Determination of Recreatıon Areas in Acarlar Longoz

Öz

The protection of nature and the environment, the preservation of the diversity of ecosystems without jeopardizing their integrity, and their sustainable development are important for sustainability. The Acarlar Floodplain is an extraordinary tourism and recreation area in terms of its ecological and landscape features. In the Acarlar Floodplain, which has recently become an important tourist destination, it is important to determine the attractions for daily recreation without neglecting the conservation value. The aim of this study is to identify suitable areas for hiking and birdwatching in the region using the weighted overlay method. The results show that most of the region is restricted areas for targeted activities, especially birdwatching, due to the different conservation status of Acar Longoz. The 1st degree suitable areas for hiking activities cover 226 ha and 4169 ha fall under the 2nd degree suitable category. The 1st degree suitable areas for birdwatching cover 16 ha, while the 2nd degree suitable areas cover 487 ha. The results provide essential inputs and an exemplary scientific methodology for the development of the current ecotourism project and wetland management plans.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Acarlar Longoz
• birdwatching
• hiking
• protected area
• recreational planning

Acarlar Longozu’nda Rekreasyonel Alanların Belirlenmesi

Öz

Doğa ve çevrenin korunması, ekosistemlerin bütünlüğü bozulmadan çeşitliliğin korunması ve sürdürülebilir gelişimin sağlanması açısından önemlidir. 1. Derece Doğal Sit Alanı statüsünde olan Acarlar Longozu, aynı zamanda Yaban Hayatı Geliştirme Sahası’dır ve Ramsar Sözleşmesi’ne göre Ulusal Öneme Sahip Sulak Alanlar Listesi’nde yer almaktadır. Acar Longozu ekolojik ve peyzaj özellikleri bakımından eşsiz bir turizm ve dinlenme alanıdır. Son zamanlarda önemli bir destinasyon haline gelen Acarlar Longozu’nda koruma öncelikleri dikkate alınarak günübirlik rekreasyonel kullanımlar açısından cazibe oluşturan mekanların belirlenmesi önemli bir ihtiyaç haline gelmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı çok katmanlı ağırlıklı çakıştırma yöntemi kullanarak bölgede yürüyüş ve kuş gözlem faaliyetleri için uygun alanların belirlenmesidir. Sonuçlar, Acarlar'ın farklı koruma statülerine sahip olması nedeniyle bölgenin büyük bir kısmının hedef faaliyetler, özellikle de kuş gözlemciliği, açısından kısıtlı alanlar olduğunu göstermektedir. Yürüyüş faaliyetleri için 1.derece uygun alanlar 226 ha olup, 4169 ha 2.derece uygun alanlar kategorisine girmektedir. Kuş gözlemciliği için 1. derece uygun alanlar 16 ha, 2. derece uygun alanlar ise 487 ha alan kaplamaktadır. Sonuçlar, mevcut ekoturizm projesinin ve sulak alan yönetim planlarının geliştirilmesi için gerekli girdileri ve örnek teşkil edecek bir bilimsel metodolojiyi sağlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Acarlar Longozu
• kuş gözlemciliği
• yürüyüş
• korunan alan
• rekreasyonel planlama

Kaynakça

1. Aber, J. S., Pavri, F., & Aber, S. W. (2012). Wetland environments: a global perspective. John Wiley & Sons.
2. Abraham, S. (2015). The relevance of wetland conservation in Kerala. International Journal of Fauna and Biological Studies, 2(3), 1–05.
3. Abrehe, S., Girma, A., & Nigusse, A. G. (2021). Potential ecotourism site suitability evaluation for sustainable natural resource management in Kafta Sheraro National Park (KSNP), north-western Tigray, Ethiopia. Journal of Ecotourism, 1–30.
4. Ağaçsapan, B., & Cabuk, S. N. (2020). Determination of suitable waste transfer station areas for sustainable territories: Eskisehir case. Sustainable Cities and Society, 52, 101829.
5. Albayrak, F. F. (2010). Korunan alanların ekoturizm gelişimine etkileri: Camili biyosfer rezervi örneği. In Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü: Vol. Master Thesis. Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi.
6. Allendorf, T. D. (2022). A global summary of local residents’ perceptions of benefits and problems of protected areas. In Biodiversity and Conservation (Vol. 31, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-022-02359-z
7. Altunöz, Ö., Tırıl, A., & Arslan, Ö. E. (2014). Hamsilos Tabiat Parkı’nın rekreasyon potansiyelini belirlemeye yönelik bir araştırma. Journal of Recreation and Tourism Research, 1(1), 20–38.
8. Andkjær, S., & Arvidsen, J. (2015). Places for active outdoor recreation–a scoping review. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 12, 25–46.

9. Atak, A., Çabuk, S. N., Bakış, R., & Çabuk, A. (2019). Determination of suitable sites for solar power plants by using weighted overlay analysis: Sivrihisar Case. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research (IJRER), 9(3), 1203–1213.
10. Atik, M. (2010). Environmental protection in coastal recreation sites in Antalya, Turkey. Coastal Management, 38(6), 598-616.
11. Ayhan, Ç. K., Taşlı, T. C., Özkök, F., & Tatlı, H. (2020). Land use suitability analysis of rural tourism activities: Yenice, Türkiye. Tourism Management, 76, 103949.
12. Ayyad, M. A. (2003). Case studies in the conservation of biodiversity: degradation and threats. Journal of Arid Environments, 54(1), 165-182.
13. Azem, K., & Terzi, F. (2018). Determination of new development area in Kırklareli by GIS based Weighted Overlay Analysis. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 5(3), 244–259.
14. Barros, A., Gonnet, J., & Pickering, C. (2013). Impacts of informal trails on vegetation and soils in the highest protected area in the Southern Hemisphere. Journal of Environmental Management, 127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.030
15. Baseer, M. A., Rehman, S., Meyer, J. P., & Alam, M. M. (2017). GIS-based site suitability analysis for wind farm development in Saudi Arabia. Energy, 141, 1166–1176.
16. Becken, S., & Job, H. (2014). Protected areas in an era of global–local change. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 22(4), 507-527.
17. Beeco, J. A., Hallo, J. C., & Brownlee, M. T. (2014). GPS visitor tracking and recreation suitability mapping: Tools for understanding and managing visitor use. Landscape and Urban Planning, 127, 136-145.
18. Bello, F. G., Lovelock, B., & Carr, N. (2017). Constraints of community participation in protected area-based tourism planning: The case of Malawi. Journal of Ecotourism, 16(2), 131-151.
19. Bentsen, P., Lindholst, A. C., & Konijnendijk, C. C. (2010). Reviewing eight years of Urban Forestry & Urban Greening: Taking stock, looking ahead. In Urban Forestry and Urban Greening (Vol. 9, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2010.06.003
20. Bilge Ozturk, G., Ozenen Kavlak, M., Cabuk, S. N., Cabuk, A., & Cetin, M. (2022). Estimation of the water footprint of kiwifruit: in the areas transferred from hazelnut to kiwi. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(48), 73171–73180. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-022-21050-Y/FIGURES/5
21. Birben, Ü. (2019). The effectiveness of protected areas in biodiversity conservation: The case of Turkey. Cerne, 25(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/01047760201925042644
22. Bishop, K., Phillips, A., & Warren, L. (1995). Protected for ever?: Factors shaping the future of protected areas policy. Land Use Policy, 12(4), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-8377(95)00030-H
23. Blaschke, T. (2011). Environmental Monitoring and Management of Protected Areas through Integrated Ecological Information Systems - An EU Perspective. In Environmental Information Systems in Industry and Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-930708-02-0.ch005
24. Bodaghabadi, M. B., Faskhodi, A. A., Salehi, M. H., Hosseinifard, S. J., & Heydari, M. (2019). Soil suitability analysis and evaluation of pistachio orchard farming, using canonical multivariate analysis. Scientia Horticulturae, 246, 528–534.
25. Bozkurt, S. G., Kuşak, L., & Akkemik, Ü. (2023). Investigation of land cover (LC)/land use (LU) change affecting forest and seminatural ecosystems in Istanbul (Turkey) metropolitan area between 1990 and 2018. In Environmental Monitoring and Assessment (Vol. 195, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10785-3
26. Breiby, M. A., Selvaag, S. K., Øian, H., Duedahl, E., & Lerfald, M. (2022). Managing sustainable development in recreational and protected areas. The Dovre case, Norway. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2021.100461
27. Caner, G. (2007). Ulusal ve uluslararası doğa koruma kriterleri ve Natura 2000. In Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü: Vol. Master Thesis. Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi.
28. Cakar, K. (2018). Critical success factors for tourist destination governance in times of crisis: a case study of Antalya, Türkiye. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 35(6), 786-802.
29. Cao, M., Peng, L., & Liu, S. (2015). Analysis of the network of protected areas in China based on a geographic perspective: Current status, issues and integration. Sustainability (Switzerland), 7(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su71115617
30. Carey, C., Dudley, N., & Stolton, S. (2000). Squandering paradise? The importance and vulnerability of the world’s protected areas. WWF-World Wide Fund For Nature.
31. CBSGM. (2023). Sit alanları yönetim sistemi. Tabiat Varlıklarını Koruma Genel Müdürlüğü. https://says.csb.gov.tr/
32. Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı Doğa Koruma ve Milli Parklar Genel Müdürlüğü, S. ve Ç. A. D. (Ed.). (2009). Acarlar Gölü Longoz Ormanı Sulak Alan Yönetim Planı. Su ve Çevre Araştırmaları Derneği.
33. Charabi, Y., & Gastli, A. (2011). PV site suitability analysis using GIS-based spatial fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation. Renewable Energy, 36(9), 2554-2561.
34. Chun, J., Kim, C. K., Kim, G. S., Jeong, J. Y., & Lee, W. K. (2020). Social big data informs spatially explicit management options for national parks with high tourism pressures. Tourism Management, 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104136
35. Çiçek, M., & Taş, N. (2018). Planning Process and Projects in National Parks of Turkey. Uluslararası Peyzaj Mimarlığı Araştırmaları Dergisi (IJLAR) E-ISSN: 2602-4322, 2(2), 24-31.
36. Ciegis, R., Ramanauskiene, J., & Martinkus, B. (2009). The concept of sustainable development and its use for sustainability scenarios. Engineering Economics, 62(2).
37. Cortinovis, C., Zulian, G., & Geneletti, D. (2018). Assessing nature-based recreation to support urban green infrastructure planning in Trento (Italy). Land, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/land7040112
38. DeFries, R., Hansen, A., Turner, B. L., Reid, R., & Liu, J. (2007). Land use change around protected areas: management to balance human needs and ecological function. Ecological applications, 17(4), 1031-1038.
39. Diktaş Bulut, N. (2018). An approach to determining forest areas with recreational potential: The case of forest areas around main transportation roads in the Maçka Region of Trabzon, Türkiye. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 37(3), 286–301.
40. Douglass, R. W. (2013). Forest recreation. Pergamon Press.
41. Eagles, P. F. J., & McCool, S. F. (2002). Tourism in national parks and protected areas: Planning and management. Cabi.
42. Elvan, O. D., & Birben, Ü. (2021). Analysis of the Ramsar Convention’s effectiveness on the Turkish legislation and judicial decisions. Wetlands, 41(3), 1–11.
43. Ezebilo, E. E., Boman, M., Mattsson, L., Lindhagen, A., & Mbongo, W. (2015). Preferences and willingness to pay for close to home nature for outdoor recreation in Sweden. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(2), 283–296.
44. Farrell, T. A., & Marion, J. L. (2002). The protected area visitor impact management (PAVIM) framework: A simplified process for making management decisions. Journal of sustainable tourism, 10(1), 31-51.
45. Farrell, B. H., & Twining-Ward, L. (2004). Reconceptualizing tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2003.12.002
46. Fisichelli, N. A., Schuurman, G. W., Monahan, W. B., & Ziesler, P. S. (2015). Protected area tourism in a changing climate: Will visitation at US National Parks warm up or overheat? PLoS ONE, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128226
47. Ghorbanzadeh, O., Pourmoradian, S., Blaschke, T., & Feizizadeh, B. (2019). Mapping potential nature-based tourism areas by applying GIS-decision making systems in East Azerbaijan Province, Iran. Journal of Ecotourism, 18(3), 261–283.
48. Gönençgil, B. (2008). Tehdit Altındaki Kıyı Alanlarına Bir Örnek: Acarlar Longozu-Karasu, Sakarya. In V. Ulusal Coğrafya Sempozyumu. Türkiye Coğrafyası Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi (TÜCAM), Ankara Üniversitesi.
49. Gül, A., Örücü, M. K., & Karaca, Ö. (2006). An approach for recreation suitability analysis to recreation planning in Gölcük Nature Park. Environmental management, 37, 606-625.
50. Gülez, S. (1990). Ormaniçi rekreasyon potansiyelinin saptanması için geliştirilen bir değerlendirme yöntemi. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University, 40(2).
51. Gundersen, V., Vistad, O. I., Panzacchi, M., Strand, O., & van Moorter, B. (2019). Large-scale segregation of tourists and wild reindeer in three Norwegian national parks: Management implications. Tourism Management, 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.04.017
52. Gunderson, L. H., Holling, C. S., Pritchard Lowell, Jr., & Peterson, G. D. (2002). Resilience of large-scale resource systems. Resilience and the Behavior of Large-Scale Systems, 60.
53. Güneş, G. (2011). Korunan alanların yönetiminde yeni bir yaklaşım: katılımcı yönetim planları. Ekonomi Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(1), 47–57.
54. Hammer, T. (2016). Protected areas and regional development: Conflicts and opportunities. In Protected areas and regional development in Europe (pp. 21-36). Routledge.
55. Hammer, D. A., & Bastian, R. K. (2020). Wetlands ecosystems: natural water purifiers?. In Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment (pp. 5-19). CRC Press.
56. Hartig, E. K., Grozev, O. & Rosenzweig, C. (1997). Climate change, agriculture and wetlands in Eastern Europe: vulnerability, adaptation and policy. Climatic Change, 36(1), 107-121. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005304816660
57. Hatipoglu, B., Alvarez, M. D., & Ertuna, B. (2016). Barriers to stakeholder involvement in the planning of sustainable tourism: The case of the Thrace region in Turkey. Journal of cleaner production, 111, 306-317.
58. Hausmann, A., Toivonen, T., Fink, C., Heikinheimo, V., Tenkanen, H., Butchart, S. H. M., Brooks, T. M., & Di Minin, E. (2019). Assessing global popularity and threats to Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas using social media data. Science of the Total Environment, 683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.268
59. Hockings, M. (2003). Systems for assessing the effectiveness of management in protected areas. In BioScience (Vol. 53, Issue 9). https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0823:SFATEO]2.0.CO;2
60. Hockings, M., Stolton, S., & Leverington, F. (2006). Evaluating effectiveness : a framework for assessing management effectiveness of protected areas, 2nd edition. In Evaluating effectiveness : a framework for assessing management effectiveness of protected areas, 2nd edition. https://doi.org/10.2305/iucn.ch.2006.pag.14.en
61. Howley, P. (2011). Landscape aesthetics: Assessing the general publics’ preferences towards rural landscapes. Ecological Economics, 72, 161–169.
62. IUCN. (2023). World Commission on Protected Areas. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. https://www.iucn.org/our-union/commissions/world-commission-protected-areas
63. Jenkins, J., & Pigram, J. (2005). Outdoor recreation management. Routledge.
64. Jennings, G. (2007). Water-Based Tourism, Sport, Leisure, and Recreation Experiences. In Water-Based Tourism, Sport, Leisure, and Recreation Experiences. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080468310-1
65. Job, H., Becken, S., & Lane, B. (2020). Protected Areas in a neoliberal world and the role of tourism in supporting conservation and sustainable development: an assessment of strategic planning, zoning, impact monitoring, and tourism management at natural World Heritage Sites. In Protected areas, sustainable tourism and neo-liberal governance policies (pp. 1-22). Routledge.
66. Jones, K. R., Venter, O., Fuller, R. A., Allan, J. R., Maxwell, S. L., Negret, P. J., & Watson, J. E. M. (2018). One-third of global protected land is under intense human pressure. Science, 360(6390). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9565
67. Jūrmalis, E., & Lībiete, Z. (2019). Developing a framework for characterizing recreational potential of forest areas using Weighted Criteria Analysis. Research For Rural Development, 1.
68. Karia, J. P. (2012). Floral and Avifaunal Diversity of Thol Lake Wildlife (Bird) Sanctuary of Gujarat State, India. Biodiversity Enrichment in a Diverse World. IntechOpen Ltd., London, UK. https://dx. doi. org/10.5772/50073, 1-34.
69. Kays, R., Parsons, A. W., Baker, M. C., Kalies, E. L., Forrester, T., Costello, R., Rota, C. T., Millspaugh, J. J., & McShea, W. J. (2017). Does hunting or hiking affect wildlife communities in protected areas? Journal of Applied Ecology, 54(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12700
70. Keddy, P. (2010). Wetland ecology: principles and conservation. https://books.google.com/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=eVeaSqFy2VgC&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=eddy,+P.+A.+(2010).+Wetland+ecology:+principles+and+conservation.+Cambridge+university+press&ots=MgW6gc6JNe&sig=3pwHH1lDxdLCF88x6-fduKzHqvc
71. Kim, Y., Kim, C. ki, Lee, D. K., Lee, H. woo, & Andrada, R. I. T. (2019). Quantifying nature-based tourism in protected areas in developing countries by using social big data. Tourism Management, 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.12.005
72. Kılıç, M. (2018). Türkiye’de Milli Parkların Gelişimi: Yozgat Çamlığı Milli Parkı Örneği. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Coğrafya Anabilim Dalı, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Isparta.
73. Koçan, N. (2012). Kızılcahamam-Çamlıdere jeoparkında kırsal peyzaj ve rekreasyon planlama. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 28(1), 38–46.
74. Komossa, F., van der Zanden, E. H., Schulp, C. J. E., & Verburg, P. H. (2018). Mapping landscape potential for outdoor recreation using different archetypical recreation user groups in the European Union. Ecological Indicators, 85, 105–116.
75. Komossa, F., Wartmann, F. M., Kienast, F., & Verburg, P. H. (2020). Comparing outdoor recreation preferences in peri-urban landscapes using different data gathering methods. Landscape and Urban Planning, 199, 103796.
76. Korir, J., Muchiri, J., & Kamwea, J. (2013). Wildlife-based tourism, ecology and sustainability of protected areas in Kenya.
77. Korunan alanlar. (2023). Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Çevre, Şehircilik ve İklim Değişikliği Bakanlığı. https://cevreselgostergeler.csb.gov.tr/korunan-alanlar-i-85778
78. KTB. (2023). Somut Olmayan Kültürel Miras Envanter Çalışmaları. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı. https://aregem.ktb.gov.tr/TR-50839/somut-olmayan-kulturel-miras-envanter-calismalari.html
79. Kuşçu Şimşek, Ç., Türk, T., Ödül, H., & Çelik, M. N. (2018). Detection of paragliding fields by GIS. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 3(3), 119–125.
80. Kuvan, Y. (2012). Doğa koruma ve korunan alanlar. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, 5066.
81. Kuvan, Y., Erol, S. Y., & Şahin, G. (2018). Management of forest areas used for ecotourism and recreation in Turkey. Forestist, 68(2), 114-121.
82. Leung, Y. F., Newburger, T., Jones, M., Kuhn, B., & Woiderski, B. (2011). Developing a monitoring protocol for visitor-created informal trails in Yosemite National Park, USA. Environmental Management, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9581-4
83. Liburd, J., Menke, B., & Tomej, K. (2023). Activating socio-cultural values for sustainable tourism development in natural protected areas. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2023.2211245
84. Liu, J., Linderman, M., Ouyang, Z., An, L., Yang, J., & Zhang, H. (2001). Ecological degradation in protected areas: the case of Wolong Nature Reserve for giant pandas. Science, 292(5514), 98–101.
85. López-Mosquera, N., & Sánchez, M. (2011). Emotional and satisfaction benefits to visitors as explanatory factors in the monetary valuation of environmental goods. An application to periurban green spaces. Land Use Policy, 28(1), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2010.05.008
86. Maltby, E. (2009). Functional assessment of wetlands: towards evaluation of ecosystem services. https://books.google.com/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=W--iAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Maltby,+E.+(2009).+Functional+assessment+of+wetlands:+towards+evaluation+of+ecosystem+services.+Elsevie&ots=687oXV_iq7&sig=yQFY_aupgOjTmHEYIDDw46dI0YU
87. Mason, P. (2005). Visitor management in protected areas: From “hard” to “soft” approaches? Current Issues in Tourism, 8(2–3). https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500508668213
88. McCool, S. F., & Moisey, R. N. (2008). Tourism, recreation, and sustainability: Linking culture and the environment: Second edition. In Tourism, Recreation and Sustainability: Linking Culture and the Environment: Second Edition.
89. McInnes, R. J. (2013). Recognizing ecosystem services from wetlands of international importance: An example from Sussex, UK. Wetlands, 33(6), 1001–1017. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13157-013-0458-1
90. McKinley, D. C., Miller-Rushing, A. J., Ballard, H. L., Bonney, R., Brown, H., Cook-Patton, S. C., ... & Soukup, M. A. (2017). Citizen science can improve conservation science, natural resource management, and environmental protection. Biological Conservation, 208, 15-28.
91. McLachlan, A., Defeo, O., Jaramillo, E., & Short, A. D. (2013). Sandy beach conservation and recreation: Guidelines for optimising management strategies for multi-purpose use. Ocean & Coastal Management, 71, 256–268.
92. McNeely, J. A. (1994). Protected areas for the 21st century: working to provide benefits to society. Biodiversity & Conservation, 3, 390-405.
93. Mebratu, D. (1998). Sustainability and sustainable development: historical and conceptual review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 18(6), 493–520.
94. Miller, G., Twining-Ward, L., Bakker, M., Carbone, G., Duka, T., Farrell, B., Font, X., Jack, E., & Tapper, R. (2005). Monitoring for a sustainable tourism transition: The challenge of developing and using indicators. In Monitoring for a Sustainable Tourism Transition: The Challenge of Developing and Using Indicators. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.thr.6050034
95. Mimbs, B. P., Boley, B. B., Bowker, J. M., Woosnam, K. M., & Green, G. T. (2020). Importance-performance analysis of residents’ and tourists’ preferences for water-based recreation in the Southeastern United States. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 31, 100324.
96. Monz, C. A., Cole, D. N., Leung, Y. F., & Marion, J. L. (2010). Sustaining visitor use in protected areas: Future opportunities in recreation ecology research based on the USA experience. In Environmental Management (Vol. 45, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9406-5
97. Mora, C., & Sale, P. F. (2011). Ongoing global biodiversity loss and the need to move beyond protected areas: a review of the technical and practical shortcomings of protected areas on land and sea. Marine ecology progress series, 434, 251-266.
98. Morea, J. P. (2019). A framework for improving the management of protected areas from a social perspective: The case of Bahía de San Antonio Protected Natural Area, Argentina. Land Use Policy, 87, 104044. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2019.104044
99. Moseley, D., Marzano, M., Chetcuti, J., & Watts, K. (2013). Green networks for people: Application of a functional approach to support the planning and management of greenspace. Landscape and Urban Planning, 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.04.004
100. Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., & Brandenburg, C. (2002). Methods for visitor monitoring in recreational and protected areas: An overview. Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas. Institut for Landscape Architecture & Landscape Management Bodenkultur University Vienna, 2001, 1-6.
101. Nahuelhual, L., Carmona, A., Lozada, P., Jaramillo, A., & Aguayo, M. (2013). Mapping recreation and ecotourism as a cultural ecosystem service: An application at the local level in Southern Chile. Applied Geography, 40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.12.004
102. Navas Romero, A. L., Herrera Moratta, M. A., Dalmasso, A. D., & Barros, A. (2019). Quad bike impacts on vegetation and soil physicochemical properties in an arid ecosystem. Acta Oecologica, 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2019.04.007
103. Özenen-Kavlak, M., & Çabuk, S. N. (2022). Geospatial suitability and cost analysis modeling for energy crop cultivation: Switchgrass case for Eskisehir. Renewable Energy.
104. Özenen-Kavlak, M., & Çabuk, S. N. (2021). Enerji bitkisi yetiştiriciliğinde coğrafi bilgi sistemlerinin kullanımı: Fil otu için uygun alanların belirlenmesi. GSI Journals Serie C: Advancements in Information Sciences and Technologies, 4(2), 1–27.
105. Özenen-Kavlak, M., Cabuk, S. N., & Cetin, M. (2021). Development of forest fire risk map using geographical information systems and remote sensing capabilities: Ören case. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1–27.
106. Pickering, C. M., & Rossi, S. (2016). Mountain biking in peri-urban parks: Social factors influencing perceptions of conflicts in three popular National Parks in Australia. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 15, 71–81.
107. Polat, S., & Polat, S. A. (2016). Rekreasyonel tabiat parklarının korunan alanlar kapsamında incelenmesi: Mersin ili örneği. Social Sciences, 11(2), 85–115.
108. Popović, D., Doljak, D., Kuzmanović, D., & Pecelj, M. (2018). Geoecological evaluation of protected area for recreation and tourism planning-the evidence from the Bosnia and Herzegovina national park. Journal of the Geographical Institute" Jovan Cvijic", SASA, 68(1), 119-131.
109. Protected Planet. (2023). December 2023 update of the WDPA and WD-OECM. UN Enviroment Programme WCMC. https://www.protectedplanet.net/en/resources/december-2023-update-of-the-wdpa-and-wd-oecm
110. Qi, J., Lu, Y., Han, F., Ma, X., & Yang, Z. (2022). Spatial distribution characteristics of the rural tourism villages in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau and its influencing factors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), 9330.
111. Qiu, L., Zhu, J., Pan, Y., Hu, W., & Amable, G. S. (2017). Multi-criteria land use suitability analysis for livestock development planning in Hangzhou metropolitan area, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 161, 1011–1019.
112. Reed, S. E., & Merenlender, A. M. (2008). Quiet, nonconsumptive recreation reduces protected area effectiveness. Conservation Letters, 1(3), 146–154.
113. Rocha, C. H. B., Fontoura, L. M., Vale, W. B. D., Castro, L. F. D. P., da Silva, A. L. F., Prado, T. D. O., & da Silveira, F. J. (2021). Carrying capacity and impact indicators: analysis and suggestions for sustainable tourism in protected areas–Brazil. World Leisure Journal, 63(1), 73-97.
114. Saarinen, J. (2015). Conflicting limits to growth in sustainable tourism. In Current Issues in Tourism (Vol. 18, Issue 10). https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2014.972344
115. Sahabo, A. A., & Mohammed, A. B. (2016). A Gis Based Multi-Criteria Analysis For Siting Recreational Parks In Yola-North Local Government. Int J Appl Sci Eng Res, 5(1), 20–29.
116. Sun, Y., & Wang, W. (2024). Research On China’s Tourism Competitiveness and its Coordination Degree Based on the Three-Dimensional Perspective Of Market, Resources and Environment. In 2023 5th International Conference on Economic Management and Cultural Industry (ICEMCI 2023) (pp. 819-837). Atlantis Press.
117. Şahin, C. (2020). Sakarya Nehri Deltası’nda uzun süreli rüzgar ve dalga iklimi değişimleri. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, 22(65), 353–368.
118. Senevirathna, E., & Gunathilake, J. (2015). Demand Based Geographic Information System for Analyzing Recreational Opportunity in Protected Areas in Sri Lanka: Special Reference to Udawalawe National Park.
119. Shafer, C. L. (2015). Cautionary thoughts on IUCN protected area management categories V-VI. In Global Ecology and Conservation (Vol. 3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2014.12.007
120. Tabiat Varlıklarını Koruma Genel Müdürlüğü. (2023). Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Çevre, Şehircilik ve İklim Değişikliği Bakanlığı. https://tvk.csb.gov.tr/
121. Tafahomi, R., & Nadi, R. (2021). Protection of natural wetlands through landscape design in Kigali City. Rwanda Journal of Engineering, Science, Technology and Environment, 4(1).
122. Taiminen, S. (2018). The negative impacts of overtourism on tourism destination from environmental and socio-cultural perspectives.
123. T.C. Orman ve Su İşleri Bakanlığı, D. K. ve M. P. G. M. (Ed.). (2016). Acarlar Gölü Longoz Ormanı Sulak Alan Yönetim Planı [2016 - 2020]. Ekoplan Mühendislik Danışmanlık Ltd. Şti.
124. Tırıl, A., & Baylan, E. (2009). Wetland management in Turkey: Problems, achievements and perspectives. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 4(11), 1106–1119.
125. Tosun, C. (2001). Challenges of sustainable tourism development in the developing world: the case of Turkey. Tourism Management, 22(3), 289–303.
126. Tunca, H., Sevindik, T. O., Bal, D. N., & Arabaci, S. (2014). Community structure of epiphytic algae on three different macrophytes at Acarlar floodplain forest (northern Turkey). Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 32(4), 845–857.
127. Turner, K. (1991). Economics and wetland management. Ambio. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4313777
128. Turner, R. K., Van Den Bergh, J. C., Söderqvist, T., Barendregt, A., Van Der Straaten, J., Maltby, E., & Van Ierland, E. C. (2000). Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: scientific integration for management and policy. Ecological economics, 35(1), 7-23.
129. Ursavaş, S., & Işin, Z. (2019). New records of Bryum gemmiferum and Atrichum crispum for Turkey. Plant Biosystems-An International Journal Dealing with All Aspects of Plant Biology, 153(5), 686–690.
130. Uzun, A., Tabur, M. A., & Ayvaz, Y. (2008). Birds of Lake Acarlar and environmental problems. Ekoloji Dergisi, 17(66).
131. Wang, Y., Yao, Y., & Ju, M. (2008). Wise use of wetlands: Current state of protection and utilization of chinese wetlands and recommendations for improvement. Environmental Management, 41(6), 793–808. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00267-008-9072-Z
132. Watson, J. E. M., Darling, E. S., Venter, O., Maron, M., Walston, J., Possingham, H. P., Dudley, N., Hockings, M., Barnes, M., & Brooks, T. M. (2016). Bolder science needed now for protected areas. Conservation Biology, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12645
133. Weyland, F., & Laterra, P. (2014). Recreation potential assessment at large spatial scales: A method based in the ecosystem services approach and landscape metrics. Ecological Indicators, 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.023
134. Wilkerson, M. L., Mitchell, M. G., Shanahan, D., Wilson, K. A., Ives, C. D., Lovelock, C. E., & Rhodes, J. R. (2018). The role of socio-economic factors in planning and managing urban ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 31, 102-110.
135. Wilkins, E. J., Sinclair, W., Miller, H. M., & Schuster, R. M. (2019). Does proximity to wetlands matter? A landscape-level analysis of the influence of local wetlands on the public’s concern for ecosystem services and conservation involvement. Wetlands, 39(6), 1271–1280.
136. Xu, L., Ao, C., Mao, B., Cheng, Y., Sun, B., Wang, J., Liu, B., & Ma, J. (2020). Which is more Important, Ecological Conservation or Recreational Service? Evidence from a Choice Experiment in Wetland Nature Reserve Management. Wetlands, 40(6), 2381–2396. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13157-020-01348-8
137. Xu, T., Weng, B., Yan, D., Wang, K., Li, X., Bi, W., Li, M., Cheng, X., & Liu, Y. (2019). Wetlands of international importance: Status, threats, and future protection. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101818
138. Yavuz, M., & Vatandaşlar, C. (2018). Monitoring temporal and ecological changes in protected areas with fragmentation analysis: a case study from Karagöl-Sahara National Park. Turkish Journal of Forestry Research.
139. Yenilmez-Arpa, N. (2011). Türkiye’de korunan alanların belirlenmesi, planlanması ve yönetimi sürecinde katılımcılığın değerlendirilmesi: Sultan Sazlığı Milli Parkı. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Peyzaj Mimarlığı Anabilim Dalı: Ankara Üniversitesi .
140. Yıldız, D. (2019). Korunan alanlarda çatışma yönetimi: Küre Dağları Milli Parkı örneği.
141. Yılmaz, R., Uygun, Ö., & Ajansı, T. C. D. M. K. (2011). Karasu’nun Genel Durum Değerlendirmesi ve Swot Analizi Raporu. T.C. Doğu Marmara Kalkınma Ajansı.
142. Yuan, J., Yang, D., Liu, N., & Gao, C. (2023). A local-scale participatory zoning approach to conflict resolution in protected areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104677
143. Yuxi, Z., & Linsheng, Z. (2020). Identifying conflicts tendency between nature-based tourism development and ecological protection in China. Ecological Indicators, 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105791
144. Zasada, I. (2011). Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture—A review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming. Land Use Policy, 28(4), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2011.01.008
145. Zeng, H., Sui, D. Z., & Wu, X. B. (2005). Human disturbances on landscapes in protected areas: a case study of the Wolong Nature Reserve. Ecological Research, 20, 487-496.
146. Zuckerberg, B., & Porter, W. F. (2010). Thresholds in the long-term responses of breeding birds to forest cover and fragmentation. Biological Conservation, 143(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.01.004