Cilt: 36 Sayı: 1 1 Mayıs 2003
  • Aslıhan Erman Aslanoğlu
  • Ömer Kutlu
PDF İndir
EN

Öz

The aim of this study is to evaluate, through the use of rubric, the student’s presentational behaviours which is one of the ways of expression of their high level thinking. performance tasks and get prepared for it in terms of a presentation. The presentations were evaluated by the teacher and the students in class. Besides, each presentation was recorded in a camera and was displayed to the science teachers at school for their evaluations. At the end of the study, the contribution to education of evaluation by “rubric” was asked to the students and the teachers who took part in the research, via a questionnaire. According to the results of the analysis made, it has been determined that there was no significant difference between the mean of the scores given by the viewer students and the teachers on each of the three performance tasks and the avarage of the scores they have given on the entire performance tasks; and that there was a high coherence in the scores given for the presentations by the teachers; and that these points were considered to be consistent. Furthermore, a relationship at 0.72 level was found between the marks which the students who made presentations were given by the class teachers and the marks they took from the first semester science lesson; as well as a relationship at 0.49 level between the points the spectator students gave for the presentations and the first semester science lesson marks of the students who made presentations.The results of survey stated that the teachers and the students believe that the use of rubric brings contribution to education

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

-

Yazarlar

Aslıhan Erman Aslanoğlu Bu kişi benim

Ömer Kutlu Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Mayıs 2003

Gönderilme Tarihi

1 Mayıs 2003

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2003 Cilt: 36 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Erman Aslanoğlu, A., & Kutlu, Ö. (2003). Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 36(1), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000000078
AMA
1.Erman Aslanoğlu A, Kutlu Ö. AÜEBFD. 2003;36(1):25-36. doi:10.1501/Egifak_0000000078
Chicago
Erman Aslanoğlu, Aslıhan, ve Ömer Kutlu. 2003. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES) 36 (1): 25-36. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000000078.
EndNote
Erman Aslanoğlu A, Kutlu Ö (01 Mayıs 2003) Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES) 36 1 25–36.
IEEE
[1]A. Erman Aslanoğlu ve Ö. Kutlu, AÜEBFD, c. 36, sy 1, ss. 25–36, May. 2003, doi: 10.1501/Egifak_0000000078.
ISNAD
Erman Aslanoğlu, Aslıhan - Kutlu, Ömer. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES) 36/1 (01 Mayıs 2003): 25-36. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000000078.
JAMA
1.Erman Aslanoğlu A, Kutlu Ö. AÜEBFD. 2003;36:25–36.
MLA
Erman Aslanoğlu, Aslıhan, ve Ömer Kutlu. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), c. 36, sy 1, Mayıs 2003, ss. 25-36, doi:10.1501/Egifak_0000000078.
Vancouver
1.Aslıhan Erman Aslanoğlu, Ömer Kutlu. AÜEBFD. 01 Mayıs 2003;36(1):25-36. doi:10.1501/Egifak_0000000078

Cited By

Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 lisansını kullanmaktadır.