Araştırma Makalesi

Design and Comparative Cost Analysis of Alternative Prefabricated Beef Cattle Barns with Conventional Barn Types

Cilt: 52 Sayı: 2 29 Mayıs 2021
PDF İndir
EN TR

Design and Comparative Cost Analysis of Alternative Prefabricated Beef Cattle Barns with Conventional Barn Types

Öz

In this study, planning, design and cost analysis of prefabricated beef cattle barns carried out. Steel mesh was used to strengthen the foundation of the structure. Galvanized-sheet material was used as the carrier and cover material, and shaped like a trapezoid cross-section. The barns, which are planned in the form of tunnel cross-section and tie-stalls type, are designed for 10, 20 and 30-cattle to be particularly suitable for family enterprises. Polyurethane (PU) foam and extruded polystyrene sandwich panel (XSP) were used to provide heat and sound insulation. Cost analysis of the galvanized-sheet barns was compared with the barns constructed by the traditional production method. After analyses, we found that as the number of animals increased, barn cost per animal decreased. The cost reduction rates in the PU foam insulated galvanized-sheet barn were 30.1%, 32.7% and 30.6% for the 10, 20 and 30-cattle respectively. These values were 24.9%, 27.8% and 25.5% for the sandwich panel insulated galvanized-sheet barn. The most economical combination was the polyurethane foam insulation of galvanized sheets. Galvanized-sheet barns are technically sufficient, and economically advantageous than the conventional ones, so it can be recommended to both newly established enterprises and enterprises that want to improve their old barns.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Proje Numarası

FYL-2018-6565

Kaynakça

  1. Arslan, M.H., Korkmaz, H.H., Gülay, F.G., 2006. Damage and failure pattern of prefabricated structures after major earthquakes in Turkey and short falls of the Turkish earthquake code. Engineering Failure Analysis, 13: 537-557.
  2. Aslan, H., Seyfi, S. U., 2015. Alternative barn design applicable in different environmental condition for goat breeding. J. Int. Environmental Application & Science, Vol. 10 (4): 421-428.
  3. Bracke, M.B.M., Hopster, H., 2006. Assessing the importance of natural behaviour for animal welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 19: 77-89.
  4. Broom, D.M., 1991. Animal welfare–concepts and measurement. Journal of Animal Sci., 69: 4167-4175.
  5. CAE, 2018. The Livestock Report, The UNION of the Chambers of Turkish Engineers and Architects (UCETA) the Chamber of Agricultural Engineers (CAE) Available online with updates at http://www.zmo.org.tr/genel/bizden_detay.php?kod=29946&tipi=17&sube=0 (Accessed Date: 15 March 2019)
  6. Dawkins, M.S., 2016. Animal welfare and efficient farming: is conflict inevitable? Animal Production Sci., 57 (2) 201-208.
  7. Dong, S. L., Yuan, X.F., 2006. Development of lattice shells in China. Journal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures, 47 (2): 111-123.
  8. Dong, S., Zhao, Y., Xing, D., 2012. Application and development of modern long-span space structures in China. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 6 (3): 224-239.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

29 Mayıs 2021

Gönderilme Tarihi

30 Eylül 2020

Kabul Tarihi

6 Şubat 2021

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2021 Cilt: 52 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Er, H., & Kuşlu, Y. (2021). Design and Comparative Cost Analysis of Alternative Prefabricated Beef Cattle Barns with Conventional Barn Types. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 52(2), 167-175. https://doi.org/10.17097/ataunizfd.802543
AMA
1.Er H, Kuşlu Y. Design and Comparative Cost Analysis of Alternative Prefabricated Beef Cattle Barns with Conventional Barn Types. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 2021;52(2):167-175. doi:10.17097/ataunizfd.802543
Chicago
Er, Hasan, ve Yasemin Kuşlu. 2021. “Design and Comparative Cost Analysis of Alternative Prefabricated Beef Cattle Barns with Conventional Barn Types”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 52 (2): 167-75. https://doi.org/10.17097/ataunizfd.802543.
EndNote
Er H, Kuşlu Y (01 Mayıs 2021) Design and Comparative Cost Analysis of Alternative Prefabricated Beef Cattle Barns with Conventional Barn Types. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 52 2 167–175.
IEEE
[1]H. Er ve Y. Kuşlu, “Design and Comparative Cost Analysis of Alternative Prefabricated Beef Cattle Barns with Conventional Barn Types”, Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 52, sy 2, ss. 167–175, May. 2021, doi: 10.17097/ataunizfd.802543.
ISNAD
Er, Hasan - Kuşlu, Yasemin. “Design and Comparative Cost Analysis of Alternative Prefabricated Beef Cattle Barns with Conventional Barn Types”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 52/2 (01 Mayıs 2021): 167-175. https://doi.org/10.17097/ataunizfd.802543.
JAMA
1.Er H, Kuşlu Y. Design and Comparative Cost Analysis of Alternative Prefabricated Beef Cattle Barns with Conventional Barn Types. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 2021;52:167–175.
MLA
Er, Hasan, ve Yasemin Kuşlu. “Design and Comparative Cost Analysis of Alternative Prefabricated Beef Cattle Barns with Conventional Barn Types”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 52, sy 2, Mayıs 2021, ss. 167-75, doi:10.17097/ataunizfd.802543.
Vancouver
1.Hasan Er, Yasemin Kuşlu. Design and Comparative Cost Analysis of Alternative Prefabricated Beef Cattle Barns with Conventional Barn Types. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 01 Mayıs 2021;52(2):167-75. doi:10.17097/ataunizfd.802543

Bu dergide yayınlanan makaleler Creative Commons Uluslararası Lisansı (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) kapsamında yayınlanmaktadır. Bu, orijinal makaleye uygun şekilde atıf yapılması şartıyla, eserin herhangi bir ortam veya formatta kopyalanmasını ve dağıtılmasını sağlar. Ancak, eserler ticari amaçlar için kullanılamaz.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/