Institutionalization at Universities: Case Study of the Focal Institution and the Spawning Institutions

Öz

The purpose of this study is to analyze the institutionalization of (blinded) A University Faculty of Education as a focal institution, and (blinded) B University Faculty of Education and (blinded) C University Faculty of Education as spawning institutions where the faculty members serve. The common feature of these academics is that they graduated from any doctoral program of (blinded) A University in the past. In this context, views of faculty members on institutionalization of universities have been presented. “Case study” was employed in the research. The study group of this research is comprised of faculty members who have been working in focal institution (blinded) A University, and spawning institutions (blinded) B University and (blinded) C University in Turkey. According to research results, faculty members create hierarchies based on academic titles. Conflicts among faculty members in spawning faculties are resolved within the department by “arbitration.” The dominant organizational decision-making method employed by faculty members within their own faculties was “consensus.” Faculty members agree that graduates from their doctorate programs should be employed at the same faculty. The culture of the spawning faculties is similar to the culture of the teacher high school and the focal institution.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Institutionalization
• focal institution
• spawning institution
• higher education
• academics

Proje Numarası

16L0630004

Üniversitelerde Kurumsallaşma: Odak Kurum ve Yavru Kurumlar Üzerine Durum Çalışması

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi’nin odak kurum olarak, Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi ile Kastamonu Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi’nin öğretim üyelerinin hizmet verdiği yavru kurumlar olarak kurumsallaşmasını incelemektir. Bu akademisyenlerin ortak özelliği, geçmişte Gazi Üniversitesi’nin herhangi bir doktora programından mezun olmalarıdır. Bu kapsamda öğretim üyelerinin üniversitelerin kurumsallaşmasına ilişkin görüşleri sunulmuştur. Araştırmada durum çalışması kullanılmıştır. Bu araştırmanın çalışma grubunu Türkiye’de odak kurum olan Gazi Üniversitesi ile yavru kurumlar olan Ahi Evran Üniversitesi ve Kastamonu Üniversitesi’nde görev yapan öğretim üyeleri oluşturmaktadır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre öğretim üyeleri akademik unvanlara göre sıradizinler (hiyerarşiler) oluşturmaktadır. Yavru fakültelerde öğretim üyeleri arasındaki anlaşmazlıklar, bölüm içinde arabuluculuk ile çözülmektedir. Öğretim üyelerinin kendi fakültelerinde kullandıkları baskın örgütsel karar verme yöntemi fikir birliğidir. Doktora programlarından mezun olanların aynı fakültede istihdam edilmesi konusunda öğretim üyeleri hemfikirdir. Yavru fakültelerin kültürü, öğretmen okulu ve odak kurumun kültürüne benzemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kurumsallaşma
• odak kurum
• yavru kurum
• yükseköğretim
• akademisyenler

Destekleyen Kurum

Ankara Üniversitesi BAP Koordinatörlüğü

Proje Numarası

16L0630004

Teşekkür

Nitel görüşmelere katılan öğretim üyelerine ve Ankara Üniversitesi BAP Koordinatörlüğü ekibine teşekkür ederim.

Kaynakça

1. Achacoso, M. V. (2002). “What do you mean my grade is not an A?” An investigation of academic entitlement, causal attributions, and self-regulation in college students (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation).
2. Akyuz, Y. (2010). Turk egitim tarihi: M.O. 1000-M.S. 2000. [Turkish educational history: BC 1000-AD 2000]. (17. Baski). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
3. Alexander, E. R. (2005). Institutional transformation and planning: From institutionalization theory to institutional design. Planning Theory, 4(3), 209-223.
4. Altbach, P. G., Yudkevich, M., and Rumbley, L. E. (2015). Academic inbreeding: Local challenge, global problem. Asia Pasific Education Review, 16(3), 317-330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9391-8
5. Apaydin, F. (2009). Kurumsal teori ve isletmelerin kurumsallasmasi [Institutional theory and institutionalization of organizations]. Cumhuriyet Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Dergisi, 10(1), 1-22.
6. Baldridge, J. V., Curtis, D. V., Ecker, G. P., and Riley, G. L. (1977/2000). Alternative models of governance in higher education. In M. C. Brown II (Ed.), Organization & governance in higher education. (5th Edition). (p. 128-142). Boston: Perarson Custom Publishing.
7. Barley, S. R., and Tolbert, P. S. (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies, 18(1), 93-117.
8. Bayram, S. (2012). Osmanli devletinde ekonomik hayatin yerel unsurlari: Ahilik teskilati ve esnaf loncalari. [Local elements of economical life in Ottoman Empire: Ahi community and craftsmen guilds]. Istanbul Universitesi Ilahiyat Fakultesi Dergisi, 21, 81-115.

9. Benneworth, P., de Boer, H., and Jongbloed, B. (2015). Between good intentions and urgent stakeholder pressures: Institutionalizing the universities’ third mission in the Swedish context. European Journal of Higher Education, 5(3), 280-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2015.1044549
10. Berger, P. L. ve Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Penguin Books Ltd.
11. Bess, J. L., and Dee, J. R. (2008). Understanding college and university organization: Theories for effective policy and practice. Volume I: The state of the system. Virginia: Stylus Publishing.
12. Cai, Y., Pinheiro, R., Geschwind, L., and Aarrevaara, T. (2016). Towards a novel conceptual framework for understanding mergers in higher education. European Journal of Higher Education, 6(1), 7-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2015.1099457
13. Cai, Y., Zhang, H., and Pinheiro, R. (2015). Institutionalization of technology transfer organizations in Chinese universities. European Journal of Higher Education, 5(3), 297-315. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2015.1044548
14. Cardilini, A. P. A., Risely, A., and Richardson, M . F. (2020). Supervising the PhD: Identifying common mismatches in expectations between candidate and supervisor to imprive research training outcomes. BioRxiv- The Preprint Server for Biology, https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.20.958520
15. Cardona, L., Pardo, M., and Dasi, A. (2020). The institutional isomorphism in the context of organizational changes in higher education institutions. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 6(1), 61-73. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.v6i1.639
16. Cavana, R. Y., Crozier, R. A., Park, N. S., and Pillai, A. P. (1996). Attitudes towards reclassifying academic titles in New Zealand universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 18(1), 93-106.
17. Chapman, B. J., and Goldberg, L. R. (2017). Act-frequency signatures of the Big Five. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 201-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.049
18. Civilidag, A., and Sargin, N. (2013). Academics’ mobbing and job satisfaction levels. The Online Journal of Counseling and Education, 2(2), 55-66.
19. Coates, H., Dobson, I., Edwards, D., Friedman, T., Godegebuure, L., and Meek, L. (2009). The attractiveness of the Australian academic profession: A comparative analysis. Melbourne: LH Martin Institute, University of Melbourne & Australian Council for Educational Research & Educational Policy Institute.
20. Colbeck, C. L. (2002). Assessing institutionalization of curricular and pedagogical reforms. Research in Higher Education, 43(4), 397- 421.
21. Contrafatto, M. (2014). The institutionalization of social and environmental reporting: An Italian narrative. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39, 414-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.01.002
22. Corazza, L., Cisi, M., Scagnelli, S. D., and Cravero, I. (2018). The accounting of cultural heritage assets of Italian universities' museums: Groking the third mission. NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
23. Creswell, J. W. (2016). 30 essential skills for the qualitative researcher. CA: Sage Publications.
24. DiMaggio, P. J., and Powell, W. W. (1991b). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In W. W. Powell, and DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. (p. 63-82). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
25. Doyle, C., and Hind, P. (1998). Occupational stress, burnout and job status in female academics. Gender, Work & Organization, 5(2), 67-82.
26. Durnali, M., and Kosar, D. (2019). An analysis of the goals of a distance education centre, a case study of a state university. Balikesir University The Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 22(42), 85-109.
27. Duru, P., Ocaktan, M. E., Celen, U., and Orsal, O. (2018). The effect of workplace bullying perception on psychological symptoms: A structural equation approach. Safety and Health at Work, 9, 210-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2017.06.010
28. Ekström, M. (1992). Causal explanation of social action. The Contribution of Max Weber and of critical realism to a generative view of causal explanation in social science. Acta Sociologica, 35, 107-122.
29. Fidan, T. (2017). Kurumsalcilik yaklasimlari ve yeni kurumsalcilik perspektifinden egitim orgutleri [Institutionalist approaches and educational organizations through the perspective of new institutionalism]. Medeniyet Egitim Arastirmalari Dergisi, 1(1), 1-16.
30. Formentelli, M., and Hajek, J. (2016). Address practices in academic interactions in a pluricentric language: Australian English, American English, and British English. Pragmatics, 26(4), 631-652. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.26.4.05for
31. Gizir, S., and Simsek, H. (2005). Communication in an academic context. Higher Education, 50, 197-221.
32. Gmelch, W. H., and Burns, J. S. (1994). Sources of stress for academic department chairpersons. Journal of Educational Administration, 32(1), 79-94.
33. Goldberg, L. R. (2001). Analyses of Digman’s child-personality data: Derivation of big-five factor scores from each of six samples. Journal of Personality, 69(5), 709-743.
34. Griffiths, J., and Yager, J. (2019). Administrative supervision. In S. G. de Golia, and K. M. Corcoran (Eds.), Supervision in psychiatric practice: Practical approaches across venues and providers (p. 245-250). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Publishing.
35. Haddad, A. E., AlSaleh, D., Speece, M., and Al-Hares, O. M. (2017). Determination of ethical acceptability among business instructors: The case of Kuwait. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 14, 121-146. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3097353
36. Hall, P. A., and Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, XLIV, 936-957.
37. Hibbing, J. R. (1988). Legislative institutionalization with illustrations from the British House of Commons. American Journal of Political Science, 32(3), 681-712.
38. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., and Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. US: McGraw Hill.
39. Hopf, C. (2004). Qualitative interviews: An overview. In U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, and I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (p. 203-208). London: SAGE Publications.
40. Horta, H. (2013). Deeping our understanding of academic inbreeding effects on research information exchange and scientific output: new insights for academic based research. Higher Education, 65, 487-510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9559-7
41. Horta, H., and Yudkevich, M. (2016). The role of academic inbreeding in developing higher education systems: Challenges and possible solutions. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 113, 363-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.06.039
42. Inanc, O., and Tuncer, O. (2011). The effect of academic inbreeding on scientific effectiveness. Scientometrics, 88, 885-898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0415-9
43. Jepperson, R. L. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects and institutionalism. In W. W. Powell, and P. J. Dimaggio (Eds.). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (p. 143-163). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44. Jordan, G. (1990). Policy community realism versus “New” institutionalist ambiguity. Political Studies, XXXVIII, 470-484.
45. Julián, M., and Bonavia T. (2020). Understanding unethical behaviors at the university level: A multiple regression analysis. Ethics & Behavior, DOI: 10.1080/10508422.2020.1723101
46. Kavili Arap, S. (2011). Turkiye’de rektor belirleme sureci ve “mutevelli heyeti” tartismalari [The discussion of the procedure for the designation of rectors and the Board of Trustees in Turkey]. Memleket Siyaset Yonetim, 6(16), 1-32.
47. Kilduff, M., and Angelmar, R. (1989). Shared history or shared culture? The effects of time, culture, and performance on institutionalization in simulated organizations. Paper presented at the Organization and Management Theory Division of the National Academy of Management Meetings, Washington, DC.
48. Kocel, T. (2011). Isletme yoneticiligi. [Management of Business]. (13. Baski). Istanbul: Beta Basim A.S.
49. Kurt, T., Gur, B. S., and Celik, Z. (2017). Necessity for reforming Turkish higher education system and possibility of governance of state universities by the board of trustees. Education and Science, 42, 49-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2017.6253
50. Kurtulaj, V. (2021). Power relations and exercise in educational institutions. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, Early View, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.30964/auebfd.809552
51. Kurtyilmaz, Y. (2019). Adaptation of academic entitlement questionnaire. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 9(2), 314-351. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.577234
52. Lawrence, T. B., Winn, M. I., and Jennings, D. P. (2001). The temporal dynamics of institutionalization. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 624-644.
53. Lebbadi, T. (2015, July). Role of institutional theory for implementation information technology to enhance safety management in shipping companies. Paper presented at the Science and Information Conference, London, UK. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7237317/metrics#metrics
54. Li, Y. (2017). A semiotic theory of institutionalization. Academy of Management Review, 42(3), 520-547. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0274
55. Lunenburg, F. C., and Ornstein, A. C. (2013). Egitim yonetimi (G. Arastaman, Cev.). Ankara: Nobel Yayin Dagitim.
56. March, J. G., and Olsen, J. P. (1995). Democratic governance. New York: Free Press.
57. Manning, K. (2013). Organizational theory in higher education. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
58. Marsh, D. J., Foster, K., and Scott, C. D. (2015). Match that PhD. Careers, 523, 247.
59. Mewburn, I. (2011). Troubling talk: Assembling the PhD candidate. Studies in Continuing Education, 33(3), 321-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2011.585151
60. Meyer J., and Rowan B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Academy Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
61. Miles, M. B., and Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2nd Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
62. Morse, J. M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Methodology Corner, 40(1), 120-123.
63. Murwonugroho, W. (2019, January). Strengthening visual media literacy in the discovery of style and creativity in packaging design for chips. Paper presented at the meeting of the 1st Workshop on Multimedia Education, Learning, Assessment and its Implementation in Game and Gamification in conjunction with COMDEV 2018, Indonesia.
64. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65. Núñez, J., and Leiva, B. (2018). The effects of a tripartite ‘participative’ university senate on university governance: The case of the University of Chile. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(6), 749-767. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2017.1418832
66. O’Donnell, G. (1996). Illusions about consolidation. Journal of Democracy, 7, 34-51.
67. blinded blinded blinded blinded blinded blinded
68. Panebianco, A. (1988). Political parties: Organization and power. New York: Cambridge University Press.
69. Parsons, T. (1956). Suggestions for a sociological approach to the theory of organizations-I. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1(1), 63-85.
70. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. (3rd edition). California: SAGE Publications.
71. Pimlott, N. (2019). Family physicians of the future redux. Canadian Family Physician, 65, 454.
72. Pinheiro, R. (2012). In the region, for the region? A comparative study of the institutionalisation of the regional mission of universities (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). University of Oslo Faculty of Educational Sciences, Oslo.
73. Pinheiro, R., Langa, P. V., and Pausits, A. (2015). The institutionalization of universities’ third mission: introduction to the special issue. European Journal of Higher Education, 5(3), 227-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2015.1044551
74. Powell, J. J. W., and Dusdal, J. (2017). Science Production in Germany, France, Belgium, and Luxembourg: Comparing the Contributions of Research Universities and Institutes to Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, and Health. Minerva, 55, 413-434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-017-9327-z
75. Saar, J. (2019). Tackling corruption in Western and Russian legal cultures. Trames, 23(4), 455-470. https//doi.org/10.3176/tr.2019.4.05
76. Saglam, A. (2007). Gaziantep ogretmen okullari. [Teachers school of Gaziantep]. (Unpublished master thesis). Nigde University Institute of Social Sciences, Nigde.
77. Scott, W. R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(4), 493-511.
78. Schultz, F., and Wehmeier, S. (2010). Institutionalization of corporate social responsibility within corporate communications: Combining institutional, sensemaking and communication perspectives. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 15(1), 9-29. DOI: 10.1108/13563281011016813
79. Schutz, A. (1982). The problem of social reality. Collected papers I. Netherlands: Springer.
80. Searle, J. R. (2005). What is an institution? Journal of Institutional Economics, 1(1), 1-22.
81. Selznick, P. (1984). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. CA: University of California Press.
82. Selznick, P. (1996). Institutionalism “Old” and “New”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(2), 40th Anniversary Issue, 270-277.
83. Shin, J. C., Kim, S. J., Kim, E., and Lim, H. (2018). Doctoral students’ satisfaction in a research-focused Korean University: Socio-environmental and motivational factors. Asia Pasific Education Review, 19, 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9528-7
84. Stracke, E. (2010). Undertaking the journey together: Peer learning for a successful and enjoyable PhD experience. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 7(1), 1-10.
85. Tapanila, K., Siivonen, P., and Filander, K. (2020). Academics’ social positioning towards the restructured management system in Finnish universities. Studies in Higher Education, 45(1), 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1539957
86. Tauginienė, L., Ojsteršek, M., Foltýnek, T., Marino, F., Cosentino, M., Gaižauskaitė, I., . . . Trevisiol, O. (2019). General guidelines for academic integrity (ENAI Report 3A) Retrieved from European Network for Academic Integrity database: http://www.academicintegrity.eu/wp/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Guidelines_amended_version_1.1_09_2019.pdf
87. Tierney, W. G. (1988). Organizational culture in higher education: Defining the essentials. The Journal of Higher Education, 59(1), 2-21.
88. Tolbert, P. S., and Zucker, L. G. (1996). The institutionalization of institutional theory. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, and W. Nord (Eds.). Handbook of organization studies (p. 175-190). London: SAGE Publications.
89. Turnbull, L., and Aucoin, P. (2006). Fostering Canadians’ role in public policy: A strategy for institutionalizing public involvement in policy (Research Report P07 Public Involvement Network) Retrieved from Canadian Policy Research Networks database: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.524.6655&rep=rep1&type=pdf
90. van Rooij, E., Fokkens-Bruinsma, M., and Jansen, E. (2019). Factors that influence PhD candidates’ success: the importance of PhD project characteristics, Studies in Continuing Education, DOI: 10.1080/0158037X.2019.1652158.
91. Walters, K. L., Lukszo, C. M., Evans-Campbell, T., Valdez, R. B., and Zambrana, R. E. (2019). ‘Before they kill my spirit entirely’: Insights into the lived experiences of American Indian Alaska native faculty at research universities. Race Ethnicity and Education, 22(5), 610-633. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2019.1579182
92. Yamanoi, A. (2005). The academic marketplace in Japan: Inbreeding, grades and organization at research universities. Higher Education Forum, 2, 93-114.
93. Zhang, L. F. (2015). Do academics’ personality traits contribute to their organizational commitment? Journal of Individual Differences, 36(1), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000150
94. Zucker, L. G. (1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42, 726-743.