BÖLGESEL KAMU HARCAMALARI VE BÖLGESEL EKONOMİK BÜYÜME İLİŞKİSİ: TÜRKİYE İÇİN PANEL VERİ ANALİZİ

Year 2008, Volume: 12 Issue: 2, 413 - 426, 18.02.2010

Ömer Yılmaz Vedat Kaya

Abstract

Bu makale bölgesel kamu harcamaları ve bölgesel ekonomik büyüme
arasındaki iliskiyi arastırır. Çalısmada bölgesel kamu harcamalarının bölgesel
hâsılaya oranı ve kisi basına bölgesel hâsıla büyüme oranı değiskenleri
kullanılmıstır. Çalısma 1990–2001 dönemine ait yedi coğrafi bölgeyi
kapsamaktadır. Uygulama bulgularına ulasmak için panel veri analizlerinde
kullanılan sabit etkili tahmin modeli kullanılmıstır. Çalısmada, özellikle 1990’lı
yılların sonlarına doğru kullanılmaya baslanan panel veri birim kök testlerine de
yer verilmistir. Sonuçlar bölgesel kamu harcamaları ve bölgesel ekonomik
büyüme arasında negatif ve istatistiksel olarak anlamsız bir iliskinin olduğunu
göstermistir.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Bölgesel kamu harcamaları, bölgesel ekonomik büyüme,
panel veri analizi, panel veri birim kök testleri

 

Abstract: This study investigates the relationship between regional public
expenditures and regional economic growth. In this study proportion to regional
product of regional government expenditure, and per capita regional product
growth ratio variables were used. The study covers seven geeoraphic regions in
Turkey for the period 1990–2001. Fixed effect model was used for panel data
analysis. In the study, we used panel data unit root tests which are popular after
end of 1990’s. The results show that there is a negative but statistically
insignificant relationship between regional public expenditures and regional
economic growth.

Key Words: Regional public expenditures, regional economic growth, panel data
analysis, panel data unit root tests

Keywords

Bölgesel kamu harcamaları, bölgesel ekonomik büyüme, panel veri analizi, panel veri birim kök testleri

References

• Alexander, W.R. (1990), ‘Growth: Some Combined Cross-Sectional and Time Series Evidence from OECD Countries’, Applied Economics, 22, pp: 1197–1204.
• Al-Yousif, Y.K. (2001), ‘Do Government Expenditures Inhibit or Promote Economic Growth: Some Empirical Evidence from Saudi Arabia’, The Indian Economic Journal, Vol: 48, No: 2, 92–96.
• Artan, S. ve Berber M. (2004), ‘Kamu kesimi Büyüklüğü ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Çoklu Ko-Entegrasyon Analizi’, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 5, Sayı: 2, ss: 13–29.
• Aschauer, D.A. (1989), ‘Is Public Expenditure Productive?’, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol: 23, pp: 177–200.
• Barro, R.J. (1989), ‘Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries’, Working Paper, No: 3120, Cambridge, Mass. NBER, September.
• …………., (1990), ‘Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth’, Journal of Political Economy, (October), 98, Part II, pp: 103– 125.
• …………., (1991), ‘Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, CVI, (May 1991), pp: 407–444
• Barth, J.R. and Bradley, M.D. (1987), ‘The Impact of Government Spending on Economic Activity’, Manuscript, Washington: George Washington University.
• Barth, J.R., Keleher R.E.and Russek F.S. (1990), ‘The Scale of Government Economic Activity’, Southern Economic Journal, 13, pp: 142-183.
• Cao, Y. and Li, M.Z.F. (2001), ‘The Long-Run Causality between Government Size and Economic Growth: A Comparative Study of Four Asian Tigers over the Period of Industrialization and Post-Industrialization’, http://www.ntu.edu.sg/nbs/ae/WP-Series/wp2001-03. 27.07.2005. ErişimTarihi:
• Çeştepe, H. ve Bilen, M. (2001), ‘Devletin Ekonomideki Rolü: Finansal Kriz Sonrası Doğu Asya’da Performans Analizi’, İktisat-İşletme ve Finans Dergisi, Haziran, ss: 54–71.
• Damalagas, B. (2000), ‘Public Sector and Economic Growth: The Greek Experience’, Applied Economics, 32, pp: 277–288.
• Devarajan, S. and Viyana, S. (1993), ‘What do Governments Buy? The Composition Public Spending and Economic Performance’, Policy Research Working Paper, The World Bank, WPS 1082.
• Devarajan, S., Swaroop V. and Zou H. (1996), ‘The Composition of Public Expenditure and Economic Growth’, Journal of Monetary Economics, 37, pp: 313–344.
• Diamond, J. (1989), ‘Government Expenditure and Economic Growth: An Empirical Investigation’, IMF Working Paper, No: 89/45, pp: 251–276.
• Folster, S. and Henrekson, M. (1999), ‘Growth and the Public Sector: A Critique of the Critics’, European Journal of Political Economy, 15: 2, pp: 337–358.
• Ghali, K.H. (1999), ‘Government Size and Economic Growth: Evidence from a Multivariate Cointegration Analysis’, Applied Economics, 31, pp: 975– 987.
• Gould, E.J. (1983), ‘The Development of Public Expenditure in Western Industrialized Countries: A Comparative Analysis’, Public Finance, 38(1), pp: 38–69.
• Grier, K.B. and Tullock, G. (1989), ‘An Empirical Analysis of Cross-National Economic Growth, 1951–1980’, Journal of Monetary Economics, 24, pp: 259–276.
• Grimes, A. (2003), ‘Economic Growth and the Size & Structure of Government: http://www.businessnz.org.nz/file/581 Erişim Tarihi: 06.07.2005.
• Grossman, P.J. (1983), ‘Government and Economic Growth. A Non Linear Relationship’, Public Choice, vol: 56, pp: 193–200.
• Gwartney, J., Holcombe R. and Lawson R. (1998), ‘The Scope of Government and the Wealth of Nations’, The Cato of Nations, Vol: 18, No: 2, pp:163- 190.
• Hadri, K. (2000), ‘Testing for Stationarity in Heterogeneous Panel Data’, Econometrics Journal, vol:3(2), pp: 215–231.
• Haris, R. D. F. and Tzavalis, E. (1999), ‘Inferences for Unit Roots in Dynamic Panels Where the Time Dimension is Fixed’, Journal of Econometrics, 91, pp: 201–226.
• Hausman, J. A. and Taylor, W.E. (1981), ‘Panel Data and Unobservable Individual Effects’, Econometrica, 49 (6), pp: 1377–1398.
• Holmes, J.M. and Hutton, P.A. (1990), ‘On the Causal Relationship Between Government Expenditures and National Income’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 72, pp: 87–95.
• Hsieh, E. and Lai, K.S. (1994), ‘Government Spending and Economic Growth: The G–7 Experience’, Applied Economics, Vol: 26, ISS 51, pp: 535–542.
• Johnston, J. and Dinardo J. (1997) Econometric Methods, 4. Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
• Kneller, R. , Bleaney M. and Gemmel N. (1998), ‘Growth, Public Policy and the Government Budget Constraint: Evidence from OECD Countries’, Discussion Papers in Economics, DP 98/14, University of Nottingham.
• Kormendi, R.C. and Meguire, P.G. (1985), ‘Macroeconomic Determinants of Growth: Cross-Country Evidence’, Journal of Monetary Economics, 16, (September 1985), pp: 141–163.
• Landau, D.L. (1983), ‘Government Expenditure and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Study’, Southern Economic Journal, January, 49, pp: 783–792.
• …………., (1985), ‘Government Expenditure and Economic Growth in the Developed Countries: 1952-1976’, Public Choice, No:3, 47, pp: 459-477.
• …………., (1986), ‘Government and Economic Growth in the Less Developed Countries: An Empirical Study for 1960–1980’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 35/1, pp: 35–75.
• Levin, A., Lin C. and Chu S. S. (2002), ‘Unit Roots Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties’, Journal of Econometrics, 108, pp: 1–24.
• Levine, R. and Renelt, D. (1992), ‘A Sensitivity Analysis of Cross Country Growth Regressions’, American Economic Review, 82(4), pp: 942–963.
• Lin, S.A.Y. (1994), ‘Government Spending and Economic Growth’, Applied Economics, 26, pp: 83–94.
• Lucas, R.E. (1988), ‘On the Mechanics of Economic Development’, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, pp: 3–42.
• Maddala, G. S. and Wu, S. (1999), ‘A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and A New Simple Test’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Special Issue, Vol: 61, Issue: 0, pp: 631–52 .
• Pio, A. (1993), ‘İçsel Büyüme Teorisinde Yeni Gelişmeler Nelerdir? Bunlar Gelişmekte Olan ve Piyasa Ekonomisine Geçiş Sürecini Yaşayan Ülkeler Açısından Ne Ölçüde Uygulanabilir?’, (Çeviren: Nurcan Özkaplan), Ekonomik Yaklaşım, Cilt: 4, Sayı: 10, ss: 109–136.
• Quah, D. (1992), ‘International Patterns of Growth: Persistence in Cross- Country Disparities’, Unpublished Manuscript, London School of Economics.
• Ram, R. (1986), ‘Government Size and Economic Growth: A New Framework and Some Evidence from Cross-Section and Time-Series Data’, The American Economic Review, March, 76/1, pp: 191–203.
• Romer, P.M. (1989), ‘What Determines the Rate of Growth and Technological Chance’, World Bank Working Papers.
• …………., (1990a), ‘Human Capital and Growth: Theory and Evidence’, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 40, pp: 47–57.
• …………., (1990b), ‘Capital, Labour and Productivity’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Special Issue, pp: 337–420.
• Singh, B. and Sahni, B. (1984), ‘Patterns and Directions of Causality Between Government Expenditure and National Income in the United States’, Journal of Quantitative Economics, 2, pp: 291–308.
• Sun, H. and Parikh, A. (2001), ‘Exports, Inward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and Regional Economic Growth in China’, Regional Studies, 35 (3), pp: 187–196.
• Tanzi, V. and Schuknecht, L. (1996), ‘Reforming Government in Industrial Countries’, Finance and Economic Development, September, pp: 2–5.
• Taylor, M. and Sarno, L. (1998), ‘The Behavior of Real Exchange Rates during the Post Bretton Woods Period’, Journal of International Economics, 46, pp: 281–312.
• Teresawa, K.L. and Gates, W.R. (1998), ‘Relationships between Government Size and Economic Growth: Japan’s Government Reforms and Evidence from OECD’, International Public Management Journal, 1(2), pp: 195– 223.
• Terzi, H. (1998), ‘Kamu Harcamaları ve Ekonomik Kalkınma İlişkisi Üzerine Ekonometrik Bir İnceleme’, İktisat İşletme ve Finans, Yıl:13, Sayı:142, ss:67–77.
• Uzay, N. (2002), ‘Kamu Büyüklüğü ve Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerindeki Etkileri: Türkiye Örneği (1970–1999)’, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı:19, Temmuz-Aralık, ss: 151–172.