Daday Atlı Turizm Merkezlerinde Turist Deneyimlerinin İncelenmesi

Öz

Turizm, kültürler arasında bir köprü görevi görmekte ve bölgesel kalkınmaya önemli ölçüde katkıda bulunmaktadır. Son yıllarda, geleneksel deniz-güneş-kum üçlüsünün ötesinde farklı deneyimler sunan alternatif turizm biçimlerine yönelik ilgi giderek artmaktadır. Binicilik turizmi, önemli bir büyüme potansiyeline sahip niş bir pazar olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu çalışma, zengin doğal manzaraları ve atlı turizm merkezleriyle tanınan Kastamonu ilinin Daday ilçesindeki atlı turizm merkezlerini ziyaret edenlerin deneyimlerini incelemektedir. Turist deneyimleri üzerine kurulan araştırma, Daday'daki binicilik faaliyetlerinin turistlerin eğlence, eğitim, kaçış ve estetikle ilgili deneyimsel ihtiyaçlarını ne ölçüde karşıladığını ve bu deneyimlerin genel memnuniyet düzeylerini araştırmaktadır. Daday'daki en az üç binicilik merkezini ziyaret eden 17 katılımcı ile yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler yapılmıştır. Yapılan betimsel ve içerik analizleri neticesinde, genel olarak olumlu deneyimler bildirirken, hizmet kalitesi, personel profesyonelliği ve faaliyet süresi gibi alanların iyileştirilmesi gerektiğini ortaya çıkarılmıştır. Bulgular, atlı turizm merkezleri bağlamında literatüre katkıda bulunmakta, turist memnuniyetini artırmak ve Daday'daki atlı turizm merkezlerinin sürdürülebilir gelişimini teşvik etmek için pratik öneriler sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Atlı turizm
• Turist deneyimi
• Daday
• Türkiye

Investigation of Tourist Experiences in Daday Equestrian Tourism Centres

Öz

Tourism acts as a bridge between cultures and contributes significantly to regional development. In recent years, there has been growing interest in alternative forms of tourism that offer different experiences beyond the traditional sea-sun-sand trio. Equestrian tourism has emerged as a niche market with significant growth potential. This study examines visitors' experiences to equestrian tourism centers in the Daday district of Kastamonu province, which is known for its rich natural landscapes and equestrian tourism centers. Building on tourist experiences, the research investigates how equestrian activities in Daday fulfill tourists' experiential needs for entertainment, education, escape, and aesthetics and the overall satisfaction levels of these experiences. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 participants who visited at least three equestrian centers in Daday. Content analysis revealed that while they reported generally positive experiences, areas such as service quality, staff professionalism and duration of activities need improvement. The findings contribute to the literature in the context of equestrian tourism centers and provide practical recommendations to improve tourist satisfaction and promote the sustainable development of equestrian tourism centers in Daday.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Equestrian tourism
• Tourist experience
• Daday
• Türkiye

Kaynakça

1. Aydoğdu, A., & Tanrısever, C. (2017). Turizmde atlı spor kümelenmesi: Daday örneği. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (51), 57-73.
2. Baş, T. ve Akturan, U. (2013). Nitel araştırma, NVİVO ile nitel veri analizi, örnekleme, analiz, yorum. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
3. Başkale, H. (2016). Nitel araştırmalarda geçerlik, güvenirlik ve örneklem büyüklüğünün belirlenmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 9(1), 23-28.
4. Chen, C.-F., & Chen, F.-S. (2010). Experience quality, perceived value, satisfaction, and behavioral intentions for heritage tourists. Tourism Management, 31(1), 29–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.02.008
5. Danby, P., & Grajfoner, D. (2022). Human–Equine Tourism and Nature-Based Solutions: Exploring Psychological Well-Being Through Transformational Experiences. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 46(3), 607-629. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348020978555
6. Değişgel, S. (2024). Türkiye’nin binicilik turizmi potansiyelinin incelenmesi. Journal of Tourism & Gastronomy Studies, 12(1), 645–662. https://doi.org/10.21325/jotags.2024.1399
7. Fernández Gallardo, J.A. & Hernandez Rojas, R. (2024). Impact of touristic sustainability on satisfaction with touristic services in a world heritage city. The case of the equestrian show in Córdoba (Spain). Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, Ön Yayım Makalesi. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-12-2023-0226
8. Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. The Sociology Press, Mill Valley.

9. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30 (4), 233-252
10. Holloway, I., & Wheeler, S. (1996). Qualitative research for nurses. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd.
11. Houser, J. (2015). Nursing research: reading, using, and creating evidence (3rd ed.). Burlington: Jones ve Bartlett Learning.
12. Ike, S., Du, G., Shirasaka, S., & Zhang, G. (2013). Development of equestrian tourism around lake lashihai in yunnan province, pr china. E-Journal Geo, 8(2), 208-222. https://doi.org/10.4157/ejgeo.8.208
13. Izenstark, D., & Ebata, A. T. (2016). Theorizing family-based nature activities and family functioning: The integration of attention restoration theory with a family routines and rituals perspective. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 8(2), 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12138
14. Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
15. Konyves, E., & Suta, E. (2009). The importance of equestrian tourism enterprises in tourism destination management in Hungary. APSTRACT: Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, 4, 25-28.
16. Kümbetoğlu, B. (2015). Sosyolojide ve antropolojide niteliksel yöntem ve atıştırma. (4. Baskı). Bağlam Yayıncılık.
17. Kvale, S. (2007). Doing interviews. SAGE Publications.
18. Layder, D. (2013). Sosyolojik araştırma pratiği (Çev: Serdar Ünal). Heretik Yayıncılık.
19. Lincoln, S. Y., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, InElo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K. ve Kyngäs, H. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: a focus on trustworthiness, SAGE Open, 1-10
20. Malchrowicz-Mośko, E., Wieliński, D., & Adamczewska, K. (2020). Perceived Benefits for Mental and Physical Health and Barriers to Horseback Riding Participation. The Analysis among Professional and Amateur Athletes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(10), 3736. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103736
21. Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals' feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001
22. Mayer, F. S., Frantz, C. M., Bruehlman-Senecal, E., & Dolliver, K. (2009). Why is nature beneficial?: The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 607-643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508319745
23. Merriam, S.B. (2013). Nitel araştırma: desen ve uygulama için bir rehber (Çev. Selahattin Turan). Nobel Yayıncılık.
24. Nemethy, S., & Bartos, A. (2019). Equestrian tourism and horse breeding in Hungary and Slovenia – environmental sustainability and conservation of cultural heritage: a strategic approach. Ecocycles, 5(1), 67–97. https://doi.org/10.19040/ecocycles.v5i1.156
25. Oh, H., Fiore, A. M., & Jeoung, M. (2007). Measuring experience economy concepts: tourism applications. Journal of Travel Research, 46(2), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287507304039
26. Ollenburg, C. (2005). Worldwide structure of the equestrian tourism sector. Journal of Ecotourism,4(1), 47–55. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14724040508668437
27. Öztürk, S. & Işınkaralar, O. (2018). Turizmde yeni eğilimler: çiftlik turizmi üzerine bir araştırma. Journal of Current Researches on Social Sciences, 8 (4), 537-546
28. Pavić, L., Blešić, I., Petrović, M. D., Radovanović, M. M., & Prišenk, J. (2019). Can the Quality of Hospitality Services Play a Role in Sustainable Equestrian Tourism in Slovenia? Mediations, Effects, and Implications. Sustainability, 11(21), 6155. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216155
29. Pickel-Chevalier, S. (2015). Can equestrian tourism be a solution for sustainable tourism development in France? Loisir et Société / Society and Leisure, 38(1), 110–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.2015.1007580
30. Pickel-Chevalier, S. (2020). Tourism as an agent of reinvention for european equestrian intangible heritages. Mondes Du Tourisme, (18). https://doi.org/10.4000/tourisme.3019
31. Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1999). The Experience Economy: Work Is Theatre & Every Business a Stage. Harvard Business School Press.
32. Punch, K. F. (2011). Sosyal araştırmalara giriş: nicel ve nitel yaklaşımlar. (Çev: D. Bayrak, H. B. Arslan ve Z. Akyüz). Siyasal Kitabevi.
33. Quan, S., & Wang, N. (2004). Towards a structural model of the tourist experience: An illustration from food experiences in tourism. Tourism Management, 25(3), 297–305. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(03)00130-4
34. Rezapouraghdam, H., Saydam, M.B., Altun, O., Roudi, S. & Nosrati, S. (2024). A contemporary systematic literature review of equestrian tourism: emerging advancements and future insights. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, Ön Yayım Makalesi. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTI-01-2024-0046
35. Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (Eds.). (2013). Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
36. Schultz, P. W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In P. Schmuck & W. P. Schultz (Eds.), Psychology of sustainable development (pp. 61-78). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0995-0_4
37. Sharts-Hopko, N. C. (2002). Assessing rigor in qualitative research. Journal of the Association of Nurses In Aids Care, 13 (4), 84-86.
38. Sigurðardóttir, I., & Helgadóttir, G. (2015). Riding High: Quality and Customer Satisfaction in Equestrian Tourism in Iceland. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 15(1–2), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2015.1015765
39. Streubert, H. J., & Carpenter, D. R. (2011). Qualitative research in nursing (5th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams ve Wilkins.
40. Wolsko, C., & Lindberg, K. (2013). Experiencing connection with nature: The matrix of psychological well-being, mindfulness, and outdoor recreation. Ecopsychology, 5(2), 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2013.0008
41. Wolsko, C., Lindberg, K., & Reese, R. (2019). Nature-based physical recreation leads to psychological well-being: Evidence from five studies. Ecopsychology, 11(4), 222-235. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2018.0076
42. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (6. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.