Despite the fact that America had spent a lot of money since 2001 and after the collapse of the Taliban to advance the project of nation-building in Afghanistan; but this militant group was able to take over Kabul again on August 15, 2021.The action of the Taliban in Afghanistan was accepted at a time when Joe Biden had determined his new policy towards Afghanistan based on the withdrawal of America from this country; for this reason, many experts should know that the control of the Taliban is the result of the government's policy, which was followed by Trump before. However, another question and concern that was raised at this time was whether the steps should be taken in relation to the withdrawal of the United States from a pre-determined regional plan with specific goals and foundations, or whether it was just at the top to reduce America's foreign spending and on the basis of partisanship. Did the democratic government accept this incident? The authors of this research have tried to compare these two views based on the method of case study. The result of this study shows that despite the existence of two main views on foreign policy, different components and variables should be included in the strategy for Afghanistan, which is a multi-faceted approach. This multi-factor approach has been presented by the authors in the end.
Despite the fact that America had spent a lot of money since 2001 and after the collapse of the Taliban to advance the project of nation-building in Afghanistan; but this militant group was able to take over Kabul again on August 15, 2021.The action of the Taliban in Afghanistan was accepted at a time when Joe Biden had determined his new policy towards Afghanistan based on the withdrawal of America from this country; for this reason, many experts should know that the control of the Taliban is the result of the government's policy, which was followed by Trump before. However, another question and concern that was raised at this time was whether the steps should be taken in relation to the withdrawal of the United States from a pre-determined regional plan with specific goals and foundations, or whether it was just at the top to reduce America's foreign spending and on the basis of partisanship. Did the democratic government accept this incident? The authors of this research have tried to compare these two views based on the method of case study. The result of this study shows that despite the existence of two main views on foreign policy, different components and variables should be included in the strategy for Afghanistan, which is a multi-faceted approach. This multi-factor approach has been presented by the authors in the end.
| Birincil Dil | Türkçe |
|---|---|
| Konular | Siyaset Bilimi (Diğer) |
| Bölüm | Araştırma Makalesi |
| Yazarlar | |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 2 Ağustos 2024 |
| Kabul Tarihi | 21 Eylül 2024 |
| Erken Görünüm Tarihi | 21 Eylül 2024 |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 22 Eylül 2024 |
| IZ | https://izlik.org/JA89KW93WC |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2024 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 4 |
Copyright and Licensing Policy
All articles published in the Journal of Academic History and Ideas / Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi are copyrighted by the journal. The journal’s content is provided as open access under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Under this license, the content may be shared, reproduced, adapted, translated, and built upon in any medium or format for non-commercial purposes, provided that proper scholarly attribution is given to the author(s) and the journal.
Requests for commercial reuse must be directed to the Editorial Board at akademiktarihvedusunce@gmail.com
The scientific, legal, and ethical responsibility for published works rests entirely with the author(s). The editors and the Editorial Board assume no responsibility or liability for the content of the published articles.
© ATDD Tüm Hakları Saklıdır