Determining the Bibliometric Profile of Birdwatching and Birding Research on Web of Science with Vosviewer Software

Öz

Numerous empirical studies have explored birdwatching and birding, but well-structured bibliometric research is needed to synthesize and understand the existing knowledge in this area. This paper presents a bibliometric analysis of birdwatching and birding research, evaluating 474 papers published on the Web of Science platform between 1976 and 2023. Co-authorship and keyword co-occurrence analyses were employed to assess the interdisciplinary nature of this research field. Key findings include author: birdwatching practices in tourism have experienced significant growth in the past decade; (2) Christoph Randler as the most prominent influential author; (3) the United States leads in document production, while Germany is prominent in citation count; (4) the University of Life Science ranks highest among institutions, but Eberhard Karls University leads in citation count; and (5) keyword trend network assessments indicate that birdwatching and birding are increasingly gaining attention in conservation, citizen Science tourism. In conclusion, birdwatching tourism research demonstrates considerable potential for further development and is expected to continue its upward trajectory.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Birdwatching
• Birding
• Bibliometric analysis
• Web of Science
• VOSviewer

Web of Science’da Yer Alan Kuş Gözlemciliği Araştırmalarının Bibliyometrik Profilinin Vosviewer Yazılımı Yardımıyla Belirlenmesi

Öz

Alanyazında kuş gözlemciliği üzerine yoğunlaşan çok sayıda çalışma mevcuttur. Ancak, bu konuyla ilgili mevcut bilgi birikimini ortaya koymak için alanın bibliyometrik araştırmalara da gereksinimi vardır. Bu çalışma, 1976 ve 2023 yılları arasında Web of Science platformunda yayımlanan ve kuş gözlemciliğini konu edinen 474 adet makalenin araştırma kapsamına alındığı bir bibliyometrik analiz sunmaktadır. Araştırma alanının disiplinlerarası niteliğini değerlendirebilmek için ortak yazarlık ve ortak anahtar kelime analizleri kullanılmıştır. Çalışmadan elde edilen bulgular: (1) turizmde kuş gözlemciliği uygulamalarında son on yılda önemli bir artış yaşandığını, (2) bu konuda en fazla öne çıkan ismin Christoph Randler olduğunu (3) en fazla çalışmanın Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’nde yapıldığını, Almanya’nın ise atıf sayısında öne çıktığını (4) Life Science Üniversitesi’nin kurumlar arasında en üst sırada yer aldığını, Eberhard Karls Üniversitesi’nin atıf sayısında öncülük ettiğini ve (5) en çok tercih edilen anahtar kelimeler arasında, çevreyi ve doğayı korumanın, vatandaşlık biliminin ve turizmin başı çektiğini göstermiştir. Sonuç olarak, kuş gözlemciliği turizmi araştırmaları, önemli bir gelişme potansiyeli göstermektedir ve gelecekte de bu konuya olan ilginin sürmesi beklenmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kuş Gözlemciliği
• Kuş Gözlemi
• Bibliyometrik Analiz
• Web of Science
• VOSviewer

Kaynakça

1. Balmford, A., Beresford, J., Green, J., Naidoo, R., Walpole, M., & Manica, A. (2009). A global perspective on trends in nature-based tourism. PLoS Biology, 7(6),1-6.
2. Balmford, A., Green, J. M., Anderson, M., Beresford, J., Huang, C., Naidoo, R., & Manica, A. (2015). Walk on the wild side: estimating the global magnitude of Visits to protected areas. PLoS Biology, 13(2),1-6.
3. Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., & Sutherland, L. A. (2011). Visitors’ memories of wildlife tourism: Implications for the design of powerful interpretive experiences. Tourism Management, 32(4), 770-779.
4. Bodnariuk, M., & Melentiev, R. (2019). Bibliometric analysis of micro-nano manufacturing technologies. Nanotechnology and Precision Engineering, 2(2), 61-70.
5. Brossard, D., Shanahan, J., & McComas, K. (2004). Are issue-cycles culturally constructed? A comparison of French and American coverage of global climate change. Mass communication & society, 7(3), 359-377.
6. Bryan, H. (1977). Leisure value systems and recreational specialization: The case of trout fishermen. Journal of leisure research, 9(3), 174-187.
7. Cavalcante, W. Q. D. F., Coelho, A., & Bairrada, C. M. (2021). Sustainability and tourism marketing: A bibliometric analysis of publications between 1997 and 2020 using VOSviewer software, Sustainability, 13(9), 1-21.
8. Chen, W., Flatnes, J. E., Miteva, D. A., & Klaiber, H. A. (2022). The Impact of Deforestation on Nature-Based Recreation: Evidence from Citizen Science Data in Mexico. Land Economics, 98(1), 22-40.

9. Cobo, M. J., López‐Herrera, A. G., Herrera‐Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382-1402.
10. Cocker, M., & Tipling, D. (2016). Birds and people. London, UK: Random House.
11. Cordell, H. K. (2012). Outdoor recreation trends and futures: a technical document supporting the Forest Service 2010 RPA Assessment. General Technical Report-Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, (SRS-150), 150-167.
12. Cox, D. T., & Gaston, K. J. (2016). Urban bird feeding: Connecting people with nature. PLoS ONE, 11(7), 1-13.
13. Czeszczewik, D., Ginter, A., Mikusiński, G., Pawłowska, A., Kałuża, H., Smithers, R. J., & Walankiewicz, W. (2019). Birdwatching, logging and the local economy in the Białowieża Forest, Poland. Biodiversity and Conservation, 28(11), 2967-2975.
14. Dallimer, M., Irvine, K. N., Skinner, A. M., Davies, Z. G., Rouquette, J. R., Maltby, L. L., Warren, P., H., Armsworth, P., R., & Gaston, K. J. (2012). Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: Understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness. BioScience, 62(1), 47-55.
15. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296.
16. Eriksson, L., Johansson, M., Månsson, J., Sandström, C., Eklund, A., & Elmberg, J. (2023). Are birdwatchers willing to participate in local goose management? A case study from Sweden. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 69(2), 1-28.
17. Garrigos-Simon, F. J., Narangajavana-Kaosiri, Y., & Lengua-Lengua, I. (2018). Tourism and sustainability: A bibliometric and visualization analysis. Sustainability, 10(6), 1-23.
18. Hvenegaard, G. T. (2017). Visitors’ perceived impacts of interpretation on knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral intentions at Miquelon Lake Provincial Park, Alberta, Canada. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 17(1), 79-90.
19. Janeczko, E., Łukowski, A., Bielinis, E., Woźnicka, M., Janeczko, K., & Korcz, N. (2021). Not just a hobby, but a lifestyle: Characteristics, preferences, and self-perception of individuals with different levels of involvement in birdwatching. Plos one, 16(7), 1-9.
20. La Rouche, G. P. (2003). Birding in the United States: A demographic and economic analysis: Addendum to the 2001 National survey of fishing, hunting and wildlife-associated recreation (Vol. 4, No. 2). Division of Federal Aid, US Fish and Wildlife Service.
21. Lovelock, C. E. (2008). Soil respiration and belowground carbon allocation in mangrove forests. Ecosystems, 11, 342-354.
22. Merigó, J. M., Cancino, C. A., Coronado, F., & Urbano, D. (2016). Academic research in innovation: a country analysis. Scientometrics, 108, 559-593.
23. Randler, C. (2023). Progression through time: Development of birdwatcher careers based on propensity score matching. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), 1-11.
24. Randler, C., Diaz-Morales, J. F., Jokimäki, J., Ortiz-Pulido, R., Staller, N., De Salvo, M., Tryjanowski, P., Tsai, J. S., de Almeida Barbosa, R., & Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki, M. L. (2022). Birding recreation specialization—A test of the factorial invariance in eight languages. Journal of Leisure Research, 54(3), 330-336.
25. Randler, C., & Marx, N. (2022). Initial involvement into birding: triggers, gender, and decade effects—a mixed-methods study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1-10.
26. Ratcliffe, E., Gatersleben, B., & Sowden, P. T. (2019). Bird sounds and their contributions to perceived attention restoration and stress recovery. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 65, 221-228.
27. Sekercioglu, C. H. (2002). Impacts of birdwatching on human and avian communities. Environmental Conservation, 29(3), 282-289.
28. Scott, D., Ditton, R. B., Stoll, J. R., & Eubanks Jr, T. L. (2005). Measuring specialization among birders: Utility of a self-classification measure. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 10(1), 53-74.
29. Skibins, J. C., Powell, R. B., & Hallo, J. C. (2013). Charisma and conservation: charismatic megafauna's influence on safari and zoo tourists' pro-conservation behaviors. Biodiversity and Conservation, 22, 959-982.
30. Steven, R., Morrison, C., & Castley, J. G. (2017). Exploring attitudes and understanding of global conservation practice among birders and avitourists for enhanced conservation of birds. Bird Conservation International, 27(2), 224-236.
31. Steven, R., Morrison, C., & Castley, J. G. (2015). Birdwatching and avitourism: a global review of research into its participant markets, distribution, and impacts, highlighting future research priorities to inform sustainable avitourism management. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(8-9), 1257-1276.
32. Steven, R., Pickering, C., & Castley, J. G. (2011). A review of the impacts of nature based recreation on birds. Journal of environmental management, 92(10), 2287-2294.
33. Tahamtan, I., Safipour Afshar, A., & Ahamdzadeh, K., (2016). Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature. Scientometrics, 107, 1195-1225.
34. Tripathi, M., Kumar, S., & Babbar, P. (2018). Bibliometrics of social science and humanities research in India. Current Science, 114(11), 2240-2247.
35. Tryjanowski, P., Murawiec, S., & Randler, C. (2023). No such thing as bad birding weather but depends on personal experience. Leisure Sciences, 45(4), 1-14.
36. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538.
37. Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2014). The knowledge base and research front of information science 2006–2010: An author cocitation and bibliographic coupling analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(5), 995-1006.
38. Zhang, Z., & Huang, G. (2020). How do urban parks provide bird habitats and birdwatching services? Evidence from Beijing, China. Remote Sensing, 12(19), 1-15.