Farklı Işık Kaynaklarının (Monokrom Işık ve Floresan) Broylerlerde Besi Performansı Üzerine Etkisi

Öz

Bu çalışma, farklı ışık kaynaklarının (monokrom ve floresan) broylerlerde besi performansı parametreleri üzerine etkilerini incelemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Toplam 216 adet günlük yaşta civciv (Ross-308) ilk 7 gün ana makinesinde barındırıldıktan sonra üç farklı aydınlatma programının uygulandığı kümeslere yerleştirilmiştir. Birinci deneme grubuna (SBKAL) soğuk beyaz renkli (5500 Kelvin) LED ışık kaynağı ile 14 saat aydınlatma yapılmış, ayrıca sabah ve akşam olmak üzere günde 2’şer kez 20 dakika kırmızı (1500 Kelvin) ve 40 dakika amber rengi (2500 Kelvin) LED ışık verilmiştir. İkinci kümeste (SBL) soğuk beyaz LED (5500 Kelvin), üçüncüde ise (BFL) beyaz floresan (4000 Kelvin) ışık kaynakları ile sabit aydınlatma programı (16A:8K) uygulanmıştır. Deneme gruplarına ait haftalık periyotlarla, canlı ağırlık, canlı ağırlık artışı ve yem tüketimi değerleri karşılaştırılmıştır. Aydınlatma parametreleri bakımından deneme grupları arasında farklılığın istatistiksel olarak önemli olmadığı belirlenmiştir (SBKAL: 2389.39 g, SBL: 2338.22 g ve BFL: 2436.32 g), (P>0.05). Denemenin 1, 2 ve 4. haftasında canlı ağırlık bakımından gruplar arasında farklılık tespit edilememiştir (P>0.05). Ancak 3. haftada SBKAL ve 5. haftada BFL grubunda en hızlı büyümenin gerçekleştiği görülmüştür (P<0.05). Denemenin 3. haftasında en yüksek yemden yararlanma oranı SBL grubunda (2.38) belirlenmiş (P<0.05), denemenin diğer dönemlerinde yemden yararlanma oranları bakımından farklılık tespit edilememiştir (P>0.05). Sonuç olarak broylerlerde değişik renklerde LED ve floresan aydınlatmanın karşılaştırılmasında, büyüme performans parametrelerine göre farklılık belirlenememiştir ancak enerji verimliliği göz önüne alındığında, LED aydınlatmanın kanatlı üretimi için uygun ve ekonomik bir ışık kaynağı olabileceği düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Besi performansı,Broyler,Işık kaynağı

The Effects of Different Light Sources (Monochromatic Light and Fluorescent) on Fattening Performance in Broilers

Abstract

This study was undertaken to investigate the effect of different light sources (monochrome and fluorescent) on fattening performance parameters (body weight, live weight gain, feed consumption, feed conversion ratio) of broilers. Totally, 216 head one day old chicks (Ross-308) were kept in brooder for the first 7 d, then transferred into the cages, in which the animals were exposed to three lighting regimes: SBKAL [(2L (amber color and yellow) + 14L (cool white LED): 8D)], SBL [16L (cool white LED): 8D)] and BFL [(16L (fluorescent) :8D)]. At weekly intervals, body weight (BW), live weight gain (LWG), feed consumption (FC) and feed conversion ratio (FCR) was recorded on group basis. The results indicated no differences in body weight in week 6 (SBKAL: 2389.39 g, SBL: 2338.22 g ve BFL: 2436.32 g), (P>0.05). The effect of the different color of the LEDs and fluorescent bulbs on live weight gain were not statistically significant in first, second and fourth weeks of ages of the broilers (P>0.05). However in the third and fifth weeks of experiment, the fastest growing group was found to be SBKAL and BFL groups (P<0.05). The highest rate of feed conversion ratio in the third week of experiment was determined in the SBL group (P<0.05) and no difference was found in the other periods of the experiment (P>0.05). Consequently, the LED lighting in different colors, when compared to fluorescent light, did not impair broiler chicken growth performance parameters but considering energy efficiency, LED lighting may be suitable and economic for poultry production.

Keywords

• Broiler,Fattening performance,Light source

Kaynakça

1. İşcan KM., 1999. The Effects of Different Intermittent Lighting Schedules Used in Different Diurnal Periods on Performances of Broilers. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 23, 711-718.
2. Ahmad F., Haq A., Ashraf M., Abbas G., Siddiqui MZ.,2011. Effect of different light intensities on the production performance of broiler chickens. Pakistan veterinary Journal, 31, 203-206.
3. Olanrewaju HA., Thaxton JP., Dozier WA., Purswell J., Roush WB., Branton SL., 2006. A review of lighting programs for broiler production, International Journal of Poultry Science, 5, 301-308.
4. Newcombe M., Cartwright AL., Harter‐Dennis JM., 1992. The effect of increasing photoperiod and food restriction in sexed broiler‐type birds. I. growth and abdominal fat cellularity. British Poultry Science, 33, 415-425.
5. Lima KA., Nääs IDA., Garcia RG., Borille R., Caldara FR., 2014. Impact of different light sources on broiler rearing environment. Engenharia Agrícola, 34, 428-434.
6. Rozenboim I., El Halawani ME., Kashash Y., Piestun Y., Halevy O., 2013. The effect of monochromatic photostimulation on growth and development of broiler birds. General and comparative endocrinology, 190, 214-219.
7. Pereira PA., Yanagi Junior, T., Silva JPD., Lima RRD., Campos AT., Abreu LH., 2012. Technical evaluation of artificial ligthing systems for broiler houses. Engenharia Agrícola, 32, 1011-1024.
8. Lacin E., Coban O., Aksu MI., Sabuncuoglu N., Das H., 2013. The Effects of Different Breeding Methods on Fattening Performance and Parameters Related to Slaughter, Carcass and Some Meat Quality in Broiler Chickens, Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi, 19, 2, 283-289.

9. Zulkifli I., Rasedee A., Syaadoh O., Norma MT., 1998. Daylength effects on stress and fear responses in broiler chickens. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 11, 751-754.
10. İlhan U., Yetişir R., 2015. Broyler yetiştiriciliğinde yaygın olarak kullanılan aydınlatma programlarının verim performansları ve bazı karkas özellikleri bakımından karşılaştırılması. Selçuk Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 23, 63-72.
11. Griffin AM., Renema RA., Robinson FE., Zuidhof MJ., 2005. The influence of rearing light period and the use of broiler or broiler breeder diets on forty-two-day body weight, fleshing, and flock uniformity in broiler stocks. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 14, 204-216.
12. Kristensen HH., Prescott NB., Perry GC., Ladewig J., Ersbøll AK., Overvad K C., Wathes CM.,2007. The behaviour of broiler chickens in different light sources and illuminances. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 103, 75-89.
13. Alvino GM., Archer GS., Mench JA., 2009. Behavioural time budgets of broiler chickens reared in varying light intensities. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 118, 54-61.
14. Rault JL., Clark K., Groves PJ., Cronin GM., 2016. Light intensity of 5 or 20 lux on broiler behavior, welfare and productivity. Poultry Science, pew423.
15. Del Rierson R., 2011. Broiler preference for light color and feed form, and the effect of light on growth and performance of broiler chicks, PhD Thesis. Kansas State University.
16. Riber AB., 2015. Effects of color of light on preferences, performance, and welfare in broilers. Poultry science, pev174.
17. Atilgan A., Koknaroglu H., 2006. Cultural energy analysis on broilers reared in different capacity poultry houses. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 5, 393-400.
18. Santana MRD., Garcia RG., Naas IDA., Paz IC., Caldara FR., Barreto B., 2014. Light emitting diode (LED) use in artificial lighting for broiler chicken production. Engenharia Agrícola, 34, 422-427.
19. Shen L., Liu X., Chen B., Pun EYB., Lin H., 2012. Dynamic colour and utilizable white fluorescence from Eu/Tb ions codoped lithium-yttrium-aluminium-silicate glasses, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 45, 115301.
20. Yıldırım İ., Parlat SS., Tiryaki S., Bülbül H., 2009. Işık yayan diotlardan (led) elde edilen monokromatik aydınlatmanın broyler performansına etkileri. Selçuk Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 23, 73-76.
21. Huth JC., Archer GS., 2015. Comparison of two LED light bulbs to a dimmable CFL and their effects on broiler chicken growth, stress, and fear. Poultry science, 94: 2027-2036.
22. Halevy O., Biran I., Rozenboim I., 1998. Various light source treatments affect body and skeletal muscle growth by affecting skeletal muscle satellite cell proliferation in broilers. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology, 120, 317-323.
23. Olanrewaju HA., Purswell JL., Maslin WR., Collier SD., Branton SL., 2015. Effects of color temperatures (kelvin) of LED bulbs on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and ocular development indices of broilers grown to heavy weights. Poultry science, 94, 338-344.
24. Hassan MR., Sultana S., Choe HS., Ryu KS., 2014. A comparison of monochromatic and mixed LED light color on performance, bone mineral density, meat and blood properties, and immunity of broiler chicks. The Journal of Poultry Science, 51, 195-201.
25. Karakaya M., Parlat SS., Yılmaz MT., Yildirim I., Ozalp B., 2009. Growth performance and quality properties of meat from broiler chickens reared under different monochromatic light sources. British poultry science, 50, 76-82.
26. Sharideh H., Zaghari M., 2016. Effect of light emitting diodes with different color temperatures on immune responses and growth performance of male broiler. Annals of Animal Science.
27. Cao J., Chen YX., Wang ZX., Li JY., Xie D., Jia LJ., 2007. Effect of Monochromatic Light on Broiler Growth [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 10, 034.
28. Guevara BDM., Pech PS., Zamora BR., Navarrete SLF., Magaña SHF., 2015. Performance of Broilers Reared under Monochromatic Light Emitting Diode Supplemental Lighting. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola, 17, 553-558.