Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Giyilebilir teknolojilerin eğitim amaçlı kullanımına yönelik kavramsal bir değerlendirme

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 4, 87 - 102, 31.10.2018

Öz

Giyilebilir teknolojiler günlük hayatımızda daha çok yer almakta ve insanlar için önemli teknolojilerden birisi haline gelmektedir. Giyilebilir teknolojiler birçok alanda olduğu gibi eğitim alanında da kullanılan teknolojilerdir. Bu düşünceden hareketle bu çalışmada giyilebilir teknoloji ve eğitim konusu incelenmiştir. Çalışmada veri madenciliği ve analizi yönteminde kullanılan sosyal ağ analizi tekniğinden faydalanılmıştır. Araştırma bulgularına göre giyilebilir teknolojiler eğitim alanında ulaşılabilir öğrenme ve mobil öğrenme modelleriyle doğrudan ilgilidir. Artırılmış gerçeklik, sanal gerçeklik ve nesnelerin interneti ise bu bağlamda kullanılabilecek teknolojiler olarak belirlenmiştir. İnsan-makine etkileşimi ve nicel/ölçülebilen insan kavramları, eğitim bağlamında incelenebilecek diğer önemli kavramlar olarak bulunmuştur. Kişisel bilgilerin gizliliği ve veri güvenliği ise dikkat edilmesi gereken önemli noktalar olarak ortaya çıkmıştır.


Kaynakça

  • Ally, M. (2007). Guest Editorial-Mobile Learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2).
  • Arroyo, I., Micciollo, M., Casano, J., Ottmar, E., Hulse, T., & Rodrigo, M. M. (2017). Wearable learning: multiplayer embodied games for math. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (pp. 205-216). Amsterdam, Netherlands. Baker, C., & Sicchio, K. (2017). Hacking the Body 2.0: Ethics in Wearable Tech, Etextiles Design and Data Collection in Performance. In International Conference on HumanComputer Interaction (pp. 623-627). Springer, Cham.
  • Bauer, M., Bräuer, C., Schuldt, J., & Krömker, H. (2018). Adaptive E-Learning Technologies for Sustained Learning Motivation in Engineering Science-Acquisition of Motivation through Self-Reports and Wearable Technology. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Supported Education CSEDU (1) (pp. 418-425). March 15-17, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal.
  • Bauer, M., Bräuer, C., Schuldt, J., Niemann, M., & Krömker, H. (2018, July). Application of Wearable Technology for the Acquisition of Learning Motivation in an Adaptive ELearning Platform. In International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (pp. 29-40). Springer, Cham.
  • Belliger, A., & Krieger, D. J. (2016). From Quantified to Qualified Self–A Fictional Dialogue at the Mall. Digital Culture & Society, 2(1), 25-41.
  • Borthwick, A. C., Anderson, C. L., Finsness, E. S., & Foulger, T. S. (2015). Special article personal wearable technologies in education: Value or villain?. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 31(3), 85–92.
  • Bower, M., & Sturman, D. (2015). What are the educational affordances of wearable technologies?. Computers & Education, 88, 343-353.
  • Bozkurt, A. (2017a). Wearable technology: The current state of the art. In Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies Conference (EDULEARN17), 3rd-5th July 2017 (pp. 8704-8711), Barcelona, Spain. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2017.0631
  • *Bozkurt, A. (2017b). Giyilebilir Teknoloji ve Eğitim: Kavramsal Bir Değerlendirme. 22.Türkiye de İnternet Konferansı (INET-TR 17), 2-4 Ekim, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
  • Buchem, I., Merceron, A., Kreutel, J., Haesner, M., & Steinert, A. (2015, November). Gamification designs in Wearable Enhanced Learning for healthy ageing. In 9th International Conference on Interactive Mobile Communication Technologies and Learning (IMCL2015) (pp. 9-15). 19-20 November, Thessaloniki, Greece.
  • Charlton, P., & Avramides, K. (2016). Knowledge construction in computer science and engineering when learning through making. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 9(4), 379-390.
  • Dawkins, M. A. (2014). Ethics, Wearable Technology, and Higher Education: Toward a New Point-of-View Angle on Interactive Instruction. In S. Thompson (Ed.), Global Issues and Ethical Considerations in Human Enhancement Technologies (pp. 1-15). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-6010-6.ch001
  • De Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2011). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek (Vol. 27). Cambridge University Press.
  • Delgado, R. (2014). Imagining the Classroom of 2016, Empowered by Wearable Technology. http://www.emergingedtech.com/2014/04/imaging-the-classroom-of-2016-empoweredby-wearable-technology/ adresinden erişilmiştir.
  • Demir, E. B., & Demir, K. (2017). Enhancing Learning with Wearable Technologies In and Out of Educational Settings. In S. Şad, & M. Ebner (Eds.), Digital Tools for Seamless Learning (pp. 119-144). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-1692-7.ch006
  • Gammack, J., & Marrington, A. (2017). The Promise and Perils of Wearable Technologies. In A. Marrington, D. Kerr, & J. Gammack (Eds.), Managing Security Issues and the Hidden Dangers of Wearable Technologies (pp. 1-17). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-1016-1.ch001
  • Hansen, D., Shneiderman, B., & Smith, M. A. (2010). Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL: Insights from a connected world. Morgan Kaufmann.
  • Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2014). NMC Horizon Report: 2014 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
  • Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2015). NMC Horizon Report: 2015 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
  • Krause, A., Smailagic, A., & Siewiorek, D. P. (2006). Context-aware mobile computing: Learning context-dependent personal preferences from a wearable sensor array. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 5(2), 113-127.
  • Krebs, V. E. (2002). Social network analysis, a brief introduction. http://www.orgnet.com/sna.html adresinden erişilmiştir.
  • Kuzu, E. B., & Demir, K. (2016). Eğitim alanında giyilebilir teknolojiler: Uygulamalar, potansiyel yararlar ve etik sorunlar. 4th International Instructional Technologies & Teacher Education Symposium (ITTES 2016), (s.437-440). Fırat Üniversitesi, Elazığ.
  • Labus, A., Milutinovic, M., Stepanic, D., Stevanovic, M., & Milinovic, S. (2015). Wearable computing in e-education. RUO. Revija za Univerzalno Odlicnost, 4(1), A39.
  • Li, L., Zheng, Y., Ogata, H., & Yano, Y. (2005). Ubiquitous computing in learning: Toward a conceptual framework of ubiquitous learning environment. International Journal of Pervasive Computing and Communications, 1(3), 207-216.
  • Lindberg, R., Seo, J., & Laine, T. H. (2016). Enhancing physical education with exergames and wearable technology. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 9(4), 328-341.
  • Lindström, J., & Hanken, C. (2018). Wearable Computing: Security Challenges, BYOD, Privacy, and Legal Aspects. In I. Management Association (Ed.), Wearable Technologies: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1043-1067). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-5484-4.ch047
  • McLuhan, M. (1966). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGrawHill.
  • Newman, M. E. (2005). A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks. Social Networks, 27(1), 39-54.
  • Page, T. (2015). A forecast of the adoption of wearable technology. International Journal of Technology Diffusion, 6(2), 12-29.
  • Park, Y. (2011). A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(2), 78-102.
  • Resnick, M. L., & Chircu, A. M. (2017). Wearable Devices: Ethical Challenges and Solutions. In A. Marrington, D. Kerr, & J. Gammack (Eds.), Managing Security Issues and the Hidden Dangers of Wearable Technologies (pp. 182-205). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-1016-1.ch008
  • Sapargaliyev, D. (2015, July). Wearables in Education: Expectations and Disappointments. International Conference on Technology in Education (pp. 73-78). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  • Schneegass, S., Olsson, T., Mayer, S., & Van Laerhoven, K. (2016). Mobile Interactions Augmented by Wearable Computing: A Design Space and Vision. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction (IJMHCI), 8(4), 104-114.
  • Sezgin, S. (2016). Eğitimde giyilebilir teknolojiler: Fırsatlar ve eğilimler. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 40, 405-418.
  • Syvanen, A., Beale, R., Sharples, M., Ahonen, M., & Lonsdale, P. (2005). Supporting pervasive learning environments: adaptability and context awareness in mobile learning. In IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE'05) (pp. 3-pp). Tokushima, Japan.
  • Van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538.
  • Waltman, L., Van Eck, N.J., & Noyons, E.C.M. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629-635.
  • Weiser, M. (1991). The computer for the twent-first century. Scientific American, 265(3), 94-104.
  • Wolf, G. (2010). The Quantified Self. https://www.ted.com/talks/gary_wolf_the_quantified_self adresinden erişilmiştir.
Toplam 39 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Aras Bozkurt Bu kişi benim 0000-0002-4520-642X

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Ekim 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA Bozkurt, A. (2018). Giyilebilir teknolojilerin eğitim amaçlı kullanımına yönelik kavramsal bir değerlendirme. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları Ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(4), 87-102.