Öz
Kaynakça
- Ansong, A. (2018). The concept of sovereign equality of states in international law. GIMPA Law Review, 2(1), 13–42.
- Baker, P. J. (1923–1924). The doctrine of legal equality of states. British Yearbook of International Law, 4, 1–20.
- Brown, P. M. (1915). The theory of the independence and equality of states. American Journal of International Law, 9(2), 305–335.
- Byers, M., Raghavan, V., & Becerra-Ramirez, M. (2005). Voices from the outside: Sovereign equality, international law, and the imbalance of power. Cambridge University Press.
- Cimanuka, K. J. L. (2022). Principle of sovereign equality and non-interference in the internal affairs of a state. Tirtayasa Journal of International Law, 1(1), 59–75.
- Gaubatz, K. T. (2015). Democratic states and the sovereign equality norm. Retrieved December 13, 2025, from http://kktg.net/kurt/publications/pubs/Sovereign%20Equality.pdf
- Hasan, A. S. M. M. (2021). Uluslararası hukukta devletlerin içişlerine karışmama ilkesinin incelenmesi: Bangladeş örneği (Doctoral dissertation, Bursa Uludağ University). YöK. Tez.
- Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. MIT Press.
- International Court of Justice. (1969). North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany v. Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v. Netherlands), Judgment. ICJ Reports 1969, p. 3.
- International Court of Justice. (2005). Case concerning certain property (Liechtenstein v. Germany), Judgment of 10 February 2005. ICJ Reports 2005, p. 6.
- Kelsen, H. (1944). The principle of sovereign equality of states as a basis for international organization. Yale Law Journal, 53(2), 207–220.
- Kingsbury, B. (1998). Sovereignty and inequality. European Journal of International Law, 9(4), 599–625.
- Koskenniemi, M., & Kari, V. (2020). Sovereign equality. In J. E. Viñuales (Ed.), The UN Friendly Relations Declaration at 50: An assessment of the fundamental principles of international law (pp. 166–188). Cambridge University Press.
- Kyryliuk, N., Savchyn, N., Bobryk, V., Koroied, S., & Makhinchuk, V. (2022). The place of the sovereign equality of states in the modern system of basic principles of international law. ASTRA Salvensis, 10(1), 563–575.
- Magarasevic, A. (1980). On the sovereign equality of states in contemporary international law. Zbornik Radova, 14, 27–60.
- Mao, Y. (1956). The principle of sovereign equality in the United Nations (Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago).
- McNair, A. D. (1927). Equality in international law. Michigan Law Review, 26(2), 131–152.
- Moslemi, B., & Babaeimehr, A. (2015). Principle of sovereign equality of states in the light of the doctrine of responsibility to protect. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Special Issue, 687–697.
- Risvas, M. (2017). Non-discrimination in international law and sovereign equality of states: An historical perspective. Houston Journal of International Law, 39(1), 79–112.
- Roth, B. R. (2005). Sovereign equality and “bounded pluralism” in the international legal order. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), 99, 392–395.
- Stirk, P. M. R. (2012). The Westphalian model and sovereign equality. Review of International Studies, 38(3), 641–660.
- Thomas, A. van W., & Thomas, A. J. (1951). Equality of states in international law: Fact or fiction? Virginia Law Review, 37(6), 791–823.
- United Nations. (1945). Charter of the United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter
- United Nations. (1965). Consensus on principle of sovereign equality of states reached by Special Committee on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations of States. International Legal Materials, 4(1), 28–50.
- United Nations. (1969). Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/unts/volume%201155/volume-1155-i-18232-english.pdf
- United Nations General Assembly. (1970). Declaration on principles of international law concerning friendly relations and cooperation among states in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations (A/RES/25/2625).
- Wright, Q. (1970). The equality of states. Cornell International Law Journal, 3(1), 1–8.
- Yurtsever, S., & Öğün, M. N. (2020). Sovereign equality in international relations. Uluslararası Türk Kültür Coğrafyasında Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(2), 152–172.
- Zarakol, A. (2018). Sovereign equality as misrecognition. Review of International Studies, 44(5), 848–862.
Öz
Kaynakça
- Ansong, A. (2018). The concept of sovereign equality of states in international law. GIMPA Law Review, 2(1), 13–42.
- Baker, P. J. (1923–1924). The doctrine of legal equality of states. British Yearbook of International Law, 4, 1–20.
- Brown, P. M. (1915). The theory of the independence and equality of states. American Journal of International Law, 9(2), 305–335.
- Byers, M., Raghavan, V., & Becerra-Ramirez, M. (2005). Voices from the outside: Sovereign equality, international law, and the imbalance of power. Cambridge University Press.
- Cimanuka, K. J. L. (2022). Principle of sovereign equality and non-interference in the internal affairs of a state. Tirtayasa Journal of International Law, 1(1), 59–75.
- Gaubatz, K. T. (2015). Democratic states and the sovereign equality norm. Retrieved December 13, 2025, from http://kktg.net/kurt/publications/pubs/Sovereign%20Equality.pdf
- Hasan, A. S. M. M. (2021). Uluslararası hukukta devletlerin içişlerine karışmama ilkesinin incelenmesi: Bangladeş örneği (Doctoral dissertation, Bursa Uludağ University). YöK. Tez.
- Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. MIT Press.
- International Court of Justice. (1969). North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany v. Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v. Netherlands), Judgment. ICJ Reports 1969, p. 3.
- International Court of Justice. (2005). Case concerning certain property (Liechtenstein v. Germany), Judgment of 10 February 2005. ICJ Reports 2005, p. 6.
- Kelsen, H. (1944). The principle of sovereign equality of states as a basis for international organization. Yale Law Journal, 53(2), 207–220.
- Kingsbury, B. (1998). Sovereignty and inequality. European Journal of International Law, 9(4), 599–625.
- Koskenniemi, M., & Kari, V. (2020). Sovereign equality. In J. E. Viñuales (Ed.), The UN Friendly Relations Declaration at 50: An assessment of the fundamental principles of international law (pp. 166–188). Cambridge University Press.
- Kyryliuk, N., Savchyn, N., Bobryk, V., Koroied, S., & Makhinchuk, V. (2022). The place of the sovereign equality of states in the modern system of basic principles of international law. ASTRA Salvensis, 10(1), 563–575.
- Magarasevic, A. (1980). On the sovereign equality of states in contemporary international law. Zbornik Radova, 14, 27–60.
- Mao, Y. (1956). The principle of sovereign equality in the United Nations (Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago).
- McNair, A. D. (1927). Equality in international law. Michigan Law Review, 26(2), 131–152.
- Moslemi, B., & Babaeimehr, A. (2015). Principle of sovereign equality of states in the light of the doctrine of responsibility to protect. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Special Issue, 687–697.
- Risvas, M. (2017). Non-discrimination in international law and sovereign equality of states: An historical perspective. Houston Journal of International Law, 39(1), 79–112.
- Roth, B. R. (2005). Sovereign equality and “bounded pluralism” in the international legal order. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), 99, 392–395.
- Stirk, P. M. R. (2012). The Westphalian model and sovereign equality. Review of International Studies, 38(3), 641–660.
- Thomas, A. van W., & Thomas, A. J. (1951). Equality of states in international law: Fact or fiction? Virginia Law Review, 37(6), 791–823.
- United Nations. (1945). Charter of the United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter
- United Nations. (1965). Consensus on principle of sovereign equality of states reached by Special Committee on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations of States. International Legal Materials, 4(1), 28–50.
- United Nations. (1969). Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/unts/volume%201155/volume-1155-i-18232-english.pdf
- United Nations General Assembly. (1970). Declaration on principles of international law concerning friendly relations and cooperation among states in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations (A/RES/25/2625).
- Wright, Q. (1970). The equality of states. Cornell International Law Journal, 3(1), 1–8.
- Yurtsever, S., & Öğün, M. N. (2020). Sovereign equality in international relations. Uluslararası Türk Kültür Coğrafyasında Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(2), 152–172.
- Zarakol, A. (2018). Sovereign equality as misrecognition. Review of International Studies, 44(5), 848–862.
Öz
Kaynakça
- Ansong, A. (2018). The concept of sovereign equality of states in international law. GIMPA Law Review, 2(1), 13–42.
- Baker, P. J. (1923–1924). The doctrine of legal equality of states. British Yearbook of International Law, 4, 1–20.
- Brown, P. M. (1915). The theory of the independence and equality of states. American Journal of International Law, 9(2), 305–335.
- Byers, M., Raghavan, V., & Becerra-Ramirez, M. (2005). Voices from the outside: Sovereign equality, international law, and the imbalance of power. Cambridge University Press.
- Cimanuka, K. J. L. (2022). Principle of sovereign equality and non-interference in the internal affairs of a state. Tirtayasa Journal of International Law, 1(1), 59–75.
- Gaubatz, K. T. (2015). Democratic states and the sovereign equality norm. Retrieved December 13, 2025, from http://kktg.net/kurt/publications/pubs/Sovereign%20Equality.pdf
- Hasan, A. S. M. M. (2021). Uluslararası hukukta devletlerin içişlerine karışmama ilkesinin incelenmesi: Bangladeş örneği (Doctoral dissertation, Bursa Uludağ University). YöK. Tez.
- Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. MIT Press.
- International Court of Justice. (1969). North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany v. Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v. Netherlands), Judgment. ICJ Reports 1969, p. 3.
- International Court of Justice. (2005). Case concerning certain property (Liechtenstein v. Germany), Judgment of 10 February 2005. ICJ Reports 2005, p. 6.
- Kelsen, H. (1944). The principle of sovereign equality of states as a basis for international organization. Yale Law Journal, 53(2), 207–220.
- Kingsbury, B. (1998). Sovereignty and inequality. European Journal of International Law, 9(4), 599–625.
- Koskenniemi, M., & Kari, V. (2020). Sovereign equality. In J. E. Viñuales (Ed.), The UN Friendly Relations Declaration at 50: An assessment of the fundamental principles of international law (pp. 166–188). Cambridge University Press.
- Kyryliuk, N., Savchyn, N., Bobryk, V., Koroied, S., & Makhinchuk, V. (2022). The place of the sovereign equality of states in the modern system of basic principles of international law. ASTRA Salvensis, 10(1), 563–575.
- Magarasevic, A. (1980). On the sovereign equality of states in contemporary international law. Zbornik Radova, 14, 27–60.
- Mao, Y. (1956). The principle of sovereign equality in the United Nations (Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago).
- McNair, A. D. (1927). Equality in international law. Michigan Law Review, 26(2), 131–152.
- Moslemi, B., & Babaeimehr, A. (2015). Principle of sovereign equality of states in the light of the doctrine of responsibility to protect. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Special Issue, 687–697.
- Risvas, M. (2017). Non-discrimination in international law and sovereign equality of states: An historical perspective. Houston Journal of International Law, 39(1), 79–112.
- Roth, B. R. (2005). Sovereign equality and “bounded pluralism” in the international legal order. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), 99, 392–395.
- Stirk, P. M. R. (2012). The Westphalian model and sovereign equality. Review of International Studies, 38(3), 641–660.
- Thomas, A. van W., & Thomas, A. J. (1951). Equality of states in international law: Fact or fiction? Virginia Law Review, 37(6), 791–823.
- United Nations. (1945). Charter of the United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter
- United Nations. (1965). Consensus on principle of sovereign equality of states reached by Special Committee on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations of States. International Legal Materials, 4(1), 28–50.
- United Nations. (1969). Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/unts/volume%201155/volume-1155-i-18232-english.pdf
- United Nations General Assembly. (1970). Declaration on principles of international law concerning friendly relations and cooperation among states in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations (A/RES/25/2625).
- Wright, Q. (1970). The equality of states. Cornell International Law Journal, 3(1), 1–8.
- Yurtsever, S., & Öğün, M. N. (2020). Sovereign equality in international relations. Uluslararası Türk Kültür Coğrafyasında Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(2), 152–172.
- Zarakol, A. (2018). Sovereign equality as misrecognition. Review of International Studies, 44(5), 848–862.
Öz
Kaynakça
- Ansong, A. (2018). The concept of sovereign equality of states in international law. GIMPA Law Review, 2(1), 13–42.
- Baker, P. J. (1923–1924). The doctrine of legal equality of states. British Yearbook of International Law, 4, 1–20.
- Brown, P. M. (1915). The theory of the independence and equality of states. American Journal of International Law, 9(2), 305–335.
- Byers, M., Raghavan, V., & Becerra-Ramirez, M. (2005). Voices from the outside: Sovereign equality, international law, and the imbalance of power. Cambridge University Press.
- Cimanuka, K. J. L. (2022). Principle of sovereign equality and non-interference in the internal affairs of a state. Tirtayasa Journal of International Law, 1(1), 59–75.
- Gaubatz, K. T. (2015). Democratic states and the sovereign equality norm. Retrieved December 13, 2025, from http://kktg.net/kurt/publications/pubs/Sovereign%20Equality.pdf
- Hasan, A. S. M. M. (2021). Uluslararası hukukta devletlerin içişlerine karışmama ilkesinin incelenmesi: Bangladeş örneği (Doctoral dissertation, Bursa Uludağ University). YöK. Tez.
- Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. MIT Press.
- International Court of Justice. (1969). North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany v. Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v. Netherlands), Judgment. ICJ Reports 1969, p. 3.
- International Court of Justice. (2005). Case concerning certain property (Liechtenstein v. Germany), Judgment of 10 February 2005. ICJ Reports 2005, p. 6.
- Kelsen, H. (1944). The principle of sovereign equality of states as a basis for international organization. Yale Law Journal, 53(2), 207–220.
- Kingsbury, B. (1998). Sovereignty and inequality. European Journal of International Law, 9(4), 599–625.
- Koskenniemi, M., & Kari, V. (2020). Sovereign equality. In J. E. Viñuales (Ed.), The UN Friendly Relations Declaration at 50: An assessment of the fundamental principles of international law (pp. 166–188). Cambridge University Press.
- Kyryliuk, N., Savchyn, N., Bobryk, V., Koroied, S., & Makhinchuk, V. (2022). The place of the sovereign equality of states in the modern system of basic principles of international law. ASTRA Salvensis, 10(1), 563–575.
- Magarasevic, A. (1980). On the sovereign equality of states in contemporary international law. Zbornik Radova, 14, 27–60.
- Mao, Y. (1956). The principle of sovereign equality in the United Nations (Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago).
- McNair, A. D. (1927). Equality in international law. Michigan Law Review, 26(2), 131–152.
- Moslemi, B., & Babaeimehr, A. (2015). Principle of sovereign equality of states in the light of the doctrine of responsibility to protect. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Special Issue, 687–697.
- Risvas, M. (2017). Non-discrimination in international law and sovereign equality of states: An historical perspective. Houston Journal of International Law, 39(1), 79–112.
- Roth, B. R. (2005). Sovereign equality and “bounded pluralism” in the international legal order. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), 99, 392–395.
- Stirk, P. M. R. (2012). The Westphalian model and sovereign equality. Review of International Studies, 38(3), 641–660.
- Thomas, A. van W., & Thomas, A. J. (1951). Equality of states in international law: Fact or fiction? Virginia Law Review, 37(6), 791–823.
- United Nations. (1945). Charter of the United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter
- United Nations. (1965). Consensus on principle of sovereign equality of states reached by Special Committee on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations of States. International Legal Materials, 4(1), 28–50.
- United Nations. (1969). Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/unts/volume%201155/volume-1155-i-18232-english.pdf
- United Nations General Assembly. (1970). Declaration on principles of international law concerning friendly relations and cooperation among states in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations (A/RES/25/2625).
- Wright, Q. (1970). The equality of states. Cornell International Law Journal, 3(1), 1–8.
- Yurtsever, S., & Öğün, M. N. (2020). Sovereign equality in international relations. Uluslararası Türk Kültür Coğrafyasında Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(2), 152–172.
- Zarakol, A. (2018). Sovereign equality as misrecognition. Review of International Studies, 44(5), 848–862.
Öz
Kaynakça
- Ansong, A. (2018). The concept of sovereign equality of states in international law. GIMPA Law Review, 2(1), 13–42.
- Baker, P. J. (1923–1924). The doctrine of legal equality of states. British Yearbook of International Law, 4, 1–20.
- Brown, P. M. (1915). The theory of the independence and equality of states. American Journal of International Law, 9(2), 305–335.
- Byers, M., Raghavan, V., & Becerra-Ramirez, M. (2005). Voices from the outside: Sovereign equality, international law, and the imbalance of power. Cambridge University Press.
- Cimanuka, K. J. L. (2022). Principle of sovereign equality and non-interference in the internal affairs of a state. Tirtayasa Journal of International Law, 1(1), 59–75.
- Gaubatz, K. T. (2015). Democratic states and the sovereign equality norm. Retrieved December 13, 2025, from http://kktg.net/kurt/publications/pubs/Sovereign%20Equality.pdf
- Hasan, A. S. M. M. (2021). Uluslararası hukukta devletlerin içişlerine karışmama ilkesinin incelenmesi: Bangladeş örneği (Doctoral dissertation, Bursa Uludağ University). YöK. Tez.
- Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. MIT Press.
- International Court of Justice. (1969). North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany v. Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v. Netherlands), Judgment. ICJ Reports 1969, p. 3.
- International Court of Justice. (2005). Case concerning certain property (Liechtenstein v. Germany), Judgment of 10 February 2005. ICJ Reports 2005, p. 6.
- Kelsen, H. (1944). The principle of sovereign equality of states as a basis for international organization. Yale Law Journal, 53(2), 207–220.
- Kingsbury, B. (1998). Sovereignty and inequality. European Journal of International Law, 9(4), 599–625.
- Koskenniemi, M., & Kari, V. (2020). Sovereign equality. In J. E. Viñuales (Ed.), The UN Friendly Relations Declaration at 50: An assessment of the fundamental principles of international law (pp. 166–188). Cambridge University Press.
- Kyryliuk, N., Savchyn, N., Bobryk, V., Koroied, S., & Makhinchuk, V. (2022). The place of the sovereign equality of states in the modern system of basic principles of international law. ASTRA Salvensis, 10(1), 563–575.
- Magarasevic, A. (1980). On the sovereign equality of states in contemporary international law. Zbornik Radova, 14, 27–60.
- Mao, Y. (1956). The principle of sovereign equality in the United Nations (Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago).
- McNair, A. D. (1927). Equality in international law. Michigan Law Review, 26(2), 131–152.
- Moslemi, B., & Babaeimehr, A. (2015). Principle of sovereign equality of states in the light of the doctrine of responsibility to protect. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Special Issue, 687–697.
- Risvas, M. (2017). Non-discrimination in international law and sovereign equality of states: An historical perspective. Houston Journal of International Law, 39(1), 79–112.
- Roth, B. R. (2005). Sovereign equality and “bounded pluralism” in the international legal order. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), 99, 392–395.
- Stirk, P. M. R. (2012). The Westphalian model and sovereign equality. Review of International Studies, 38(3), 641–660.
- Thomas, A. van W., & Thomas, A. J. (1951). Equality of states in international law: Fact or fiction? Virginia Law Review, 37(6), 791–823.
- United Nations. (1945). Charter of the United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter
- United Nations. (1965). Consensus on principle of sovereign equality of states reached by Special Committee on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations of States. International Legal Materials, 4(1), 28–50.
- United Nations. (1969). Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/unts/volume%201155/volume-1155-i-18232-english.pdf
- United Nations General Assembly. (1970). Declaration on principles of international law concerning friendly relations and cooperation among states in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations (A/RES/25/2625).
- Wright, Q. (1970). The equality of states. Cornell International Law Journal, 3(1), 1–8.
- Yurtsever, S., & Öğün, M. N. (2020). Sovereign equality in international relations. Uluslararası Türk Kültür Coğrafyasında Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(2), 152–172.
- Zarakol, A. (2018). Sovereign equality as misrecognition. Review of International Studies, 44(5), 848–862.
Öz
Kaynakça
- Ansong, A. (2018). The concept of sovereign equality of states in international law. GIMPA Law Review, 2(1), 13–42.
- Baker, P. J. (1923–1924). The doctrine of legal equality of states. British Yearbook of International Law, 4, 1–20.
- Brown, P. M. (1915). The theory of the independence and equality of states. American Journal of International Law, 9(2), 305–335.
- Byers, M., Raghavan, V., & Becerra-Ramirez, M. (2005). Voices from the outside: Sovereign equality, international law, and the imbalance of power. Cambridge University Press.
- Cimanuka, K. J. L. (2022). Principle of sovereign equality and non-interference in the internal affairs of a state. Tirtayasa Journal of International Law, 1(1), 59–75.
- Gaubatz, K. T. (2015). Democratic states and the sovereign equality norm. Retrieved December 13, 2025, from http://kktg.net/kurt/publications/pubs/Sovereign%20Equality.pdf
- Hasan, A. S. M. M. (2021). Uluslararası hukukta devletlerin içişlerine karışmama ilkesinin incelenmesi: Bangladeş örneği (Doctoral dissertation, Bursa Uludağ University). YöK. Tez.
- Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. MIT Press.
- International Court of Justice. (1969). North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany v. Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v. Netherlands), Judgment. ICJ Reports 1969, p. 3.
- International Court of Justice. (2005). Case concerning certain property (Liechtenstein v. Germany), Judgment of 10 February 2005. ICJ Reports 2005, p. 6.
- Kelsen, H. (1944). The principle of sovereign equality of states as a basis for international organization. Yale Law Journal, 53(2), 207–220.
- Kingsbury, B. (1998). Sovereignty and inequality. European Journal of International Law, 9(4), 599–625.
- Koskenniemi, M., & Kari, V. (2020). Sovereign equality. In J. E. Viñuales (Ed.), The UN Friendly Relations Declaration at 50: An assessment of the fundamental principles of international law (pp. 166–188). Cambridge University Press.
- Kyryliuk, N., Savchyn, N., Bobryk, V., Koroied, S., & Makhinchuk, V. (2022). The place of the sovereign equality of states in the modern system of basic principles of international law. ASTRA Salvensis, 10(1), 563–575.
- Magarasevic, A. (1980). On the sovereign equality of states in contemporary international law. Zbornik Radova, 14, 27–60.
- Mao, Y. (1956). The principle of sovereign equality in the United Nations (Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago).
- McNair, A. D. (1927). Equality in international law. Michigan Law Review, 26(2), 131–152.
- Moslemi, B., & Babaeimehr, A. (2015). Principle of sovereign equality of states in the light of the doctrine of responsibility to protect. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Special Issue, 687–697.
- Risvas, M. (2017). Non-discrimination in international law and sovereign equality of states: An historical perspective. Houston Journal of International Law, 39(1), 79–112.
- Roth, B. R. (2005). Sovereign equality and “bounded pluralism” in the international legal order. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), 99, 392–395.
- Stirk, P. M. R. (2012). The Westphalian model and sovereign equality. Review of International Studies, 38(3), 641–660.
- Thomas, A. van W., & Thomas, A. J. (1951). Equality of states in international law: Fact or fiction? Virginia Law Review, 37(6), 791–823.
- United Nations. (1945). Charter of the United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter
- United Nations. (1965). Consensus on principle of sovereign equality of states reached by Special Committee on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations of States. International Legal Materials, 4(1), 28–50.
- United Nations. (1969). Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/unts/volume%201155/volume-1155-i-18232-english.pdf
- United Nations General Assembly. (1970). Declaration on principles of international law concerning friendly relations and cooperation among states in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations (A/RES/25/2625).
- Wright, Q. (1970). The equality of states. Cornell International Law Journal, 3(1), 1–8.
- Yurtsever, S., & Öğün, M. N. (2020). Sovereign equality in international relations. Uluslararası Türk Kültür Coğrafyasında Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(2), 152–172.
- Zarakol, A. (2018). Sovereign equality as misrecognition. Review of International Studies, 44(5), 848–862.
Uluslararası Hukukta Devletlerin Egemen Eşitliğini Yeniden Düşünmek: Normatif İddialar ve Pratik Gerçeklikler
Öz
Egemen eşitlik, modern uluslararası hukukun temel ilkelerinden biri olarak kabul edilmekte olup Birleşmiş Milletler Antlaşması’nın 2(1). maddesinde açık biçimde ifade edilmiştir. Bu ilke, devletlerin büyüklüğü, ekonomik gücü ya da siyasal tercihleri ne olursa olsun uluslararası hukuk düzeninde eşit hukuki statüye sahip olduklarını varsayar. Bununla birlikte, uluslararası kurumların ve küresel yönetişim yapılarının içkin güç asimetrileri nedeniyle egemen eşitlik ilkesinin uygulamada çoğu zaman sembolik bir nitelik taşıdığı görülmektedir. Bu çalışma, egemen eşitlik ilkesini normatif iddiaları ile pratik uygulanışı arasındaki gerilim bağlamında yeniden değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma, hukuki metinlerin öğretisel analizi ile egemen eşitlik literatürüne ilişkin eleştirel söylem analizini bir arada kullanmaktadır. Çalışma, egemen eşitlik kavramının Avrupa merkezli kökenlerinden Birleşmiş Milletler sistemi içindeki kurumsallaşmasına uzanan tarihsel gelişimini incelemekte ve bu ilkenin sömürge sonrası hiyerarşiler, güç asimetrileri ve tanınma siyasetleri içinde nasıl hem inşa edildiğini hem de tartışmaya açıldığını göstermektedir. Sonuç olarak egemen eşitliğin normatif değeri sürmekle birlikte, ilkenin anlamlı biçimde uygulanabilmesi daha çoğulcu hukuki çerçevelerin geliştirilmesini, uluslararası kurumlarda kapsayıcılığın artırılmasını ve devletlerin farklı tarihsel ve siyasal konumlarını dikkate alan tanınma süreçlerinin oluşturulmasını gerektirmektedir.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Egemen Eşitlik Uluslararası Hukuk Postkolonyal Eleştiri BM Antlaşması Kurumsal Eşitsizlik
Kaynakça
- Ansong, A. (2018). The concept of sovereign equality of states in international law. GIMPA Law Review, 2(1), 13–42.
- Baker, P. J. (1923–1924). The doctrine of legal equality of states. British Yearbook of International Law, 4, 1–20.
- Brown, P. M. (1915). The theory of the independence and equality of states. American Journal of International Law, 9(2), 305–335.
- Byers, M., Raghavan, V., & Becerra-Ramirez, M. (2005). Voices from the outside: Sovereign equality, international law, and the imbalance of power. Cambridge University Press.
- Cimanuka, K. J. L. (2022). Principle of sovereign equality and non-interference in the internal affairs of a state. Tirtayasa Journal of International Law, 1(1), 59–75.
- Gaubatz, K. T. (2015). Democratic states and the sovereign equality norm. Retrieved December 13, 2025, from http://kktg.net/kurt/publications/pubs/Sovereign%20Equality.pdf
- Hasan, A. S. M. M. (2021). Uluslararası hukukta devletlerin içişlerine karışmama ilkesinin incelenmesi: Bangladeş örneği (Doctoral dissertation, Bursa Uludağ University). YöK. Tez.
- Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. MIT Press.
- International Court of Justice. (1969). North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany v. Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v. Netherlands), Judgment. ICJ Reports 1969, p. 3.
- International Court of Justice. (2005). Case concerning certain property (Liechtenstein v. Germany), Judgment of 10 February 2005. ICJ Reports 2005, p. 6.
- Kelsen, H. (1944). The principle of sovereign equality of states as a basis for international organization. Yale Law Journal, 53(2), 207–220.
- Kingsbury, B. (1998). Sovereignty and inequality. European Journal of International Law, 9(4), 599–625.
- Koskenniemi, M., & Kari, V. (2020). Sovereign equality. In J. E. Viñuales (Ed.), The UN Friendly Relations Declaration at 50: An assessment of the fundamental principles of international law (pp. 166–188). Cambridge University Press.
- Kyryliuk, N., Savchyn, N., Bobryk, V., Koroied, S., & Makhinchuk, V. (2022). The place of the sovereign equality of states in the modern system of basic principles of international law. ASTRA Salvensis, 10(1), 563–575.
- Magarasevic, A. (1980). On the sovereign equality of states in contemporary international law. Zbornik Radova, 14, 27–60.
- Mao, Y. (1956). The principle of sovereign equality in the United Nations (Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago).
- McNair, A. D. (1927). Equality in international law. Michigan Law Review, 26(2), 131–152.
- Moslemi, B., & Babaeimehr, A. (2015). Principle of sovereign equality of states in the light of the doctrine of responsibility to protect. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Special Issue, 687–697.
- Risvas, M. (2017). Non-discrimination in international law and sovereign equality of states: An historical perspective. Houston Journal of International Law, 39(1), 79–112.
- Roth, B. R. (2005). Sovereign equality and “bounded pluralism” in the international legal order. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), 99, 392–395.
- Stirk, P. M. R. (2012). The Westphalian model and sovereign equality. Review of International Studies, 38(3), 641–660.
- Thomas, A. van W., & Thomas, A. J. (1951). Equality of states in international law: Fact or fiction? Virginia Law Review, 37(6), 791–823.
- United Nations. (1945). Charter of the United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter
- United Nations. (1965). Consensus on principle of sovereign equality of states reached by Special Committee on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations of States. International Legal Materials, 4(1), 28–50.
- United Nations. (1969). Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/unts/volume%201155/volume-1155-i-18232-english.pdf
- United Nations General Assembly. (1970). Declaration on principles of international law concerning friendly relations and cooperation among states in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations (A/RES/25/2625).
- Wright, Q. (1970). The equality of states. Cornell International Law Journal, 3(1), 1–8.
- Yurtsever, S., & Öğün, M. N. (2020). Sovereign equality in international relations. Uluslararası Türk Kültür Coğrafyasında Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(2), 152–172.
- Zarakol, A. (2018). Sovereign equality as misrecognition. Review of International Studies, 44(5), 848–862.
Rethinking Sovereign Equality of States in International Law: Normative Claims and Practical Realities
Öz
Sovereign equality is widely recognized as a fundamental principle of modern international law and is explicitly articulated in Article 2(1) of the United Nations Charter. The concept of sovereign equality guarantees legal parity among all states, regardless of their size, relative wealth, or political orientation. However, in practice, this principle has often functioned more symbolically than substantively due to structural inequalities embedded within international institutions and systems of global governance. This article re-evaluates the principle of sovereign equality and examines its contemporary relevance in a global order marked by a significant gap between its normative ideal and its uneven application in international law. The methodology combines doctrinal analysis of legal texts and treaties with a critical discourse analysis of key scholarly works referenced in the study. The paper traces the historical evolution of sovereign equality from its Eurocentric origins through its codification within the United Nations system and examines how it has been both constructed and contested through postcolonial hierarchies, asymmetries, and recognition politics. Drawing on critical legal theory and postcolonial thought, the study demonstrates the dual character of sovereign equality as both a legal instrument designed to protect weaker states from domination and a mechanism that may reproduce forms of exclusion and inequality. Accordingly, while sovereign equality retains significant normative value, its meaningful application requires structural reforms, including more pluralistic legal frameworks, greater inclusivity in international institutional practices, and recognition processes that reflect the diverse realities and needs of states.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Sovereign Equality International Law Postcolonial Critique UN Charter Institutional Inequality
Kaynakça
- Ansong, A. (2018). The concept of sovereign equality of states in international law. GIMPA Law Review, 2(1), 13–42.
- Baker, P. J. (1923–1924). The doctrine of legal equality of states. British Yearbook of International Law, 4, 1–20.
- Brown, P. M. (1915). The theory of the independence and equality of states. American Journal of International Law, 9(2), 305–335.
- Byers, M., Raghavan, V., & Becerra-Ramirez, M. (2005). Voices from the outside: Sovereign equality, international law, and the imbalance of power. Cambridge University Press.
- Cimanuka, K. J. L. (2022). Principle of sovereign equality and non-interference in the internal affairs of a state. Tirtayasa Journal of International Law, 1(1), 59–75.
- Gaubatz, K. T. (2015). Democratic states and the sovereign equality norm. Retrieved December 13, 2025, from http://kktg.net/kurt/publications/pubs/Sovereign%20Equality.pdf
- Hasan, A. S. M. M. (2021). Uluslararası hukukta devletlerin içişlerine karışmama ilkesinin incelenmesi: Bangladeş örneği (Doctoral dissertation, Bursa Uludağ University). YöK. Tez.
- Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. MIT Press.
- International Court of Justice. (1969). North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany v. Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v. Netherlands), Judgment. ICJ Reports 1969, p. 3.
- International Court of Justice. (2005). Case concerning certain property (Liechtenstein v. Germany), Judgment of 10 February 2005. ICJ Reports 2005, p. 6.
- Kelsen, H. (1944). The principle of sovereign equality of states as a basis for international organization. Yale Law Journal, 53(2), 207–220.
- Kingsbury, B. (1998). Sovereignty and inequality. European Journal of International Law, 9(4), 599–625.
- Koskenniemi, M., & Kari, V. (2020). Sovereign equality. In J. E. Viñuales (Ed.), The UN Friendly Relations Declaration at 50: An assessment of the fundamental principles of international law (pp. 166–188). Cambridge University Press.
- Kyryliuk, N., Savchyn, N., Bobryk, V., Koroied, S., & Makhinchuk, V. (2022). The place of the sovereign equality of states in the modern system of basic principles of international law. ASTRA Salvensis, 10(1), 563–575.
- Magarasevic, A. (1980). On the sovereign equality of states in contemporary international law. Zbornik Radova, 14, 27–60.
- Mao, Y. (1956). The principle of sovereign equality in the United Nations (Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago).
- McNair, A. D. (1927). Equality in international law. Michigan Law Review, 26(2), 131–152.
- Moslemi, B., & Babaeimehr, A. (2015). Principle of sovereign equality of states in the light of the doctrine of responsibility to protect. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Special Issue, 687–697.
- Risvas, M. (2017). Non-discrimination in international law and sovereign equality of states: An historical perspective. Houston Journal of International Law, 39(1), 79–112.
- Roth, B. R. (2005). Sovereign equality and “bounded pluralism” in the international legal order. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), 99, 392–395.
- Stirk, P. M. R. (2012). The Westphalian model and sovereign equality. Review of International Studies, 38(3), 641–660.
- Thomas, A. van W., & Thomas, A. J. (1951). Equality of states in international law: Fact or fiction? Virginia Law Review, 37(6), 791–823.
- United Nations. (1945). Charter of the United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter
- United Nations. (1965). Consensus on principle of sovereign equality of states reached by Special Committee on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations of States. International Legal Materials, 4(1), 28–50.
- United Nations. (1969). Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/unts/volume%201155/volume-1155-i-18232-english.pdf
- United Nations General Assembly. (1970). Declaration on principles of international law concerning friendly relations and cooperation among states in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations (A/RES/25/2625).
- Wright, Q. (1970). The equality of states. Cornell International Law Journal, 3(1), 1–8.
- Yurtsever, S., & Öğün, M. N. (2020). Sovereign equality in international relations. Uluslararası Türk Kültür Coğrafyasında Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(2), 152–172.
- Zarakol, A. (2018). Sovereign equality as misrecognition. Review of International Studies, 44(5), 848–862.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Hukuk (Diğer) |
| Bölüm | Araştırma Makalesi |
| Yazarlar | |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 19 Aralık 2025 |
| Kabul Tarihi | 5 Mart 2026 |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 5 Mart 2026 |
| IZ | https://izlik.org/JA53RL68DJ |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2026 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2 |
Amaç ve Kapsam
Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi / Academic Journal of History and Idea is a peer-reviewed scientific journal dedicated to the study of humanity in all its dimensions. Placing human concerns at the centre of its mission, Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi / Academic Journal of History and Idea aims to disseminate original, high-quality, and internationally recognised research that contributes to a deeper understanding of historical, social, cultural, and intellectual phenomena. By emphasising multidisciplinarity and interdisciplinarity, the journal encourages scholars to engage with diverse perspectives and to develop innovative and comprehensive approaches within the humanities and social sciences.
Since 2023, Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi / Academic Journal of History and Idea has maintained a regular publication schedule, fostering a dynamic and sustained academic dialogue through the timely dissemination of scholarly work. As of 1 January 2026, Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi / Academic Journal of History and Idea has adopted a continuous publication model, in line with contemporary standards of academic publishing and digital dissemination. Under this model, manuscripts that successfully complete the double-blind peer-review and editorial processes are published online immediately, without waiting for the completion of a specific issue. This approach enhances the timeliness, accessibility, and visibility of published research while fully preserving the journal’s commitment to academic rigour, ethical publishing principles, and editorial independence.
Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi / Academic Journal of History and Idea embraces a broad and inclusive range of methodological frameworks, from classical qualitative and interpretive analyses to comparative, mixed-methods, and data-informed approaches. By encouraging methodological diversity and critical engagement, Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi / Academic Journal of History and Idea seeks to overcome the limitations of conventional research paradigms and to promote intellectual exchange across disciplinary boundaries in the humanities and social sciences.
Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi / Academic Journal of History and Idea is an international, double-blind peer-reviewed electronic journal that provides an interdisciplinary platform for original research articles, critical review essays, meta-analyses, and meta-synthesis studies. The journal welcomes scholarly contributions from a wide range of fields, including but not limited to history, archaeology, art history, philosophy, religious studies, education, linguistics and literature, philology, political science, public administration, law, sociology, anthropology, psychology, economics, human and cultural geography, urban studies, architecture and urban planning, cultural heritage studies, media and communication studies, gender studies, migration and diaspora studies, international relations, security studies, and the history of civilisations and ideas.
Through its continuous publication model and strong interdisciplinary orientation, Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi / Academic Journal of History and Idea aims to advance scholarly knowledge, support innovative research practices, and make a meaningful and lasting contribution to the global academic community in the humanities and social sciences.
Yazım Kuralları
Publication Principles of the Academic Journal of History and Idea
(Applicable to issues published from April 2023 onward)
1. Responsibility for Content
All scientific, legal, and ethical responsibility for the content of articles published in the Academic Journal of History and Idea rests entirely with the author(s). Published works reflect the academic views and findings of the author(s); the journal, its editors, and the editorial board cannot be held responsible for these views.
Once an article has been published, authors may not request its removal from publication, except in exceptional cases that require correction, retraction, expression of concern, or other editorial actions in accordance with publication ethics.
2. Copyright, Licensing, and the Law on Intellectual and Artistic Works
The copyright of published articles belongs to the author(s). However, the use and protection of the articles are subject to the provisions of Law No. 5846 on Intellectual and Artistic Works.
By submitting a manuscript to the journal, the author(s) declare and undertake that the work:
is their own original work,
does not infringe the copyright of third parties,
has been prepared in compliance with all moral and economic rights protected under applicable copyright law.
In the event that a published article is later found to involve copyright infringement, unauthorized use, authorship disputes, or similar legal issues, all legal and criminal liability rests solely with the author(s). Such situations do not bind the journal, its editors, or the editorial board.
3. Open Access Policy
The Academic Journal of History and Idea is an open-access academic journal. All articles published in the journal are made freely available under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Under this license, articles may be shared, reproduced, adapted, and translated for non-commercial purposes, provided that:
proper scholarly attribution is given to the author(s) and the journal, and
it is clearly stated that the work was first published in the Academic Journal of History and Idea.
4. No Guarantee of Publication
Submission of a manuscript to the journal does not guarantee publication. Only manuscripts that successfully complete the editorial and peer-review processes are accepted for publication.
5. Editorial Preliminary Review
All submitted manuscripts undergo an editorial preliminary review before being sent to peer review. The journal reserves the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with its scope, author guidelines, scientific standards, or ethical principles.
6. Revision Timeline
If authors fail to respond to revision requests made by editors or reviewers for a period exceeding one year, the journal does not guarantee the retention of the manuscript in draft status within the system.
7. Post-Publication Ethical Violations and Journal Authority
If a published article is later found to be problematic due to plagiarism, data fabrication or falsification, ethical violations, unauthorized use of third-party works, unlawful content, or similar reasons, all legal and penal responsibility rests solely with the author(s).
In such cases, the Academic Journal of History and Idea reserves the right to:
temporarily suspend online publication of the article,
publish a retraction notice,
restrict access to or remove the article while retaining it in the archive,
notify relevant institutions and indexing services when necessary.
These actions are carried out in accordance with international publishing standards, COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines, and applicable legal regulations.
8. Confidentiality and Ethical Standards
The manuscript evaluation and publication process is conducted in strict accordance with scientific and ethical standards. In the double-blind peer review process, authors are not entitled to request information regarding the identities of reviewers. The authority to manage and finalize editorial decisions rests entirely with the journal.
9. Conflict of Interest
If a conflict of interest, close relationship, or prior acquaintance between an author and a reviewer is identified at any stage of the evaluation process, the journal reserves the right to suspend the process, appoint new reviewers, or reject the manuscript.
10. Manuscript Submission and Acceptance of Journal Policies
Manuscripts must be submitted in Word format, without any author-identifying information (such as name, institutional affiliation, or ORCID), via the journal’s online system:
https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/atdd
By submitting a manuscript to the journal, all authors are deemed to have read, understood, and accepted the journal’s publication, ethical, open access, and copyright policies. This acceptance is valid without the need for any additional written confirmation.
11. Scope
The Academic Journal of History and Idea accepts manuscripts in the fields of history, geography, religious studies, philosophy, pedagogy, architecture, linguistics and literature, archaeology, art, political history, human geography, economics, law, political science, public administration, urban history, environmental economics, sociology, and related disciplines.
12. Plagiarism Screening
Authors are required to submit a plagiarism/similarity report with their manuscripts. The similarity rate must not exceed 18%. The journal also conducts independent similarity checks using iThenticate software.
13. Copyright and Author Agreement
Submission of the Copyright and Author Agreement form is mandatory and must be uploaded to the system together with the manuscript.
14. Peer Review Process (Double-Blind Peer Review)
Manuscripts that pass the preliminary review are evaluated through a double-blind peer review process by at least two reviewers appointed by the editor. When necessary, a third or fourth reviewer may be consulted.
15. Editorial Responsibility
Throughout the evaluation process, the assigned editor is responsible for monitoring the manuscript’s compliance with language quality, academic writing standards, and reviewer recommendations.
16. Research and Publication Ethics / Ethics Committee Approval
For studies requiring ethics committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted together with the manuscript. Manuscripts for which required ethics approval documents are not provided upon request will be rejected.
17. Article Withdrawal Policy
Unless there is a valid reason approved by the editorial board, manuscripts that have entered the evaluation process may not be withdrawn. The final decision rests with the editorial board.
18. Manuscript Format and Writing Rules
Manuscripts must consist of a title page, main text, and references.
Formatting requirements:
Font:
Volumes 12 and earlier: Times New Roman
From Volume 13 onward: Garamond
Line spacing: 1.5
Margins: 2.5 cm
Paragraph indentation: First line indented by 0.5 inches
Citation style: APA 7
Contact
📧 akademiktarihvedusunce@gmail.com
APA 7 Yazım kurallarıyla ilgili daha geniş bilgi ve daha fazla eser ve örnekleri için lütfen tıklayınız.
* Sisteme yüklediği makalesini hiç bir gerekçe göstermeden ve haber vermeden geri çeken yazar ( sorumlu bir yazarın yaptığı bu işlem doğrultusunda bundan sebep diğer yazarlar) 2 (iki) yıl dergimize makale gönderimi yapamayacaktır. Lütfen geriçekme talebinde bulunacağız makaleniz için dergimiz e-mail, telefon ve diğer iletişim kanallarından bize bilgi veriniz.
Etik İlkeler ve Yayın Politikası
Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
General Principles
Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi / Academic Journal of History and Idea is committed to upholding the highest standards of academic integrity, ethical publishing, and scholarly responsibility. The journal is founded on the principles of objectivity, transparency, and the advancement of knowledge through original and high-quality research. All publication processes are conducted in accordance with internationally recognised ethical standards.
The journal adheres to the principles and guidelines set forth by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). All stakeholders involved in the publication process—publisher, editors, editorial board members, authors, reviewers, and readers—are expected to comply with these ethical principles and to act responsibly throughout all stages of submission, review, and publication.
Any form of misconduct, including data fabrication or falsification, plagiarism, misuse of sources, unethical research practices, or violations of individual rights, constitutes grounds for immediate rejection of a manuscript. In such cases, the author(s) and, where necessary, their affiliated institution(s) will be formally notified.
Publisher’s Ethical Responsibilities
Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi / Academic Journal of History and Idea is a non-profit, independent academic journal that operates without financial or institutional influence. The publisher is committed to safeguarding editorial independence and ensuring that all editorial decisions are made solely on the basis of scholarly merit.
The journal has been published in accordance with ethical principles since its first issue in December 2013. The editorial, advisory, and publication boards consist of scholars from various countries and operate on a voluntary basis. The publisher ensures that all publication processes are conducted transparently, ethically, and in the public interest.
Responsibilities of the Editor-in-Chief and Editors
The Editor-in-Chief holds ultimate responsibility for overseeing the entire editorial process and ensuring compliance with ethical standards. Editors act on behalf of the editorial board and manage the peer-review process impartially, efficiently, and confidentially.
Editors:
Evaluate submissions solely on the basis of academic quality, originality, relevance, and methodological rigor, without discrimination based on the author’s gender, ethnicity, nationality, institutional affiliation, political views, or beliefs.
Ensure that all manuscripts undergo a double-blind peer-review process.
Maintain confidentiality regarding submitted manuscripts and reviewer identities.
Identify and manage potential conflicts of interest.
Reject manuscripts that fail to meet ethical standards, including those with unacceptable levels of similarity detected through plagiarism screening tools.
Take appropriate action in cases of suspected misconduct, following COPE procedures.
Editorial Board Responsibilities
The Editorial Board supports the editors in maintaining the scientific quality and ethical integrity of the journal. Its responsibilities include:
Contributing to the development and continuous improvement of journal policies.
Upholding academic freedom and editorial independence.
Protecting authors’ intellectual property rights.
Ensuring the proper archiving and documentation of editorial correspondence and decisions.
Monitoring the journal’s compliance with indexing and database requirements.
Peer Reviewers’ Ethical Responsibilities
Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi / Academic Journal of History and Idea employs a double-blind peer-review system, in which the identities of both authors and reviewers remain confidential.
Peer reviewers are expected to:
Review manuscripts only within their areas of expertise.
Conduct evaluations objectively, fairly, and confidentially.
Declare any conflicts of interest and decline review when such conflicts exist.
Provide constructive, respectful, and scholarly feedback.
Complete reviews within the agreed timeframe.
Refrain from using unpublished material for personal research purposes.
Authors’ Ethical Responsibilities
Authors submitting manuscripts to the journal are deemed to have accepted the following responsibilities:
Manuscripts must be original, unpublished, and not under consideration elsewhere.
All sources must be properly cited in accordance with ethical and academic standards.
Authorship must accurately reflect individual contributions; all listed authors must have made a significant scholarly contribution.
Authors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest.
Studies involving human participants or data collection methods requiring ethical approval must include clear documentation of approval by a recognized ethics committee.
Authors must promptly inform the editors of any errors or inaccuracies discovered after submission or publication.
Withdrawal of a manuscript is not permitted once the peer-review process has begun, except under exceptional and justified circumstances.
Handling of Ethical Misconduct
Allegations of ethical misconduct related to submitted, accepted, or published articles are taken seriously. Any suspected violation of publication ethics should be reported to the journal via official communication channels. The journal will investigate all allegations in accordance with COPE guidelines and will take appropriate actions, which may include rejection, retraction, or notification of relevant institutions.
Commitment to Ethical Publishing
Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi / Academic Journal of History and Idea is dedicated to promoting ethical research practices, safeguarding academic integrity, and contributing responsibly to the global scholarly community. Continuous review and improvement of ethical policies remain integral to the journal’s mission.
Ücret Politikası
Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi, 2025-2026 eğitim-öğretim yılına az bir süre kala, farklı ülkelerin üniversiteleriyle devam eden protokollerin yenilenmesi ve gelen talepler doğrultusunda yeni ülkelerden üniversitelerle yeni iş birliği protokollerinin imzalanması ile ortak çalışma projelerine start verilmesi sürecine girmiştir. 2025 yılı itibarıyla dergimiz, uluslararası akademik yayıncılık standartlarını daha da ileriye taşımak amacıyla kapsamlı bir güncelleme süreci yürütmektedir. Bu dönemde özellikle, farklı ülkelerden gelen akademik iş birliği protokollerinin geliştirilmesi, Scopus ve Web of Science gibi önde gelen uluslararası indekslerin gerekliliklerinin daha sıkı biçimde takip edilmesi ve dergi politikalarının bu doğrultuda yeniden yapılandırılması temel öncelikler arasında yer almaktadır. Yeni dönemde, makaleler ile protokoller arasında kurulan bu güçlü bağ, hem bilimsel etkileşimin artmasına hem de uluslararası indekslerdeki konumun daha da güçlenmesine hizmet edecektir.
.....................................................................................................................................
With the 2025–2026 academic year fast approaching, The Journal of Academic History and Thought has initiated a process of renewing its existing protocols with universities in various countries and, in line with incoming requests, signing new cooperation protocols with additional institutions, thereby launching joint research projects. As of 2025, the journal has embarked on a comprehensive update process with the aim of further advancing international standards of academic publishing. During this period, particular priority has been given to the development of academic cooperation protocols with institutions abroad, the closer monitoring of the requirements of leading international indexes such as Scopus and Web of Science, and the restructuring of the journal’s policies in accordance with these requirements. In this new phase, the strengthened link between published articles and institutional protocols is expected to foster greater scholarly interaction and further consolidate the journal’s position within international indexing systems.
Dizinler
Diğer Dizinler
Dergi Kurulları
Bilimsel Yayım Koordinatörü / Scientific Publication Coordinator
İmtiyaz Sahibi ve Genel Yayım Sorumlusu / Concessionaire and General Editor-in-Chief
Baş Editör / Editor-in-Chief
Editörler / Editors
16.04.1970 tarihinde Kastamonu İli Tosya İlçesi’nde dünyaya geldi. İlköğrenimini Tosya’da, orta öğrenimini ise Kastamonu’da tamamladı. 1994 yılında Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Tarih Öğretmenliği Bölümü’nden mezun oldu. 1997 yılında Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Amasya Eğitim Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Anabilim Dalı’na Araştırma Görevlisi oldu. 2001 yılında Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yakınçağ Tarihi Anabilim Dalı’nda Yüksek Lisansını, 2005 yılında ise Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yakınçağ Tarihi Anabilim Dalı’nda Doktora eğitimini tamamladı. 2007 yılında Kastamonu Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Tarih Bölümü’ne Yrd. Doç. Dr. olarak atandı. 2018 yılında Doçent, 2024 yılında Profesör oldu. Halen Kastamonu Üniversitesi İnsan ve Toplum Bilimler Fakültesi Tarih Bölümü Cumhuriyet Tarihi Anabilim Dalı’nda çalışmaktadır. Doç. Dr. Ercan ÇELEBİ, Millî Mücadele, Türk Dünyası, göçler, Kastamonu kent tarihi üzerine çalışmaktadır. Evli ve iki çocuk babasıdır.
EDİTÖR
Ben Entela Muço, 27.03.1968 doğumluyum. Arnavut vatandaşıyım. Tırana'da doğdum ve yaşıyorum. Size özet şeklinde bir biyografi sunuyorum.
Eğitim; Yüksek okul'u Tirana Üniversitesi, Filoloji Fakültesi, Tarih Bölümü 30.06.1990'da bittirdim. İki yıl Osmanlıca öğrenmek amacıyla İstanbul Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi Tarih Bölümü'nde öğrendim. Yüksek Lisans Tepedelenli 2006 ve Doktora unvanları İstanbul Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi Tarih Bölümü'nde 24.12.2012 başarılı kazandım. Yüksek Lisans ve Doktora unvanları için çalıştığım konuları 1- Ali Paşa ve Emlaki ve 2- İbrahim Temo, Hayatı, Faaliyeti ve Fikirleri oldu.
Arnavutluk'ta Arnavut Arşivlerin Genel Müdürlüğü, Devlet Merkez Arşiv'inde 1993-2016 memur görevlisi olarak çalıştım
2011-2024 Dostluk, Bilimsel, Kültürel Arnavutluk-Azerbaycan Derneği'nde, derneğin başkan olarak işimi devam ediyorum.
Bu zaman boyunca, hatta Yüksek Lisans için fakültede okuduğum zaman bilim işimi başladım ve şu ana kadar Eylül 2024 devam etmekteyim.
Birçok ülkelerde Arnavutluk dışında Azerbaycan, Bulgaristan, Bruksel, Makedonya, Romanya, Türkiye, Ukrayna çoklu ilim faaliyetlerine başarı şekilde katıldım.
Çalıştığım konular sadece Yakın Çağ Osmanlı Tarihi içermemektedir. Ortağ Çağ ve Eski Çağ üzerinde çalışmaktayım. Konular Arnavutluk-Türkiye-Azerbaycan tarihi üzerinde çalışıyorum.
Şu ana kadar 72 etkinliklere katıldım. Birçok makaleler Arnavutluk'ta, Türkiye'de ve Azerbaycan'da gazete ve ilim dergilerimizde yayınladım. Üç kitap Tepedelenli Ali Paşa ve Emlaki, Nizami Gencevi, Hayatı, Faaliyeti ve Fikirleri ve Haydar Aliyev, Hayatı, Faaliyeti ve Fikirleri yayınladım.
Ümit ediyorum ki beğeneceksiniz.
Saygılarımla
Dr. Entela Muço
I am a Professor Emeritus. My field is the history of medieval Eurasia with special emphasis on the Turkic peoples
Ben Emekli Profesörüm. Alanım, Türk halklarına özel vurgu yaparak ortaçağ Avrasya tarihidir.
سفيان الحبيب شتيوي من مواليد 03/04/1986 بولاية الوادي ـ الجزائر،
متحصل على شهادة الدكتوراه تخصص مقارنة الأديان بجامعة الأمير عبد القادر للعلوم الإسلامية قسنطينة ـ الجزائر،
أستاذ محاضر أ (مشارك) بكلية الإسلامية جامعة باتنةَ1 ـ الجزائر،
له العديد من المقالات والأبحاث المنشورة في مجلات وطنية ودولية
محكّم في العديد من المجلات الوطنية والدولية،
ناقش العديد من أطاريح الدكتوراه في الجامعات الجزائرية،
عضو مخبر بحث "العلوم الإسلامية في الجزائر
Alan Editörleri / Area Editors
In the current academic landscape, Dr.Deniz is deeply entrenched within the scholarly echelons of Ankara University's Department of Foreign Language Education, where his intellectual pursuits traverse a labyrinthine expanse of scholarly domains. His scholarly proclivities encapsulate the intricate intersections of Educational Sciences, English Language Education, Educational Technology, Computer-Based Teaching Methods, Adaptive Learning, Blended Learning, and the profound philosophical undercurrents that define the realm of Education. Moreover, his scholarly trajectory is intricately interwoven with a meticulous examination of the historiography of Education, particularly honing in on the complex entanglements within the Turkish-American Relations and the consequential paradigm shifts witnessed within the Turkish Educational System in the post-1950 era. This scholarly odyssey seamlessly dovetails into his erudite explorations in English Language and Literature, Psychology, and the pedagogical nuances of Teacher Education, Educational and Instructional Technologies. Beyond these engagements, he persists in his capacity as a peer reviewer for a multitude of esteemed national and international scientific journals. Besides his roles as a reviewer for international journals, Dr.Deniz also serves as an editor and language editor, thereby contributing significantly to the academic community.Dr. Deniz has likewise partaken in an array of internationally convened symposia spanning nations such as Germany, England, Austria, and Cyprus. Beyond his tenure as a Lecturer at Ankara University, Dr. Deniz is immersed in profound undertakings for myriad distinguished educational entities, concentrating on the synergetic alignment of linguistic studies and language pedagogy with technological advancements, aspiring to amplify the dynamism and efficacy of this integration, thereby augmenting its advantages for language acquirers. In addition to his undergraduate, graduate, and doctoral education, Dr. Deniz has successfully completed internationally recognized courses in Language Education in England, including TESOL, CELTA, and DELTA. Dr. Deniz has also excelled in training across diverse domains such as awareness of education for individuals with disabilities, workplace stress and stress management, professional ethics and law, 5G mass education tools, statistical data interpretation, adult learning principles, time management and productivity, public ethics, and fundamental occupational health and safety. Furthermore, Dr. Deniz frequently participates in various projects both in Turkey and several European countries, dedicated to the most effective acquisition and instruction of the English language.
For his personal webpage, please click on the following link: https://avesis.ankara.edu.tr/sdeniz
Yayım ve Danışma Kurulu / Publication and Advisory Board
1970 yılında Kelbecer’de doğmuştur. 1997 yılında Bakü Devlet Üniversitesi Coğrafya Fakültesi’nden üstün başarı diploması ile mezun olmuştur. 2003–2008 yılları arasında Azerbaycan Milli İlimler Akademisi Felsefe, Sosyoloji ve Hukuk Enstitüsü’nde doktora eğitimi almıştır. 2016 yılında “Biyosfer süreçlerinin dinamiğinde insanın yeri ve rolü (sosyal-felsefi analiz)” başlıklı tezini savunarak Felsefe alanında Doktora derecesini almıştır.
2024 yılında Azerbaycan Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı nezdindeki Yüksek Attestasyon Komisyonu tarafından Doçent unvanına layık görülmüştür.
Bilimsel çalışmaları ağırlıklı olarak yapay zekâ ve toplumsal sorunlar, dijital gelişim, coğrafi küreselleşme, emperyalizm ve jeopolitik problemler ile kuantum felsefesi alanlarında yoğunlaşmaktadır. Hâlen Azerbaycan Milli İlimler Akademisi Felsefe ve Sosyoloji Enstitüsü’nde “Dijital Gelişim ve Yapay Zekâ Felsefesi” Bölüm Başkanı olarak görev yapmakta ve “Çağdaş jeopolitik koşullarda emperyalizm sorunu: siyasal-teorik analiz” başlıklı doktora sonrası bilimsel araştırmalarını sürdürmektedir.
Yurt içinde ve yurt dışında 100’den fazla bilimsel makalenin, bir bilimsel monografinin ve çok sayıda bilimsel-popüler yayının yazarıdır. Çeşitli ülkelerde düzenlenen uluslararası bilimsel konferanslarda çok sayıda bildiri ve konuşma yapmıştır.
Uljaeva Şahistahan Mamajonovna, 1967 yılında Ferghana bölgesinin Beşarik şehrinde doğdu. 1985–1990 yılları arasında Taşkent Devlet Üniversitesi Tarih Fakültesi’nde eğitim gördü ve üstün başarıyla mezun oldu.
Üniversiteyi bitirdikten sonra, tarih bölümünde doçent olarak çalışmaya başladı ve 1990 yılından itibaren yüksek nitelikli yetişkinler, meslektaşlar ve öğrenciler arasında saygınlık kazandı. 1997 yılında Fransa’nın Rennes Üniversitesi’nde uzmanlık seviyesini artırma imkânı buldu; 1999 yılında ise “Amir Temur ve Timuriler Dönemi Tarih Araştırmaları” konulu doktora tezini savundu. Bu başarı, onun bilimsel potansiyelini daha da güçlendirdi.
2004 yılında yeni bir yöne giderek NamGU Hukuk Fakültesi’ni tamamladı ve iki alanda bilgi sahibi oldu. Daha sonra Taşkent Kimya-Teknoloji Enstitüsü ile Ulusal Araştırma Üniversitesi’nde bölüm başkanı ve profesör olarak görev yaptı. 2008 yılında “Amir Temur Döneminde Ulusal Devlet Yapısının Gelişimi” konulu doktora tezini başarıyla savunarak tarih bilimleri doktoru unvanını aldı.
Uljaeva Şahistahan, bilimsel ve pedagojik başarılarıyla yalnızca Özbekistan’da değil, uluslararası arenada da tanınmaktadır. İngiltere, Fransa, İspanya, Slovakya, Macaristan, Rusya, Azerbaycan, Türkiye, Hindistan, İran, Nijerya, Gürcistan, Kazakistan ve Kırgızistan gibi ülkelerde düzenlenen uluslararası konferanslarda bildiriler sunmuştur. Onun öğretim stili ve bilimsel araştırmalara olan bağlılığı, öğrenciler ve akademik çevre tarafından yüksek takdirle karşılanmaktadır.
Lisans eğitimini Erzurum Atatürk üniversitesinde, yüksek lisans eğitimini Nevşehir hacı Bektaş veli üniversitesinde ve doktora eğitimini ise Ankara üniversitesi DTCF Eski çağ tarihi kürsüsünde tamamladı. 2024 senesinde ÜAK tarafından Eskiçağ tarihi alanında doçent ilan edildi. Halen Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli üniversitesi fen edebiyat fakültesi tarih bölümü Eskiçağ tarihi kürsüsünde görev yapmaktadır. Özellikle Hititler üzerinde çalışmaları vardır. Eski Anadolu tarihi üzerine uzmanlaşmıştır.
Teymur Şahin oğlu Gasimli, 30 Nisan 1988 tarihinde Azerbaycan Cumhuriyeti’nin Göyçay bölgesinde dünyaya gelmiştir. Azerbaycan vatandaşı olan Gasimli, temel eğitimini tamamladıktan sonra 2005 yılında Azerbaycan Uluslararası Üniversitesi’nin Tarih ve Toplum Fakültesine kabul edilmiş ve burada aldığı lisans eğitimi sonucunda 2009 yılında başarıyla mezun olmuştur. Lisans eğitimi süresince tarihsel süreçler, toplumsal yapı ve bölgesel jeopolitik dinamikler üzerine çalışmalar yürüterek akademik ilgi alanlarını şekillendirmiştir.
2015–2017 yılları arasında Türkiye’de İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü bünyesinde Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Güvenlik Çalışmaları alanında yüksek lisans eğitimini tamamlamıştır. Yüksek lisans tezi kapsamında özellikle Güney Kafkasya bölgesindeki jeopolitik gelişmeler, Azerbaycan-İran ilişkileri ve bölgesel güvenlik konularına odaklanmış, bu süreçte saha araştırmaları ve literatür incelemeleri yaparak uzmanlığını derinleştirmiştir.
11 Şubat 2018 tarihinde İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü bünyesinde Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Anabilim Dalı doktora programına kabul edilerek,“AZERBAYCAN -İRAN İLİŞKİLERİNDE (1991-2019) ERMENİSTAN MESELESİ” doktora tezi savunmuş doktora unvanını kazanmıştır (2025). Bu bağlamda, Güney Kafkasya’nın uluslararası sistemdeki rolü, bölgesel güvenlik mimarileri ve Azerbaycan-İran ilişkileri üzerine akademik araştırmalar yürütmektedir.Gasimli, çok iyi derecede Azerbaycan Türkçesi, Türkiye Türkçesi ve Rusça bilmekte; ayrıca İngilizceyi orta düzeyde kullanabilmektedir. Akademik çalışmaları, uluslararası ilişkiler, güvenlik çalışmaları ve bölgesel jeopolitik analizler çerçevesinde yoğunlaşmaktadır. Uluslararası sempozyum ve konferanslarda bildiriler sunmuş, çeşitli akademik makale ve projelerde yer alarak alanına katkı sağlamıştır.
1965’de Aydın’da doğmuştur. 1986 yılında Ege Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi Tarih Bölümü'nden mezun olmuştur. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Atatürk İlkeleri ve İnkılap Tarihi Enstitüsünde 1990’da Yüksek Lisans, 1994’de Doktora eğitimini tamamlamıştır.
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi’nde görev yapan HAYTOĞLU, 1992’den itibaren Pamukkale Üniversitesinde öğretim üyeliği yapmaktadır.
Akademik ve idari görevlerde bulunan Prof.Dr. Ercan HAYTOĞLU halen Pamukkale Üniversitesi İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi Tarih Bölümü’nde öğretim üyesi, olarak görev yapmaktadır.
“Denizli’de Tabaklık”, “Denizli Basın Tarihi”, “Dağılan Köyün Hikayesi Hisar (Attouda)” ve “Balkan Harbinde İhmal Faciaları” adlı kitapları bulunmaktadır. Halen Atatürk İlkeleri ve İnkılap Tarihi Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkez Müdürlüğü ve Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Tarihi Anabilim Dalı Başkanlığı görevini de sürdüren Haytoğlu’nun çok sayıda makalesi bulunmaktadır.
- PERSÖNLICHE DATEN
● Vorname Nachname: Bedri Şahin.
● Heimatadresse: Deutschland/NRW.
● E-Mail-Adresse: sahinbedri40@googlemail.com
● Staatsangehörigkeit: Staatsbürger der Republik Türkei und Staatsbürger Deutschlands. (Doppelstaatsbürgerschaft)
■ Politikwissenschaft und Internationale Beziehungen - PhD. / Internationale Sicherheit - Experte für Europastudien und Fernoststudien.
■ Mitglied des Deutschen Instituts für Politikwissenschaft (DVPW).
■ Bachelor of Business Administration - Business Management Specialist - MBA.
■ Türkischer Philologe (Turkologe) - Lehrer für türkische Sprache und Literatur.
■ Deutschland, Kolumnist und Redakteur bei www.euhaber.com.
■ Belgien, Kolumnist für www.bruxelleskorner.com.
■ Belgien, Kolumnist bei http://avrupapress.com.
■ Kolumnist des Politischen Strategieforschungszentrums (POLSAM) in der Türkei.
■ Türkiye, Dergi Park TR Index İmgelem Magazine Redakteur, Gutachter, Korrekturleser, Autor, Redaktionsassistent.
MEINE AKADEMISCHEN SEITEN
Accademia: https://independent.academia.edu/BedriSahin
Researchgate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bedri-Sahin
Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.de/citations?user=QmcxLe8AAAAJ&hl=de
Dergipark: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/@bedrisahin
MEINE HOBBYS, MEINE LEIDENSCHAFTEN
● Lesen, Reisen, Radfahren. Ich rauche nicht. ● Fußball, Volleyball, Schwimmen, Kenpo, Karate und Laufen. ● Musiker, Mitglied des Kölner Türkischen Kunstmusikchors, Interpret türkischer Kunstmusik und türkischer Volksmusik. Professioneller Bendir-Spieler, Amateur-Saz-Spieler (Bağlama). ● Amateur-Karikaturist und Naturfotograf.
MEINE VERÖFFENTLICHTEN WERKE
1. Bachelorarbeit: Universität Selçuk; Fakultät für Künste und Wissenschaften, Abteilung für türkische Sprache und Literatur, „Transkription von Ferîduddîn-i Attârs osmanischem Werk Tezkiret-ül Evliya“, Konya-1996.
2. Buchstudie: Grundlegende Informationen 1, Köln, Deutschland (Ein Buch mit grundlegenden Informationen für türkische Einwandererkinder in Europa). Dieses Buch wurde 1997 von der IGMG in Köln herausgegeben.
3. Buchstudie: Grundlageninformationen 2, Köln, Deutschland (Der zweite Band, die Fortsetzung von Grundlageninformationen 1). Dieses Buch wurde 1998 von IGMG in Köln herausgegeben.
4. Masterarbeit und Buchstudie: Anadolu-Universität; Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Westeuropäisches Programm, Fachbereich Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Masterarbeit zum Thema „Die wirtschaftlichen und sozialen Auswirkungen von Fremdenfeindlichkeit auf türkische Einwandererunternehmen in Nordrhein-Westfalen (NRW), Deutschland“. Diese Masterarbeit wird Ende 2025 als Buch mit ISBN im Nobel Verlag erscheinen.
5. Dissertation und Buchstudie: „Eine Analyse der Sicherheitspolitik der rot-grünen Koalitionsregierung in Deutschland aus neorealistischer und neoliberaler institutioneller Perspektive“. Die Dissertation wurde am Institut für Politikwissenschaft und Internationale Beziehungen der Beykent-Universität eingereicht und 2023 als Buch (ISBN) im Gazi-Verlag veröffentlicht.
6. Buchkapitelstudie: Artikel über „Die Auswirkungen der Welthandelsorganisation auf die deutsche Außenpolitik“, Juni 2020, Academic Studies in Social, Human and Administrative Sciences-II, Band 2, Herausgeber Dr. Lecturer Hasan Selim Kıroğlu, Gece Kitapligi, Kapitel 28, Seiten 259-286.
7. Artikelstudie: „Analyse des Zusammenhangs zwischen politischer Ideologie und Umweltschutzpolitik in Deutschland im Kontext von Parteierklärungen“, erschienen in der Zeitschrift Türkisch Studies – Economics, Finance, Politics, Band 5, Juni 2020, Seiten 2455–2475. Ulakbilim TR Index, Annahmedatum: Januar 2019 (14/1).
8. Tagungsband: Kayseri University, 3. Internationaler Kongress für Sozialwissenschaften (USBIK 2020), 24.-26. Juni 2020. Artikel zum Thema „Multikulturalismus als Faktor in Sicherheitsstrategien: Ein Vergleich zwischen Sudan und Spanien“. Seiten 108-124.
9. Tagungsband: Karadeniz Technical University, Fakultät für Geisteswissenschaften, Institut für Soziologie, USBBAS 2020, Erstes Internationales Symposium für Sozial- und Humanwissenschaftliche Forschung. Artikel mit dem Titel „Reaktionen auf die entstehende internationale liberale Partnerschaftsordnung in China im Kontext der Seidenstraßeninitiative“. 1.–3. Juli 2020, S. 116–136.
10. Tagungsband: Karadeniz Technical University – Fakultät für Geisteswissenschaften, Institut für Soziologie, USBBAS 2020, Erstes Internationales Forschungssymposium für Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften. Artikel zum Thema „Die Rolle der Türkei und Chinas im internationalen Handel, ihre Wirtschaftsbeziehungen und die Neue Seidenstraße“. 1.–3. Juli 2020, Seiten 132–163.
11. Artikelstudie: Zeitschrift Park Imagination Magazine, Artikel mit dem Titel „Changing International Security Perception Hanging on the Changing World Order“. Jahr 2020 - 11.07.2020, Band 4, Ausgabe 6, Seite 177-204.
12. Beitrag: 3. Internationaler Akademischer Forschungskongress (ICAR 2020), 20.-21.-22. Juli 2020, Artikel zum Thema „Analyse der türkischen Außenpolitik nach dem Kalten Krieg (1991-2016)“, Seiten 57-71.
13. Beitrag: 14. Internationaler Istanbuler Kongress für wissenschaftliche Forschung in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften, 20.-21.-22. Juli 2020, „Bewertung des deutschen NATO-Beitrittsprozesses im Kontext der Schwankungen bei der NATO-Erweiterung und des Wandels und der Transformation der NATO“, Seiten 410-417.
14. Buchkapitelstudie: Artikel mit dem Titel „Die Covid-19-Pandemie und ihre Auswirkungen auf die deutsche Sicherheitspolitik“ als fünftes Kapitel im ISBN-Buch „Wirtschafts-, Verwaltungs- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Studien in der Covid-19-Zeit“ (İksad Publications, Dezember 2020, Seiten 93–113).
15. Buchkapitel: Artikel mit dem Titel „Analyse der Handelsbeziehungen zwischen Deutschland und der Volksrepublik China“ im Sammelband „Economics and Finance: Empirical Analysis of Applications“, herausgegeben vom Verlag Economics. Herausgeber: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Şahin Karabulut, Ekin Verlag, August 2023, Seiten 133–150.
16. Tagungsband: 10. Internationaler Kongress für Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften in einer sich wandelnden Welt, 14. August 2023, Artikel über „Analyse der Entstehung und Entwicklung von Umweltbewegungen (grünes Denken) in der Welt, das Beispiel Deutschlands“, Seiten 164-177.
17. Beitrag: Cumhuriyet 9. Internationaler Kongress für Sozialwissenschaften, Afyonkarahisar; 30. August 2023, Artikel zum Thema „Auswirkungen und Folgen von Covid-19, Bewertung seiner letztendlichen Auswirkungen auf die internationalen Beziehungen und die Politikgestaltung im globalen System“, Seiten 919-929.
18. Buchkapitel: Artikel zum Thema „Die Beziehungen zwischen der Türkei und Deutschland aus geopolitischer und geostrategischer Perspektive“ im Sammelband „Die Beziehungen zwischen der Türkei und Deutschland: Gestern, Heute und Morgen“, herausgegeben vom Tesam Center for Economic, Political and Strategic Research (TESAM). Oktober 2023. Seiten 31–56.
19. Artikelstudie: „Die Auswirkungen der Ansichten von Joseph Martin (Joschka) Fischer auf die Koalitionspartei und die deutsche Außenpolitik zwischen 1998 und 2005“, Dr. Bedri Şahin, 2023, EURO Politics, DOI: -, 01.12.2023.
20. Artikelstudie: „Analyse der Außenpolitik der Bundesrepublik Deutschland nach den Terroranschlägen vom 11. September im Kontext der Koalitionsregierungen (1998-2005) und der Regierungsaktivitäten“, Dr. Bedri Şahin, Dr. Güngör Gökdağ, 2023, Alinteri Journal of Social Sciences, DOI: 1. 30913/alinterisosbil.139192, 30.12.2023.
21. Artikelstudie: Artikel über „Bewertung von Artikel 24 der Verfassung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Deutschland) im Hinblick auf die internationale Souveränität (Unabhängigkeit)“, Dr. Bedri Şahin, 2023, İmgelem, DOI: 10.53791/imgelem.1373619, 31.12.2023.
22. Artikelstudie: Artikel über „Entwicklungen in der Politik der erneuerbaren Energiesysteme Chinas“, Dr. Bedri Şahin, 2024, Eurosian Research Journal, DOI: -, 01.02.2024.
23. Artikelstudie: „Evaluation der Außenpolitik der Bundesrepublik Deutschland gegenüber der Ukraine“, Ahmet Emre Köker, Bedri Şahin, 2024, UPA Strategic Affairs, DOI:, - 02.03.2024.
24. Artikelstudie: „Das Verhältnis von Religion und Politik in Deutschland: Eine historische Betrachtung“, Dr. Bedri Şahin, 2024, Erciyes Academy, DOI: 10.48070/erciyesakademi.1362288, 29.03.2024
25. Tagungsband: 12. Internationaler Kongress für Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften in einer sich wandelnden Welt, 11.-13. April 2024, Artikel über „Die Auswirkungen des Neorealismus auf die Sicherheitspolitik: Das Beispiel der Xi-Jinping-Ära der Volksrepublik China“, Seiten 1025-1037.
26. Vortrag: „Bewertung der Sicherheitspolitik der Vereinigten Staaten und Deutschlands: Der Fall der Deutschen Wiedervereinigung“, 2024, Dekan der Fakultät für Politikwissenschaften der Necmettin-Erbakan-Universität, Prof. Bezen Balamir Coskun, Präsident von INTPOLSEC. 3. Internationale Sicherheitskonferenz von INTPOLSEC, veranstaltet von der International Politics and Security Association an der Necmettin-Erbakan-Universität am 30. und 31. Mai 2024.
27. Tagungsband: Juli 2024; DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23638.25926; Konferenz: 2. Internationale Konferenz der Akademie für Migrationsforschung, 2.–4. August 2024, Rom; www.gockongresi.org www.akademikongre.org gockongresi@gmail.com, 2. Internationale Konferenz der Akademie für Migrationsforschung, 2.–4. August 2024, Rom; Artikel mit dem Titel „Bewertung der Beziehungen zwischen der rot-grünen Koalitionsregierung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Deutschland) (1998–2005) und der Nordatlantikpakt-Organisation (NATO)“.
28. Artikelstudie: „Globale Auswirkungen der Bundesrepublik Deutschland auf Sicherheit und Außenpolitik: Der Fall Usbekistan“, Dr. Bedri Şahin, 2024, İmgelem, DOI: 10.53791/imgelem.1516843, 26.10.2024.
29. Abstract: Dr. Bedri Sahin, BILINGUALIZM, 5. Internationaler Kongress für Europäische Türken und Bilingualismusforschung. „Die Vorteile der Zweisprachigkeit nutzen und den Beitrag der zweisprachigen Generation zur Stärkung der Beziehungen zwischen zwei Staaten bewerten“. Der fünfte Internationale Kongress für Europäische Türken und Bilingualismusforschung, der am 24. November 2024 in Köln stattfindet, steht unter dem Motto „Künstliche Intelligenz und Technologieanwendungen in der Bilingualismusforschung“. Er wird mit Unterstützung des Yunus-Emre-Instituts Köln, des Bildungsattachés des Kölner Konsulats und der Istanbul Medeniyet Universität organisiert.
30. Artikelstudie: Journal of Education and Social Sciences Research (ESAR) RESEARCH Journal of Education and Social Sciences Research Einreichungsdatum: 01.09.2024 (Band: 5 Ausgabe: 2 - Dezember 2024) Annahmedatum: 05.12.2024, Artikel mit dem Titel „Evaluation of China's Middle East Policies: Current Situation and Future Trends“, Bedri Şahin 1 & Gülşah Özdemir 2, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14585278, Annahmedatum: 05.12.2024.
31. Artikelstudie: Dr. Gülşah Özdemir, Dr. Bedri Şahin, 2025, Artikel mit dem Titel „Analyse der Auswirkungen der NATO-Erweiterung auf die deutsche Außenpolitik im Hinblick auf Sicherheitsstrategien“, International Journal of Political Studies, DOI: 10.25272/icps.1503260, Veröffentlichung: 18.01.2025.
32. Buchkapitel: TWILIGHT ZONE Covid-19 Pandemic Period, Herausgeber: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Fulya Köksoy, Tesam Bibliothek Nr.: 38 ISBN: 978-625-6748-24-8 E-ISBN: 978-625-6748-25-5 Auflage: 1. Auflage, Dezember 2024, TESA, NOBEL, Artikel über „Covid-19 und die sich verändernde Soft Power der Volksrepublik China: Das europäische Beispiel“, Dr. Bedri Şahin – Unabhängiger Forscher, Mitglied der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Politikwissenschaft (DVPW), sahinbedri40@googlemail.com, ORCID: 0000-0002-6923-760X, April 2025.
33. Buchkapitel: Dr. Gülşah Özdemir und Dr. Bedri Şahin. Artikel zum Thema „Die Bewertung der deutschen Einwanderungspolitik im Hinblick auf die Versicherheitlichung“, Özgür Press, Ankara, April 2025.
34. Artikelstudie: Artikel über „Der Einfluss des historischen Kontextes Deutschlands auf die Entstehung und den Aufstieg der AfD (Alternative für Deutschland)“, Jahr 2025, Ausgabe: 70, 97 - 105, doi: 10.18070/erciyesiibd.1588949, Veröffentlichung: 30. April 2025.
35. Buchkapitelstudie: Forschungszentrum für politische Strategien, Herausgegebenes Buchprojekt in Gedenken an Güney Ferhat Bati. Artikel mit dem Titel „Bewertung der Beziehungen zwischen der Volksrepublik China und der Welthandelsorganisation im Kontext internationaler Institutionen und globaler Beziehungen“ – 2025. Nobel Verlag – Ankara.
36. Buchkapitelstudie: Buchprojekt „ASIAN GEOPOLITICS“. Herausgeber: Prof. Dr. Hasret Çomak. Titel des ersten Buchkapitels: „USA: ASIEN-PAZIFISCHER STRATEGIE UND WETTBEWERB MIT CHINA“. Titel des zweiten Buchkapitels im selben Buch: „ASIENPOLITIK UND STRATEGIEN INTERNATIONALER UND REGIONALER ORGANISATIONEN: MILITÄRISCHE ZUSAMMENARBEIT RUSSLAND-CHINAS“. Artikel von Dr. Bedri ŞAHİN – 2025. Nobel Publishing – Ankara.
Hande Ortay, çocukluk yıllarını Almanya’nın Heilbronn şehrinde geçirmiştir. 2011 yılında Türkiye’ye kesin dönüş yapmasının ardından Trabzon’da lise eğitimini tamamlamış; 2015 yılından itibaren İstanbul’daki önde gelen şirketlerde üst düzey yöneticilere ve CEO’lara yönelik eğitimler vererek profesyonel kariyerine adım atmıştır. Bu süreçte özellikle saha temelli uygulamalı çalışmalarla dikkat çekmiştir.
Lisans eğitimini 2018 yılında İstanbul Üniversitesi’nde onur derecesiyle tamamlayan Ortay, yüksek lisansını Yeni Yüzyıl Üniversitesi, Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler alanında yapmıştır. “Arap Baharında Tunuslu Kadınların Rollerinin ve Kazanımlarının İncelenmesi” başlıklı yüksek lisans teziyle yüksek onur derecesine layık görülmüştür. Doktora eğitimini ise “Almanya’nın PKK Terör Örgütü Politikası ve Türkiye’ye Etkileri” başlıklı doktora teziyle başarıyla yüksek onur derecesine ile tamamlamıştır.
Akademik kariyerine İbn Haldun Üniversitesi, Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü ile Karatay Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi’nde doktor olarak devam etmektedir. Akademik çalışmaları; Uluslararası İlişkiler, Avrupa Politikası, Güvenlik Çalışmaları, PKK Terör Örgütü, Türkiye-Almanya İlişkileri, Medya-Siyaset İlişkisi ve Toplumsal Dönüşüm temalarında yoğunlaşmaktadır.
Yazılı ve görsel medyada da aktif olan Ortay, İstiklal Gazetesi’nde köşe yazarlığı yapmakta; ayrıca Daily Sabah, International Policy Digest gibi uluslararası yayınlarda Türkiye ve bölge jeopolitiğine ilişkin analizler kaleme almaktadır. 2016 yılından itibaren 30 kitabın yayın sürecinde yer almış; akademik editörlük, içerik geliştirme ve bölüm yazarlığı gibi çeşitli görevlerde bulunmuştur. Bunun yanında, pek çok hakemli dergiye akademik makalelerle katkı sunmaya devam etmektedir.
İlk lisansını kamu yönetimi alanında Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir'den, ikinci lisansını Uluslararası İlişkiler alanında Selçuk Üniversitesi, Konya'dan aldı; üçüncü lisans derecesine ise NEÜ, Güzel Sanatlar Fak, Geleneksel Türk Sanatları alanında devam ediyor. Yüksek lisans derecesini 2014 yılında Konya Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi’nde adalet felsefesi üzerine gerçekleştirdi. Bu yöndeki araştırmaları, özellikle adalet ve özgürlük konularında Batı ve İslam medeniyetlerinin felsefi ve etik geleneklerini kapsıyor. Doktora derecesini ise Ankara, Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi’nde hukuk felsefesi üzerine gerçekleştirdi. Doktora tezi, İbn Haldun ve Herbert Spencer’ın Kanun ve Otorite anlayışlarının karşılaştırılması üzerine idi. Yaklaşık 10 yıl Konya Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesinde doktor öğretim görevlisi olarak görev yaptı. Halihazırda araştırma makaleleri uzmanlaştığı multidisiplin konularda çeşitli indeksli dergilerde yayınlanmaya devam ederken, diğer yandan sanat çalışmalarını, özellikle kültür diplomasisi , insan hakları ve uluslararası hukuk felsefesi bağlamında sürdürmektedir.
Eğitim Bilimleri Alan Editörleri / Editors of Educational Sciences
Abdulbaki Emir Alıcı is an emerging intellectual whose academic pursuits reflect a profound commitment to understanding the intricate interplay between governance, historical consciousness, and societal transformation. He earned his Bachelor’s degree in Political Science and Public Administration from Hacı Bayram Veli University in Ankara, where he cultivated a strong foundation in political theory, institutional analysis, and public policy.
Currently, he is advancing his academic journey through a Master’s program in the Department of History, with a specialization in Modern History, at Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University’s Institute of Social Sciences. His interdisciplinary background positions him uniquely at the nexus of political thought and historical inquiry, enabling him to approach contemporary issues with both analytical precision and a nuanced appreciation of their historical trajectories.
Abdulbaki Emir Alıcı stands out as a promising scholar whose intellectual curiosity, methodological rigor, and commitment to academic excellence continue to enrich the fields of political science and history. His capacity to synthesize political and historical paradigms not only reflects his academic maturity but also signals his potential to contribute meaningfully to scholarly and civic discourse.
In the current academic landscape, Dr.Deniz is deeply entrenched within the scholarly echelons of Ankara University's Department of Foreign Language Education, where his intellectual pursuits traverse a labyrinthine expanse of scholarly domains. His scholarly proclivities encapsulate the intricate intersections of Educational Sciences, English Language Education, Educational Technology, Computer-Based Teaching Methods, Adaptive Learning, Blended Learning, and the profound philosophical undercurrents that define the realm of Education. Moreover, his scholarly trajectory is intricately interwoven with a meticulous examination of the historiography of Education, particularly honing in on the complex entanglements within the Turkish-American Relations and the consequential paradigm shifts witnessed within the Turkish Educational System in the post-1950 era. This scholarly odyssey seamlessly dovetails into his erudite explorations in English Language and Literature, Psychology, and the pedagogical nuances of Teacher Education, Educational and Instructional Technologies. Beyond these engagements, he persists in his capacity as a peer reviewer for a multitude of esteemed national and international scientific journals. Besides his roles as a reviewer for international journals, Dr.Deniz also serves as an editor and language editor, thereby contributing significantly to the academic community.Dr. Deniz has likewise partaken in an array of internationally convened symposia spanning nations such as Germany, England, Austria, and Cyprus. Beyond his tenure as a Lecturer at Ankara University, Dr. Deniz is immersed in profound undertakings for myriad distinguished educational entities, concentrating on the synergetic alignment of linguistic studies and language pedagogy with technological advancements, aspiring to amplify the dynamism and efficacy of this integration, thereby augmenting its advantages for language acquirers. In addition to his undergraduate, graduate, and doctoral education, Dr. Deniz has successfully completed internationally recognized courses in Language Education in England, including TESOL, CELTA, and DELTA. Dr. Deniz has also excelled in training across diverse domains such as awareness of education for individuals with disabilities, workplace stress and stress management, professional ethics and law, 5G mass education tools, statistical data interpretation, adult learning principles, time management and productivity, public ethics, and fundamental occupational health and safety. Furthermore, Dr. Deniz frequently participates in various projects both in Turkey and several European countries, dedicated to the most effective acquisition and instruction of the English language.
For his personal webpage, please click on the following link: https://avesis.ankara.edu.tr/sdeniz
Uluslararası İlişkiler, Güvenlik ve Diplomasi Alan editörlüğü / International Relations, Security and Diplomacy Field Editor
🔸Dr. Elvin Abdurahmanlı Namig oğlu 1993.08.14 tarihinde Azerbaycan Cumhuriyetinin Şeki şehrinde doğdu. Son Şeki hanedanının torunun torunudur. 2000-2011 Yılları arasında Orta okul ve liseyi başkent Bakü'de tamamladıktan sonra 2011 yılında Anadolu Üniversitesi Turizm ve Otel konaklama Hizmetleri ön lisans bölümünü kazandı. 2014 yılında bölümü başarıyla tamamlayarak Dikey Geçişle sistemi ile Anadolu Üniversitesi Uluslararası ilişkiler lisans bölümüne geçiş yaptı. 2016 yılında Uluslararası İlişkiler Lisans bölümünü ayrı ayrılıkda Güz ve Bahar döneminde de üniversitenin onur öğrencisi adını alarak başarıyla tamamlayarak lisans diplomasını almaya hak kazandı. 2016.09.01 tarihinde İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsünün ''Uluslararası ilişkiler ve İstihbarat İncelemeleri'' Tezli Yüksek Lisans bölümünü kazandı. 2019.01.25 tarihinde ''İstihbarat Teşkilatlarının Terör Örgütlerine sızması: IRA'' isimli tez konulu tezin savunması juriler tarafından onaylanarak mezun olma hakkını kazandı. 31.08.2019 tarihinde İstanbul Arel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler bölümünde doktora eğitime başladı. 2020 yılının 10 Haziran tarihinde Azerbaycan Diaspora Bakanlığı tarafından kurulan ''KİAMP-Karabakh is Azerbaijan'' Milli Platformu Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Genel Koordinatörü görevine atandı. 2021 yılının Eylül ayında Marmara Üniversitesinin ''Uluslararası İlişkiler ve UPE-Uluslararası Politik Ekonomi'' Doktora Bölümüne geçiş yaptı. 2021.05.28 tarihinde ''KİAMP-Karabakh is Azerbaijan'' Milli Platformu Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Genel Koordinatörü olarak Karabağ Azerbaycan'dır Koordine Etme Derneğini kurdu ve Genel Başkanı seçilmiştir. Şuan Derneğin Mütevellit heyetinin kurucu başkanı olarak Genel Başkanı görevini devam ettirmektedir. Uzmanı olduğu: Diplomasi, Siyaset, Uluslararası İlişkiler, Terörle Mücadele ve İstihbarat gibi alanlarında akademik yazıları mevcuttur. Dünyada bu alanlarda kaleme aldığı 5 kitabı, 19 kitapta toplamda 27 kitap bölümü ve 18 akademik makalesi mevcuttur. “DEFINITION OF DIPLOMACY AND TYPES OF DIPLOMACY USED BETWEEN STATES“ isimli İngilizce akademik makalesi en çok okunan olmuştur. Ayrıca bu makale İngiltere'nin Cranfield Üniversitesi ve Türkiye'nin Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Kannur Universitesinde Lisans, Yüksek Lisans ve doktora bölümlerinin Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler alanlarında ders müfredatı olarak okutulmaktadır. Siyaset alanında da aktif halde faaliyetlerini devam ettirmektedir.
1 DEFINITION OF DIPLOMACY AND TYPES OF DIPLOMACY USED BETWEEN STATES
2 Types of International Diplomacy and ASALA Terrorist Organization
3 İstihbarat Teşkilatlarının Terör Örgütlerina Sızması: İra Örneği
4 Armenian Terrorist Activities and International Political Problems
5 Uluslararası Diplomasi Araştırmaları
Ph.D. Political Science and İnternational Relations
🔸Dr. Elvin Abdurahmanlı Namig's son was born on 1993.08.14 in Sheki City of Azerbaijan Republic. He is a great-grandson of the last Sheki dynasty. After completing middle school and high school in the capital city of Baku between 2000-2011, he won Anadolu University Tourism and Hotel Accommodation Services associate degree 2011. He successfully completed the department in 2014 and transferred to Anadolu University International Relations undergraduate program with the Vertical Transfer system. In 2016, he successfully completed the International Relations Undergraduate Program in the Fall and Spring semesters, as an honor student of the university, and was entitled to receive his undergraduate diploma. On 2016.09.01, he won the "International Relations and Intelligence Studies" Master's Degree with a Thesis from Istanbul Aydın University Social Sciences Institute. On 2019.01.25, the defense of the thesis titled "Infiltration of Intelligence Agencies into Terrorist Organizations: IRA" was approved by the jury and earned the right to graduate. On 31.08.2019, he started his doctorate education at Istanbul Arel University, Institute of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science and International Relations. He was appointed as the General Coordinator of the Republic of Turkey of the "KIAMP-Karabakh is Azerbaijan" National Platform, which was established by the Ministry of Diaspora of Azerbaijan on 10 June 2020. In September 2021, he transferred to Marmara University's "International Relations and UPE-International Political Economy" Doctorate Department. On 2021.05.28, he established the Karabakh is Azerbaijan Coordinating Association as the General Coordinator of the "KIAMP-Karabakh is Azerbaijan" National Platform of the Republic of Turkey and was elected its Chairman. Currently, he continues his duty as the Chairman of the Association as the founding chairman of the Board of Trustees. Specialized in: Diplomacy, Politics, International Relations, Anti-Terrorism, and Intelligence. He has 5 books written in these fields in the world, a total of 19 book chapters, and 27 academic articles in 18 books. His English academic article “DEFINITION OF DIPLOMACY AND TYPES OF DIPLOMACY USED BETWEEN STATES“ has been the most read. In addition, this article is taught as a curriculum in the fields of Political Science and International Relations of the undergraduate, graduate, and doctoral departments of Cranfield University in England and Karadeniz Technical University, Akdeniz University, and Kannur University in Turkey. He continues his activities actively in the field of politics.
Copyright and Licensing Policy
All articles published in the Journal of Academic History and Ideas / Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi are copyrighted by the journal. The journal’s content is provided as open access under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Under this license, the content may be shared, reproduced, adapted, translated, and built upon in any medium or format for non-commercial purposes, provided that proper scholarly attribution is given to the author(s) and the journal.
Requests for commercial reuse must be directed to the Editorial Board at akademiktarihvedusunce@gmail.com
The scientific, legal, and ethical responsibility for published works rests entirely with the author(s). The editors and the Editorial Board assume no responsibility or liability for the content of the published articles.
© ATDD Tüm Hakları Saklıdır