Bush's "anti-terrorism strategy", Obama's "counter-insurgency strategy" and Trump's "zero foot strategy" are three separate strategies of the US government during the three presidential terms in Afghanistan, which ended with the withdrawal of American forces. Ultimately, the withdrawal of US forces led to the resurgence of the same group that had sought to overthrow the Taliban government 20 years ago in 2001. This article aims to provide evidence supporting the change in strategy and its conflict with the overarching macro strategy, focusing on the shifts in Afghanistan's internal environment. We are looking for an answer to this question, what are the evidences of the change in the US foreign policy towards Afghanistan in the three mentioned periods and what is the relationship between the internal developments in Afghanistan and these changes? In response to this hypothesis, it is proposed that the role of internal opposition groups and their power in these three periods is the most important factor in creating a change in the attitude of the American foreign policy in the era of Bush, Obama and Trump. The findings of this article, according to the American high-ranking documents, show that the pursuit of conflicting strategies with the primary goals is a result of the failure of the strategy in the American foreign policy against the actions of armed groups. Considering the approach of comparative investigation and focusing on its descriptive stage, the method used in this writing is qualitative and of a comparative type.
America Afghanistan Foreign Policy Strategy Obama Bush Trump
Bush's "anti-terrorism strategy", Obama's "counter-insurgency strategy" and Trump's "zero foot strategy" are three separate strategies of the US government during the three presidential terms in Afghanistan, which ended with the withdrawal of American forces. Ultimately, the withdrawal of US forces led to the resurgence of the same group that had sought to overthrow the Taliban government 20 years ago in 2001. This article aims to provide evidence supporting the change in strategy and its conflict with the overarching macro strategy, focusing on the shifts in Afghanistan's internal environment. We are looking for an answer to this question, what are the evidences of the change in the US foreign policy towards Afghanistan in the three mentioned periods and what is the relationship between the internal developments in Afghanistan and these changes? In response to this hypothesis, it is proposed that the role of internal opposition groups and their power in these three periods is the most important factor in creating a change in the attitude of the American foreign policy in the era of Bush, Obama and Trump. The findings of this article, according to the American high-ranking documents, show that the pursuit of conflicting strategies with the primary goals is a result of the failure of the strategy in the American foreign policy against the actions of armed groups. Considering the approach of comparative investigation and focusing on its descriptive stage, the method used in this writing is qualitative and of a comparative type.
America Afghanistan Foreign Policy Strategy Obama Bush Trump
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Siyaset Bilimi (Diğer) |
| Bölüm | Araştırma Makalesi |
| Yazarlar | |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 31 Ocak 2024 |
| Kabul Tarihi | 1 Nisan 2024 |
| Erken Görünüm Tarihi | 1 Nisan 2024 |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 2 Nisan 2024 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.46868/atdd.2024.680 |
| IZ | https://izlik.org/JA79JH99MD |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2024 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1 |
Copyright and Licensing Policy
All articles published in the Journal of Academic History and Ideas / Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi are copyrighted by the journal. The journal’s content is provided as open access under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Under this license, the content may be shared, reproduced, adapted, translated, and built upon in any medium or format for non-commercial purposes, provided that proper scholarly attribution is given to the author(s) and the journal.
Requests for commercial reuse must be directed to the Editorial Board at akademiktarihvedusunce@gmail.com
The scientific, legal, and ethical responsibility for published works rests entirely with the author(s). The editors and the Editorial Board assume no responsibility or liability for the content of the published articles.
© ATDD Tüm Hakları Saklıdır