ERGENLERİN PROBLEMLİ İNTERNET KULLANIMININ BAZI DEĞİŞKENLER AÇISINDAN İNCELENMESİ

Yıl 2008, Sayı: 18, 106 - 124, 03.12.2010

Hüseyin Doğan Abdullah Işıklar Susran Erkan Eroğlu

Öz

Bu araştırmada, ergenlerin problemli internet kullanımları, cinsiyet,
internete ulaşım durumları, ilgileri ve internet küfelere gitmeyi sakıncalı bulup
bulmamaları açısından incelenmiştir. Araştırma genel tarama modeliyle
gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu araştırmanın evreni, Konya ili ortaöğretim kurumlarına
devam eden öğrencilerden oluşmaktadır. Araştırmanın örneklemini ise Selçuklu
ilçesi Atatürk Lisesi'nde öğrenim gören 86'sı erkek 98'i kız olmak üzere toplam 184
12. sınıf öğrencisi oluşturmaktadır. Verilerin toplanmasında "Problemli Internet
Kullanımı Ölçeği" ve "Kişisel Bilgi Formu" kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda
Öğrencilerin puanları arasında anlamlı düzeyde farklılıkları bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Internet bağımlılığı, problemli internet kullanımı, ergenlik

Kaynakça

• Bölükbaş, K. (2003). internet Cafeler ve internet Bağımlılığı Üzerine Sosyolojik Bir Araştırma: Diyarbakır Örneği, (Basılmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Diyarbakır.
• Buckingham, D. (2002) 'The Electronic Generation? Children and New Media', in L.A Lievrouw and S. Livingstone (eds) The Handbook of New Media, pp. 77-89. London: Sage.
• Ceyhan, E., Ceyhan, A.A. ve Gürcan, A (2007). Problemli internet kullammı ölçeğinin geçerlilik ve güvenirlilik çalışmaları, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi. 7(1),390-410.
• Chou, C. ve Hsiao M.C. (2000). Internet addiction, usage, gratification, and pleasure experience: The Taiwan college student's case,. Computers and Education 35:65-80.
• Davis, R. A. (2001). A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use (PIU). Computers in Human Behavior
• Davis, S., Smith, B., Rodrigue, K. & Pulvers, K. (1999). An examination ofInternet usage on two college campuses. College Student Journal.
• Eltugay, Ö. (2000). "internet ve Yabancılaşma" http://www.inet-tr.org.trlinetconf6!tammetin! yabanci1asma.html,
• Erel, R. (2000). "internet Zararlı Alışkanlıklar Yaratıyor mu? http://turk.internet.comllıaberiyazigoster. php3') yaziid=679
• Facer, K. ve Furlong R. (2001). Beyond the myth ofthe "cyberkid": young people at the margins of the mformation revolution, Journal of Youth Studies 4(4):451-69.
• Facer, K., Furlong, J., Furlong, R. ve Sutherland, R. (2001 a). Constructing the child computer user: from public policy to private practices, British Journal of Sociology 22(1): 91-108.
• Facer, K., Sutherland, R., Furlong, R. ve Furlong, 1. (2001 b). What's the point of using computers? the development of young people's computer expertise in the home, New Media & Society 3(2): 199-219.
• Fortson, B. L, Scotti, J.R., Cihen Yu-C, Malone Judith, D. B. ve Kevin S. (2007). İnternet use, abuse and dependence among students at a Southeastern Regional University, Journal ofAmencan College Health, Vol. 56, no. 2
• Goldberg, 1. (1995). Internet Addiction Disorder. http://www.cog. brown.edu / brochure / people / duchonf / humor / internet.addiction.html.
• Griffiths, M. (2000). Does Internet and computer "addiction" exist? Some case study evidence, Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 5,211-218.
• Gross, E.F., Juvonen, J. & Gable, S.L (2002). Internet Use and Well-being in Adolescence, Journal ofSocial1ssues 58(1): 75-90.
• Harre, N. (2000). The internet: lls Effects on Safety and Behavıour ImplıcatlOnsfor Adolescents. Department ofPsychology University of Auckland
• Ho SMY, Lee. M.C. (2001). Computer usage and its relationship with adolescent life in Hong Kong, J Adolescence Health.;29:258-266.
• Holloway, S.L. ve Valentine, G. (2002). 'Spatiality and the New Social Studies of Childhood', Sociology 34(4): 763-79.
• Hutchby, ı. ve Moran-Ellis, J. (2001). Children, Technology and Culture: The Impacts of Technologies in Children's Everyday Lives. London: RoutledgeIFalmer.
• Johnson, D. (2001). The Cyber Children Have Arrived: The Wired Life Presents Opportunities and Threats for Children, The Futurist 35(5): 14-15.
• Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T. ve ScherIis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist. 53, 1017-1031.
• Livingstone, S. (2003). Children's Use of the Internet: Refleetions on the Emerging Research Agenda, New Media & Society 5(2): 147-66
• Mcmillan, S. 1. and Morrison, M. (2006). Coming of age with the internet: A qualitative exploration of how the internet has become an integral part of young peop]e's lives, New Media Sodety; 8; 73
• Miller, M. (2001). A Snapshot of the Class of 2001, Publie Relations Tacties 8(9):21-2.
• Montgomery, Montgomery, K.C. (2001). Digital Kids: The New On-line Children 's Consumer Culture, in D.G.
• Morahan-Martin, J. (1998). Males, females, and the Internet. In J. Gackenbach (Ed.). Psychology and the In/emet (pp. 169-197). New York: Academic Press.
• Morrison, M. ve Kmgınan, D. (2001). A Look at Mass and Computer Mediated Technologies: Understanding the Roles of Television and Computeıs in the Home, Journal ofBroadcasting and Elec/ronic Media 45(1): 135-61.
• Peele, S. ve Brodsky, A. (1992). The truth about addiction and recovery: The life process program for outgrowing destructive habits. New York: Simon and Schuster.
• Ribak, R. (2001). Like Immigrants": Negotiating Power in the Face of the Home Computer, New Media & Society 3(2): 220-38.
• Rice, R.E. (2001). "Primary Issues in Internet Use: Access, Civic and Community Involvement, and Social Interaction and Expression ", in L.A. Lievrouw and S. Livingstone (eds) The Handbook of New Media, pp. 105-29. London: Sage.
• Rideout, V. 1., Foehr, V. G., Roberts, D. F. ve Brody, M. (I 999). Kids and media at the new millennium. (Available from The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Menl0 Park, CA, www.ldforg).
• Riva, G. ve Oalimberti, C. (1998). Computer-mediated Communieation: ldentity and Social Interaction in an Electronic Environment, Genetic. Social, and General Psychology Monographs 124(4): 434-58.
• Sefton-Oreen, J. ve Buckingham, D. (1998) "Digilal Visions: Children's "Creative" Uses of Multimedia Technologies", in J. Sefton-Oreen (ed.) Digital Diversions, pp. 62-83. London: UCL Press.
• Senemoğlu, N. (1997). Gelişim, Öğrenme Öğretme: Kurarndan Uygulamaya. Ankara: Spot Matbaacılık
• Shapira NA, Goldsmith T.D., Keck. P.E., Khosla U.M ve McElroy S.L. (2000). Psychiatric features of individuals with problematic Internet use, Journal of Affictive Disorders
• Spears, R., Postmes, T., Lea, M. ve Wolbert,A. (2002). When are Net Effects Gross Products? The Power of Influence and the Influence ofPower in Computermediated Communication,Journal ofSocial1ssues 58(1): 91-108.
• Tarpley, T. (2001). "Children, the 1nternet, and Other New Technologies ", in D.G. Singer and J.L. Singer (eds) Handbook ofChildren and the Media, pp. 54756. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Teo T, ve Lim VKG.( 2000). Gender differences in Internet usage and task preferences, Behavior 1nfTechno!.; 19:283-295.
• Valentme, G. ve HoJloway S.L. (2002). Cyberkids? Exploring Children's Identities and Social Networks in On-line and Off-line Worlds, Annals of the Association ofAmerican Geographers 92 (2): 302-19.
• Young, K. (1999). 1nternet addietion: symptorns, evafuation and treatment. In: Vande Creek, L., ve Jackson, T. Innovations in Clinical Practice: A Source Book (VoU 7). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Pres.
• Young, K. (1996). 1nternet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyber Psychology and Behavior. http://www.netaddiction.com; Internet;2 Aralık 2005