-

Öz

Dogs are social, active and exploratoric animals. Keeping them in restricted area leads to limitations in their activities. In addition, conditions of shelters for dogs without taking care of basic requirements can be a source of stress. Stressful situations that endure, say for several days, may induce different stress responses, and will be more detrimental to a dog’s state of welfare, than when such situations are relatively short lasting. The physical activity favourably affects the physiological and mental parameters that result in greater welfare level and an improved physical fitness. The lack of human care seriously impairs the health and well-being of dog, making it susceptible to disease, as well as behovioural problems and anxiety disorders. Concern over the well-being of dogs has prompted much research in recent years. This paper reviews the findings and results of the studies available in the scientific literature on this matter.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Animal Welfare, Dog, Husbandry.

Barınak Koşulları ve Köpek Refahı

Öz

Köpekler; sosyal, aktif ve araştırmacı hayvanlardır. Bu hayvanların sınırlandırılmış alanlarda tutulması aktivitelerinde
azalmaya neden olmaktadır. Ayrıca,  köpeklerin temel gereksinimleri dikkate alınmadan yapılan barınak koşulları onlar için stres kaynağı olabilir. Birkaç gün süre için bile olsa stresli duruma maruz kalmak, farklı stres yanıtlarının oluşmasına neden olmaktadır. Bu yanıtların oluşturduğu zararlar kısa süreli strese göre uzun dönemlerde daha fazladır. Fiziksel aktiviteye bağlı olarak artan sağlık ve refah seviyesi, fiziksel ve mental parametreleri olumlu bir şekilde etkilemektedir. İnsan tarafından yeterli ilgi görmeyen köpeğin hastalıklara yakalanma riski artmaktadır. Ayrıca,  oluşan kaygı ve davranış bozuklukları köpek refahını ve sağlığını ciddi bir şekilde bozmaktadır. Son yıllarda köpeklerin  barındırılma koşularının hayvan refahı üzerine etkisini konu alan birçok araştırma yapılmıştır. Bu çalışmada, konu ile ilgili literatür bildirişlerinde yer alan bulgu ve sonuçlar derlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Barındırma, Hayvan refahı, Köpek.

Kaynakça

1. Aleman CL., Noa M., Mas R., Rodeiro I., Mesa R., Menendez R., Gamez R., Hernandez C., 2000. Reference data for the principal physiological indicators in three species of laboratory animals. Lab. Anim., 34, 379-385.
2. Anonim, 1986. European convention for the protection of vertebrate animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes, ETS 1
3. Anonim., 1999. Guidelines for the care and housing of dogs in scientific institutions. NSW Agriculture, Sydney.
4. Anonim, 2004. Su kirliliği kontrolü yönetmeliği. Resmi Gazete, Sayı: 25687.
5. Anonim, 2006. Deneysel ve diğer bilimsel amaçlar için kullanılan deney hayvanlarının korunması, deney hayvanlarının üretim yerleri ile deney yapacak olan laboratuvarların kuruluş, çalışma, denetleme, usul ve esaslarına dair yönetmeliğin uygulama talimatı. KKGM., Tarih ve No: 25.04.2006, 24.
6. Anonim, 2007. A Code of practice for canadian kennel operations second edition. Canadian Veterinary Medical Association. Anonim, 20 Environmental factors and husbandry. http:// oslovet. veths. no/ compendia/ LAS/ KAP23. pdf/ *Erişim: 02011].
7. Beerda B., Schilder MB., Bernadina W., van Hooff JA., de Vries HW., Mol JA., 1999. Chronic stress in dogs subjected to social and spatial restriction. II. Hormonal and immunological responses. Physiol. Behav., 66, 243-54.
8. BVAAWF/FRAME/RSPCA/UFAW Joint Working, 200 Refining dog husbandry and care. Lab. Anim., 38 , 27-38. Campbell SA., Hughes HC., Griffin HE., Landi MS., Mallon FM., 1988. Some effects of limited exercise on purpose-bred beagles. Am. J. Vet. Res., 49, 1298–130.

9. Clark JD., Rager DR., Crowell-Davis S., Evans DL., 19 Housing and exercise of dogs: effects on behaviour, immune function and cortisol concentration. ATLA, Altern. Lab. Anim., 47, 500-5 Cohen S., Janicki-Deverts D., Miller GE., 2007. Psychological stress and disease. Am. J. Vet. Res., 298, 1685-1687.
10. Coppinger R., Zuccotti J., 1999. Kennel enrichment: exercise and socialization of dogs. J. Appl. Anim. Welfare Sci., 2, 281-296.
11. Coppola CL., Grandin T., Enns RM., 2006. Human interaction and cortisol: Can human contact reduce stres for shelter dogs?. Physiol. Behav., 87, 537–541.
12. Crista L., Coppola R., Enns M., Grandin T., 2006. Noise in the animal shelter environment: building design and the effects of daily noise exposure. J. Appl. Anim. Welfare Sci., 9, 1–7.
13. EC., 2003. “Directive 2003/10/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers arising from physical agents (noise).” (Seventeenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC).
14. Eisele PH., 2001. A Practical dog bed for environmental enrichment for geriatric beagles with applications for puppies and other small dogs. Lab. Anim. Sci., 40, 36-38.
15. File SE., Zangrossi H., Sanders FL., Mabbutt PS., 19 Dissociation between behavioral and corticosterone responses to repeated exposures to cat odor. Physiol. Behav., 54, 1109–1111.
16. Fillman-Holliday D., Landi MS., 2002. Animal care best practices for regulatory testing. Institute for laboratory animal reserch journal. ILAR J., 43 Sup., 49-48.
17. Finke MD., 1991. Evaluation of the energy equirements of adult kennel dogs. J. NUTR., 121, 22-28.
18. Fox MW., Bekoff M., 1975. The behaviour of dogs. In “The Behaviour of Domestic Animals”. 3 rd . Ed. E.S.E. Hafez. London. Baillière Tindall.
19. Graham L., Wells DL., Hepper PG., 2005. The influence of olfactory stimulation on the behaviour of dogs housed in a rescue shelter. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 91, 143–153.
20. Hubrecht RC., 1995. The domestic dog, its evolution, behavior and interactions with people. In “The Welfare of Dogs in Human Care”. Ed. J. Serpell, 179–198, Cambridge. England: Cambridge University Press.
21. Hughes HC., Campbell SA., 1989. Effect of primary enclosure size and human contact. In “Canine Research Environment” Eds J. Mench & L.
22. Krulisch 66–73, Bethesda. MD: Scientists Center for Animal Welfare. Karaman S., 200 Hayvansal üretimden kaynaklanan çevre sorunları ve çözüm olanakları. KSÜ Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, 9, 133-1 Loveridge GG., 1998. Environmentally enriched dog housing. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 59, 101–113. Morgan KN., Tromborg CT., 2007. Sources of stress in captivity. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 102, 262– 30
23. NRC (National Research Council), 1994. Laboratory Animal Management: Dogs. National Academy Press. Washington. D.C.
24. Ottesen JL., Anett W., Hanne G., Friis ML., 2004. New housing conditions: Improving the welfare of experimental animals. ATLA, Altern. Lab. Anim., 32, 397-404.
25. Padgett DA., Glaser R., 2003. How stress influences the immune response. Trends Immunol., 24, 444-4
26. Poole T., 1997. Happy animals make good science. Lab. Anim., 31,116-124.
27. Reinhardt V., 2004. Common husbandry-related variables in biomedical research with animals. Lab. Anim., 38, 213–235.
28. Sales GD., Hubrecht R., Peyvandi A., Milligan S., Shield B., 1997. Noise in dog kennelling: Is barking a welfare problem for dogs?. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 52, 321–329.
29. Scholander PF., Hock R., Walters V., Johnson F., Irving L., 1950. Heat regulation ın some arctic and tropical mammals and birds. Biol. Bull., 99, 237-2
30. Spangenberg E., 2007. Housing laboratory dogs and rats. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Doctoral Thesis.
31. Spangenberg EMF., Björklund L., Dahlborn K., 2006. Outdoor housing of laboratory dogs: Effects on activity, behaviour and physiology. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 98, 260–276.
32. Stafford K., 2007. The welfare of dogs In: “Free Living Dog”, 31-54 Springer, The Netherlands.
33. Tami G., Barone A., Diverio S., 2008. Relationship between management factors and dog behavior in a sample of Argentine Dogos in Italy. J. Vet. Behavior, 3, 59-73.
34. Tepeli C., 2008. Farklı barındırma şartlarında yetiştirilen Kangal ve Akbaş köpeklerinde bazı döl verimi özellikleri. Vet. Bil. Derg., 24 , 53-58.
35. USDA-APHIS (Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service), 1997. Humane treatment of dogs and cats: Tethering and temperature requirements. Riverdale. MD: Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
36. Uzunova K., Stoyanchev A., Iliev T., Miteva C., Mitev J., Stoycheva I., 2008. Comparative veterinary hygienic evaluation of stray dog shelters and their categorization. T. J. S., 6, 27-32.
37. Wells DL., Hepper PG., 2000. The influence of environmental change on the behaviour of sheltered dog. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 68, 151–162.
38. Yeon SC., Golden G., Sung W., Erb HN., Reynolds AJ., Houpt KA., 2001. A comparison of tethering and pen confinement of dogs. J. Appl. Anim. Welfare Sci., 4, 257–270.
39. Young MS., Manning TO., 1984. Psychogenic dermatosis (dog and cat). Dermatology Reports, 3, 1-8.