Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

A Posthuman Paradigm Shift: Reimagining English Language Learning at the Nexus of Human Consciousness and Intelligent Technologies

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 12 Sayı: Özel Sayı 2025-2, 1 - 22, 31.12.2025

Öz

In an era marked by rapid digital evolution and techno-human convergence, this study adopts a posthumanist lens to reconceptualize English language education. Anchored in theoretical analysis and enriched with case scenarios from emerging technologies such as neurodevices, biochips, and augmented reality, the research interrogates how language learning transforms when learners become techno-human hybrids. Moving beyond anthropocentric pedagogies, it advocates for fluid, personalized learning ecosystems responsive to the cognitive and affective complexities of posthuman individuals. By drawing upon posthumanist philosophy, neuroscience, and AI-driven tools, the study explores how language acquisition, critical thinking, and creativity are reconfigured in technologically augmented learners. It further examines the ethical, cultural, and pedagogical implications of this transformation, highlighting the urgent need to reimagine the role of the human in learning design. The findings argue that posthumanism not only challenges traditional language education paradigms but also offers a hopeful and innovative vision, one where human and machine agency coalesce to shape adaptive, inclusive, and future-ready learning landscapes in higher education.

Kaynakça

  • Billinghurst, M., & Dünser, A. (2012). Augmented reality in the classroom. Computer, 45(7), 56–63.
  • Berg, B. L. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Pearson Education.
  • Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). Sage.
  • Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.
  • Braidotti, R. (2017). Posthuman critical theory. Journal of Posthuman Studies, 1(1), 9–25.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  • Deniz, Ş., & Alıcı, A. E. (2024). The evolution of theories, transformations, and emerging trends in distance education worldwide: A comprehensive research article. Kastamonu Education Journal, 32(4), 600–611. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1574351
  • Deniz, Ş., & Vardal Özkutlu, M. (2024). Navigating the evolving landscape of distance education: Pivotal challenges faced by the educators and strategic solutions. Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi, 11(4), 2606–2620. https://doi.org/10.46868/atdd.2024.769
  • Edman, T. B. (2023). Bir Klonun Günlüğünden: Posthümanizm, transhümanizm, distopya ve “Beni Asla Bırakma” [Makale]. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
  • Gillespie, A. (2017). Posthumanism and education: New approaches. Cambridge University Press.
  • Gümüş, H., Kavanoz, S., & Yılmaz, M. B. (2017). Kavram karikatürlerinin mobil öğrenme ortamında ulaştırılmasının ortaöğretimde İngilizce deyim öğrenmeye etkisi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(1), 815–855.
  • Haraway, D. J. (2020a). Çok disiplinli çalışmalarda posthümanizm. Transnational Press London. https://www.tplondon.com/product/cokludisiplinli-posthumanizm/
  • Haraway, D. J. (2020b). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
  • Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press.
  • Kavanoz, S. (2017). EFL teachers’ conceptualizations and instructional practices of critical thinking. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 4(4), 418–433.
  • Kim, H. (2024). Science fiction as a critical posthuman reading. National Council of Teachers of English. https://ncte.org/blog/2024/07/science-fiction-posthuman-reading/
  • LaGrandeur, K. (2018). Edebiyatta posthümanizm / Posthumanism in literature [Makale]. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351664919_
  • Luckin, R. (2018). Machine learning and human intelligence: The future of education for the 21st century. UCL Institute of Education Press.
  • Nayar, P. K. (2014). Posthumanism. Polity Press.
  • Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on learning and teaching in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(1), 1–13.
  • Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 12 Sayı: Özel Sayı 2025-2, 1 - 22, 31.12.2025

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Billinghurst, M., & Dünser, A. (2012). Augmented reality in the classroom. Computer, 45(7), 56–63.
  • Berg, B. L. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Pearson Education.
  • Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). Sage.
  • Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.
  • Braidotti, R. (2017). Posthuman critical theory. Journal of Posthuman Studies, 1(1), 9–25.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  • Deniz, Ş., & Alıcı, A. E. (2024). The evolution of theories, transformations, and emerging trends in distance education worldwide: A comprehensive research article. Kastamonu Education Journal, 32(4), 600–611. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1574351
  • Deniz, Ş., & Vardal Özkutlu, M. (2024). Navigating the evolving landscape of distance education: Pivotal challenges faced by the educators and strategic solutions. Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi, 11(4), 2606–2620. https://doi.org/10.46868/atdd.2024.769
  • Edman, T. B. (2023). Bir Klonun Günlüğünden: Posthümanizm, transhümanizm, distopya ve “Beni Asla Bırakma” [Makale]. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
  • Gillespie, A. (2017). Posthumanism and education: New approaches. Cambridge University Press.
  • Gümüş, H., Kavanoz, S., & Yılmaz, M. B. (2017). Kavram karikatürlerinin mobil öğrenme ortamında ulaştırılmasının ortaöğretimde İngilizce deyim öğrenmeye etkisi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(1), 815–855.
  • Haraway, D. J. (2020a). Çok disiplinli çalışmalarda posthümanizm. Transnational Press London. https://www.tplondon.com/product/cokludisiplinli-posthumanizm/
  • Haraway, D. J. (2020b). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
  • Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press.
  • Kavanoz, S. (2017). EFL teachers’ conceptualizations and instructional practices of critical thinking. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 4(4), 418–433.
  • Kim, H. (2024). Science fiction as a critical posthuman reading. National Council of Teachers of English. https://ncte.org/blog/2024/07/science-fiction-posthuman-reading/
  • LaGrandeur, K. (2018). Edebiyatta posthümanizm / Posthumanism in literature [Makale]. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351664919_
  • Luckin, R. (2018). Machine learning and human intelligence: The future of education for the 21st century. UCL Institute of Education Press.
  • Nayar, P. K. (2014). Posthumanism. Polity Press.
  • Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on learning and teaching in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(1), 1–13.
  • Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 12 Sayı: Özel Sayı 2025-2, 1 - 22, 31.12.2025

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Billinghurst, M., & Dünser, A. (2012). Augmented reality in the classroom. Computer, 45(7), 56–63.
  • Berg, B. L. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Pearson Education.
  • Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). Sage.
  • Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.
  • Braidotti, R. (2017). Posthuman critical theory. Journal of Posthuman Studies, 1(1), 9–25.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  • Deniz, Ş., & Alıcı, A. E. (2024). The evolution of theories, transformations, and emerging trends in distance education worldwide: A comprehensive research article. Kastamonu Education Journal, 32(4), 600–611. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1574351
  • Deniz, Ş., & Vardal Özkutlu, M. (2024). Navigating the evolving landscape of distance education: Pivotal challenges faced by the educators and strategic solutions. Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi, 11(4), 2606–2620. https://doi.org/10.46868/atdd.2024.769
  • Edman, T. B. (2023). Bir Klonun Günlüğünden: Posthümanizm, transhümanizm, distopya ve “Beni Asla Bırakma” [Makale]. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
  • Gillespie, A. (2017). Posthumanism and education: New approaches. Cambridge University Press.
  • Gümüş, H., Kavanoz, S., & Yılmaz, M. B. (2017). Kavram karikatürlerinin mobil öğrenme ortamında ulaştırılmasının ortaöğretimde İngilizce deyim öğrenmeye etkisi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(1), 815–855.
  • Haraway, D. J. (2020a). Çok disiplinli çalışmalarda posthümanizm. Transnational Press London. https://www.tplondon.com/product/cokludisiplinli-posthumanizm/
  • Haraway, D. J. (2020b). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
  • Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press.
  • Kavanoz, S. (2017). EFL teachers’ conceptualizations and instructional practices of critical thinking. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 4(4), 418–433.
  • Kim, H. (2024). Science fiction as a critical posthuman reading. National Council of Teachers of English. https://ncte.org/blog/2024/07/science-fiction-posthuman-reading/
  • LaGrandeur, K. (2018). Edebiyatta posthümanizm / Posthumanism in literature [Makale]. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351664919_
  • Luckin, R. (2018). Machine learning and human intelligence: The future of education for the 21st century. UCL Institute of Education Press.
  • Nayar, P. K. (2014). Posthumanism. Polity Press.
  • Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on learning and teaching in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(1), 1–13.
  • Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 12 Sayı: Özel Sayı 2025-2, 1 - 22, 31.12.2025

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Billinghurst, M., & Dünser, A. (2012). Augmented reality in the classroom. Computer, 45(7), 56–63.
  • Berg, B. L. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Pearson Education.
  • Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). Sage.
  • Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.
  • Braidotti, R. (2017). Posthuman critical theory. Journal of Posthuman Studies, 1(1), 9–25.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  • Deniz, Ş., & Alıcı, A. E. (2024). The evolution of theories, transformations, and emerging trends in distance education worldwide: A comprehensive research article. Kastamonu Education Journal, 32(4), 600–611. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1574351
  • Deniz, Ş., & Vardal Özkutlu, M. (2024). Navigating the evolving landscape of distance education: Pivotal challenges faced by the educators and strategic solutions. Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi, 11(4), 2606–2620. https://doi.org/10.46868/atdd.2024.769
  • Edman, T. B. (2023). Bir Klonun Günlüğünden: Posthümanizm, transhümanizm, distopya ve “Beni Asla Bırakma” [Makale]. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
  • Gillespie, A. (2017). Posthumanism and education: New approaches. Cambridge University Press.
  • Gümüş, H., Kavanoz, S., & Yılmaz, M. B. (2017). Kavram karikatürlerinin mobil öğrenme ortamında ulaştırılmasının ortaöğretimde İngilizce deyim öğrenmeye etkisi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(1), 815–855.
  • Haraway, D. J. (2020a). Çok disiplinli çalışmalarda posthümanizm. Transnational Press London. https://www.tplondon.com/product/cokludisiplinli-posthumanizm/
  • Haraway, D. J. (2020b). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
  • Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press.
  • Kavanoz, S. (2017). EFL teachers’ conceptualizations and instructional practices of critical thinking. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 4(4), 418–433.
  • Kim, H. (2024). Science fiction as a critical posthuman reading. National Council of Teachers of English. https://ncte.org/blog/2024/07/science-fiction-posthuman-reading/
  • LaGrandeur, K. (2018). Edebiyatta posthümanizm / Posthumanism in literature [Makale]. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351664919_
  • Luckin, R. (2018). Machine learning and human intelligence: The future of education for the 21st century. UCL Institute of Education Press.
  • Nayar, P. K. (2014). Posthumanism. Polity Press.
  • Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on learning and teaching in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(1), 1–13.
  • Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 12 Sayı: Özel Sayı 2025-2, 1 - 22, 31.12.2025

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Billinghurst, M., & Dünser, A. (2012). Augmented reality in the classroom. Computer, 45(7), 56–63.
  • Berg, B. L. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Pearson Education.
  • Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). Sage.
  • Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.
  • Braidotti, R. (2017). Posthuman critical theory. Journal of Posthuman Studies, 1(1), 9–25.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  • Deniz, Ş., & Alıcı, A. E. (2024). The evolution of theories, transformations, and emerging trends in distance education worldwide: A comprehensive research article. Kastamonu Education Journal, 32(4), 600–611. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1574351
  • Deniz, Ş., & Vardal Özkutlu, M. (2024). Navigating the evolving landscape of distance education: Pivotal challenges faced by the educators and strategic solutions. Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi, 11(4), 2606–2620. https://doi.org/10.46868/atdd.2024.769
  • Edman, T. B. (2023). Bir Klonun Günlüğünden: Posthümanizm, transhümanizm, distopya ve “Beni Asla Bırakma” [Makale]. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
  • Gillespie, A. (2017). Posthumanism and education: New approaches. Cambridge University Press.
  • Gümüş, H., Kavanoz, S., & Yılmaz, M. B. (2017). Kavram karikatürlerinin mobil öğrenme ortamında ulaştırılmasının ortaöğretimde İngilizce deyim öğrenmeye etkisi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(1), 815–855.
  • Haraway, D. J. (2020a). Çok disiplinli çalışmalarda posthümanizm. Transnational Press London. https://www.tplondon.com/product/cokludisiplinli-posthumanizm/
  • Haraway, D. J. (2020b). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
  • Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press.
  • Kavanoz, S. (2017). EFL teachers’ conceptualizations and instructional practices of critical thinking. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 4(4), 418–433.
  • Kim, H. (2024). Science fiction as a critical posthuman reading. National Council of Teachers of English. https://ncte.org/blog/2024/07/science-fiction-posthuman-reading/
  • LaGrandeur, K. (2018). Edebiyatta posthümanizm / Posthumanism in literature [Makale]. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351664919_
  • Luckin, R. (2018). Machine learning and human intelligence: The future of education for the 21st century. UCL Institute of Education Press.
  • Nayar, P. K. (2014). Posthumanism. Polity Press.
  • Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on learning and teaching in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(1), 1–13.
  • Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 12 Sayı: Özel Sayı 2025-2, 1 - 22, 31.12.2025

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Billinghurst, M., & Dünser, A. (2012). Augmented reality in the classroom. Computer, 45(7), 56–63.
  • Berg, B. L. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Pearson Education.
  • Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). Sage.
  • Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.
  • Braidotti, R. (2017). Posthuman critical theory. Journal of Posthuman Studies, 1(1), 9–25.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  • Deniz, Ş., & Alıcı, A. E. (2024). The evolution of theories, transformations, and emerging trends in distance education worldwide: A comprehensive research article. Kastamonu Education Journal, 32(4), 600–611. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1574351
  • Deniz, Ş., & Vardal Özkutlu, M. (2024). Navigating the evolving landscape of distance education: Pivotal challenges faced by the educators and strategic solutions. Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi, 11(4), 2606–2620. https://doi.org/10.46868/atdd.2024.769
  • Edman, T. B. (2023). Bir Klonun Günlüğünden: Posthümanizm, transhümanizm, distopya ve “Beni Asla Bırakma” [Makale]. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
  • Gillespie, A. (2017). Posthumanism and education: New approaches. Cambridge University Press.
  • Gümüş, H., Kavanoz, S., & Yılmaz, M. B. (2017). Kavram karikatürlerinin mobil öğrenme ortamında ulaştırılmasının ortaöğretimde İngilizce deyim öğrenmeye etkisi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(1), 815–855.
  • Haraway, D. J. (2020a). Çok disiplinli çalışmalarda posthümanizm. Transnational Press London. https://www.tplondon.com/product/cokludisiplinli-posthumanizm/
  • Haraway, D. J. (2020b). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
  • Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press.
  • Kavanoz, S. (2017). EFL teachers’ conceptualizations and instructional practices of critical thinking. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 4(4), 418–433.
  • Kim, H. (2024). Science fiction as a critical posthuman reading. National Council of Teachers of English. https://ncte.org/blog/2024/07/science-fiction-posthuman-reading/
  • LaGrandeur, K. (2018). Edebiyatta posthümanizm / Posthumanism in literature [Makale]. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351664919_
  • Luckin, R. (2018). Machine learning and human intelligence: The future of education for the 21st century. UCL Institute of Education Press.
  • Nayar, P. K. (2014). Posthumanism. Polity Press.
  • Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on learning and teaching in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(1), 1–13.
  • Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 12 Sayı: Özel Sayı 2025-2, 1 - 22, 31.12.2025

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Billinghurst, M., & Dünser, A. (2012). Augmented reality in the classroom. Computer, 45(7), 56–63.
  • Berg, B. L. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Pearson Education.
  • Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). Sage.
  • Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.
  • Braidotti, R. (2017). Posthuman critical theory. Journal of Posthuman Studies, 1(1), 9–25.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  • Deniz, Ş., & Alıcı, A. E. (2024). The evolution of theories, transformations, and emerging trends in distance education worldwide: A comprehensive research article. Kastamonu Education Journal, 32(4), 600–611. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1574351
  • Deniz, Ş., & Vardal Özkutlu, M. (2024). Navigating the evolving landscape of distance education: Pivotal challenges faced by the educators and strategic solutions. Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi, 11(4), 2606–2620. https://doi.org/10.46868/atdd.2024.769
  • Edman, T. B. (2023). Bir Klonun Günlüğünden: Posthümanizm, transhümanizm, distopya ve “Beni Asla Bırakma” [Makale]. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
  • Gillespie, A. (2017). Posthumanism and education: New approaches. Cambridge University Press.
  • Gümüş, H., Kavanoz, S., & Yılmaz, M. B. (2017). Kavram karikatürlerinin mobil öğrenme ortamında ulaştırılmasının ortaöğretimde İngilizce deyim öğrenmeye etkisi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(1), 815–855.
  • Haraway, D. J. (2020a). Çok disiplinli çalışmalarda posthümanizm. Transnational Press London. https://www.tplondon.com/product/cokludisiplinli-posthumanizm/
  • Haraway, D. J. (2020b). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
  • Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press.
  • Kavanoz, S. (2017). EFL teachers’ conceptualizations and instructional practices of critical thinking. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 4(4), 418–433.
  • Kim, H. (2024). Science fiction as a critical posthuman reading. National Council of Teachers of English. https://ncte.org/blog/2024/07/science-fiction-posthuman-reading/
  • LaGrandeur, K. (2018). Edebiyatta posthümanizm / Posthumanism in literature [Makale]. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351664919_
  • Luckin, R. (2018). Machine learning and human intelligence: The future of education for the 21st century. UCL Institute of Education Press.
  • Nayar, P. K. (2014). Posthumanism. Polity Press.
  • Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on learning and teaching in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(1), 1–13.
  • Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.

Posthüman Bir Paradigma Değişimi: İnsan Bilinci ve Akıllı Teknolojilerin Kesişiminde İngilizce Dil Öğrenimini Yeniden Tasavvur Etmek

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 12 Sayı: Özel Sayı 2025-2, 1 - 22, 31.12.2025

Öz

Hızla gelişen dijital dönüşüm ve tekno-insan yakınsamasının belirleyici olduğu günümüzde bu çalışma, İngilizce dil eğitimini yeniden yorumlamak amacıyla posthümanist bir perspektif benimsemektedir. Kuramsal çözümlemelere dayanan ve nörocihazlar, biyoçipler ile artırılmış gerçeklik gibi yükselen teknolojilerden alınan örnek senaryolarla desteklenen araştırma, öğrenenlerin tekno-insan hibritlerine dönüştüğü bir bağlamda dil öğreniminin nasıl şekillendiğini irdelemektedir. Antroposantrik pedagojileri aşan bu yaklaşım, posthüman bireylerin bilişsel ve duyuşsal karmaşıklıklarına duyarlı, akışkan ve kişiselleştirilmiş öğrenme ekosistemlerini savunmaktadır. Posthümanist felsefe, sinirbilim ve yapay zekâ destekli araçlardan yararlanan çalışma, dil edinimi, eleştirel düşünme ve yaratıcılığın teknolojik olarak güçlendirilmiş öğrenenlerde nasıl yeniden yapılandığını incelemektedir. Ayrıca bu dönüşümün etik, kültürel ve pedagojik sonuçlarını değerlendirerek, öğrenme tasarımında insanın rolünün yeniden düşünülmesi gerektiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bulgular, posthümanizmin yalnızca geleneksel dil eğitimi paradigmasını sorgulamakla kalmayıp; insan ve makine ajanlığının birleştiği, uyarlanabilir, kapsayıcı ve geleceğe hazırlıklı yükseköğretim öğrenme ortamlarına yönelik umut verici ve yenilikçi bir vizyon sunduğunu göstermektedir.

Kaynakça

  • Billinghurst, M., & Dünser, A. (2012). Augmented reality in the classroom. Computer, 45(7), 56–63.
  • Berg, B. L. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Pearson Education.
  • Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). Sage.
  • Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.
  • Braidotti, R. (2017). Posthuman critical theory. Journal of Posthuman Studies, 1(1), 9–25.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  • Deniz, Ş., & Alıcı, A. E. (2024). The evolution of theories, transformations, and emerging trends in distance education worldwide: A comprehensive research article. Kastamonu Education Journal, 32(4), 600–611. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1574351
  • Deniz, Ş., & Vardal Özkutlu, M. (2024). Navigating the evolving landscape of distance education: Pivotal challenges faced by the educators and strategic solutions. Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi, 11(4), 2606–2620. https://doi.org/10.46868/atdd.2024.769
  • Edman, T. B. (2023). Bir Klonun Günlüğünden: Posthümanizm, transhümanizm, distopya ve “Beni Asla Bırakma” [Makale]. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
  • Gillespie, A. (2017). Posthumanism and education: New approaches. Cambridge University Press.
  • Gümüş, H., Kavanoz, S., & Yılmaz, M. B. (2017). Kavram karikatürlerinin mobil öğrenme ortamında ulaştırılmasının ortaöğretimde İngilizce deyim öğrenmeye etkisi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(1), 815–855.
  • Haraway, D. J. (2020a). Çok disiplinli çalışmalarda posthümanizm. Transnational Press London. https://www.tplondon.com/product/cokludisiplinli-posthumanizm/
  • Haraway, D. J. (2020b). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
  • Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press.
  • Kavanoz, S. (2017). EFL teachers’ conceptualizations and instructional practices of critical thinking. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 4(4), 418–433.
  • Kim, H. (2024). Science fiction as a critical posthuman reading. National Council of Teachers of English. https://ncte.org/blog/2024/07/science-fiction-posthuman-reading/
  • LaGrandeur, K. (2018). Edebiyatta posthümanizm / Posthumanism in literature [Makale]. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351664919_
  • Luckin, R. (2018). Machine learning and human intelligence: The future of education for the 21st century. UCL Institute of Education Press.
  • Nayar, P. K. (2014). Posthumanism. Polity Press.
  • Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on learning and teaching in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(1), 1–13.
  • Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.
Toplam 21 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Alan Eğitimleri (Diğer)
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Şenol Deniz 0000-0003-2553-1070

Gönderilme Tarihi 4 Temmuz 2025
Kabul Tarihi 31 Aralık 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 12 Sayı: Özel Sayı 2025-2

Kaynak Göster

APA Deniz, Ş. (2025). A Posthuman Paradigm Shift: Reimagining English Language Learning at the Nexus of Human Consciousness and Intelligent Technologies. Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi, 12(Özel Sayı 2025-2), 1-22.

Copyright and Licensing Policy

All articles published in the Journal of Academic History and Ideas / Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi are copyrighted by the journal. The journal’s content is made available as open access under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Under this license: Content may be shared and reproduced in any medium or format for non-commercial purposes, provided that proper scholarly attribution is given. Modification, adaptation, translation, or the creation of derivative works is not permitted (ND). Requests for commercial reuse, translation, or republication must be directed to the Editorial Board at akademiktarihvedusunce@gmail.com. The scientific, legal, and ethical responsibility for published works rests entirely with the author(s); the editors and Editorial Board assume no liability for the content.
 
©  ATDD Tüm Hakları Saklıdır