Adaptation of Helicopter Parenting and Autonomy Supportive Behaviors to Turkish: Validity and Reliability Study

Öz

The aim of this study is to adapt the Helicopter Parenting and Autonomy Supportive Behaviour Scale developed by Schiffrin, Liss, Miles-McLean, Geary, Erchull, and Tashner to Turkish and to examine its validity and reliability. The original form of the scale consists of 15 items and two dimensions: Helicopter Parenting and Autonomy Supportive Behaviours. After communicating with the original authors the translation process the 6-point likert form was administered to 381 (78%) females, 107 (22%) males total of 488 university students. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to obtain evidence for the validity of the scale. The scale was found to fit well with the two dimensional structure as in the original form (χ2 = 223.02, df = 87, χ2/df = 2.56, p < .001, RMSEA = .060, SRMR = .070, CFI = .97, NNFI = .96, NFI = .95, GFI = .98). To establish reliability, Cronbach Alpha internal consistency coefficient has been calculated. The Cronbach Alpha coefficient was α = .80 for the helicopter parenting dimension and α = .80 for the autonomy supportive behaviours dimension. Correlations were found to vary between .31-.64. In all items, a significant difference was found between the means of the upper-lower 27% groups. The results yield that, Helicopter Parenting and Autonomy Supportive Behaviour Scale consisting of 15 items is a valid and reliable instrument to examine helicopter parenting and autonomy supportive behaviours of parents from the perspective of university students in Turkey.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• helicopter parenting
• autonomy support
• validity
• reliability

Helikopter Anababalık ve Özerklik Destekleyici Davranışlar Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı Schiffrin, Liss, Miles-McLean, Geary, Erchull ve Tashner tarafından geliştirilen Helikopter Anababalık ve Özerklik Destekleyici Davranışlar Ölçeği’nin (HAÖDD) Türkçeye kazandırılması, geçerlik ve güvenirliğinin incelenmesidir. Ölçeğin özgün formu helikopter anababalık ve özerklik destekleyici davranışlar olmak üzere iki alt boyut ve 15 maddeden oluşmaktadır. Yazarlarla bağlantı, onay alma ve çeviri süreçlerinin ardından ölçeğin uyarlama süreçlerine uygun son biçimi altılı likert form olarak 381 (%78) kadın 107 (%22) erkek olmak üzere toplam 488 üniversite öğrencisine uygulanmış ve sonuçlar değerlendirilmiştir. Ölçeğin geçerliği için kanıt elde etmek amacıyla yapılan doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda özgün ölçekte belirlenen iki boyutlu yapıyla iyi uyum gösterdiği belirlenmiştir (χ2 = 223.02, df = 87, χ2/df = 2.56, p < .001, RMSEA = .060, SRMR = .070, CFI = .97, NNFI = .96, NFI = .95, GFI = .98). Ölçeğin güvenirliğine yönelik kanıtlar bulmak amacıyla Cronbach alfa iç tutarlılık katsayısı hesaplanmış ve helikopter anababalık boyutu için α = .80 ve özerklik destekleyici davranışlar boyutu için α = .80 bulunmuştur. Maddelerin, toplam puanı yordamasına ilişkin madde-toplam korelasyonları incelendiğinde korelasyonların .31-.64 arasında değiştiği görülmüştür. Tüm maddelerde, üst-alt %27’lik grupların ortalamaları arasında anlamlı fark bulunmuştur. Sonuç olarak 15 maddeden oluşan Helikopter Anababalık ve Özerklik Destekleyici Davranışlar Ölçeği’nin Türkiye’deki üniversite öğrencilerinin bakış açısıyla anababaların helikopter anababalık ve özerklik destekleyici davranışlarını ölçmede geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu görülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• helikopter anababalık
• özerklik desteği
• geçerlik
• güvenirlik

Kaynakça

1. Ashton-James, C. E., Kushlev, K., and Dunn, E. W. (2013). Parents reap what they sow: Child-centrism and parental well-being. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(6), 635-642. doi: 10.1177/1948550613479804
2. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2020). Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analizi El Kitabı: İstatistik, Araştırma Deseni SPSS Uygulamaları ve Yorum. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
3. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Şekercioğlu, G., ve Çokluk, Ö. (2018). Sosyal Bilimler için Çok Değişkenli İstatistik: SPSS ve Lisrel Uygulamaları (5. Basım). Ankara: PEGEM Akademi.
4. Chae, M. O., Yim, S. Y., Lee, Y. H., Kim, J. H., and Oh, J. (2016). Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the helicopter parenting scale. Child Health Nursing Research, 22(3), 207-214. doi: 10.4094/chnr.2016.22.3.207
5. Cline, F. W., and Fay, J. (1990). Parenting with love and logic: Teaching children responsibility. Colorado Spring: Pinon Press.
6. Cui, M., Darling, C. A., Coccia, C., Fincham, F. D., and May, R. W. (2019). Indulgent parenting, helicopter parenting, and well-being of parents and emerging adults. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(3), 860-871. doi: 10.1007/s10826-018-01314-3
7. Darlow, V., Norvilitis, J. M., and Schuetze, P. (2017). The relationship between helicopter parenting and adjustment to college. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(8), 2291-2298. doi: 10.1007/s10826-017-0751-3
8. Deci, E. L., and Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182. doi: 10.1037/a0012801

9. Earle, A. M., and LaBrie, J. W. (2016). The upside of helicopter parenting: Engaging parents to reduce first-year student drinking. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 53(3), 319-330. doi: 10.1080/19496 591.2016.11651 08.
10. Ertuna, E. (2016). The Turkish translation, and reliability, validity study of helicopter parenting instrument, Yüksek lisans tezi, Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi, Kuzey Kıbrıs.
11. Fraenkel, J.R and Wallen, N.E (2009). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (7th ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill.
12. Grolnick, W. S., and Ryan, R. M. (1989). Parent styles associated with children’s self-regulation and competence in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 143–154. doi:10.1037/0022-0663. 81.2.143.
13. Grolnick, W. S., Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L. (1991). Inner resources for school achievement: Motivational mediators of children's perceptions of their parents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 508. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.83.4.508
14. Hind, B. Z. (2016). Conceptualization, measurement, and effects of helicopter parenting on college students from the millennial generation. Unpublished Dissertation. Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo.http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2931&context=dissertations
15. Hirsch, D., and Goldberger, E. (2010). Hovering practices in and outside the classroom. About Campus, 14(6), 30-32. doi: 10.1002/abc.20007
16. Hong, M.-H., and Doh, H.-S. (2018). Effects of helicopter parenting on depression in female emerging adults: examining the mediating role of adaptive and maladaptive perfectionism. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 39(6), 143-158. doi: 10.5723/kjcs.2018.39.6.143
17. Hwang, W., and Jung, E. (2020). Parenting Practices, Parent–Child Relationship, and Perceived Academic Control in College Students. Journal of Adult Development, 1-13. doi: 10.1007/s10804-020-09346-0
18. International Test Commission (ITC). (2018). Guidelines for translating and adapting tests. International Journal of Testing, 18(2), 101–134. doi: 10.1080/15305058.2017.1398166.
19. Jung, E., Hwang, W., Kim, S., Sin, H., Zhao, Z., Zhang, Y., and Park, J. H. (2020). Helicopter Parenting, Autonomy Support, and Student Wellbeing in the United States and South Korea. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 29(2), 358-373. doi: 10.1007/s10826-019-01601-7
20. Kenney‐Benson, G. A., and Pomerantz, E. M. (2005). The role of mothers' use of control in children's perfectionism: Implications for the development of children's depressive symptoms. Journal of Personality, 73(1), 23-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00303.x
21. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (3th ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
22. Kouros, C. D., Pruitt, M. M., Ekas, N. V., Kiriaki, R., and Sunderland, M. (2017). Helicopter parenting, autonomy support, and college students’ mental health and well-being: The moderating role of sex and ethnicity. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(3), 939-949. doi: 10.1007/s10826-016-0614-3
23. LeMoyne, T., and Buchanan, T. (2011). Does “hovering” matter? Helicopter parenting and its effect on well-being. Sociological Spectrum, 31(4), 399-418. doi: 10.1080/02732173.2011.574038
24. Liu, D., Wang, Z., Yang, X., Zhang, Y., Zhang, R., and Lin, S. (2019). Perceived autonomy-supportive parenting and internet addiction: respiratory sinus arrhythmia moderated the mediating effect of basic psychological need satisfaction. Current Psychology, 1-10. doi: 10.1007/s12144-019-00485-6
25. Love, H., May, R. W., Cui, M., and Fincham, F. D. (2020). Helicopter parenting, self-control, and school burnout among emerging adults. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 29(2), 327-337. doi: 10.1007/s10826-019-01560-z
26. McGinley, M. (2018). Can hovering hinder helping? Examining the joint effects of helicopter parenting and attachment on prosocial behaviors and empathy in emerging adults. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 179(2), 102-115. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2018.1438985
27. Mertler, C. A., and Reinhart, R. V. (2017). Advanced and Multivariate Statistical Methods: Practical Application and Interpretation (6th ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis. Montgomery, N. (2010). The negative impact of helicopter parenting on personality. Poster session presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Psychological Science, Boston
28. Nunnally, J., and Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
29. Odenweller, K. G., Booth-Butterfield, M., and Weber, K. (2014). Investigating helicopter parenting, family environments, and relational outcomes for millennials. Communication Studies, 65(4), 407–425. doi: 10.1080/10510974.2013.811434
30. Okray, Z. (2016). Helicopter parenting and related issues: Psychological well being, basic psychological needs and depression on university students. Current Research in Education, 2(3), 165-173.
31. Padilla-Walker, L. M., and Nelson, L. J. (2012). Black hawk down?: Establishing helicopter parenting as a distinct construct from other forms of parental control during emerging adulthood. Journal of Adolescence, 35(5), 1177-1190. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.03.007
32. Reed, K., Duncan, J. M., Lucier-Greer, M., Fixelle, C., and Ferraro, A. J. (2016). Helicopter parenting and emerging adult self-efficacy: Implications for mental and physical health. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(10), 3136-3149.
33. Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68
34. Schiffrin, H. H., Liss, M., Miles-McLean, H., Geary, K. A., Erchull, M. J., and Tashner, T. (2014). Helping or hovering? The effects of helicopter parenting on college students’ well-being. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23(3), 548-557. doi: 10.1007/s10826-013-9716-3
35. Segrin, C., Woszidlo, A., Givertz, M., Bauer, A., and Taylor Murphy, M. (2012). The association between overparenting, parent‐child communication, and entitlement and adaptive traits in adult children. Family Relations, 61(2), 237-252. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00689.x
36. Soenens, B., and Vansteenkiste, M. (2010). A theoretical upgrade of the concept of parental psychological control: Proposing new insights on the basis of self-determination theory. Developmental Review, 30(1), 74-99. doi: 1016/j.dr.2009.11.001
37. Tabachnick, B. G., and Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th ed.). London: Pearson.
38. Yılmaz, H. (2019). İyi ebeveyn, çocuğu için her zaman her şeyi yapan ebeveyn değildir: Algılanan Helikopter Ebeveyn Tutum Ölçeği (AHETÖ) geliştirme çalışması. Erken Çocukluk Çalışmaları Dergisi, 3(1), 3-31. doi: 10.24130/eccd-jecs.1967201931114