Counting Geographical İmaginations: A Systematic Analysis Via Bibliometrix

Öz

This article examines geographical imagination using bibliometric analysis. This study, which analyzed 834 publications using Bibliometrix, seeks to answer three questions: (1) What is the profile of geographical imagination in terms of descriptive parameters such as authors, country of origin, place of publication, and citations? (2) What are the prominent research themes in the geographical imagination literature? (3) What are the emerging themes in the literature on geographical imagination that are open to further development? Between 1976 and 2025, geographical imagination exhibits a quantitative growth trend framed within an Anglo-American context. Although geopolitics, migration, and literature are identified as the most frequently studied themes in the analysis, health, pedagogy, geographic information systems, ethics, relational space, and the Global South also emerge as potential themes. The study concludes that geographical imaginations can be used to construct alternative theoretical frameworks.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Geographical imagination
• Bibliometric analysis
• Bibliometrix
• Co-occurence network
• Thematic map

Destekleyen Kurum

No

Etik Beyan

This study does not contain any ethical problems.

Teşekkür

No

Coğrafi İmgelemleri Saymak: Bibliometrix Üzerinden Sistematik Bir Analiz

Öz

Bu makale, coğrafi imgelemler literatürünü bibliyometrik olarak incelemektedir. Web of Science (WoS) platformundan elde edilen 834 yayına ilişkin bibliyometrik verileri Bibliyometrix aracılığıyla analiz eden çalışma, üç araştırma sorusuna cevap aramaktadır: (1) Coğrafi imgelemler yazar, kaynak ülke, yayın yeri, atıf gibi tanımlayıcı parametreler doğrultusunda nasıl bir görünüme sahiptir? (2) Coğrafi imgelemler literatüründe öne çıkan araştırma temaları nelerdir? (3) Coğrafi imgelemler literatüründe gelişime açık yükselen temalar hangileridir? Buna göre, 1976-2025 aralığında, coğrafi imgelem konulu yayınlar nicel bir büyüme eğilimi sergilerken; bu eğilim dergi, yazar, kurum, ülke, atıf gibi parametreler bakımından Anglo-Amerikan merkezli bir bağlam taşımaktadır. Bununla birlikte jeopolitik, göç ve edebiyat en çok çalışılan temalar olarak tespit edilirken; sağlık, pedagoji, coğrafi bilgi sistemleri, etik, ilişkisel mekan ve küresel güney başlıkları da yükselen temalar olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Çalışma, coğrafi imgelemlerin tematik çeşitlilikle kendisini gösteren bütüncül ve kapsayıcı bağlamının, alternatif kuramsal çerçevelerin inşası için model olarak kullanılabileceği ile sonuçlanmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Coğrafi imgelem
• Bibliyometrik analiz
• Bibliometrix
• Eş kelime ağı analizi
• Tematik haritalama

Destekleyen Kurum

Yok

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma, etik yönden herhangi bir sorun içermemektedir.

Teşekkür

Yok

Kaynakça

1. Abbasi, A., Wigand, R., & Hossain, L. (2014). Measuring social capital through network analysis and its influence on individual performance. Library & Information Science Research, 36(1). 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2013.08.001
2. Abdelwahab, S.I., Taha, M.M.E., Mariod, A.A., Al-Foraih, M., & Al-Asmari, H. (2024). Exploring nutraceuticals: A comprehensive examination of ınception, thematic mapping, evolution, emerging trends, and gaps. Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science, 12(1). 41-57. https://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CRNFSJ.12.1.04
3. Akbari, A. (2020). Follow the thing: Data: Contestations over data from the Global South. Antipode, 52(2). 408–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12596
4. Al-Mahfedi, M.H.K. (2011). Edward Said’s ‘imaginative geography’ and geopolitical mapping: Knowledge/power constellation and landscaping Palestine. The Criterion: An International Journal in English, 2(3). 115-140. https://the-criterion.com/V2/n3/Mahfedi.pdf
5. Alryalat, S.A., Malkawi, L., & Momani, S. (2019). Comparing bibliometric analysis using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 152. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3791/58494
6. An, N., Sharp, J., & Shaw, I. (2020). Towards a Confucian geopolitics. Dialogues in Human Geography, 11(2). 218-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820620951354
7. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4). 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
8. Asl, M.P. (2020). The politics of space: Vietnam as a communist heterotopia in Viet Thanh Nguyen’s the Refugees. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 26(1). 156 – 170. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2020-2601-11

9. Atkinson, D. (2013). Geographical imaginations, public education and the everyday worlds of Fascist Italy. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 18(5). 561–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354571X.2013.839487
10. Balogh, P., Gál, Z., Hajdú, Z., Rácz, S., & Scott, J. W. (2022). On the (geo)political salience of the geo-graphical imaginations: A central European perspective. Euroasian Geography and Economics, 63(6). 691–703. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2022.2142146
11. Bekaroğlu, E. (2016). Modern dünya-sisteminin bilgi yapıları bağlamında coğrafya disiplini için bir dışsal tarih okuması. Toplum ve Bilim, 136. 117-145.
12. Bergmann, L., & Lally, N. (2020). For geographical imagination systems. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 111(1). 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1750941
13. Bialasiewicz, L. (2008). The uncertain state(s) of Europe? European Urban and Regional Studies, 15(1). 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776407081279
14. Bialasiewicz, L., & Minca, C. (2005). Old Europe, new Europe: For a geopolitics of translation. Area, 37(4). 365–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2005.00646.x
15. Bicket, L. (2023). ‘We are Scottish nationalist and Catholic’: Death’s Bright Shadow and Catholic literary nationalism. International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church, 23(4). 346–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/1474225X.2023.2281084
16. Bourlet, M., & Lorin, M. (2018). An environmental history of literary resilience: “Environmental refugees” in the Senegal River Valley. Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 54(6). 821–834. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449855.2018.1555210
17. Bretelle-Establet, F. (2019). The worst environment in which to live in China: A Question of points of view. The legendary miasmatic far South of China challenged by local doctors in late ımperial China. In F.Bretelle-Establet, M.Gaille, M.Katouzian-Safadi, (Eds.) Making sense of health, disease, and the environment in cross-cultural history: The Arabic-Islamic world, China, Europe, and North America (pp.168-208). Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science: Springer, Cham.
18. Cosgrove, D. (1994). Contested global visions: One-world, whole-earth, and the Apollo space photographs. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 84(2). 270–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1994.tb01738.x
19. Cosgrove, D. E., & della Dora, V. (2005). Mapping global war: Los Angeles, the Pacific, and Charles Owens’s pictorial cartography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95(2). 373–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00465.x
20. Daija, P., & Kalnačs, B. (2019). The Geographical ımagination in early twentieth-century Latvian novels. Primerjalna Književnost, 42(2). 153–171. https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-TUPPEWD0?&language=eng
21. Daniels, S. (2011). Geographical imagination. Transactions of The Institute of British Geographers, 36(2). https://doi.org/182–187. 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00440.x
22. Darling, J. (2010). A city of sanctuary: the relational re-imagining of Sheffield’s asylum politics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(1). 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2009.00371.x
23. Derviş, H. (2020). Bibliometric analysis using Bibliometrix an R Package. Journal of Scientometric Research, 8(3). 156–160. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.8.3.32
24. DiCarlo, J., & DeBoom, M. (2025). Six paths of Global China: A genealogy of a contested geographical imaginary. Dialogues in Human Geography, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/20438206251345563
25. Dittmer, J. (2008). The geographical pivot of (the end of) history: Evangelical geopolitical imaginations and audience interpretation of Left Behind. Political Geography, 27(3). 280-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2007.12.002
26. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133. 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
27. Durgun, S. (2018). Geographical imaginations of the Mediterranean along dichotomies of East-West/North-South. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi, 6 (Özel Sayı), 38-61.
28. Edenborg, E. (2017). Creativity, geopolitics and ontological security: Satire on Russia and the war in Ukraine. Postcolonial Studies, 20(3). 294-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2017.1378086
29. Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J.A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?. Scientometrics, 105. 1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
30. Gerlach, J. (2015). Editing worlds: participatory mapping and a minor geopolitics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 40(2). 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12075
31. Goldstein, Y. S. K. (2021). Reading and translating towards decoloniality: critique of the Korean ethnonation in Kwŏn Chŏng-saeng’s Mongsil ŏnni. Asia Pacific Translation and Intercultural Studies, 8(1). 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23306343.2021.1889255
32. Grant, A. (2018). China’s double body: Infrastructure routes and the mapping of China’s nation-state and civi-lization-state. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 59(3-4). 378–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2019.1571370
33. Gregory, D. (1994). Geographical Imaginations. Cambridge: Blackwell.
34. Gregory, D. (1995). Imaginative geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 19(4). 447–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913259501900402
35. Gregory, D. (2004). The colonial present: Afghanistan, Palestine, and Iraq. Maiden and Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
36. Gregory, D. (2009a). Geographical imagination. In D.Gregory vd., (Eds.), The dictionary of human geography (pp. 282–285). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
37. Gregory, D. (2009b). Geographical imaginary. In D.Gregory vd., (Eds.), The dictionary of human geography (pp. 282). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
38. Görentaş, B. (2018). Coğrafya tahayyülleri: Ulusal kimlik, anlatı ve sınır. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(1), 139–143. https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.371303
39. Guan, W. W., Wilson, M. W., & Knowles, A. K. (2019). Evaluating the geographic in GIS. Geographical Review, 109(3). 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/gere.12313
40. Guleria, D., & Kaur, G. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of ecopreneurship using VOSviewer and RStudio Bibliometrix, 1989-2019. Library Hi Tech, 39. https://doi.org/1001-1024. 10.1108/LHT-09-2020-0218
41. Hall E. (2003). Reading maps of the genes: interpreting the spatiality of genetic knowledge. Health Place. 9(2).151-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1353-8292(03)00003-0
42. Harrison, S. (2009). Physical geography and human geography. In R. Kitchin, N. Thrift, (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (pp. 4152-4157). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
43. Harvey, D. (2003). Sosyal adalet ve şehir (M. Moralı, Çev.). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
44. Harvey, D. (2005). The Sociological and geographical imaginations. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 18(3/4). 211-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-006-9009-6
45. Harvey, D. (2006). Spaces of global capitalism: A theory of uneven geographical development. London and New York City: Verso.
46. Hatvany, M. G. (2017). Imagining duckland: postnationalism, waterfowl migration, and ecological commons. The Canadian Geographer, 61, 224–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12352
47. Howell, J., Rafferty, A.M., & Snaith, A. (2011). (Author)ity abroad: the life writing of colonial nurses. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48(9), 1155-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.03.010
48. Howitt, R. (2001). Constructing Engagement: Geographical education for justice within and beyond tertiary classrooms. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 25(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260120067600
49. Huang, Y., An, N., & Ge, Y. (2021). Reading China’s self-definition of international politics from intergovernmen-tal conferences. Geographical Review, 111(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167428.2020.1728193
50. Hudson, B. (2021). Arnold Bennett, geography and architecture: A literary synthesis. Geoforum, 119, 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEOFORUM.2020.12.004
51. Johnson, L., Jacobsen, M. H., & Ehrkamp, P. (2024). The work of fluid metaphors in migration research: Geographical imaginations and the politics of writing. Progress in Human Geography, 48(6), 843-860. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325241280398
52. Johnston, R. (2005). Geography – Coming apart at the seams? In N. Castree, A. Rogers, D. Sherman, (Eds.), Questioning geography: Fundamental debates (pp. 26-38). Maiden and Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
53. Jons, H., Heffernan, M., & Bond, D.W. (2022). Unity in bronze: German universities and the 250th anniversary of the Royal Society. Notes and Records of the Royal Society, 76(3). 407-443. http://doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.2020.0051 Kasbarian, J.A. (1996). Mapping Edward Said: Geography, identity, and the politics of location. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 14(5), 529–557. https://doi.org/10.1068/d140529
54. Kearns, G. (2004). The political pivot of geography. The Geographical Journal, 170(4), 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0016-7398.2004.00135.x
55. Krugman, D.W., Manoj, M., Nassereddine, G., Cipriano, G., Battelli, F., Pillay, & Schor, M. (2022). Transforming global health education during the COVID-19 era: Perspectives from a transnational collective of global health students and recent graduates. BMJ Global Health, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010698
56. Kumar, N., & Pradhan, S. (2024). Exploring the ethical and aesthetic representations of wetlands in literary texts: A comparative ecocritical study. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 30 (2). 21-34. http://journalarticle.ukm.my/24407/
57. Li, W., Zhou, H., Lu, Z., & Kamarthi, S. (2024). Navigating the evolution of digital twins research through keyword co-occurence network analysis. Sensors, 24(4). 1202. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24041202
58. Liao, W. (2024). The Bubble Metropolis: Manhattan Island Crises in contemporary science fiction. Island Studies Journal 20(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.24043/001c.94618
59. Linnenluecke, M. K., Marrone, M., & Singh, A. K. (2019). Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management, 45(2), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896219877678
60. Liu, B., Zhou, C., Ma, H. & Gong, B. (2023). Mapping the youth soccer: A bibliometrix analysis using R-tool. Digital Health, 9, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231183550
61. Lowenthal, D. (1961). Geography, experience and imagination: Towards a geographical epistemology. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 61, 241–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1961.tb00377.x
62. MacDonald, F. (2007). Anti-Astropolitik — outer space and the orbit of geography. Progress in Human Geography, 31(5), 592-615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507081492
63. Madhu, S., & Jose, S. (2025). Black geographies and trans-corporeality: Terrains of toxicity in cullud wattah. GeoHumanities, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/2373566X.2025.2536051
64. Magrane, E. (2025). Imagining alternative climate futures in higher education. Geographical Research, 63(1), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12678
65. Mahony, M. (2016). Picturing the future-conditional: montage and the global geographies of climate change. Geo: Geography and Environment, 3(2). 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/geo2.19
66. Märtsin, M. (2023). Homemaking away from home: a semiotic cultural psychology perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1215654
67. Massey, D. (1999) Space-Time, science and the relationship between physical geography and human geography. Transactions of The Institute of British Geographers, 24, 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-2754.1999.00261.x
68. Matthews, J.A., & Herbert, D.T. (2008). Geography. A very short ıntroduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Megoran, N. (2023). Making sense of the Ukraine war: Geographers should not be afraid of geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 48(4). 821 – 825. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12626
69. Messina, G. (2021). Cesare Pavese’s Il campo di granturco: geographical trails. Cultural Geographies, 29(3), 465-471. https://doi.org/10.1177/14744740211053607
70. Nikunen, K. (2016). Hopes of hospitality: Media, refugee crisis and the politics of a place. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 19(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877914530314
71. Noxolo, P., & Preziuso, M. (2011). Postcolonial Imaginations: Approaching a “Fictionable” world through the novels of Maryse Condé and Wilson Harris. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(1), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2011.628251
72. O’Sullivan, D., Bergmann, L., & Thatcher, J. E. (2017). Spatiality, Maps, and mathematics in critical human geography: Toward a repetition with difference. The Professional Geographer, 70(1). 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2017.1326081
73. Purcell, D., & Rogelj, B. (2025). Constructing the U.S. in Slovenian news media. GeoJournal, 90. 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-024-11269-2
74. Rabbiosi, C. (2025). Rethinking Europeanness through travelling imaginative geographies. Mobilities. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2025.2485294
75. Robins, D. J. (2019). Imagining London: The role of the geographical imagination in migrant subjectivity and decision-making. Area, 51(4). 728-735. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12519
76. Rodríguez, M.S., Ortega Alvarez, A.M., & Arango-Vasquez, L. (2022). Worldwide trends in the scientific production on soccer players market value, a bibliometric analysis using bibliometrix R-tool. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 28(5-6). 415–440. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-02-2022-0015
77. Roelofsen, M., & Carter-White, R. (2022). Virtual reality as a spatial prompt in geography learning and teaching. Geographical Research, 60(4). 625-636. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12551
78. Rommetveit, K., Pereira, A.G., & Pedrosa, T. (2016). Digital globes: Layers of meaning and technology, redefining geographies and communities. In A. Delgado, (Eds.), Technoscience and citizenship: Ethics and governance in the digital society (pp. 129-142). Berlin: Springer.
79. Said, E. (2013). Oryantalizm (B. Ülner, Çev.). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
80. Saunders, R. A. (2019). Reimagining the colonial wilderness: ‘Africa’, imperialism and the geographical legerdemain of the Vorrh. Cultural Geographies, 26(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474018811669
81. Saunders, R.A. (2024). Genealogical journeys, geographical imagination, and (popular) geopolitics in who do you think you are? Social & Cultural Geography, 25(5). 698–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2023.2177714 Sharp, J. (2011). A subaltern critical geopolitics of the war on terror: postcolonial security in Tanzania. Geoforum, 42(3), 297-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.04.005
82. Shim, D. (2014). Remote sensing place: Satellite ımages as visual spatial ımaginaries. Geoforum, 51, 152-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.11.002
83. Sidaway, J. D., & Pryke, M. (2000). The strange geographies of “emerging markets.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 25(2), 187–201. https://www.jstor.org/stable/623191?seq=1
84. Sjöberg, J., & D’Onofrio, A. (2020). Moving global horizons: Imagining selfhood, mobility and futurities through creative practice in ethnographic research. Culture & Psychology, 26(4). 732-748. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X20922141
85. Smith, E. (2017). Remapping Capricornia: Xavier Herbert’s cosmopolitan ımagination. Cultural Studies Review, 23(2), 126-140. https://doi.org/10.5130/csr.v23i2.5822
86. Stratford, E., & Langridge, C. (2012). Critical artistic interventions into the geopolitical spaces ofislands. Social & Cultural Geography, 13(7), 821–843. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2012.728615
87. Tanrıkulu, M. (2025). Türkiye’nin coğrafi bölge ayrımına kültürel, etimolojik, etnolojik ve eleştirel bir yaklaşım. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Karatekin Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(2), 145-190. https://doi.org/10.57115/karefad.1716818
88. Thompson, M. (2017). Migration decision-making: A geographical ımaginations approach. Area, 49, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12292
89. Vegliò, S. (2023). Subverting geopolitics: The reinventionof geography in post-revolutionary Mexico. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 48(2), 439–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12596
90. Walkington, H., Dyer, S., Solem, M., Haigh, M., & Waddington, S. (2017). A capabilities approach to higher education: geocapabilities and implications for geography curricula. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2017.1379060
91. Wang, J., & Zhang, S. (2022). Cross-cultural learning: A visualized bibliometric analysis based on Bibliometrix from 2002 to 2021. Mobile Information Systems, 2022, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7478223
92. Wang, K. (2021). Reimagining the global food regimes for relational spaces. Area, 53, 637–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12714
93. Watson, A. (2023). Radio geopolitics: Imaginative geographies of Europe's migration ‘crisis’ on BBC Radio 4. Political Geography, 107, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2023.102993
94. Watson, A. (2024a). The production of ‘From Our Own Correspondent’ on BBC Radio 4: A popular geopolitical analysis. Area, 56(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12918
95. Watson, A. (2024b). Listening to Europe's migration ‘crisis’: the discursive, affective and imaginative responses of audiences to BBC Radio 4 broadcasts. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 49(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12670
96. Web of Science. (2025, 1 Eylül). https://a8f59890210bb2a36cc265c34c80a801c14e01d5.vetisonline.com/wos/woscc/basic-search
97. White, K., & Ferguson, F. (2019). The silence, exile, and cunning of “I”: An analysis of bildungsroman as the place model in the work of Charlotte Brontë and James Joyce. Education Sciences, 9(4), 2-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040248
98. Wright, J. K. (1947). Terrae incognitae: The place of the imagination in geography. Annals of the Association of American Geogaphers, 37, 1–15. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2561211?seq=1
99. Yazan, S., & Bekaroğlu, E. (2024). Claiming civilizations: The geographical imagination of blue anatolianism in modern Türkiye. GeoJournal, 89, 206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-024-11212-5
100. Yazan, S., Bekaroglu, E., Arı, Y., & Özgür, E. M. (2024). Coğrafi imgelemler: Mavi Anadoluculuk’ta kimlik, kültür ve mekân. Ege Coğrafya Dergisi, 33(2), 169-195. https://doi.org/10.51800/ecd.1545901
101. Yoon, H., & Kim, H. (2019). Seeking a sense of belonging: The exclusion of female doctorate holders in South Korea and the US. Gender, Place & Culture, 26(5). 638–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2018.1555141 Zaragocin, S. (2023). Geographies of the Global South and the hemispheric scale. Dialogues in Human Geography, 14(2), 230-233. https://doi.org/10.1177/20438206231179227
102. Zhang, J., Yu, Q., Zheng, F., Long, C., Lu, Z., & Duan, Z. (2016). Comparing keywords plus of WOS and author keywords: A case study of patient adherence research. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(4), 967–972. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23437
103. Zhao, J., & Li, M. (2023). Worldwide trends in prediabetes from 1985 to 2022: A bibliometric analysis using bibliometrix R-tool. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1072521