BibTex RIS Cite

-

Year 2015, Volume: 19 Issue: 1, 41 - 68, 09.11.2015

M. Kürşad Timuroğlu

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of organizational and environmental factors on organizational innovation. In this context, the research questions were determined according to theoretical discussions and previous empirical study findings. In the implementation section the data from the survey conducted on 993 SMEs in Turkey by using relevant statistical methods. Consequently, it is found that there is a significant impact of organizational and environmental factors on organizational innovation. Thus, the hypothesis of the study is supported as it was expected

Keywords

Organizational Factors Environmental Factors Organizational Innovation

References

  • Achrol, R., Stern LW. (Feb., 1988). “Environmental Determinants of Decision-Making Uncertainty in Marketing Channels”. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(1), 36-50.
  • Adegoke, O. (2007). “Innovation Types and Innovation Management Practices in Service Companies”, Int. Journal of Operations and Production Management, 27(6), 569.
  • Antoncıc, B. and Hısrıch, R. D. (2001). “Intrapreneurship: Construct Refinement and Cross-Cultural Validation”. Journal of Business Venturing, No.16, 497- 527.
  • Aselage, J. ve Eisenberger, R. (2003). “Perceived organizational support and psychological contracts: A theoretical integration”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 491-509.
  • Bullinger, A. C. (2008). Innovation and Ontologies: Structuring the Early Stages of Innovation Management, Almanya: Gabler Publishing.
  • Doyle, P. (1998). “Innovation or die”, Marketing Business, 20, 3.
  • Eisenberger, R. Aselage, J., Sucharski, I. L. and Jones, J. R. (2004). Perceived Organizational Support, The Employment Relationship: Examining Psychological and Contextual Perspectives. (Edt. J. Coyle-Shapiro, L. Shore, and S. Taylor, & L. Tetrick), Oxford University Press, 206-225.
  • Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P. ve Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). “Perceived Organizational Support and Employee Diligence, Commitment, and Innovation”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75 (1), 51-59.
  • Eisenberger, R.; Stinglhamber, F.; Vandenberghe, C.; Sucharski, I. L. and Rhoades, L. (2002). “Perceived Supervisor Support: Contributions to Perceived Organizational Support and Employee Retention”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (3), 565-573.
  • Eisenberger, R., Cummings, J., Armelo, S. ve Lynch, P. (1997). “Perceived Organizational Support, Discretionary Treatment and Job Satisfaction”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 812–820.
  • Elçi, Ş. (2007). “Herkesin İnovasyon Yapması Kaçınılmaz”. Bursa Ticaret ve Sanayi Odası Bursa Ekonomi Dergisi, Sayı 227, 38.
  • Ellonen, R., Blomqvist, K. ve Puumalainen, K. (2008). “The Role of Trust in Organizational Innovativeness”. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11, 2, 160- 181.
  • Eymen, U. E. (2007). SPSS Veri Analiz Yöntemleri. İstatistik Merkezi, 74.
  • Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A. S., Slovic, P. ve Johnson, S. M. (2000). “The Affect Heuristic in Judgments of Risk and Benefits”. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 1-17.
  • Fry, A. S. (1987). “The Post it Note: An Intrapreneurial Success”, SAM Advanced Management Journal, Summer, 4-9.
  • Genis-Gruber, A. ve Hulisi Ö. (2014). “Environmental factors affecting innovation strategies of companies: Customers and suppliers effect Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences”. 10th International Strategic Management Conference, 150, 718- 725.
  • Gilley, K., Walters, B. A., Olson, B. J. (Fall 2002). “Top Management Team Risk Taking Propensities and Firm Performance: Direct and Firm Performance: Direct and Moderating Effects”. Journal of Business Strategies. 19, 2, 95-114.
  • Gliner, J. A. ve Morgan, G. A. (2000). Research Methods in Applied Settings: An Integrated Approach. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Gupta, A. K. ve Singhal, A. (1993). “Managing Human Resources for Innovation and Creativity”. Research Technology Management. 36, 3, 41-48.
  • Halsey, W. D. (1988). Macmillan Contemporary Dictionary, 1. Baskı, İstanbul: ABC Kitabevi.
  • Hattori, R. A. ve Wycoff, J. (2004). Innovation Training, USA: American Society for Training and Development.
  • Hornsby, J. S.; Kuratko, D. F. ve Zahra, S. A. (May 2002) “Middle Managers' Perception of the Internal Environment for Corporate Entrepreneurship: Assessing A Measurement Scale”. Journal of Business Venturing, Volume 17, Issue 3, 253–273.
  • http://www.tdk.gov.tr, Erişim tarihi: 25.03.2010
  • http://www.tdk.gov.tr/index.php?option=com_gts&arama=gts&guid=TDK.GTS.50ceef baa24587.42623485, Erişim Tarihi 10.12.2012
  • Kaplan, R. S. ve Norton D. P., (2004). Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets Into Tangible Outcomes, USA, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Press.
  • Koberg, C. S.; Dawn R., Kurt, D., Heppard, A. (Spring 2003). “An empirical test of environmental, organizational, and process factors affecting incremental and radical innovation”. The Journal of High Technology Management Research,14 (1), 21–45.
  • Kuratko, D. F. ve Hodgetts, R. M. (2004). Entrepreneurship: Theory, Process and Practice. Sixth edition. USA: Thompson South-Western.
  • Kuratko, D.F.; Ireland, R.D. ve Hornsby, J.S. (2001). "Improving Firm Performance Through Entrepreneurial Actions: Acordia's Corporate Entrepreneurship Strategy", Academy of Management Executive, 15, 4, 60-71.
  • Leavy, B. (2005). “A Leader's Guide to Creating an Innovation Culture”, Strategy and Leadership, Vol:33, Issue:4, s. 39.
  • Löfsten, H. ve Lindelöf, P. (2005). “Environmental hostility, strategic orientation and the importance of management accounting: an empirical analysis of new technology-based firms”. Technovation. 25, 725–738.
  • Lumpkin, T. ve Dess, G. G. (1996). “Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance”. The Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172.
  • Moore, L. ve Craig, L. (2008). Intellectual capital in enterprise success: strategy revisited, USA, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Mullins, L. J. (1990). Management and Organizational Behaviour, USA: Pitman Publishing.
  • Naktiyok, A. (2004). İç Girişimcilik. İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
  • Özdevecioğlu, M. (2003). “Algılanan Örgütsel Destek İle Örgütsel Bağlılık Arasındaki İlişkilerin Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma”. D.E.Ü.İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 18 (2), 113-130.
  • Paswan, AK., Dant R. P. ve Lumpkin J. R.. (1998) “An Empirical Investigation of the Linkages among Relationalism, Environmental Uncertainty, and Bureaucratization”. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 43, Issue 3, 125- 140.
  • Renn, O. ve Rohrman, B. (2000). Cross-Cultural Risk Perception, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Rhoades, L. and Eisenberger, R. (2002). “Perceived Organizational Support: A Review of The Literature”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714.
  • Short, J. F. (1984). “The Social Fabric of Risk: Toward The Social Transformation of Risk”, American Sociological Review, 711-725.
  • Sims, H.P.; Szilagyi, A. D. ve McKemey, D. R. (1976). “Antecedents of Work-Related Expectancies”. Academy of Management Journal 19 (4), 547-559.
  • Şah, N. ( 2007). Personel Güçlendirmenin İş Tatmini ve Örgütsel Bağlılık Üzerine Etkisi: Dört Ve Beş Yıldızlı Otel İşletmelerinde Bir Uygulama. (Doktora Tezi), İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • Tannenbaum, S. I. ve Dupuree-Bruno, L. M. (1994). “The Relationship between Organizational and Environmental Factors and the Use of Innovative Human Resource Practices”. Group & Organization Management, 19, 2, 171-202.
  • Thompson, J. L. (1999) "The World of the Entrepreneur – A New Perspective". Journal of Workplace Learning, Vol. 11 Iss: 6, 209-224.
  • Tidd, J.; Bessant, J. ve Pavitt, K. (2005). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change (3.Baskı). İngiltere: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Yoshimura, K. E. (2003). Employee Traits, Perceived Organizational Support, Supervisory Communication, Affective Commitment, and Intent To Leave: Group Differences (Degree of Masters of Science), North Carolina: North Carolina State University.
  • Zahra, S. A. (1991). “Predictors and, Financial Outcomes of Corporate Entrepreneurship: an Exploratory Study”. Journal of Business Venturing, 6, 4, 259-285.
  • Zahra, S. A. ve Covin, J. G. (1995). “Contextual Influences on The Corporate Entrepreneurship-Performance Relationship: A Longitudinal Analysis”. Journal of Business Venturing, No.10, 43-58.
  • Zahra, S. A. ve Garvis, D. M. (2000). “International Corporate Entrepreneurship and Firm Performance: The Moderating Effect of International Environmental Hostility”. Journal of Business Venturing, No.15, 469 –492.

Örgütsel ve Çevresel Faktörlerin Örgütsel Yenilik Üzerine Etkisi

Year 2015, Volume: 19 Issue: 1, 41 - 68, 09.11.2015

M. Kürşad Timuroğlu

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, örgütsel ve çevresel faktörlerin örgütsel yenilik üzerine
etkisinin araştırılmasıdır. Daha önceki bilimsel çalışmalara dayanarak araştırma soruları
belirlenmiştir. Türkiye’de faaliyet gösteren 993 KOBİ üzerinde anket vasıtasıyla
araştırma yürütülmüş ve sonuç olarak, örgütsel ve çevresel faktörlerin örgütsel yenilik
üzerinde istatistiki anlamda önemli bir etkisi olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

Örgütsel Faktörler Çevresel Faktörlerin Örgütsel Yenilik

References

  • Achrol, R., Stern LW. (Feb., 1988). “Environmental Determinants of Decision-Making Uncertainty in Marketing Channels”. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(1), 36-50.
  • Adegoke, O. (2007). “Innovation Types and Innovation Management Practices in Service Companies”, Int. Journal of Operations and Production Management, 27(6), 569.
  • Antoncıc, B. and Hısrıch, R. D. (2001). “Intrapreneurship: Construct Refinement and Cross-Cultural Validation”. Journal of Business Venturing, No.16, 497- 527.
  • Aselage, J. ve Eisenberger, R. (2003). “Perceived organizational support and psychological contracts: A theoretical integration”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 491-509.
  • Bullinger, A. C. (2008). Innovation and Ontologies: Structuring the Early Stages of Innovation Management, Almanya: Gabler Publishing.
  • Doyle, P. (1998). “Innovation or die”, Marketing Business, 20, 3.
  • Eisenberger, R. Aselage, J., Sucharski, I. L. and Jones, J. R. (2004). Perceived Organizational Support, The Employment Relationship: Examining Psychological and Contextual Perspectives. (Edt. J. Coyle-Shapiro, L. Shore, and S. Taylor, & L. Tetrick), Oxford University Press, 206-225.
  • Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P. ve Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). “Perceived Organizational Support and Employee Diligence, Commitment, and Innovation”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75 (1), 51-59.
  • Eisenberger, R.; Stinglhamber, F.; Vandenberghe, C.; Sucharski, I. L. and Rhoades, L. (2002). “Perceived Supervisor Support: Contributions to Perceived Organizational Support and Employee Retention”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (3), 565-573.
  • Eisenberger, R., Cummings, J., Armelo, S. ve Lynch, P. (1997). “Perceived Organizational Support, Discretionary Treatment and Job Satisfaction”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 812–820.
  • Elçi, Ş. (2007). “Herkesin İnovasyon Yapması Kaçınılmaz”. Bursa Ticaret ve Sanayi Odası Bursa Ekonomi Dergisi, Sayı 227, 38.
  • Ellonen, R., Blomqvist, K. ve Puumalainen, K. (2008). “The Role of Trust in Organizational Innovativeness”. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11, 2, 160- 181.
  • Eymen, U. E. (2007). SPSS Veri Analiz Yöntemleri. İstatistik Merkezi, 74.
  • Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A. S., Slovic, P. ve Johnson, S. M. (2000). “The Affect Heuristic in Judgments of Risk and Benefits”. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 1-17.
  • Fry, A. S. (1987). “The Post it Note: An Intrapreneurial Success”, SAM Advanced Management Journal, Summer, 4-9.
  • Genis-Gruber, A. ve Hulisi Ö. (2014). “Environmental factors affecting innovation strategies of companies: Customers and suppliers effect Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences”. 10th International Strategic Management Conference, 150, 718- 725.
  • Gilley, K., Walters, B. A., Olson, B. J. (Fall 2002). “Top Management Team Risk Taking Propensities and Firm Performance: Direct and Firm Performance: Direct and Moderating Effects”. Journal of Business Strategies. 19, 2, 95-114.
  • Gliner, J. A. ve Morgan, G. A. (2000). Research Methods in Applied Settings: An Integrated Approach. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Gupta, A. K. ve Singhal, A. (1993). “Managing Human Resources for Innovation and Creativity”. Research Technology Management. 36, 3, 41-48.
  • Halsey, W. D. (1988). Macmillan Contemporary Dictionary, 1. Baskı, İstanbul: ABC Kitabevi.
  • Hattori, R. A. ve Wycoff, J. (2004). Innovation Training, USA: American Society for Training and Development.
  • Hornsby, J. S.; Kuratko, D. F. ve Zahra, S. A. (May 2002) “Middle Managers' Perception of the Internal Environment for Corporate Entrepreneurship: Assessing A Measurement Scale”. Journal of Business Venturing, Volume 17, Issue 3, 253–273.
  • http://www.tdk.gov.tr, Erişim tarihi: 25.03.2010
  • http://www.tdk.gov.tr/index.php?option=com_gts&arama=gts&guid=TDK.GTS.50ceef baa24587.42623485, Erişim Tarihi 10.12.2012
  • Kaplan, R. S. ve Norton D. P., (2004). Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets Into Tangible Outcomes, USA, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Press.
  • Koberg, C. S.; Dawn R., Kurt, D., Heppard, A. (Spring 2003). “An empirical test of environmental, organizational, and process factors affecting incremental and radical innovation”. The Journal of High Technology Management Research,14 (1), 21–45.
  • Kuratko, D. F. ve Hodgetts, R. M. (2004). Entrepreneurship: Theory, Process and Practice. Sixth edition. USA: Thompson South-Western.
  • Kuratko, D.F.; Ireland, R.D. ve Hornsby, J.S. (2001). "Improving Firm Performance Through Entrepreneurial Actions: Acordia's Corporate Entrepreneurship Strategy", Academy of Management Executive, 15, 4, 60-71.
  • Leavy, B. (2005). “A Leader's Guide to Creating an Innovation Culture”, Strategy and Leadership, Vol:33, Issue:4, s. 39.
  • Löfsten, H. ve Lindelöf, P. (2005). “Environmental hostility, strategic orientation and the importance of management accounting: an empirical analysis of new technology-based firms”. Technovation. 25, 725–738.
  • Lumpkin, T. ve Dess, G. G. (1996). “Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance”. The Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172.
  • Moore, L. ve Craig, L. (2008). Intellectual capital in enterprise success: strategy revisited, USA, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Mullins, L. J. (1990). Management and Organizational Behaviour, USA: Pitman Publishing.
  • Naktiyok, A. (2004). İç Girişimcilik. İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
  • Özdevecioğlu, M. (2003). “Algılanan Örgütsel Destek İle Örgütsel Bağlılık Arasındaki İlişkilerin Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma”. D.E.Ü.İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 18 (2), 113-130.
  • Paswan, AK., Dant R. P. ve Lumpkin J. R.. (1998) “An Empirical Investigation of the Linkages among Relationalism, Environmental Uncertainty, and Bureaucratization”. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 43, Issue 3, 125- 140.
  • Renn, O. ve Rohrman, B. (2000). Cross-Cultural Risk Perception, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Rhoades, L. and Eisenberger, R. (2002). “Perceived Organizational Support: A Review of The Literature”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714.
  • Short, J. F. (1984). “The Social Fabric of Risk: Toward The Social Transformation of Risk”, American Sociological Review, 711-725.
  • Sims, H.P.; Szilagyi, A. D. ve McKemey, D. R. (1976). “Antecedents of Work-Related Expectancies”. Academy of Management Journal 19 (4), 547-559.
  • Şah, N. ( 2007). Personel Güçlendirmenin İş Tatmini ve Örgütsel Bağlılık Üzerine Etkisi: Dört Ve Beş Yıldızlı Otel İşletmelerinde Bir Uygulama. (Doktora Tezi), İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • Tannenbaum, S. I. ve Dupuree-Bruno, L. M. (1994). “The Relationship between Organizational and Environmental Factors and the Use of Innovative Human Resource Practices”. Group & Organization Management, 19, 2, 171-202.
  • Thompson, J. L. (1999) "The World of the Entrepreneur – A New Perspective". Journal of Workplace Learning, Vol. 11 Iss: 6, 209-224.
  • Tidd, J.; Bessant, J. ve Pavitt, K. (2005). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change (3.Baskı). İngiltere: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Yoshimura, K. E. (2003). Employee Traits, Perceived Organizational Support, Supervisory Communication, Affective Commitment, and Intent To Leave: Group Differences (Degree of Masters of Science), North Carolina: North Carolina State University.
  • Zahra, S. A. (1991). “Predictors and, Financial Outcomes of Corporate Entrepreneurship: an Exploratory Study”. Journal of Business Venturing, 6, 4, 259-285.
  • Zahra, S. A. ve Covin, J. G. (1995). “Contextual Influences on The Corporate Entrepreneurship-Performance Relationship: A Longitudinal Analysis”. Journal of Business Venturing, No.10, 43-58.
  • Zahra, S. A. ve Garvis, D. M. (2000). “International Corporate Entrepreneurship and Firm Performance: The Moderating Effect of International Environmental Hostility”. Journal of Business Venturing, No.15, 469 –492.
There are 48 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language tr;en
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

M. Kürşad Timuroğlu This is me

Publication Date November 9, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2015 Volume: 19 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Timuroğlu, M. K. (2015). Örgütsel ve Çevresel Faktörlerin Örgütsel Yenilik Üzerine Etkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19(1), 41-68.
 Download Cover Image

Creative Commons Lisansı
ATASOBED- Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari-AynıLisanslaPaylaş 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.