are Detrimental for International Joint Ventures”, Journal of International Business Studies, 28(4): 845-864.
Barney, J.B. and Hesterly, W. (1996), “Organizational Economics: Understanding the Relationship between Organizations and Economic Analysis”, Handbook of Organization Studies, (eds. Clegg, C. Hardy and W.R. Nord), London: Sage: 115-147.
Brouthers, K. D. and Hennart, J-F. (2007), “Boundaries of the Firm: Insights From International Entry Mode Research”, Journal of Management, 33(3), 395-425.
Carpenter, M.A, Pollock T.G. and Leary, M.M. (2003), “Testing a Model of Reasoned Risk-Taking: Governance, the Experience of Principals and Agents, and Global strategy in Hıgh-Technology IPO Firm”, Strategic Management Journal, 24: 803-820.
Chen H. and Hu M. Y. (2002), “An Analysis of Determinants of Entry Mode and its Impact on Performance”, International Business Review, 11: 193-2

Conyon, M. J. and Peck S. I. (1998), “Board Size and Corporate Performance: Evidence from European Countries”, The European Journal of Finance, 4: 291-304.
Davis, P.S, Desai, A.B and Francis J.D. (2000), “Mode of International Entry: An Isomorphism Perspective”, Journal of International Business Studies, 31, 2: 239-258.
Dehaene, A., Vuyst, V. and Ooghe, H. (2001), “Corporate Performance and Board Structure in Belgian Companies”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 34: 383-39
Demirag, İ. and Serter M. (2003), “Ownership Patterns and Control in Turkish Listed Companies”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol.11, No.1: 40-51.
Demirbağ, M., Glaister, K. W., ve Tatoglu, E. (2007), “Institutional and Transaction Cost Influences on MNEs’ Ownership Strategies of their Affiliates: Evidence from an Emerging Market”, Journal of World Business, 42: 418-434.
Demirbağ, M., Tatoglu, E. ve Glaister, K. W. (2008), “Factors Affecting Perceptions of the Choice between Acquisition and Greenfield Entry: The Case of Western FDI in an Emerging Market”, Management International Review, Vol 48 (1): 5 – 38.
Demirbağ, M., Tatoglu, E. ve Glaister, K. W. (2009), “Equity-Based Entry Modes of Emerging Country Multinationals: Lessons from Turkey”, Journal of World Business, 44(4): 445-462.
Denis, D. K., and McConnell, J.J. (2003), “International Corporate Governance. European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)”, Finance Working Paper No: 05/2003.
Eisenberg, T., Sundgren, S. and Wells, M.T. (1998), “Larger Boards Size and Decreasing Firm Value in Small Firms”, Journal of Financial Economics, 48, 35-54.
Erdal, F and Tatoğlu, E. (2002), “Locational Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment In An Emerging Market Economy: Evidence From Turkey”, Multinational Business Review, Vol.10, No.1
Erdilek, A. (2003), “A comparative analysis of inward and outward FDI in Turkey”, Transnational Corporations, Vol.12 (3).
Erdilek, A. (2008), “Internationalization of Turkish MNEs”, Journal of Management Development Vol. 27 No. 7: 744-760
Erramilli, K and Rao, C.P. (1993), “Service Firms' International Entry-Mode Choice: A Modified Transaction-Cost Analysis”, The Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57, No. 3: 19-38.
Fama, E. F. (1980), “Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm”, The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 88, No. 2: 288-307.
Fama, E.F. and Jensen, M.C. (1983), “Separation of Ownership and Control”, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 26: 301-325
Filatotchev, I., Strange, R., Piesse, J. and Lien, Y-C. (2007), “FDI Firms from Newly Industrialized Economies in Emerging Markets: Corporate Governance, entry Mode and Location”, Journal of International Business Studies, 38: 556-572.
Fried, V.H., Bruton, G.D. and Hisrich, R.D. (1998), “Strategy and the Board of Directors in Venture Capital-Backed Firms”, Journal of Business Venturing, 13: 493-503.
Gökşen, N.N.S. (2007), Makro Kurumsal Bakış Açısı: Bir Değerlendirme, Örgüt Kuramları, (Derleyenler: A.Selami Sargut ve Şükrü Özen), İmge Kitabevi, Ankara.
Gökşen, N.N.S. and Tezölmez, S.H.U. (2007), “Control and Performance in International Joint Ventures in Turkey”, European Management Journal, Vol.25, No.5, 384-394.
Jensen, M. and Meckling, W.H. (1976), “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 287-322.
Kaymak, T. and Bektaş, E. (2008), “East Meets West? Board Characteristics in an Emerging Market: Evidence from Turkish Banks”, Corporate Governance, Vol. 16 (6): 550-561.
Kim, H. and Lim, C. (2009), “Diversity, Outside Directors and Firm Valuation: Korean Evidence”, Journal of Business Research, doi:1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.013
Koch, A.J. (2001), “Selecting Overseas Markets and Entry Modes: Two Decision Processess or None?”, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 19 (1): 65-75
Kogut, B. and Sing H. (1988), “The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode”, Journal of International Business Studies, 19 (3): 4114
Kula, V. (2005), “The Impact of the Roles, Structure and Process of Boards on Firm Performance: Evidence from Turkey”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 13, No. 2: 265-276
Lefort, F. and Urzua, F. (2008), “Board Independence, Firm Performance and Ownership Concentration: Evidence from Chile”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 61(6): 615-622.
Lu, J.W. (2002), “Intra and Inter Organizational Imitative Behavior: Institutional Influences on Japanese Firms’ Entry Mode Choice”, Journal of International Business Studies, 33: 19-37.
Luo, Y. (1999), Entry and Cooperative Strategies in International Business Expansion. Ouorum Books, Wesport, CT.
Luo, Y. (2001), “Determinants Of Entry In An Emerging Economy: A Multilevel Approach”, Journal of Management Studies, 38 (3): 44347
Mak, Y.T and Roush, M.L. (2000), “Factors Affecting the Characteristics of Board of Directors: An Empirical Study of New Zealand Initial Public Offering Firms”, Journal of Business Research, 47: 147-154.
Meyer, K.E, Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S.K and Peng, M.W. (2009), “Institutions, Resources, and Entry Strategies in Emerging Economies”, Strategic Management Journal, 30: 61-80.
Musteen M, Datta, D.K and Herrmann P. (2009), “Ownership Structure and CEO Compensation: Implication for the Choice of Foreign Market Entry Modes”, Journal of International Business Studies, 40: 321-338.
Oğuz, F. (2007), “Örgüt İktisadı: Ekonomi, Hukuk ve Örgüt İlişkileri”, Örgüt Kuramları, (Derleyenler: A.Selami Sargut ve Şükrü Özen), İmge Kitabevi, Ankara.
Özsalih, A. (2009), Yönetim Kurulu Yapısının İşletmelerin Finansal ve Sosyal Sorumluluk Performansı Üzerindeki Etkisi, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Trabzon.
Özdamar, K. (2002), Paket Programlar ile İstatistiksel Veri Analizi1, 4.Baskı, Eskişehir: Kağan Kitapevi.
Peng, M.W. (2004), “Identifying the Big Question In International Business Research”, Journal of International Business Studies, 35: 99–108
Peng, M.W., Wang, D.YL and Jiang Y. (2008), “An Institution Based View of International Business Strategy: A Focus on Emerging Economies”, Journal of International Business Studies, 39: 920-936.
Rhoades, D.L and Rechner, P.L. (2001), “The Role of Ownership and Corporate Governance Factors in International Entry Mode Selection”, The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol.9, No.4: 309-326. Rose, C. (2005), “The Composition of Semi-Two-Tier Corporate Boards and Firm Performance”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 13(5): 691-701.
Shleifer A. and Vishny, R.W. (1997), “A Survey of Corporate Governance”, The Journal of Finance, Vol.52, Issue 2: 737-783.
Tatoğlu, E ve Glaister, K.W. (1998a), “Western MNCs’ FDI in Turkey: An Analysis of Location Specific Factors”, Management International Review; Second Quarter, 38(2), 133 – 159.
Tatoğlu, E ve Glaister, K.W. (1998b), “An Analysis of Motives for Western FDI in Turkey”, International Business Review, 7, 203 – 230.
Tatoğlu, E. (2000), “Western Joint Ventures in Turkey: Strategic Motives and Partner Selection Criteria”, European Business Review, vol. 12(3): 137 – 1
Tatoğlu, E., Glaister, K.W. and Erdal, F. (2003), “Determinants of Foreign Ownership in Turkish Manufacturing”, Eastern European Economics, vol. 41(2): 5–41.
Taylor, C.R., Zou, S. and Osland G.E. (2000), “Foreign Market Entry Strategies of Japanese MNC’s”, International Marketing Review, Vol.17, No.2: 146-16
Tihanyi L, Griffith D.A. and Rusell C.J. (2005), “The Effect Of Cultural Distance On Entry Mode Choice, International Diversification, And MNE Performance: A Meta-Analysis”, Journal of International Business Studies, 36: 270–283.
Ülgen, H. ve Mirze, K. (2007), İşletmelerde Stratejik Yönetim, 4. Baskı, Literatür Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
Ülgen, H. ve Mirze, K. (2010), İşletmelerde Stratejik Yönetim, 5. Baskı, Beta Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
Wright, M., Filatotchev I., Hoskisson, E. and Peng. M.W. (2005), “Guest Editors’ Introduction Strategy Research in Emerging Economies: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom”, Journal of Management Studies, 42 (1): 1-27.
Wiseman, R.M. and Gomez-Mejia L.R. (1998), “A Behavioral Agency Model of Managerial Risk Taking”, Academy of Management Review, Vol.23, No.1: 133-153.
Xu, D. and Shenkar, O. (2002), “Institutional Distance and the Multinational Enterprise”, Academy of Management Review, Vol.27, No.4: 608-618.
Young, M.N, Peng, M.W, Ahlstrom, D. Bruton, G.D and Jiang Y. (2008), “Corporate Governance in Emerging Economies: A Review of the Principal-Principal Perspective”, Journal of Management Studies, 45(1): 196-220. http://eski.imkb.gov.tr/sirket/sy2007.htm, (Erişim: 12 Ağustos 2009). http://www.spk.gov.tr/displayfile.aspx?action=displayfile&pageid=67&fn=67.p df (Erişim: 20 Ekim 2009)

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

-

Yazarlar

Tülay İlhan Nas

Kader Tan Şahin

Tarhan Okan

Yayımlanma Tarihi

6 Ağustos 2013

Gönderilme Tarihi

6 Ağustos 2013

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2013 Cilt: 27 Sayı: 4

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA36NA65PM

APA

İlhan Nas, T., Tan Şahin, K., & Okan, T. (2013). KURUMSAL YÖNETİM VE ÇOKULUSLU İŞLETMELERİN STRATEJİ TERCİHLERİ. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 27(4), 210-228. https://izlik.org/JA36NA65PM

AMA

1.İlhan Nas T, Tan Şahin K, Okan T. KURUMSAL YÖNETİM VE ÇOKULUSLU İŞLETMELERİN STRATEJİ TERCİHLERİ. Trend Bus Econ. 2013;27(4):210-228. https://izlik.org/JA36NA65PM

Chicago

İlhan Nas, Tülay, Kader Tan Şahin, ve Tarhan Okan. 2013. “KURUMSAL YÖNETİM VE ÇOKULUSLU İŞLETMELERİN STRATEJİ TERCİHLERİ”. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 27 (4): 210-28. https://izlik.org/JA36NA65PM.

EndNote

İlhan Nas T, Tan Şahin K, Okan T (01 Ekim 2013) KURUMSAL YÖNETİM VE ÇOKULUSLU İŞLETMELERİN STRATEJİ TERCİHLERİ. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 27 4 210–228.

IEEE

[1]T. İlhan Nas, K. Tan Şahin, ve T. Okan, “KURUMSAL YÖNETİM VE ÇOKULUSLU İŞLETMELERİN STRATEJİ TERCİHLERİ”, Trend Bus Econ, c. 27, sy 4, ss. 210–228, Eki. 2013, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA36NA65PM

ISNAD

İlhan Nas, Tülay - Tan Şahin, Kader - Okan, Tarhan. “KURUMSAL YÖNETİM VE ÇOKULUSLU İŞLETMELERİN STRATEJİ TERCİHLERİ”. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 27/4 (01 Ekim 2013): 210-228. https://izlik.org/JA36NA65PM.

JAMA

1.İlhan Nas T, Tan Şahin K, Okan T. KURUMSAL YÖNETİM VE ÇOKULUSLU İŞLETMELERİN STRATEJİ TERCİHLERİ. Trend Bus Econ. 2013;27:210–228.

MLA

İlhan Nas, Tülay, vd. “KURUMSAL YÖNETİM VE ÇOKULUSLU İŞLETMELERİN STRATEJİ TERCİHLERİ”. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, c. 27, sy 4, Ekim 2013, ss. 210-28, https://izlik.org/JA36NA65PM.

Vancouver

1.Tülay İlhan Nas, Kader Tan Şahin, Tarhan Okan. KURUMSAL YÖNETİM VE ÇOKULUSLU İŞLETMELERİN STRATEJİ TERCİHLERİ. Trend Bus Econ [Internet]. 01 Ekim 2013;27(4):210-28. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA36NA65PM

800px-Open-Access-PLoS.svg.png

-

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

KURUMSAL YÖNETİM VE ÇOKULUSLU İŞLETMELERİN STRATEJİ TERCİHLERİ

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

IZ

Kaynak Göster